Article | Published:

Cis-dicarbonyl binding at cobalt and iron porphyrins with saddle-shape conformation

Nature Chemistry volume 3, pages 114119 (2011) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Diatomic molecules attached to complexed iron or cobalt centres are important in many biological processes. In natural systems, metallotetrapyrrole units carry respiratory gases or provide sensing and catalytic functions. Conceiving synthetic model systems strongly helps to determine the pertinent chemical foundations for such processes, with recent work highlighting the importance of the prosthetic groups' conformational flexibility as an intricate variable affecting their functional properties. Here, we present simple model systems to investigate, at the single molecule level, the interaction of carbon monoxide with saddle-shaped iron– and cobalt–porphyrin conformers, which have been stabilized as two-dimensional arrays on well-defined surfaces. Using scanning tunnelling microscopy we identified a novel bonding scheme expressed in tilted monocarbonyl and cis-dicarbonyl configurations at the functional metal-macrocycle unit. Modelling with density functional theory revealed that the weakly bonded diatomic carbonyl adduct can effectively bridge specific pyrrole groups with the metal atom as a result of the pronounced saddle-shape conformation of the porphyrin cage.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    & Is the CO Adduct of myoglobin bent, and does it matter? Acc. Chem. Res. 34, 137–144 (2001).

  2. 2.

    , , & Functional analogues of cytochrome c oxidase, myoglobin, and hemoglobin. Chem. Rev. 104, 561–588 (2004).

  3. 3.

    Metalloporphyrin–NO bonding: building bridges with organometallic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 38, 943–954 (2005).

  4. 4.

    Stereochemistry of hemes and other metalloporphyrins. Science 174, 1295–1302 (1971).

  5. 5.

    et al. The saddle conformation of hydroporphinoid nickel(II) complexes: structure, origin, and stereochemical consequences. Helv. Chim. Act. 68, 1312–1327 (1985).

  6. 6.

    , , & Structural and theoretical models of photosynthetic chromophores. Implications for redox, light absorption properties and vectorial electron flow. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 110, 7566–7567 (1988).

  7. 7.

    et al. Nonplanar porphyrins. X-ray structures of (2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl- and -octamethyl-5,10,15,20-tetraphenyl-porphinato)zinc(II). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 8851–8857 (1990).

  8. 8.

    et al. Metal dependence of the nonplanar distortion of octaalkyltetraphenylporphyrins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 581–592 (1993).

  9. 9.

    et al. Nonplanar porphyrins and their significance in proteins. Chem. Soc. Rev. 27, 31–41 (1998).

  10. 10.

    Exercises in molecular gymnastics—bending, stretching and twisting. Chem. Commun. 243–256 (2006).

  11. 11.

    et al. Visualizing the frontier orbitals of a conformationally adapted metalloporphyrin. ChemPhysChem 9, 89–94 (2008).

  12. 12.

    et al. Site-specific electronic and geometric interface structure of Co-tetraphenyl-porphyrin layers on Ag(111). Phys. Rev. B 81, 245403 (2010).

  13. 13.

    , , & Mechanisms of ligand recognition in myoglobin. Chem. Rev. 94, 699–714 (1994).

  14. 14.

    Biochemical and biophysical properties of the CO-sensing transcriptional activator CooA. Acc. Chem. Res. 36, 825–831 (2003).

  15. 15.

    , & CO as a cellular signaling molecule. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 46, 411–449 (2006).

  16. 16.

    , & A steric mechanism for inhibition of CO binding to heme proteins. Science 284, 473–476 (1999).

  17. 17.

    & On the significance of hydrogen bonds for the discrimination between CO and O2 by myoglobin. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 4, 99–110 (1999).

  18. 18.

    et al. Quantitative vibrational dynamics of iron in carbonyl porphyrins. Biophys. J. 92, 3764–3783 (2007).

  19. 19.

    & Stereochemistry of low-spin cobalt porphyrins. 8. α,β,γ,δ-Tetraphenylporphinatocobalt(II). Inorg. Chem. 15, 3182–3184 (1976).

  20. 20.

    et al. Controlled metalation of self-assembled porphyrin nanoarrays in two dimensions. ChemPhysChem 8, 250–254 (2007).

  21. 21.

    , & Controlled lateral manipulaiton of single molecules with the scanning tunneling microscope. Appl. Phys. A 60, 343–345 (1995).

  22. 22.

    & Single-bond formation and characterization with a scanning tunneling microscope. Science 286, 1719–1722 (1999).

  23. 23.

    et al. Molecular nanoscience and engineering on surfaces. Int. J. Nanotechnol. 5, 1171–1193 (2008).

  24. 24.

    & Recent developments in the chemistry of early transition metal porphyrin compounds. Coord. Chem. Rev. 140, 137–168 (1995).

  25. 25.

    , & Structural aspects and coordination chemistry of metal porphyrin complexes with emphasis on axial ligand binding to carbon donors and mono- and diatomic nitrogen and oxygen donors. Coord. Chem. Rev. 39, 31–75 (1981).

  26. 26.

    et al. Kondo effect of molecular complexes at surfaces: ligand control of the local spin coupling. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 166601 (2005).

  27. 27.

    , , & NO-induced reversible switching of the electronic interaction between a porphyrin-coordinated cobalt ion and a silver surface. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129, 12110–12111 (2007).

  28. 28.

    Fresh perspectives for surface coordination chemistry. Surf. Sci. 603, 1533–1541 (2009).

  29. 29.

    & From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999).

  30. 30.

    et al. Structure and energetics of azobenzene on Ag(111): benchmarking semiempirical dispersion correction approaches. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 036102 (2010).

  31. 31.

    et al. Substrate-induced supramolecular ordering of functional molecules: theoretical modelling and STM investigation of the PEBA/Ag(111) system. Acta Mater. 52, 1589–1596 (2004).

  32. 32.

    , & Adsorption structure and scanning tunneling data of a prototype organic–inorganic interface: PTCDA on Ag(111). Phys. Rev. B 76, 115421 (2007).

  33. 33.

    et al. Conformational adaptation in supramolecular assembly on surfaces. ChemPhysChem 8, 1782–1786 (2007).

  34. 34.

    et al. Reducing the molecule–substrate coupling in C60-based nanostructures by molecular interactions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 036807 (2008).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Research Council Advanced Grant MolArt (no. 247299), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Cluster of Excellence Munich Center for Advanced Photonics, Canadian National Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) and Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI). W.A., A.W.-B. and J.R. thank the Technische Universität München Institute for Advanced Studies, the German Academic Exchange Service and the Deutsche Forschungsgesellschaft for scholarships, respectively. M.–L.B. acknowledges computational time at the Leibniz Rechenzentrum Garching. N.L. thanks Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación for financial support (grant no. FIS2009-1271-C04-01).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Physik Department E20, TU München, James-Franck Strasse, D-85748 Garching, Germany

    • Knud Seufert
    • , Willi Auwärter
    • , Joachim Reichert
    •  & Johannes V. Barth
  2. Université de Lyon, Laboratoire de Chimie, ENS de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69364 Lyon cedex 07, France

    • Marie-Laure Bocquet
  3. Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T1Z4

    • Alexander Weber-Bargioni
    • , Joachim Reichert
    •  & Johannes V. Barth
  4. Centre d' Investigació en Nanociència i Nanotecnologia (CSIC-ICN), Campus de la UAB, Bellaterra E-08193, Spain

    • Nicolás Lorente

Authors

  1. Search for Knud Seufert in:

  2. Search for Marie-Laure Bocquet in:

  3. Search for Willi Auwärter in:

  4. Search for Alexander Weber-Bargioni in:

  5. Search for Joachim Reichert in:

  6. Search for Nicolás Lorente in:

  7. Search for Johannes V. Barth in:

Contributions

K.S., W.A., A.W.-B. and J.R. performed the STM experiments, and analysed and interpreted the experimental data. The theoretical analysis was provided by M.-L.B. and N.L. J.V.B., W.A. and M.-L.B. conceived the studies and co-wrote the paper with K.S. and N.L.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes V. Barth.

Supplementary information

PDF files

  1. 1.

    Supplementary information

    Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.956