Promoting interdisciplinarity through climate change education


Climate change is a complex scientific and social problem. Effectively dealing with it presents an immense challenge, yet educating students about it offers educators in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) fruitful opportunities for promoting interdisciplinarity, retaining talented young people in STEM fields and enhancing multiple literacies of all students. We offer three illustrative examples of interdisciplinary climate change-related STEM education projects. Each of these models is designed deliberately for implementation in the first two years of collegiate-level STEM courses; thus, they may be employed in both four- and two-year institutions. The scientific community can use climate change education opportunities to help further transform STEM education in the US and increase production of high-quality STEM graduates.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.


  1. 1

    US National Research Council Advancing the Science of Climate Change (National Academies, 2010).

  2. 2

    Marquart-Pyatt, S. et al. Understanding public opinion on climate change: A call for research. Environment 53, 38–42 (2011).

  3. 3

    McCright, A. M. & Dunlap, R. E. The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public's views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol. Quart. 52, 155–194 (2011).

  4. 4

    Reynolds, T. W., Bostrom, A., Read, D. & Morgan, M. G. Now what do people know about global climate change: Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal. 30, 1520–1538 (2010).

  5. 5

    Hartley, L. M., Wilke, B. J., Schramm, J. W., D'Avanzo, C. & Anderson, C. W. College students' understanding of the carbon cycle: Contrasting principle-based and informal reasoning. BioScience 61, 65–75 (2011).

  6. 6

    Sterman, J. D. Risk communication on climate: Mental models and mass balance. Science 322, 532–533 (2008).

  7. 7

    US National Research Council Taking Science to School (National Academies, 2007).

  8. 8

    US National Research Council Climate Change Education (National Academies, 2011).

  9. 9

    Scientific Foundations for Future Physicians (AAMC, 2009).

  10. 10

    US National Research Council BIO2010 (National Academies, 2003).

  11. 11

    US National Research Council. Rising Above the Gathering Storm (National Academies, 2007).

  12. 12

    Quantitative Reasoning for College Graduates (Mathematics Association of America, 1998).

  13. 13

    Speth, E. B. et al. 1, 2, 3, 4: Infusing quantitative literacy into introductory biology. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 9, 323–332 (2010).

  14. 14

    American Association for the Advancement of Science Science for All Americans (Oxford Univ. Press, 1989).

  15. 15

    US National Research Council National Science Education Standards (National Academies, 1996).

  16. 16

    Climate Literacy (US Global Change Research Program, 2009).

  17. 17

    Arum, R. & Roksam, J. Academically Adrift (Univ. of Chicago Press, 2011).

  18. 18

    A Test of Leadership (US Department of Education, 2006).

  19. 19

    Klein, J. T. Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures (Jossey-Bass, 2010).

  20. 20

    DeZure, D. in Encyclopedia of Education (ed. Guthrie, J. W.) 509–524 (Macmillan Reference USA, 2003).

  21. 21

    Alper, J. The pipeline is leaking women all the way along. Science 260, 409–411 (1993).

  22. 22

    Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. & Schwartz, S. Gender difference in high-school students' views about science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 28, 363–381 (2006).

  23. 23

    Jonassen, D. H. Learning to Solve Problems (Routledge, 2011).

  24. 24

    King, P. M. & Kitchener, K. S. Developing Reflective Judgment (Jossey-Bass, 1994).

  25. 25

    Handelsman, J., Miller, S. & Pfund, C. Scientific Teaching (Freeman, 2007).

  26. 26

    National Science Board Preparing the Next Generation of STEM Innovators (National Science Foundation, 2010).

  27. 27

    Derting, T. L. & Ebert-May, D. Learner-centered inquiry in undergraduate biology: Positive relationships with long-term student achievement. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 9, 462–472 (2010).

  28. 28

    Henderson, C. & Dancy, M. H. Barriers to the use of research-based instructional strategies: The influence of both individual and situational characteristics. Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 3, 2, 1–14 (2007).

  29. 29

    Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E. & Allen, D. E. The Power of Problem-Based Learning; A Practical “How To” for Teaching Undergraduate Courses in Any Discipline (Stylus, 2001).

  30. 30

    Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. & Cocking, R. R. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (National Academies, 2000).

  31. 31

    Herreid, C. F. Why isn't cooperative learning used to teach science? Bioscience 48, 553–559 (1998).

  32. 32

    Froyd, J. E. White Paper on Promising Practices in Undergraduate STEM Education (National Academies Board on Science Education, 2009).

  33. 33

    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T. & Smith, K. A. Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4 (George Washington Univ., 1991).

  34. 34

    Hake, R. R. Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. Am. J. Phys. 66, 64–74 (1998).

  35. 35

    Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. & Allen, D. Attitudinal effects of a student-centered active learning environment. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 944–949 (2005).

  36. 36

    Oliver-Hoyo, M. T., Allen, D., Hunt, W. F., Hutson, J. & Pitts, A. Effect of an active learning environment: Teaching innovations at a research I institution. J. Chem. Educ. 81, 441–448 (2004).

  37. 37

    Zacharia, Z. Beliefs, attitudes, and intentions of science teachers regarding the educational use of computer simulations and inquiry-based experiments in physics. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 40, 792–823 (2003).

  38. 38

    AAU Announces Major Initiative To Improve Undergraduate STEM Education (AAU, 2011); available via

  39. 39

    Schmidt, H. G. Problem-based learning: An introduction. Instr. Sci. 22, 247–250 (1994).

  40. 40

    Anthony, S., Ferrett, T. & Bender, J. What Should We Do about Global Warming? (W. W. Norton and Company, 2003).

  41. 41

    Chin, C. & Chia, L. G. Problem-based learning: Using students' questions to drive knowledge construction. Sci. Educ. 88, 707–727 (2004).

  42. 42

    Raine, D. & Symons, S. (eds) PossiBiLities: A Practice Guide to Problem-Based Learning in Physics and Astronomy (The Higher Education Academy Physical Sciences Centre, 2005).

  43. 43

    Zitarelli, D. E. The origin and early impact of the Moore Method. Am. Math. Mon. 111, 465–486 (2004).

  44. 44

    Holman, J. & Pilling, G. Thermodynamics in context: A case study of contextualized teaching for undergraduates. J. Chem. Educ. 81, 373–375 (2004).

  45. 45

    Ramsden, J. M. How does a context-based learning approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 19, 697–710 (1997).

  46. 46

    Gürses, A., Acikyildiz, M., Dogar, C. & Sözbilir, M. An investigation into the effectiveness of problem-based learning in a physical chemistry laboratory course. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ. 25, 99–113 (2007).

  47. 47

    Barker, V. & Millar, R. Students' reasoning about basic chemical thermodynamics and chemical bonding: What changes occur during a context-based post-16 secondary course? Int. J. Sci. Educ. 22, 1171–1200 (2000).

  48. 48

    Vaino, K., Holbrook, J. & Rannikmäe, M. Stimulating students' intrinsic motivation for learning chemistry through the use of context-based learning modules. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 13, 410–419 (2012).

  49. 49

    NASA Innovations in Climate Education For Educators; available at

  50. 50

    US National Science Foundation Climate Change Education Partnership Program Is Launched; available via

  51. 51

    NOAA Climate Program Office Education; available at

  52. 52

    Weber, E. & Stern, P. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychol. 66, 315–328 (2011).

  53. 53

    President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Engage to Excel (Office of Science and Technology Policy, 2012).

  54. 54

    Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy Beyond Bias and Barriers (National Academies, 2007).

  55. 55

    Uriarte, M., Ewing, H. A., Eviner, V. T. & Weathers, K. C. Constructing a broader and more inclusive value system in science. BioScience 57, 71–78 (2007).

  56. 56

    Luckie, D. B., Maleszewski, J. J., Loznak, S. D. & Krha, M. Infusion of collaborative inquiry throughout a biology curriculum increases student learning: A four-year study of 'teams and streams'. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 28, 199–209 (2004).

  57. 57

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis (eds Solomon, S. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  58. 58

    Revkin, A. C. Politics reasserts itself in the debate over climate change and its hazards. New York Times (5 August 2003); available via

  59. 59

    Soon, W. & Baliunas, S. Proxy climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years. Clim. Res. 23, 89–110 (2003).

  60. 60

    Climatologists under pressure. Nature 462, 545 (2009).

  61. 61

    Mann, M. E. The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines (Columbia Univ. Press, 2012).

Download references


The authors extend special thanks to Tom Dietz for encouraging work on this piece.

Author information

A.M.M. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. A.M.M., B.W.O., R.D.S., G.R.U. and A.Z. wrote and revised parts of the manuscript.

Correspondence to Aaron M. McCright.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McCright, A., O'Shea, B., Sweeder, R. et al. Promoting interdisciplinarity through climate change education. Nature Clim Change 3, 713–716 (2013) doi:10.1038/nclimate1844

Download citation

Further reading