Letter | Published:

Combined speeds of climate and land-use change of the conterminous US until 2050

Nature Climate Change volume 4, pages 811816 (2014) | Download Citation

Abstract

High rates of climate and land-use changes threaten biodiversity and ecosystem function1,2, creating a need for integrated assessments and planning at regional to global scales. We develop a new approach to measure multivariate estimates of climate and land-use change that builds on recently developed measures of climate velocity3,4,5,6, and apply it to assess the combined speeds of climate and land use for the conterminous US from 2001 to 2051. The combined speeds of climate and land-use change are highest in a broad north-to-south swath in the central US and in parts of the intermountain west. Climate speeds are roughly an order of magnitude higher than land-use speeds in most regions, but land-use speed is particularly high in the Appalachians and north-central forests. Joint speeds are low across much of the intermountain west. Our results highlight areas expected to be most vulnerable to changes in biodiversity and ecosystem function due to the individual or combined effects of climate and land-use change. The integration of climate and land-use scenarios suggests different conservation prioritization strategies from climate velocities and species alone7.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405, 234–242 (2000).

  2. 2.

    , , , & Beyond predictions: Biodiversity conservation in a changing climate. Science 332, 53–58 (2011).

  3. 3.

    et al. The velocity of climate change. Nature 462, 1052–1055 (2009).

  4. 4.

    et al. The pace of shifting climate in marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Science 334, 652–655 (2011).

  5. 5.

    et al. The climate velocity of the contiguous United States during the 20th century. Glob. Change Biol. 19, 241–251 (2013).

  6. 6.

    & Projected climate reshuffling based on multivariate climate-availability, climate-analog, and climate-velocity analyses: Implications for community disaggregation. Climatic Change 119, 659–675 (2013).

  7. 7.

    , & Ecosystems: Climate change must not blow conservation off course. Nature 500, 271–272 (2013).

  8. 8.

    , & Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 104, 5738–5742 (2007).

  9. 9.

    , , & Towards European climate risk surfaces: The extent and distribution of analogous and non-analogous climates 1931–2100. Glob. Ecol. Biogeography 15, 395–405 (2006).

  10. 10.

    et al. Key areas for conserving United States’ biodiversity likely threatened by future land use change. Ecosphere 4, art58 (2013).

  11. 11.

    et al. Economic-based projections of future land use in the conterminous United States under alternative policy scenarios. Ecol. Appl. 22, 1036–1049 (2012).

  12. 12.

    et al. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 7492–7497 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  14. 14.

    & Climatic and biotic velocities for woody taxa distributions over the last 16 000 years in eastern North America. Ecol. Lett. 16, 773–781 (2013).

  15. 15.

    & Disequilibrium vegetation dynamics under future climate change. Am. J. Bot. 100, 1266–1286 (2013).

  16. 16.

    et al. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nature Clim. Change 2, 121–124 (2012).

  17. 17.

    et al. The influence of late quaternary climate-change velocity on species endemism. Science 334, 660–664 (2011).

  18. 18.

    et al. Europe’s other debt crisis caused by the long legacy of future extinctions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 7342–7347 (2013).

  19. 19.

    & A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421, 37–42 (2003).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).

  21. 21.

    , & Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. PLoS Biol. 5, 1211–1219 (2007).

  22. 22.

    et al. Potential impacts of future land use and climate change on the red list status of the proteaceae in the cape floristic region, South Africa. Glob. Change Biol. 11, 1452–1468 (2005).

  23. 23.

    , , & Using niche-based modelling to assess the impact of climate change on tree functional diversity in Europe. Divers. Distrib. 12, 49–60 (2006).

  24. 24.

    , , , & Late-quaternary vegetation dynamics in North America: Scaling from taxa to biomes. Ecol. Monograph 74, 309–334 (2004).

  25. 25.

    , & Climate change and forests of the future: Managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecol. Appl. 17, 2145–2151 (2007).

  26. 26.

    , & Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460 (2008).

  27. 27.

    et al. Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science 321, 345–346 (2008).

  28. 28.

    et al. Is conservation triage just smart decision making? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 649–654 (2008).

  29. 29.

    , & Mapping vulnerability and conservation adaptation strategies under climate change. Nature Clim. Change 3, 989–994 (2013).

  30. 30.

    , , & Downscaled CMIP3 and CMIP5 Climate Projections: Release of Downscaled CMIP5 Climate Projections, Comparison with Preceding Information, and Summary of User Needs (US Dept of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, 2013).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank S. Veloz, G. Schuurman, S. Stewart and L. Estes for their helpful comments and suggestions, which improved this manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support for this research by the Bryson Climate, People and Environment Program, the HISTFUNC project (ERC Starting Grant 310886), NSF DEB-1257508, NSF’s Coupled Natural and Human Systems Program, and NASA’s Land Cover and Land Use Change Program.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Section of Ecoinformatics and Biodiversity, Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 114 DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark

    • Alejandro Ordonez
  2. Center for Climatic Research (CCR), University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • Alejandro Ordonez
    •  & John W. Williams
  3. SILVIS Lab, Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • Sebastián Martinuzzi
    •  & Volker C. Radeloff
  4. Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA

    • John W. Williams

Authors

  1. Search for Alejandro Ordonez in:

  2. Search for Sebastián Martinuzzi in:

  3. Search for Volker C. Radeloff in:

  4. Search for John W. Williams in:

Contributions

A.O. and J.W.W. developed the multivariate metric, A.O. downscaled the climatic data, ran analyses, and produced figures and tables. S.M. and V.C.R. produced the land-use-change model scenarios. A.O. led the writing, with the assistance of J.W.W., S.M. and V.C.R. All authors contributed equally to development and discussion of ideas.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Ordonez.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2337