Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming


In this paper, we address the chicken-or-egg question posed by two alternative explanations for the relationship between perceived personal experience of global warming and belief certainty that global warming is happening: Do observable climate impacts create opportunities for people to become more certain of the reality of global warming, or does prior belief certainty shape people’s perceptions of impacts through a process of motivated reasoning1? We use data from a nationally representative sample of Americans surveyed first in 2008 and again in 2011; these longitudinal data allow us to evaluate the causal relationships between belief certainty and perceived experience, assessing the impact of each on the other over time2. Among the full survey sample, we found that both processes occurred: ‘experiential learning’, where perceived personal experience of global warming led to increased belief certainty, and ‘motivated reasoning’, where high belief certainty influenced perceptions of personal experience. We then tested and confirmed the hypothesis that motivated reasoning occurs primarily among people who are already highly engaged in the issue whereas experiential learning occurs primarily among people who are less engaged in the issue, which is particularly important given that approximately 75% of American adults currently have low levels of engagement3,4.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1: Tested models.


  1. Akerlof, K., Maibach, W. W., Fitzgerald, D., Cedeno, A. Y. & Neuman, A. Do people ‘personally experience’ global warming, and if so how, and does it matter? Glob. Env. Change (in the press).

  2. Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L. & Mulaik, S. A. Causation issues in structural equation modeling research. Struct. Equ. Modeling 13, 253–267.

  3. Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A., Roser-Renouf, C. & Mertz, C. K. Identifying like-minded audiences for global warming public engagement campaigns: An audience segmentation analysis and tool development. PLoS ONE 6, e17571 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. & Hmielowski, J. Global Warming’s Six Americas, March 2012 & Nov. 2011 (Yale Project on Climate Change Communication, 2012).

  5. Karl, T. R., Melillo, J. M. & Peterson, T. C. (eds) Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009).

  6. Leiserowitz, A. American risk perceptions: Is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal. 25, 1433–1442 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J. & Schneider, S. H. Expert credibility in climate change. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 12107–12109 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Roser-Renouf, C., Maibach, E., Leiserowitz, A. & Zhao, X. The Genesis of Climate Change Activism: From Key Beliefs to Political Advocacy Int. Commun. Assoc. Annual Conference (2011).

  9. Weber, E. U. & Stern, P. C. Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am. Psychologist 66, 315–328 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiske, S. T. & Taylor, S. E. Social Cognition 2nd edn (McGraw-Hill, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, J. D. Public understanding of, and attitudes toward, scientific research: What we know and what we need to know. Public Underst. Sci. 13, 273–294 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Marx, S.M. et al. Communication and mental processes: Experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob. Environ. Change 17, 47–58 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lejarraga, T. When experience is better than description: Time delays and complexity. J. Behav. Decis. Making 23, 100–116 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leiserowitz, A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery, and values. Climatic Change 77, 45–72 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Weber, E. U. What shapes perceptions of climate change? WIREs Clim. Change 1, 332–342 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brody, S. D., Zahran, S., Vedlitz, A. & Grover, H. Examining the relationship between physical vulnerability and public perceptions of global climate change in the United States. Env. Behav. 40, 72–95 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spence, A., Poortinga, W., Butler, C. & Pidgeon, N. S. Perceptions of climate change and willingness to save energy related to flood experience. Nature Clim. Change 1, 46–49 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leiserowitz, A. & Broad, K. Florida: Public Opinion on Climate Change (Yale Project on Climate Change, 2008).

  19. Kahan, D. M. et al. The Tragedy of the Risk-Perception Commons: Culture Conflict, Rationality Conflict, and Climate Change Temple University Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2011-26 (2011); available at (2011).

  20. El-Gamal, M. A. & Grether, D. M. Are people Bayesian? Uncovering behavioral strategies. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90, 1137–1145 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kunda, Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 3, 480–498 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dawson, E., Gilovich, T. & Regan, D. T. Motivated reasoning and performance on the Wason selection task. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 28, 1379–1387 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hart, P. S. & Nisbet, E. C. Boomerang effects in science communication: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polarization about climate mitigation policies. Commun. Res. 39, 701–723 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taber, C. S. & Lodge, M. Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 50, 755–769 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leiserowitz, A., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C., Smith, N. & Dawson, E. Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. (in the press); accessed July 23, 2012 from

  26. Weber, E. U. & Sonka, S. in Farmers’ Decision Making: A Descriptive Approach (eds Jacobsen, B. H., Pedersen, D. E., Christensen, J. & Rasmussen, S.) 201–218 (SJFI, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruddell, D., Harlan, S. L., Grossman-Clarke, S. & Chowell, G. Scales of perception: Public awareness of regional and neighborhood climates. Climatic Change 3, 1–27 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kline, R. B. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling 3rd edn (The Guilford Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Maibach, E. W., Nisbet, M., Baldwin, P. & Diao, G. Reframing climate change as a public health issue: An exploratory study of public reactions. BMC Public Health 10, 1–11 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Myers, T.A., Nisbet, M.C., Maibach, E. W. & Leiserowitz, A. A public health frame arouses hopeful emotions about climate change: A letter. Climatic Change 113, 1105–1112 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Callegaro, M. & DiSogra, C. Computing response metrics for online panels. Public Opin. Quart. 72, 1008–1032 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Glob. Env. Change 17, 445–459 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was supported by the Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, the Surdna Foundation, the 11th Hour Project, the V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation, and a Health Policy Investigator Award from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



This study was designed by T.A.M., E.W.M., C.R-R., K.A. and A.A.L. The survey was conducted by E.W.M., C.R-R. and A.A.L.. The analysis was conducted by T.A.M. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa A. Myers.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Myers, T., Maibach, E., Roser-Renouf, C. et al. The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Clim Change 3, 343–347 (2013).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI:

Further reading


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing