Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Practice Point
  • Published:

Immunosuppression minimization protocols: how should they be monitored?

Abstract

This Practice Point commentary discusses the experience of Shapiro et al. with renal allograft recipients at a single center who underwent significant minimization of immunosuppressive treatment with alemtuzumab induction and tacrolimus monotherapy (weaned to three times weekly by 1 year after transplantation). Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) against human leukocyte antigen were monitored after transplantation in some patients. Although 44% of patients did not develop acute rejection or DSAs and had excellent 2-year graft survival (96%), spaced weaning was not attempted in 20% of patients, generally those with early rejection and poor allograft function. During tapering, 20% of patients developed acute rejection and 15% developed DSAs. Two-year graft survival was 63% in patients for whom weaning was not attempted and 78% in patients who experienced acute rejection. Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy and spaced weaning increased the risk of acute rejection and development of DSAs. Patients should be carefully selected for this protocol and monitored closely for DSAs. Results of a long-term controlled trial that includes protocol biopsies are required to reach more-definitive conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Shapiro R et al. (2008) Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy—the impact of serial monitoring for donor-specific antibody. Transplantation 85: 1125–1132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciancio G and Burke GW 3rd (2008) Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 8: 15–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro R et al. (2003) Kidney transplantation under a tolerogenic regimen of recipient pretreatment and low-dose postoperative immunosuppression with subsequent weaning. Ann Surg 238: 520–525

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Akalin E and Pascual M (2006) Sensitization after kidney transplantation. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 1: 433–440

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Akalin E and Watschinger B (2007) Antibody-mediated rejection. Semin Nephrol 27: 393–407

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brouard S et al. (2007) Identification of a peripheral blood transcriptional biomarker panel associated with operational renal allograft tolerance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 15448–15453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akalin, E. Immunosuppression minimization protocols: how should they be monitored?. Nat Rev Nephrol 4, 484–485 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0910

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneph0910

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing