Letter | Published:

Coastal habitats shield people and property from sea-level rise and storms

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 913918 (2013) | Download Citation

This article has been updated

Abstract

Extreme weather, sea-level rise and degraded coastal ecosystems are placing people and property at greater risk of damage from coastal hazards1,2,3,4,5. The likelihood and magnitude of losses may be reduced by intact reefs and coastal vegetation1, especially when those habitats fringe vulnerable communities and infrastructure. Using five sea-level-rise scenarios, we calculate a hazard index for every 1 km2 of the United States coastline. We use this index to identify the most vulnerable people and property as indicated by being in the upper quartile of hazard for the nation’s coastline. The number of people, poor families, elderly and total value of residential property that are most exposed to hazards can be reduced by half if existing coastal habitats remain fully intact. Coastal habitats defend the greatest number of people and total property value in Florida, New York and California. Our analyses deliver the first national map of risk reduction owing to natural habitats and indicates where conservation and restoration of reefs and vegetation have the greatest potential to protect coastal communities.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 01 August 2013

    In the version of this Letter originally published online, the second sentence of the Acknowledgements section should have read "We thank Zillow and the many individuals and institutions that provided data (see Supplementary Information for full details)". This error has now been corrected in all versions of the Letter.

References

  1. 1.

    et al. Restoration of the mississippi delta: Lessons from hurricanes katrina and rita. Science 315, 1679–1684 (2007).

  2. 2.

    et al. Assessing future risk: Quantifying the effects of sea level rise on storm surge risk for the southern shores of Long Island, New York. Nat. Hazards 60, 727–745 (2012).

  3. 3.

    CCSP Coastal Sensitivity to Sea-Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2009).

  4. 4.

    , & Increasing flood risk and wetland losses due to global sea-level rise: Regional and global analyses. Glob. Environ. Change 9 (Suppl. 1), S69–S87 (1999).

  5. 5.

    , & Hotspot of accelerated sea-level rise on the Atlantic coast of North America. Nature Clim. Change 2, 884–888 (2012).

  6. 6.

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report (eds Pachauri, R. K. & Reisinger, A.) 104 (IPCC, 2007).

  7. 7.

    & The Impact of Climate Change upon Coastal Defense Structures (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 2004).

  8. 8.

    et al. Coastal Defense Cost Estimates: Case Study of the Netherlands, New Orleans and Vietnam (Delft University of Technology, Royal Haskoning, University Southampton, 2010).

  9. 9.

    & Implications of cumulative impacts to estuarine and marine habitat quality for fish and invertebrate resources. Rev. Fish. Sci. 17, 505–523 (2009).

  10. 10.

    et al. Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: A review. Estuar. Coast. Shelf S. 81, 1–12 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Louisiana’s Comprehensive Master Plan for a Stainable Coast (Coastal Protection and Restoration Authority, 2012).

  12. 12.

    , & in Integrated Coastal Zone Management (eds Moksness, E., Dahl, E. & Støttrup, J.) 131–144 (Wiley-Blackwell, 2009); available at .

  13. 13.

    National Research Council Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change, America’s Climate Choices (National Academies, 2010).

  14. 14.

    et al. Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319, 321–323 (2008).

  15. 15.

    , & Harnessing nature to help people adapt to climate change. Nature Clim. Change 2, 504–509 (2012).

  16. 16.

    & Coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise: A preliminary database for the US Atlantic, Pacific and Gulf of Mexico Coasts. (US Geological Survey Digital Data Series, Vol. 68, 2001).

  17. 17.

    Vulnerability of the east coast, USA to future sea level rise. J. Coast. Res.201–237 (1990).

  18. 18.

    , , & Social Vulnerability to Climate Variability Hazards: A Review of the Literature (Oxfam America, 2009).

  19. 19.

    , & Erosion hazard vulnerability of US coastal counties. J. Coast. Res. 215, 932–942 (2005).

  20. 20.

    Hurricane sweeps into climate-adaptation debate. Nature 491, 167–168 (2012).

  21. 21.

    et al. InVEST 2.3.0 User’s Guide (The Natural Capital Project, 2011); available at .

  22. 22.

    The 2006–2010 American Community Survey 5 Year Summary File Technical Documentation (US Census Bureau, 2011); available at .

  23. 23.

    What is a Zestimate? (Zillow, 2012); available at .

  24. 24.

    et al. Global Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the US National Climate Assessment Tech Memo OAR CPO-1 (NOAA, 2012).

  25. 25.

    Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute The Spatial Hazard Events and Losses Database for the United States (University of South Carolina, 2011); available at .

  26. 26.

    Protecting New York City, Before Next Time. New York Times(3 November 2012); available at .

  27. 27.

    IPCC Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (eds Nakicenovic, N. & Swart, R.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2000).

  28. 28.

    Sea Level Variations of the United States (1854 to 2006) Derived from 128 National Water Level Observation Network Stations (NOAA’s Ocean Service); available at .

  29. 29.

    User Manual and System Documentation of WAVEWATCH III version 3.14 Technical Note (US Department of Commerce, National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, National Weather Service, National Centers for Environmental Predictions, 2009).

  30. 30.

    , , , & Projected changes in wave climate from a multi-model ensemble. Nature Clim. Change 3, 471–476 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Generating surface models of population using dasymetric mapping. Prof. Geogr. 55, 31–42 (2003).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation for financial support and for hosting the National Climate Assessment Biodiversity, Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services Technical Chapter working group. We thank Zillow and the many individuals and institutions that provided data (see Supplementary Information for full details). We also thank J. Burke, G. Gelfenbaum, R. Griffin, C. K. Kim, J. Lawler, M. Plummer, P. Ruggiero, J. Samhouri, H. Tallis, J. Toft and G. Ziv for discussions during this research. Links for downloading the coastal hazard index and data, and visualizing results are available at www.naturalcapitalproject.org.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, 8907 25th Ave NE Seattle, Washington 98115, USA

    • Katie K. Arkema
  2. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, 371 Serra Mall, Stanford, California 94305-5020, USA

    • Greg Guannel
    • , Spencer A. Wood
    • , Anne Guerry
    • , Mary Ruckelshaus
    • , Martin Lacayo
    •  & Jessica M. Silver
  3. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, c/o Conservation Science Program World Wildlife Fund—US, 1250 24th Street NW, Washington DC 20037-1193, USA

    • Gregory Verutes
  4. The Nature Conservancy, 4722 Latona Ave NE, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA

    • Peter Kareiva

Authors

  1. Search for Katie K. Arkema in:

  2. Search for Greg Guannel in:

  3. Search for Gregory Verutes in:

  4. Search for Spencer A. Wood in:

  5. Search for Anne Guerry in:

  6. Search for Mary Ruckelshaus in:

  7. Search for Peter Kareiva in:

  8. Search for Martin Lacayo in:

  9. Search for Jessica M. Silver in:

Contributions

P.K., M.R., K.K.A., G.G., A.G., S.A.W. and G.V. conceived the research. G.G. and G.V. developed the coastal hazard index. K.A., G.V. and S.W. carried out analyses. K.K.A., G.G., G.V. and S.A.W. collected the data. M.L. and J.M.S. helped with data collection and analyses. K.K.A. wrote the paper with contributions from A.G., G.G, P.K., M.R., J.M.S., G.V. and S.A.W.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie K. Arkema.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1944

Further reading