Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Optimizing the specificity of nucleic acid hybridization

Nature Chemistry volume 4, pages 208–214 (2012)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The specific hybridization of complementary sequences is an essential property of nucleic acids, enabling diverse biological and biotechnological reactions and functions. However, the specificity of nucleic acid hybridization is compromised for long strands, except near the melting temperature. Here, we analytically derived the thermodynamic properties of a hybridization probe that would enable near-optimal single-base discrimination and perform robustly across diverse temperature, salt and concentration conditions. We rationally designed ‘toehold exchange’ probes that approximate these properties, and comprehensively tested them against five different DNA targets and 55 spurious analogues with energetically representative single-base changes (replacements, deletions and insertions). These probes produced discrimination factors between 3 and 100+ (median, 26). Without retuning, our probes function robustly from 10 °C to 37 °C, from 1 mM Mg2+ to 47 mM Mg2+, and with nucleic acid concentrations from 1 nM to 5 µM. Experiments with RNA also showed effective single-base change discrimination.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Hybridization specificity of nucleic acids.
Figure 2: Toehold exchange probes.
Figure 3: Experimental demonstration of toehold exchange probes.
Figure 4: Results for additional DNA and RNA targets.
Figure 5: Performance of the 7/5 probe for the X1 target at different conditions.

References

  1. Bartel, D. P. MicroRNAs: target recognition and regulatory functions. Cell 136, 215–233 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Saiki, R. K. et al. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science 239, 487–491 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W. & Brown, P. O. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science 270, 467–470 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gunderson, K. L., Steemers, F. J., Lee, G., Mendoza, L. G. & Chee, M. S. A genome-wide scalable SNP genotyping assay using microarray technology. Nature Genet. 37, 549–554 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Koltai, H. & Weingarten-Baror, C. Specificity of DNA microarray hybridization: characterization, effectors, and approaches for data correction. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2395–2405 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DeLong, E. F., Wickham, G. S. & Pace, N. R. Phylogenetic stains: ribosomal RNA-based probes for the identification of single cells. Science 243, 1360–1363 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Amann, R. I., Krumholz, L. & Stahl, D. A. Fluorescent-oligonucleotide probing of whole cells for determinative, phylogenetic, and environmental studies in microbiology. J. Bacteriol. 172, 762–770 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seeman, N. C. Nanomaterials based on DNA. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 79, 65–87 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rothemund, P. Folding DNA to create nanoscale shapes and patterns. Nature 440, 297–302 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Douglas, S. M. et al. Self-assembly of DNA into nanoscale three-dimensional shapes. Nature 459, 414–418 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aldaye, F. A., Palmer, A. L. & Sleiman, H. F. Assembling materials with DNA as the guide. Science 321, 1795–1799 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yin, P., Choi, H. M. T., Calvert, C. R. & Pierce, N. A. Programming biomolecular self-assembly pathways. Nature 451, 318–322 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang, D. Y. & Seelig, G. Dynamic DNA nanotechnology using strand displacement reactions. Nature Chem. 3, 103–113 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tyagi, S. & Kramer, F. R. Molecular beacons: probes that fluoresce upon hybridization. Nature Biotechnol. 14, 303–308 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tyagi, S., Bratu, D. P. & Kramer, F. R. Multicolor molecular beacons for allele discrimination. Nature Biotechnol. 16, 49–53 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyagi, S. Imaging intracellular RNA distribution and dynamics in living cells. Nature Methods 6, 331–338 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bonnet, G., Tyagi, S., Libchaber, A. & Kramer, F. R. Thermodynamic basis of the enhanced specificity of structured DNA probes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 96, 6171–6176 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsourkas, A., Behlke, M. A., Rose, S. D. & Bao, G. Hybridization kinetics and thermodynamics of molecular beacons. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 1319–1330 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao, Y. et al. Fluorescence detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms with a single, self-complementary, triple-stem DNA probe. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 48, 4354–4358 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolpashchikov, D. M. A binary DNA probe for highly specific nucleic acid recognition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 10625–10628 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dave N. & Liu, J. Fast molecular beacon hybridization in organic solvents with improved target specificity. J. Phys. Chem. B 114, 15694–15699 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. SantaLucia, J. & Hicks, D. The thermodynamics of DNA structural motifs. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 33, 415–440 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Peyret, N. Prediction of Nucleic Acid Hybridization: Parameters and Algorithms. Doctoral thesis, Wayne State University (2000).

  24. Tan, Z. J. & Chen, S. J. Nucleic acid helix stability: effects of salt concentration, cation valence and size, and chain length. Biophys. J. 90, 1175–1190 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Yurke, B., Turberfield, A. J., Mills, A. P., Simmel, F. C. & Neumann, J. L. A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature 406, 605–608 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Control of DNA strand displacement kinetics using toehold exchange. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 17303–17314 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhang, D. Y., Turberfield, A. J., Yurke, B. & Winfree, E. Engineering entropy-driven reactions and networks catalyzed by DNA. Science 318, 1121–1125 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. He, G., Rapireddy, S., Bahal, R., Sahu, B. & Ly, D. H. Strand invasion of extended, mixed-sequence B-DNA by γPNAs. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 12088–12090 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen, M. & Wengel, J. LNA: a versatile tool for therapeutics and genomics. Trends Biotechnol. 21, 74–81 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Bommarito, S., Peyret, N. & SantaLucia, J. Thermodynamic parameters for DNA sequences with dangling ends. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 1929–1934 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dirks, R. M., Bois, J. S., Schaeffer, J. M., Winfree, E. & Pierce, N. A. Thermodynamic analysis of interacting nucleic acid strands. SIAM Rev. 49, 65–88 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang, D. Y. & Winfree, E. Robustness and modularity properties of a non-covalent DNA catalytic reaction. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 4182–4197 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Temsamani, J., Kubert, M. & Agrawal, S. Sequence identity of the n–1 product of a synthetic oligonucleotide. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 1841–1844 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Marras, S. A., Kramer, F. R. & Tyagi S. Efficiencies of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and contact-mediated quenching in oligonucleotide probes. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e122 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lu, J. et al. MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers. Nature 435, 834–838 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Li, Q., Luan, G., Guo, Q. & Liang, J. A new class of homogeneous nucleic acid probe based on specific displacement hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e5 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Subramanian, H. K. K., Chakraborty, B., Sha, R. & Seeman, N. C. The label-free unambiguous detection and symbolic display of single nucleotide polymorphisms on DNA origami. Nano Lett. 11, 910–913 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Gao, Y., Wolf, L. K. & Georgiadis, R. M. Secondary structure effects on DNA hybridization kinetics: a solution versus surface comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 3370–3377 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim, S. & Misra A. SNP genotyping: technologies and biomedical applications. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 9, 289–320 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Lizardi, P. M. et al. Mutation detection and single-molecule counting using isothermal rolling-circle amplification. Nature Genet. 19, 225–232 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Isaacs, F. J., et al. Engineered riboregulators enable post-transcriptional control of gene expression. Nature Biotechnol. 22, 841–847 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Venkataraman, S., Dirks, R. M., Ueda, C. T. & Pierce, N. Selective cell death mediated by small conditional RNAs. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16777–16782 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank M. Dai and P-S. Loh for assistance with mathematical analysis and J. Aliperti, E. Haney, R. Jungmann and T. Schaus for helpful suggestions during manuscript preparation. This work was funded by a Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineered faculty start-up fund, an NIH Director's New Innovator Award (1DP2OD007292), an NSF CAREER Award (CCF1054898) and an Office of Naval Research grant (N000141010827) to P.Y. D.Y.Z. is a Howard Hughes Medical Institute postdoctoral fellow, as part of the Life Sciences Research Foundation programme. There is a patent pending on the methods described in this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    David Yu Zhang & Peng Yin

  2. Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    David Yu Zhang & Peng Yin

  3. Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Sherry Xi Chen

Authors
  1. David Yu Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sherry Xi Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peng Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

D.Y.Z. conceived the project, designed and conducted the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript. S.X.C. conducted experiments, analysed the data and edited the manuscript. P.Y. conceived, designed and supervised the study, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to David Yu Zhang or Peng Yin.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have a patent pending on the methods described in the manuscript.

Supplementary information

Supplementary information

Supplementary information (PDF 765 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, D., Chen, S. & Yin, P. Optimizing the specificity of nucleic acid hybridization. Nature Chem 4, 208–214 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1246

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1246

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing