Letter | Published:

Climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species and giant pandas in China’s Qinling Mountains

Nature Climate Change volume 3, pages 249253 (2013) | Download Citation

This article has been updated


Climate change is threatening global ecosystems through its impact on the survival of individual species and their ecological functions1,2. Despite the important role of understorey plants in forest ecosystems3,4,5, climate impact assessments on understorey plants and their role in supporting wildlife habitat are scarce in the literature. Here we assess climate-change impacts on understorey bamboo species with an emphasis on their ecological function as a food resource for endangered giant pandas (Ailuropoda melanoleuca). An ensemble of bamboo distribution projections associated with multiple climate-change projections and bamboo dispersal scenarios indicates a substantial reduction in the distributional ranges of three dominant bamboo species in the Qinling Mountains, China during the twenty-first century. As these three species comprise almost the entire diet of the panda population in the region, the projected changes in bamboo distribution suggest a potential shortage of food for this population, unless alternative food sources become available. Although the projections were developed under unavoidable simplifying assumptions and uncertainties, they indicate potential challenges for panda conservation and underscore the importance of incorporating interspecific interactions into climate-change impact assessments and associated conservation planning.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Change history

  • 15 November 2012

    In the version of this Letter originally published online, in the penultimate sentence of the abstract it should have read 'the projected changes in bamboo distribution suggest a potential shortage of food for this population'. This error has now been corrected in all versions of the Letter.


  1. 1.

    IPCC Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability (eds Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J. & Hanson, C. E.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2007).

  2. 2.

    Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 637–669 (2006).

  3. 3.

    The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems. Bioscience 57, 845–858 (2007).

  4. 4.

    & Understory vegetation as a forest ecosystem driver: Evidence from the northern Swedish boreal forest. Front. Ecol. Environ. 3, 421–428 (2005).

  5. 5.

    Management strategies to increase stand structural diversity and enhance biodiversity in coastal rainforests of Alaska. Biol. Conserv. 137, 520–532 (2007).

  6. 6.

    , & Canopy tree development and undergrowth bamboo dynamics in old-growth Abies-Betula forests in Southwestern China: A 12-year study. Forest Ecol. Manag. 200, 347–360 (2004).

  7. 7.

    & Bamboo control of forest succession:Guadua sarcocarpa in Southeastern Peru. Forest Ecol. Manag. 175, 445–454 (2003).

  8. 8.

    et al. The Opportunity for the Giant Panda to Exist (Peking Univ. Press, 2001).

  9. 9.

    , , & The Giant Pandas of Wolong (Univ. Chicago Press, 1985).

  10. 10.

    & Bamboo diversity: The need for a Red List review. Biodiversity 6, 12–16 (2006).

  11. 11.

    Why bamboos wait so long to flower. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 7, 347–391 (1976).

  12. 12.

    , , & Spatial patterns and environmental associates of bamboo (Bashania fangiana Yi) after mass-flowering in southwestern China. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 118, 247–254 (1991).

  13. 13.

    & Structure and dynamics of bamboos in the Wolong Natural Reserve, China. Am. J. Bot. 80, 375–384 (1993).

  14. 14.

    Shooting and growth of Bashania fargesii. J. Bamboo Res. 8, 400–407 (1989).

  15. 15.

    State Forestry Administration The Third National Survey Report on Giant Panda in China (Science Press, 2006).

  16. 16.

    , , , & Giant panda Ailuropoda melanoleuca behaviour and carrying capacity following a bamboo die-off. Biol. Conserv. 49, 85–104 (1989).

  17. 17.

    et al. Range-wide analysis of wildlife habitat: Implications for conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1960–1969 (2010).

  18. 18.

    , , , & Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol. 25, 1965–1978 (2005).

  19. 19.

    Studies of the food base of giant panda in Qinling mountains. Acta Theriol. Sin. 10, 88–96 (1990).

  20. 20.

    , , , & Research on edible bamboo species preference of captive giant pandas in Qinling. Forest. Res. 21, 1–7 (2008).

  21. 21.

    , , , & Niches, models, and climate change: Assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 19729–19736 (2009).

  22. 22.

    in Scientific Proceedings of Foping Nature Reserve (ed. Zhao, N.) 408–412 (Northwest A&F Univ. Press, 2006).

  23. 23.

    et al. Ecological degradation in protected areas: The case of Wolong Nature Reserve for giant pandas. Science 292, 98–101 (2001).

  24. 24.

    , & The influence of species interactions on geographic range change under climate change. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1249, 18–28 (2012).

  25. 25.

    & Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: Are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 361–371 (2003).

  26. 26.

    , , , & Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).

  27. 27.

    , & Predicting species distribution and abundance responses to climate change: Why it is essential to include biotic interactions across trophic levels. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 365, 2025–2034 (2010).

  28. 28.

    , & Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Model. 190, 231–259 (2006).

  29. 29.

    & High Resolution Statistically Downscaled Future Climate Surfaces (The International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, 2008).

Download references


We thank G. Dang, X. Du, J. Meng and Y. Wang for their invaluable assistance during field campaigns. We also thank the Forestry Department of Shaanxi Province and administrations of nature reserves in the Qinling Mountains for support with fieldwork logistics. This study was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (Terrestrial Ecology and Biodiversity programme and the Earth and Space Science Fellowship programme) and the US National Science Foundation (Dynamics of Coupled Natural and Human Systems programme and Partnership for International Research and Education).

Author information

Author notes


  1. Center for Systems Integration and Sustainability, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 1405 S. Harrison Road, Suite 115 Manly Miles Building, East Lansing, Michigan 48823, USA

    • Mao-Ning Tuanmu
    • , Andrés Viña
    • , Yu Li
    •  & Jianguo Liu
  2. Department of Geography, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA

    • Julie A. Winkler
  3. State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China

    • Weihua Xu
    •  & Zhiyun Ouyang


  1. Search for Mao-Ning Tuanmu in:

  2. Search for Andrés Viña in:

  3. Search for Julie A. Winkler in:

  4. Search for Yu Li in:

  5. Search for Weihua Xu in:

  6. Search for Zhiyun Ouyang in:

  7. Search for Jianguo Liu in:


M-N.T., A.V., J.A.W and J.L. conceived the ideas and designed the analyses; M-N.T., A.V., Y.L., W.X. and Z.O. collected the data; M-N.T. built the models and performed the data analyses; all authors wrote the paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mao-Ning Tuanmu or Jianguo Liu.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary Information

    Supplementary Information

About this article

Publication history






Further reading