Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming

Abstract

Although perceptions of common weather phenomena moderately align with instrumental measurements of such phenomena1, the evidence that weather or climatic conditions influence beliefs about anthropogenic climate change is mixed2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13. This study addresses both foci, which are important to scholars who investigate human–environment interactions and observers who expect greater exposure to weather or climate extremes to translate into stronger support for climate change adaptive measures and mitigative policies. We analyse the extent to which state-level winter temperature anomalies influence the likelihood of perceiving local winter temperatures to be warmer than usual and attributing these warmer temperatures mainly to global warming. We show that actual temperature anomalies influence perceived warming but not attribution of such warmer-than-usual winter temperatures to global warming. Rather, the latter is influenced more by perceived scientific agreement; beliefs about the current onset, human cause, threat and seriousness of global warming; and political orientation. This is not surprising given the politicization of climate science14,15 and political polarization on climate change beliefs16,17 in recent years. These results suggest that personal experience with weather or climate variability may help cultivate support for adaptive measures, but it may not increase support for mitigation policies.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Analytical model.

References

  1. 1

    Howe, P. D. & Leiserowitz, A. Who remembers a hot summer or a cold winter? The asymmetric effect of beliefs about global warming on perceptions of local climate conditions in the U. S. Glob. Environ. Change 23, 1488–1500 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Zahran, S., Brody, S. D., Grover, H. & Vedlitz, A. Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc. Nat. Resour. 19, 771–789 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Hamilton, L. C. & Keim, B. D. Regional variation in perceptions about climate change. Int. J. Climatol. 29, 2348–2352 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Egan, P. J. & Mullin, M. Turning personal experience into political attitudes: The effect of local weather on Americans’ perceptions about global warming. J. Politics 74, 796–809 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Scruggs, L. & Benegal, S. Declining public concern about climate change: Can we blame the great recession? Glob. Environ. Change 22, 505–515 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Howe, P. D., Markowitz, E. M., Lee, T., Ko, C. & Leiserowitz, A. Global perceptions of local temperature change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 352–356 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Hamilton, L. & Stampone, M. ‘Blowin’ in the wind: Short-term weather and belief in anthropogenic climate change. Weath. Clim. Soc. 5, 112–119 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Shao, W., Keim, B. D., Garand, J. C. & Hamilton, L. C. Weather, climate, and the economy: Explaining risk perceptions of global warming, 2001–2010. Weath. Clim. Soc. 6, 119–134 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. & Grover, H. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Environ. Behav. 41, 72–95 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Schuldt, J. & Schwarz, N. Do People Believe in Global Warming?: It Depends on What the Weather is Like When You Ask (Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 2008)

  11. 11

    Brulle, R. J., Carmichael, J. & Jenkins, J. C. Shifting public opinion on climate change: An empirical assessment of factors influencing concern over climate change in the U. S. 2002–2010. Climatic Change 114, 169–188 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Goebbert, G., Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Klockow, K., Nowlin, M. & Silva, C. Weather, climate, and worldviews: The sources and consequences of changes in local weather patterns. Weath. Clim. Soc. 4, 132–144 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Shum, R. Y. Effects of economic recession and local weather on climate change attitudes. Clim. Policy 12, 38–49 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. Anti-reflexivity: The American conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Cult. Soc. 27, 100–133 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Oreskes, N. & Conway, E. M. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming (Bloomsbury, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Hamilton, L. C. Education, politics, and opinions about climate change: Evidence for interaction effects. Climatic Change 104, 231–242 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. The Sociological Quarterly 52, 155–194 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Rahmstorf, S. & Coumou, D. Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 17905–17909 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Trenberth, K. E. & Fasullo, J. T. Climate extremes and climate change: The Russian heat wave and other climate extremes of 2010. J. Geophys. Res. 117 (2012)10.1029/2012JD018020

  20. 20

    Adger, W. N. et al. in IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Hanson, C. E.) 717–743 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    US National Research Council Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change (National Academies Press, 2010).

  22. 22

    Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people?: The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J. Risk Res. 11, 351–374 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Crouch, J., Bair, A. & van den Dool, H. NOAA Climate Science and Services Monthly Climate Update (NOAA, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Kahan, D. M., Jenkins-Smith, H. & Braman, D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J. Risk Res. 14, 147–174 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C. & Leiserowitz, A. Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Clim. Change 1, 462–466 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Xiao, C. Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA. Climatic Change 119, 511–518 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    McCright, A. M., Dunlap, R. E. & Xiao, C. Increasing influence of party identification on perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA 2006–2012. Weath. Clim. Soc. 6, 194–201 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Dietz, T., Dan, A. & Shwom, R. Support for climate change policy: Social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol. 72, 185–214 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    McCright, A. M. The effects of gender on climate change knowledge and concern in the American public. Population Environ. 32, 66–87 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Hansen, J. et al. Global climate changes as forecast by Goddard Institute for Space Studies three-dimensional model. J. Geophys. Res. 93, 9341–9364 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Karl, T. R. & Katz, R. W. A new face for climate dice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14720–14721 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Raudenbush, S. & Bryk, A. Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods 2nd edn (Sage, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Hulme, M., Dessai, S., Lorenzoni, I. & Nelson, D. R. Unstable climates: Exploring the statistical and social constructions of normal climate. Geoforum 40, 197–206 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Gallup Organization for making its data available for analysis.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.M.M. and R.E.D. conceptualized the research question. C.X. performed the data analyses. A.M.M. wrote the initial drafts of the manuscript. A.M.M., R.E.D. and C.X. revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron M. McCright.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McCright, A., Dunlap, R. & Xiao, C. The impacts of temperature anomalies and political orientation on perceived winter warming. Nature Clim Change 4, 1077–1081 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2443

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing