Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Cardiac cell-repair therapy: clinical issues

Abstract

The possibility that cardiac cell-repair therapy might become a clinical reality is a challenge worthy of the current state of technological and scientific expertise at the start of the 21st century. The success of preclinical and early clinical studies is a strong inducement to move ahead with larger clinical trials, but caution is warranted given our lack of understanding of the potential mechanisms by which cell-repair therapy exerts a benefit on ventricular function, perfusion, and infarct size, irrespective of the type of cell, method, site, and disease entity. There are multiple clinical, mechanistic, and safety questions requiring answers, and these will be forthcoming only if the design of clinical trials is carefully tailored to answer specific questions. These questions, in turn, will require the use of different and multiple end points, depending on the specific issue and study. Accordingly, this review addresses the limitations of current clinical studies, the design of future trials, and the concept of a hierarchical series of end points that might provide answers to a host of different questions. Clinical and basic scientists need to approach the next generation of trials in partnership.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2: Patient-related issues
Figure 3: Schematic drawing illustrating multiplicity of potential trial end points that could be used in an attempt to answer specific clinical questions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (2004) Morbidity and Mortality: 2004 Chartbook on Cardiovascular Lung and Blood Diseases. Bethesda, MD: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

  2. Bardy GH et al. (2005) Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med 352: 225–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wollert KC and Drexler H (2005) Clinical applications of stem cells for the heart. Circ Res 96: 151–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gersh BJ and Caplice NM (2002) Stem cells to repair the heart: a clinical perspective. Circ Res 91: 1092–1102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Caplice NM et al. (2005) Cell therapy for cardiovascular disease: what cells, what diseases, and for whom. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2: 37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gnecchi M et al. (2005) Paracrine action accounts for marked protection of ischemic heart by akt-modified mesenchymal stem cells. Nat Med 11: 367–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson DM et al. (2004) Stable benefit of embryonic stem cell therapy in myocardial infarction. Am J Physiol 287: H471–H479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chien KR (2004) Stem cells: lost in translation. Nature 428: 607–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Caplice NM and Deb A (2004) Myocardial-cell replacement: the science, the clinic and the future. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 1: 90–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dai W et al. (2005) Allogeneic mesenchymal stem cell transplantation in postinfarcted rat myocardium: short- and long-term effects. Circulation 112: 214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Melo LG et al. (2004) Molecular and cell-based therapies for protection, rescue, and repair of ischemic myocardium: reasons for cautious optimism. Circulation 109: 2386–2393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Makkar RR et al. (2003) Stem cell therapy for myocardial repair: is it arrhythmogenic? J Am Coll Cardiol 42: 2063–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh SK et al. (2003) Identification of a cancer stem cell in human brain tumors. Cancer Res 63: 5821–5828

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aicher A et al. (2003) Assessment of the tissue distribution of transplanted human endothelial progenitor cells by radioactive labeling. Circulation 107: 2134–2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yoon YS et al. (2004) Unexpected severe calcification after transplantation of bone marrow cells in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 109: 3154–3157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kang HJ et al. (2004) Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial. Lancet 363: 746–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bartunek J et al. (2005) Intracoronary injection of CD133-positive enriched bone marrow progenitor cells promotes cardiac recovery after recent myocardial infarction: feasibility and safety. Circulation 112: I178–I183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vulliet PR et al. (2004) Intra-coronary arterial injection of mesenchymal stromal cells and microinfarction in dogs. Lancet 363: 783–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rauscher FM et al. (2003) Aging, progenitor cell exhaustion, and atherosclerosis. Circulation 108: 457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tepper OM et al. (2002) Human endothelial progenitor cells from type II diabetics exhibit impaired proliferation, adhesion, and incorporation into vascular structures. Circulation 106: 2781–2786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fleming TR and DeMets DL (1996) Surrogate end points in clinical trials: are we being misled? Ann Int Med 125: 605–613

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Burkhoff D et al. (2001) Variability of myocardial perfusion defects assessed by thallium-201 scintigraphy in patients with coronary artery disease not amenable to angioplasty or bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 38: 1033–1039

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pislaru SV and Simari RD (2005) Gene transfer for ischemic cardiovascular disease: is this the end of the beginning or the beginning of the end? Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2: 138–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard J Gersh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gersh, B., Simari, R. Cardiac cell-repair therapy: clinical issues. Nat Rev Cardiol 3 (Suppl 1), S105–S109 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0400

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpcardio0400

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing