Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation

Nature Climate Change volume 6, pages 354–359 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

In the field of adaptation governance research, current discussion on the barriers to adaptation shows that theoretical explanations for why institutions emerge and how they enable or constrain adaptation are underdeveloped. In this Perspective, we show that there is a significant opportunity to advance the understanding of adaptation governance by integrating insights that have been developed in the extensive commons literature on the institutions that work to overcome social conflicts or dilemmas. 'Realist-materialist' approaches to understanding such collective action are particularly valuable to adaptation governance research because they emphasize how biophysical conditions give rise to certain types of social dilemma. Climate change affects these biophysical conditions, and thus may alter dilemmas or create new ones. Based on realist-materialist reasoning, this Perspective describes six types of dilemma, illustrates each with a case from the adaptation literature and draws on insights from the commons literature regarding relevant contextual conditions and effective policy instruments for overcoming social dilemmas. The dilemma types provide entry points for rigorous comparative adaptation research to deepen understanding of how context influences adaptation governance processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: The Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) framework adjusted for adaptation governance analysis.

References

  1. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. & Walker, J. Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources (Univ. Michigan Press, 1994).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Adger, W. N. Social capital, collective action and adaptation to climate change. Econ. Geogr. 79, 387–404 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomkins, E. & Adger, W. N. Does adaptive management of natural resources enhance resilience to climate change? Ecol. Soc. 9, 10 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pelling, M., High, C., Dearing, J. & Smith, D. Shadow spaces for social learning: a relational understanding of adaptive capacity to climate change within organisations. Environ. Plann. A 40, 867–884 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hinkel, J. & Bisaro, A. Methodological choices in solution-oriented adaptation research: a diagnostic framework. Reg. Environ. Change http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10113-014-0682–0 (2014).

  6. IPCC Summary for Policymakers in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. (eds Field, C. B. et al.) 1–32 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

  7. Agrawala, S. Adaptation: Contributing to the common good. Nature Clim. Change 1, 447–448 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tompkins, E. L. & Eakin, H. Managing private and public adaptation to climate change. Global Environ. Change 22, 3–11 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Moser, S. C. & Ekstrom, J. A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22026–22031 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta, J. et al. in Making Climate Change Work for Us (eds Hulme, M. & Neufeldt, H.) 319–339 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adger, W. N. et al. Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change 93, 335–354 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Benzie, M. Social justice and adaptation in the UK. Ecol. Soc. 19, 39 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hughes, S. Justice in urban climate change adaptation: criteria and application to Delhi. Ecol. Soc. 18, 48 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B. & Policansky, D. Revisiting the commons: local lessons, global challenges. Science 284, 278–282 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. & Norberg, J. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Env. Resour. 30, 1–8 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ostrom, E. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325, 419–422 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ecology and Society Special Feature: The Governance of Adaptation (eds Huitema, D. et al.); http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/issues/view.php?sf=87

  18. Plummer, R. Can adaptive comanagement help to address the challenges of climate change adaptation? Ecol. Soc. 18, 2 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Munaretto, S., Siciliano, G. & Turvani, M. E. Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: a framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecol. Soc. 19, 74 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dupuis, J. & Knoepfel, P. The adaptation policy paradox: the implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation. Ecol. Soc. 18, 31 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mees, H. L. P. et al. A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation. Ecol. Soc. 19, 58 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eisenack, K. et al. Explaining and overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation. Nature Clim. Change 4, 867–872 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biesbroek, R. et al. Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nature Clim. Change 5, 493–494 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostrom, E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Wade, R. The management of common property resources: collective action as an alternative to privatisation or state regulation. Camb. J. Econ. 11, 95–106 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Janssen, M. A., Holahan, R., Lee, A. & Ostrom, E. Lab experiments for the study of social-ecological systems. Science 328, 613–617 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ostrom, E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 3, 137–158 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, V. A. Discursive institutionalism: the explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Polit. Sci. 11, 303 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmid, A. A. Conflict and Cooperation: Institutional and Behavioral Economics (Blackwell, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Paavola, J. & Adger, W. N. Institutional ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 53, 353–368 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Varela-Ortega, C. et al. How can irrigated agriculture adapt to climate change? Insights from the Guadiana basin in Spain. Reg. Environ. Change 16, 59–70 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ostrom, E. Understanding Institutional Diversity (Princeton Univ. Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hagedorn, K., Arzt, K. & Peters, U. in Environmental Co-operation and Institutional Change: Theories and Policies for European Agriculture (ed. Hagedorn, K.) 3–25 (Elgar, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bougherara, D., Grolleau, G. & Mzoughi, N. The 'make or buy' decision in private environmental transactions. Eur. J. Law Econ. 27, 79–99 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kimmich, C. Linking action situations: coordination, conflicts, and evolution in electricity provision for irrigation in Andhra Pradesh, India. Ecol. Econ. 90, 150–158 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ménard, C. Embedding organizational arrangements: towards a general model. J. Institutional Econ. 10, 567–589 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ostrom, E. in Community Management and Common Property of Coastal Fisheries in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts, Methods and Experiences (ed. Pomeroy, R.) 34–50 (International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Samuelson, P. A. in Public Economics (eds Margolis, J. & Guitton, H.) 98–123 (Macmillan, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Hinkel, J., Cox, M. E., Schlüter, M., Binder, C. R. & Falk, T. A diagnostic procedure for applying the social-ecological systems framework in diverse cases. Ecol. Soc. 20, 32 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huntjens, P. et al. Institutional design propositions for the governance of adaptation to climate change in the water sector. Glob. Environ. Change 22, 67–81 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hinkel, J. et al. Coastal flood damage and adaptation costs under 21st century sea-level rise. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3292–3297 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Meinzen-Dick, R., Raju, K. V. & Gulati, A. What affects organization and collective action for managing resources? Evidence from canal irrigation systems in India. World Dev. 30, 649–666 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nordhaus, W. D. in Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century (eds Szenberg, M., Ramrattan, L. & Gottesman, A.) 88–98 (Oxford Univ. Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Adger, W. N., Lorenzoni, I. & O'Brien, K. L. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Tainio, A. et al. Conservation of grassland butterflies in Finland under a changing climate. Reg. Environ. Change 16, 71–84 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rittel, J. H. W. & Webber, M. M. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4, 155–169 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Olson, M. The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups (Harvard Univ. Press, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  48. van Slobbe, E., Werners, S. E., Riquelme Solar, M., Bölscher, T. & van Vliet, M. The future of the Rhine: stranded ships and no more salmon? Reg. Environ. Change 16, 31–41 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sen, A. K. Isolation, assurance and the social rate of discount. Q. J. Econ. 81, 112–124 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Blomquist, W. in Rules, Games and Common-Pool Resources (eds Ostrom, E., Gardner, R. & Walker, J.) Ch. 13 (Univ. Michigan Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Runge, C. F. Institutions and the free rider: the assurance problem in collective action. J. Polit. 46, 154–181 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Kovats, R. S. et al. in Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects (eds Barro, V. R. et al.) 1267–1326 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  53. White, I. The absorbent city: urban form and flood risk management. Proc. ICE - Urban Des. Plan. 161, 151–161 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  54. Libecap, G. D. Distributional issues in contracting for property rights. J. Institutional Theor. Econ. 1, 6–24 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mees, H. L., Driessen, P. P., Runhaar, H. A. & Stamatelos, J. Who governs climate adaptation? Getting green roofs for stormwater retention off the ground. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 56, 802–825 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wong, P. P. et al. Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climatic Change 6, 361–409 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Arkema, K. K. et al. Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms. Nature Clim. Change 3, 913–918 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Shapiro-Kline, J. The Impact of the Public Process in Rebuild by Design. MSc Thesis, Columbia Univ. (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Beatley, T. Planning for Coastal Resilience: Best Practices for Calamitous Times (Island, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Howgate, O. R. & Kenyon, W. Community cooperation with natural flood management: a case study in the Scottish Borders. Area 41, 329–340 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Dombrowsky, I. Conflict, Cooperation, and Institutions in International Water Management: An Economic Analysis (Elgar, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Füssel, H.-M. & Klein, R. J. T. Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Climatic Change 75, 301–329 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Haasnoot, M., Middelkoop, H., Offermans, A., van Beek, E. & van Deursen, W. P. A. Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Climatic Change 115, 795–819 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Kwadijk, J. C. J. et al. Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study in the Netherlands. WIREs Clim. Change 1, 729–740 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Schlager, E., Blomquist, W. & Tang, S. Y. Mobile flows, storage, and self-organized institutions for governing common-pool resources. Land Econ. 70, 294–317 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Agrawal, A. Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev. 29, 1649–1672 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Berkes, F. Community-based conservation in a globalized world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 15188–15193 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Bisaro, A. Climate Change Adaptation and Wetlands Governance: A Discourse and Institutional Analysis (Shaker, 2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the EU-funded projects RISES-AM (grant no. 603396) and GREEN-WIN (grant no. 642018).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Global Climate Forum (GCF), Neue Promenade 6, Berlin, 10178, Germany

    Alexander Bisaro & Jochen Hinkel

  2. Division of Resource Economics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Albrecht Daniel Thaer-Institute, Faculty of Life Sciences, Unter den Linden 6, Berlin, 10099, Germany

    Jochen Hinkel

Authors
  1. Alexander Bisaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jochen Hinkel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

A.B. initiated the planning of the project and conducted systematic literature reviews. Both authors contributed equally to the intellectual content and the drafting, revision and editing of the text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Bisaro.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bisaro, A., Hinkel, J. Governance of social dilemmas in climate change adaptation. Nature Clim Change 6, 354–359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2936

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2936

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing