Bloggers shouldn't be relegated to the sidelines of the scientific literature, argues Michelle Francl.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Get just this article for as long as you need it
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Murray, R. W. Anal. Chem. 82, 8755 (2010).
Research Information Network If You Build It, Will They Come? How Researchers Perceive and Use Web 2.0 (2010); http://go.nature.com/zixLyD
Charlton, B. G. Medical Hypotheses 71, 475–480 (2008).
Steen, R. G. J. Med. Ethics doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040923 (2010).
Kronick, D. A. The Library Quarterly 71, 28–43 (2001).
Cooke, H. Learned Publishing 17, 125–134 (2004).
Rosenberg, S. Say Everything: How Blogging Began, What It's Becoming and Why It Matters (Three Rivers Press, 2009).
W. J. A. B. Chemical News, 63, 11 (1891).
Mitrovic, M., Paltogou, G. & Tadic, B. Eur. Phys. J. B 77, 597–609 (2010).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Francl, M. Blogging on the sidelines. Nature Chem 3, 183–184 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.991