Abstract
Anthropogenic habitat fragmentation represents a major obstacle to species shifting their range in response to climate change1. Conservation measures to increase the (meta-)population capacity2 and permeability of landscapes3 may help but the effectiveness of such measures in a warming climate has rarely been evaluated. Here, we simulate range dynamics of 51 species from three taxonomic groups (vascular plants, butterflies and grasshoppers) in Central Europe as driven by twenty-first-century climate scenarios and analyse how three habitat-based conservation strategies (establishing corridors, improving the landscape matrix, and protected area management) modify species’ projected range size changes. These simulations suggest that the conservation strategies considered are unable to save species from regional extinction. For those persisting, they reduce the magnitude of range loss in lowland but not in alpine species. Protected area management and corridor establishment are more effective than matrix improvement. However, none of the conservation strategies evaluated could fully compensate the negative impact of climate change for vascular plants, butterflies or grasshoppers in central Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Corlett, R. T. & Westcott, D. A. Will plant movements keep up with climate change? Trends Ecol. Evol. 28, 482–488 (2013).
Hanski, I. & Ovaskainen, O. The metapopulation capacity of a fragmented landscape. Nature 404, 755–758 (2000).
McGuire, J. L., Lawler, J. J., McRae, B. H., Nuñez, T. A. & Theobald, D. M. Achieving climate connectivity in a fragmented landscape. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 7195–7200 (2016).
Parmesan, C. & Yohe, G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).
Pauli, H. et al. Recent plant diversity changes on Europe’s mountain summits. Science 336, 353–355 (2012).
Pereira, H. M. et al. Scenarios for global biodiversity in the 21st century. Science 330, 1496–1501 (2010).
Ordonez, A., Martinuzzi, S., Radeloff, V. C. & Williams, J. W. Combined speeds of climate and land-use change of the conterminous US until 2050. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 811–816 (2014).
Dullinger, S. et al. Modelling the effect of habitat fragmentation on climate-driven migration of European forest understorey plants. Divers. Distrib. 21, 1375–1387 (2015).
Thomas, C. D. et al. Protected areas facilitate species’ range expansions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14063–14068 (2012).
Oliver, T. H. et al. Interacting effects of climate change and habitat fragmentation on drought-sensitive butterflies. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 941–945 (2015).
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B. & Hockings, M. The performance and potential of protected areas. Nature 515, 67–73 (2014).
Nuñez, T. A. et al. Connectivity planning to address climate change. Conserv. Biol. 27, 407–416 (2013).
Mawdsley, J. R., O’Malley, R. & Ojima, D. S. A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1080–1089 (2009).
Directive EH European Habitats Directive (1992); http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/legislation/habitatsdirective/index_en.htm
EC Green Infrastructure (GI)—Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital (2013); http://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:d41348f2-01d5-4abe-b817-4c73e6f1b2df.0014.03/DOC_1&format=PDF
EC Our Life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 (2011); http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0244&from=EN
Akçakaya, H. R., Butchart, S. H., Watson, J. E. & Pearson, R. G. Preventing species extinctions resulting from climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 4, 1048–1049 (2014).
Dullinger, S. et al. Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 619–622 (2012).
Kuttner, M. et al. A new high-resolution habitat distribution map for Austria, Liechtenstein, southern Germany, South Tyrol and Switzerland. Eco Mont-J. Protect. Mt. Areas Res. 7, 18–29 (2015).
Dirnböck, T., Dullinger, S. & Grabherr, G. A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J. Biogeogr. 30, 401–417 (2003).
Devictor, V. et al. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 121–124 (2012).
Ellis, E. C., Klein Goldewijk, K., Siebert, S., Lightman, D. & Ramankutty, N. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 19, 589–606 (2010).
WCPA World Database on Protected Areas (2016); https://www.iucn.org/theme/protected-areas/our-work/world-database-protected-areas
Erb, K.-H. et al. Exploring the biophysical option space for feeding the world without deforestation. Nat. Commun. 7, 11382 (2016).
Ehrlén, J. & Morris, W. Predicting changes in the distribution and abundance of species under environmental change. Ecol. Lett. 18, 303–314 (2015).
Hassall, C. & Thompson, D. J. Study design and mark-recapture estimates of dispersal: a case study with the endangered damselfly Coenagrion mercuriale. J. Insect Conserv. 16, 111–120 (2012).
Svenning, J.-C. & Sandel, B. Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1266–1286 (2013).
Zimmermann, N. E. et al. Climatic extremes improve predictions of spatial patterns of tree species. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19723–19728 (2009).
Taylor, K., Brummer, T., Taper, M. L., Wing, A. & Rew, L. J. Human-mediated long-distance dispersal: an empirical evaluation of seed dispersal by vehicles. Divers. Distrib. 18, 942–951 (2012).
IUCN SSC Guidelines for Reintroductions and Other Conservation Translocations, Version 1.0 57 (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2013).
Hülber, K. et al. Uncertainty in predicting range dynamics of endemic alpine plants under climate warming. Glob. Change Biol. 22, 2608–2619 (2016).
Niklfeld, H. Mapping the flora of Austria and the eastern Alps. Revue Valdôtaine d’Histoire Naturelle 51 (suppl.), 53–62 (1998).
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).
Katul, G. G. et al. Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind. Am. Nat. 166, 368–381 (2005).
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge funding by the Austrian Climate and Energy Fund (Project Number KR11AC0K00355). The computational results presented have been achieved using the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC). We are very grateful to the Floristic Mapping Projects of Austria, Switzerland, South Tyrol, Bavaria and Baden-Wurttemberg, the Austrian Working Group on Orthoptera, the Centre Suisse de Cartographie de la Faune, the Bayerisches Landesamt für Umwelt, the Tiroler Landesmuseen-Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H., the Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Karlsruhe, the Naturmuseum Südtirol, H. Habeler, J. Pennerstorfer, H. Höttinger, P. Detzel, S. Maas, A. Staudt and all other colleagues and institutions that provided distribution data for this study. We thank J. Settele and O. Schweiger (UFZ, Halle) for sharing and discussing demographic and dispersal traits of butterflies. Pictograms of plants and grasshoppers were derived from the PhyloPic (www.phylopic.org).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
S.D. and F.E. designed the study. F.E., S.S. and W.R. compiled the species data. M.K. and D.M. compiled the region and climate data. A.G., J.W., K.H., D.M., M.K. and S.D. performed the analyses. J.W., S.D., K.H. and F.E. wrote the text with further input from all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Information (PDF 887 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wessely, J., Hülber, K., Gattringer, A. et al. Habitat-based conservation strategies cannot compensate for climate-change-induced range loss. Nature Clim Change 7, 823–827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3414
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3414
This article is cited by
-
The last of the maculineans: can we save the emblematic Alcon Blue butterfly Phengaris alcon under climate change when its habitat continues to deteriorate?
Journal of Insect Conservation (2024)
-
Climate warming may increase the frequency of cold-adapted haplotypes in alpine plants
Nature Climate Change (2022)
-
Assessing the impact of climate change on threatened endemic vascular plants of Argentina
Folia Geobotanica (2022)
-
Arctic freshwater fish productivity and colonization increase with climate warming
Nature Climate Change (2020)
-
Natura 2000 forest habitats: climatic debt in lowlands and thermophilization in highlands
Biodiversity and Conservation (2020)