Letter | Published:

Black-carbon reduction of snow albedo

Nature Climate Change volume 2, pages 437440 (2012) | Download Citation

Abstract

Climate models indicate that the reduction of surface albedo caused by black-carbon contamination of snow contributes to global warming and near-worldwide melting of ice1,2. In this study, we generated and characterized pure and black-carbon-laden snow in the laboratory and verified that black-carbon contamination appreciably reduces snow albedo at levels that have been found in natural settings1,3,4. Increasing the size of snow grains in our experiments decreased snow albedo and amplified the radiative perturbation of black carbon, which justifies the aging-related positive feedbacks that are included in climate models. Moreover, our data provide an extensive verification of the Snow, Ice and Aerosol Radiation model1, which will be included in the next assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change5.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , & Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow. J. Geophys. Res. 112, D11202 (2007).

  2. 2.

    & Soot climate forcing via snow and ice albedos. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 423–428 (2004).

  3. 3.

    & Soot in the arctic snowpack—a cause for perturbations in radiative-transfer. Atmos. Environ. 19, 2045–2053 (1985).

  4. 4.

    , , , & Light-absorbing impurities in Arctic snow. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 11647–11680 (2010).

  5. 5.

    et al. The formulation and atmospheric simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3). J. Clim. 19, 2144–2161 (2006).

  6. 6.

    et al. Short-lived pollutants in the Arctic: Their climate impact and possible mitigation strategies. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 1723–1735 (2008).

  7. 7.

    , & Spatial distribution and radiative effects of soot in the snow and sea ice during the SHEBA experiment. J. Geophys. Res. 107, D8032 (2002).

  8. 8.

    & A model for the spectral albedo of snow. 2. Snow containing atmospheric aerosols. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2734–2745 (1980).

  9. 9.

    , & Graphitic carbon content of aerosols, clouds and snow, and its climatic implications. Sci. Total Environ. 36, 117–120 (1984).

  10. 10.

    An overview of seasonal snow metamorphism. Rev. Geophys. 20, 45–61 (1982).

  11. 11.

    & Linking snowpack microphysics and albedo evolution. J. Geophys. Res. 111, D12208 (2006).

  12. 12.

    & What controls the strength of snow-albedo feedback? J Clim. 20, 3971–3981 (2007).

  13. 13.

    , & A controlled snowmaking experiment testing the relation between black-carbon content and reduction of snow albedo. J. Geophys. Res. 116, D08109 (2011).

  14. 14.

    Climate response of fossil fuel and biofuel soot, accounting for soot’s feedback to snow and sea ice albedo and emissivity. J. Geophys. Res. 109, D21201 (2004).

  15. 15.

    , & Reflection of solar-radiation by the antarctic snow surface at ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared wavelengths. J. Geophys. Res. 99, 18669–18684 (1994).

  16. 16.

    & A model for the spectral albedo of snow. 1. Pure snow. J. Atmos. Sci. 37, 2712–2733 (1980).

  17. 17.

    , & Albedo of dirty snow during conditions of melt. Wat. Resour. Res. 32, 1713–1718 (1996).

  18. 18.

    et al. Aerosol and graphitic carbon content of snow. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 9801–9809 (1987).

  19. 19.

    , , , & Measured black carbon deposition on the Sierra Nevada snow pack and implication for snow pack retreat. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7505–7513 (2010).

  20. 20.

    Applicability of effective-medium theories to problems of scattering and absorption by nonhomogeneous atmospheric particles. J. Atmos. Sci. 43, 468–475 (1986).

  21. 21.

    & Light absorption by carbonaceous particles: An investigative review. Aerosol Sci. Technol. 40, 27–67 (2006).

  22. 22.

    & In-situ measurements of the mixing state and optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing estimates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 11872–11877 (2009).

  23. 23.

    & Dirty snow after nuclear-war. Nature 313, 467–470 (1985).

  24. 24.

    et al. Effects of snow physical parameters on spectral albedo and bidirectional reflectance of snow surface. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 10219–10236 (2000).

  25. 25.

    & Controlled generation of black carbon particles from a diffusion flame and applications in evaluating black carbon measurement methods. Atmos. Environ. 41, 1874–1888 (2007).

  26. 26.

    , & Hydration of black carbon. J. Geophys. Res. 101, 19505–19514 (1996).

  27. 27.

    , , , & Hydrophilic properties of aged soot. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L01807 (2005).

  28. 28.

    , & Measuring solar reflectance-Part II: Review of practical methods. Sol. Energ. 84, 1745–1759 (2010).

  29. 29.

    , , & Measurement of the specific surface area of snow using infrared reflectance in an integrating sphere at 1310 and 1550 nm. Cryosphere 3, 167–182 (2009).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was financially supported by the Public Interest Energy Research programme of the California Energy Commission and the Atmospheric Systems Research programme of the Department of Energy, Office of Biological and Environmental Research. O.L.H. received financial support from the E.O. Lawrence Fellowship at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. We thank M. Flanner for providing an executable version of the SNICAR model online and modifying it to accommodate our analysis, C. Preble for assistance in our laboratory and T. Novakov for more than a decade of encouragement.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley California 94720, USA

    • Odelle L. Hadley
    •  & Thomas W. Kirchstetter

Authors

  1. Search for Odelle L. Hadley in:

  2. Search for Thomas W. Kirchstetter in:

Contributions

O.L.H. conducted the experiments, ran the model simulations and analysed the data with guidance from T.W.K. O.L.H. and T.W.K. designed the experiments and co-wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Odelle L. Hadley.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1433

Further reading