Abstract
A fundamental manifestation of wave scattering in a disordered medium is the highly complex intensity pattern the waves acquire due to multipath interference. Here we show that these intensity variations can be entirely suppressed by adding disorderspecific gain and loss components to the medium. The resulting constantintensity waves in such nonHermitian scattering landscapes are free of any backscattering and feature perfect transmission through the disorder. An experimental demonstration of these unique wave states is envisioned based on spatially modulated pump beams that can flexibly control the gain and loss components in an active medium.
Introduction
The scattering of waves through disordered media is a paradigmatic phenomenon that has captured the interest of various communities for quite some time now^{1, 2, 3}. Among the many important physical aspects of wave propagation that have been studied the phenomenon of Anderson localisation has received particular attention^{4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12}. While much work has been invested into understanding the ‘statistical’ properties of the corresponding wave phenomena^{13} there has recently been a surge of interest in controlling the scattering of waves through ‘individual’ systems for specific purposes such as detection, imaging, and efficient transmission across disordered materials^{14, 15}. Remarkable progress in these endeavours has recently been made in the optical domain, largely due to the availability of spatial light modulators and new concepts for how to apply them on turbid media^{16, 17}. In a first generation of corresponding experiments the focus was laid on shaping the input wave front impinging on an immutable disordered sample such as to achieve a desired output, like a spatial or temporal focus behind the medium^{18, 19, 20, 21}. More recent studies focused instead on controlling the medium itself, for example, through the material fabrication process^{22} or through a spatially modulated pumping^{23}, leading, for example, to a versatile control of random and microcavity lasers^{24, 25, 26, 27, 28}.
Largely in parallel to these efforts on disordered media, it was recently realised that materials and devices can get entirely new functionalities when adding to them a suitably arranged combination of gain and loss. In particular, structures with a socalled parity time (PT) symmetry^{29, 30}, were recently introduced theoretically^{31, 32, 33} and experimentally^{34, 35} in the context of paraxial waveguide optics. On the basis of a delicate balance between gain and loss, these synthetic structures exhibit rich and unconventional behaviour, holding promise for numerous applications in nano photonics and lasers^{36}. In particular, the relation between coherent perfect absorption and scattering through PTcavities^{37} as well as unidirectional invisibility in PTgratings^{38} have attracted a lot of attention. Symmetry breaking in fibre loop optical networks^{39}, PTscattering structures^{40} and periodic PTsystems as new types of metamaterials^{41} are also active research directions in this new field on PToptics. Along with these activities, another direction is that of complex lasers that rely on the concepts of PT symmetry breaking and exceptional points. Such synthetic lasers with novel characteristics, are based on loss engineering^{42}. More specifically, coupled PTsymmetric micro disk lasers can lead to optical diodes^{43}, singlemode microring lasers^{44}, synthetic PTlasers^{45}, lossinduced lasing^{46, 47} and lasers with chiral modes^{48, 49}. More recent developments include large scale exceptional points in multilayer optical geometries^{50}, transient growth in nonnormal lossy potentials^{51}, modulation instabilities in nonHermitian structures^{52}, nonHermitian phase matching in optical parametric oscillators^{53}, higherorder exceptional points^{54}, protocols for asymmetric mode switching based on encircling exceptional points dynamically^{55, 56}, and directional cloaking based on nonHermitian potentials^{57}.
Here we will build on the advances that were made in both of the above research fields with the aim to combine them in a novel and potentially very useful way. We show that for a general disordered medium, given by a distribution of the real part of the refractive index n_{R}(x), a corresponding distribution of its imaginary part n_{I}(x) can be found, such that a wave propagating through this medium will feature a constant intensity throughout the entire nonuniform scattering landscape. In other words, we demonstrate that adding a judiciously chosen distribution of gain and loss to a disordered medium will make waves lose all of their internal intensity variations such that they propagate through the disorder without any backreflection.
Materials and methods
Scattering states without internal intensity variations
The solution strategy that we explore for this purpose is based on the onedimensional Helmholtz Equation that describes timeindependent scattering of a linearly polarised electric field ψ(x) both in forward and in backward direction,
Here ɛ(x) is the dielectric permittivity function varying along the spatial coordinate x, k=2π/λ is the wavenumber (with λ being the free space wavelength) and ∂_{x}≡d/dx. The dielectric function is complex thus ɛ(x)=[n_{R}(x)+in_{I}(x)]^{2}. In general, when a plane wave is incident on a spatially varying distribution ɛ(x), interference takes place between the waves propagating forward and backward. As a result, a complex interference pattern is produced with spatial variations on its intensity. As we will now show, this fundamental physical picture can be quite different in the case of nonHermitian cavities with loss and/or gain.
To jump right to the heart of the matter, we start with an ansatz for a constantintensity (CI) wave with unit amplitude, ψ(x)=exp[iS(x)], where S(x) is a real valued function. Because of the obvious relation to the semiclassical approximation by WentzelKramersBrillouin (WKB)^{58}, we will derive the CIsolution of the Helmholtz Equation (1) in the bulk, by demanding that the ansatz ψ(x)=exp[iS(x)] has to be exact in the first order WKBapproximation. As a result of this analysis (see Supplementary Information for details) we obtain the following nonHermitian dielectric function,
that supports a corresponding CIsolution at wavenumber k, which solves Equation (1) exactly and is valid for the whole bulk space. At this point we have to emphasise, that the above exact WKB analysis is generally valid (not only in the geometric optics limit). The fact that W(x) can be chosen arbitrarily, with no limitations on its spatial complexity (apart from smoothness), is a key asset of this approach, making it very generally applicable. From this result it is also clear that for vanishing imaginary part [W(x)=const.], the dielectric function as defined in Equation (2), reduces to ɛ(x)=const., resulting in the familiar plane wave in free space. We emphasise that our approach works not only when the functional profile W(x) is known from the outset. Also when a refractive index distribution n_{R}(x) is given, the corresponding gainloss profile n_{I}(x) can be determined (see Supplementary Information for details).
Furthermore, it can be shown that CIwaves can also be found for all dielectric functions that are described by Equation (2) in a finite domain x∈[−D, D], bordering on free space for x<−D and x>D. In this case, the scalar Helmholtztype Equation (1) admits the following exact CIscattering state:
where the integration constant c makes sure that the field continuity relations^{59} are satisfied and is given by . We note at this point that the wavenumber k appearing in Equation (2) is the same as the wavenumber k in the above CIwave solution. In other words, for any value of k for which a CIscattering state is desired, the dielectric function ɛ(x) has to be engineered correspondingly. Once ɛ(x) is fixed and plane waves with varying values of k are impinging on this dielectric structure, a perfectly transmitting CIsolution in general only occurs at the predetermined k value inherent in the design of ɛ(x). Due to this restriction to a single frequency also no issues arise with the KramersKronig relations.
Most importantly, the solution in Equation (3) does not only feature a constant intensity ψ(x)^{2}=1 in the asymptotic regions x<–D and x>D, where ɛ(x)=1 and simple plane wave propagation is realised, but also inside the finite region of length 2D in which the dielectric function varies and the phaseevolution is nontrivial. Regarding the appropriate boundary conditions at x=±D, it can be shown that the following perfect transmission boundary conditions (zero reflection)^{40},
imply the following conditions for the generating function,
We also emphasise that a CIwave is associated with a specific incidence direction (incidence is assumed here from the left, x<−D, in positive xdirection). When injecting a plane wave with the same predetermined wavenumber k from the other incidence direction (that is, from the right, x>D, in negative xdirection) one still gets perfect transmission simply due to Lorentzreciprocity. In addition, however, one will also get finite reflection and nontrivial intensity variations inside the potential (x≤D).
NonHermitian scattering methods
To elucidate the above ideas, we consider in the section ‘Results and Discussions’ several specific examples of index distributions and study the CIwaves they give rise to. For these calculations, a transfer matrix method^{59} was used for TElinearly polarised optical waves along with an effective Hamiltonian approach^{40}. More specifically, the transfer matrix method is valid for piecewise refractive index distributions. To apply such an approach to our scattering problem, we discretised the continuous potential into many slabs of almost constant refractive index, and then applied the transfer matrix method. Another technique we used was that of the effective Hamiltonian. The wave Equation (1), , can be written as a generalised eigenvalue problem for the potential of Equation (2) for a given W(x). More specifically we have: . This generalised eigenvalue problem is nonHermitian due to the perfect transmission boundary conditions. Notice that only one of its eigenmodes will be the CIstate and satisfy the relation . We have compared the two different approaches for specific optical structures and they give identical results.
Results and discussion
As a first example, we assume W(x) to be a parabolic function modulated with a cosine, namely W(x)=[1−0.2 cos(15πx/2)](2−x^{2}). The corresponding real part of the refractive index distribution n_{R}(x) is shown as the grey shaded area in Figure 1. A wave impinging on this dielectric structure composed of only n_{R}(x) is partly reflected and features a highly oscillatory profile, see Figure 1a. Quite in contrast, when adding also the gain and loss inherent in the imaginary index component n_{I}(x) derived from W(x) (see green and red regions in Figure 1b), the resulting scattering state is fully transmitted and features a constant intensity. Because of the boundary conditions, W(x) must be symmetric at the end points of the cavity, resulting in an antisymmetric distribution of n_{I}(x). Our example shows that for a plane wave at an arbitrary incident wavenumber k, we can find the corresponding gainloss landscape (from Equation (2)), such that this wave will fully penetrate the scattering medium without forming any spatial variations in its intensity pattern.
Perfect transmission through disorder
The most striking application of CIwaves is realised for the case of disordered environments, which is also the focus of our work. We know, for example, that in strongly scattering disordered media Anderson localisation occurs, resulting in an exponential decrease of the transmittance T=t^{2} for structures with sizes greater than the localisation length . For a given real and disordered index of refraction in the localised regime close to unit transmittance is thus very unlikely and occurs only at wellisolated, sharply resonant wavenumbers that are difficult to achieve experimentally^{60, 61}. Our approach now allows to turn this behaviour upside down—not only in the sense that we can engineer unit transmission at any predetermined value of the wavenumber k but also that we can create scattering states that have constant intensity in a strongly disordered environment which would usually give rise to the most dramatic intensity fluctuations known in wave physics.
We illustrate our results for the disordered onedimensional slab shown in Figure 2, where a refractive index distribution following Equation (2) is considered with a tunable imaginary component, ɛ(x)=[n_{R}(x)+ian_{I}(x)]^{2} (the tunable parameter a controls the overall amplitude of gain and loss). From Equation (2), one can understand that CIscatteringstates exist only for a=1. In particular, we choose the generating function W(x) to be a superposition of N Gaussian functions of the same width d, but centred around random positions c_{n} and having random amplitudes r_{n}. More specifically, we consider , where c_{n} and r_{n} are random variables. This leads us to the following analytical expression of a CIstate ψ(x) in a disordered medium:
where the error function is defined as follows: , and the constant c is defined as in Equation (3). For a=0 the refractive index is Hermitian, whereas for a=1 CIwaves exist. The refractive index distribution of such a nonHermitian disordered medium is depicted in Figure 2a, and the localisation length ξ of the Hermitian refractive index (a=0) is depicted in Figure 2b. The imaginary part (gain and loss) of the refractive index distribution that leads (based on Equation (2)) to a CIstate is depicted in Figure 2c. As is physically expected, without the gain and loss distribution, the system reflects almost all waves due to localisation. Furthermore, adding first only the gain part of the refractive index distribution that leads to a CIstate (see Figure 2c) still results in highly oscillatory scattering wave functions with finite reflectance for all values of the gainloss amplitude a (from 0 to 1), as is illustrated in Figure 2d. Quite counterintuitively, adding also the loss part of the refractive index distribution leads to perfect transmission without any intensity variations for a=1, as demonstrated in Figure 2e. By varying the gainloss amplitude a, as in Figure 2e, we can thus see a smooth transition from the Anderson localisation regime (at a=0) to perfect transmission with constant intensity (at a=1). Figure 2f shows this transition for the transmittance T(a), indicating the robustness of our approach as well as the fact that already smaller values of a<1 lead to a transmittance that is several orders of magnitude larger than in the absence of gain and loss (T≈2 × 10^{−3} for a=0). We thus find that the presence of gain and loss in a scattering environment can completely suppress the localisation of waves due to multiple scattering, leading to a delocalised state with a constant intensity and perfect transmission.
A crucial question is the physical values of gain and loss required to observe and realise the proposed CIwaves. It turns out that these values depend directly on the slope and amplitude of the refractive index distribution, as well as on the wavelength of operation, as we can see from Equation (2). The maximum value of gain/loss for the system shown in Figure 2 is at max(n_{I}) ≈ 6.7 × 10^{−3} with the length of the disorder region being 6 cm. With a wavelength of λ=0.58 μm this would correspond (for a variation of Δn_{R} ≈ 2 × 10^{−2}) to a gain value of ~1450 cm^{−1}. Typical example gain media at this wavelength that are also implementable in a practical experimental setting are, for example, Rhodamine (6 G) dye materials, commonly used in active plasmonics^{62} and in optofluidic random lasers^{24}. The above gain values are, however, quite high for organic media such that in an experimental implementation smoother refractive index distributions, n_{R}(x), are more realistic, for which the corresponding gain values are smaller. Since, in turn, the localisation length ξ will then be larger (in the absence of gain and loss), also longer disorder regions will be required to see the transition from localised states to CIwaves. We emphasize, however, that our approach is completely scalable also to other wavelengths and gain media. First practical applications that we anticipate will probably also be focused on exploring only a subpart of the above crossover.
Discrete disordered systems
Certainly the most challenging aspect of CIwaves in terms of their experimental realisation is the fabrication of a specific index distribution with gain and loss^{63}. To overcome such inherent difficulties, we study here also the existence of CIwaves in a system of discrete scatterers, like the one presented in Figure 3. Such a setup is composed of many discrete elements (cavities) with gain or loss and a specific real refractive index distribution. The analytic solution of Equation (2) is still valid in the discrete version of the Helmholtztype wave Equation:
and
where ɛ_{m} is the permittivity of the mth scatterer, b=ωΔx, ω^{2}=2[1−cos(kΔx)]/Δx^{2} and m=1,…, M. In addition, the perfect transmission boundary conditions imposed at the end points of the discrete chain of scatterers ψ_{0}=ψ_{1} exp(−ikΔx), and ψ_{M+1}=ψ_{M} exp(ikΔx) as well as the relation ωΔx<2 must always hold. We consider a specific example in Figure 3 of M elements that form a onedimensional disordered chain. By adding gain or loss onto the sites as prescribed by Equation (7) an incoming wave from the left will have the same constant intensity on all of these sites.
PT symmetry and mean reality condition
So far we have not discussed the relation of the nonHermitian distribution (Equation (2)) that supports CIwaves with PT symmetry. For the special case that the generating function is even with respect to x, namely W(x)=W(−x), the dielectric function turns out to be PTsymmetric since ɛ(x)=ɛ*(−x). In other words, our approach is rather general and the only restrictions are the permittivity distribution (Equation (2)) and the boundary conditions (Equation (5)) for W. Keep in mind that Re[ɛ(x)] could in principle also be negative—at least there is no restriction from the mathematical point of view. Since we wish to study relevant physical materials that are easily accessible also experimentally, we choose our W(x) such that we have Re[ɛ(x)]>1 and also n_{R}(x)>1. A direct consequence of these two restrictions is that the spatial average gainloss over the scattering region is zero, . In terms of the refractive index, the evaluation of the integral depends on the symmetry of W(x). For example, if W(x) is an even function of x, then the refractive index is PTsymmetric, and . It would be interesting to explore if this condition of ‘mean reality’ also has other interesting consequences that go beyond the restrictions imposed by PT symmetry.
Effect of wavenumber detuning and gain saturation
As we have already shown analytically and numerically, for a fixed refractive index determined by Equation (2), a CIwave at the corresponding wavenumber k_{0} exists. A natural question one may ask at this point is what happens to incident plane waves with detuned wavenumbers k_{0}±Δk_{0} (Figure 4; when considering active materials that are characterised by approximately flat dispersion curves near the values of the wavelength of operation). Naively, one may expect that the emergence of CIwaves is a sharp resonance phenomenon, so that waves with a slight detuning in the wavenumber k_{0} should show a completely different behaviour as, for example, around a resonance in a FabryPérot interferometer^{59}. This picture turns out to be misleading on several levels. Since the CIwave function at position x, , only depends on the generating function W(x') evaluated at values x'<x, one can easily truncate the system at any point x and still get a CIwave provided one continues the system for all x>x' with a constant generating function that has the same value as at the point of truncation. This behaviour indicates that a refractive index profile that supports CIwaves is not only reflectionless in total but also unidirectional at any point inside a given structure. Perfect transmission in such systems is thus not a resonance phenomenon (as resulting from a back and forth propagation of waves), suggesting that CIwaves are stable against changes of the incident wavelength. To check this explicitly, we numerically calculated the average resonance width of the transmission spectrum t(k) of the Hermitian system in Figure 1, , in an interval , with minimum transmission t(k)_{min}=0.94, as is shown in Figure 4. The transmission of waves through the corresponding nonHermitian CIrefractive index (that of Figure 1b) stays larger than 0.99 over the entire kinterval, confirming our prediction. Another important point to make is that one can easily achieve a transmission equal to one in a nonHermitian system just by adding enough gain to it. In the scattering landscapes that we consider here, however, the net average amplification is zero, since and the intensity is equally distributed everywhere.
In realistic gain materials, high enough field amplitudes lead inevitably to gain saturation. A natural question to ask is if CIwaves exist also in this nonlinear regime. As we show in the Supplementary Information, one can analytically derive CIscatteringstates by solving the corresponding nonlinear Helmholtz equation. The difference in this case is that the CI amplitude is specific for the parameters of the gain material.
Connections to the literature
The results presented above also have several interesting connections to earlier insights from the literature. Perhaps the first mention of CIwaves was made in laser physics in an underappreciated work by Yariv et al.^{64}, in which it was shown that modes in distributed feedback (DFB) lasers can be engineered to have a constant intensity throughout the entire laser device—a feature that was proposed as a strategy to overcome spatial and spectral lasing instabilities^{65, 66}. The design principle for CIwaves in these DFB lasers was, however, restricted to periodic potential structures without any incoming wave and is thus orthogonal to our own approach. In a recent work, CIwaves were presented as solutions of the paraxial wave Equation where the ‘Wadati potential’, previously introduced in Ref. 67, varies only transversely to the propagation direction^{52}. The paraxial approximation employed in that work, however, excludes any backscattering from the potential and the incoming wave had to be engineered through wave front shaping to yield the desired CIsolution. The approach presented here has the clear advantage that it does not rely on any approximation, that no wave front shaping of the incoming wave is necessary and that it can be applied to arbitrary, even disordered potentials with an unspecified amount of backscattering. We also mention in this context that during the last few years nonHermitian potentials without PT symmetry that yield real propagation constants (including similar ones as in our Equation (2)) have been studied (see Refs 68, 69, 70, 71, 72). In our own work we are, however, not concerned with a phase transition to complex eigenvalues, but rather focus on the unique possibility to achieve perfect transmission and a suppression of any intensity variations in disordered media. For this purpose it is clearly essential that, in contrast to these earlier works, we address here the full scattering problem including backscattering. Last but not least we also highlight that our approach opens up a new and promising way to apply the WKBapproximation to potentials such as those with a shortrange disorder, that usually fall completely outside the scope of this wellstudied approximation.
Conclusions
In conclusion, we examine the existence and the properties of a novel type of waves, the CIwaves in onedimensional nonHermitian optical slab geometries with and without disorder. For any wavenumber k of a plane wave incident on a real refractive index distribution, we can identify a corresponding gainloss profile that allows for CIwaves to propagate through such a scattering landscape without any reflection. Most importantly, we found the gainloss profiles that need to be added to any disordered system such as to completely overcome the strong backscattering and the intensity variations that usually occur in such media. As a first step towards an experimental realisation we propose to study chains of discrete scatterers with gain and loss that can nowadays be routinely fabricated in the laboratory.
References
 1
Lagendijk A, van Tiggelen BA . Resonant multiple scattering of light. Phys Rep 1996; 270: 143–215.
 2
Akkermans E, Montambaux G . Mesoscopic Physics of Electrons and Photons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
 3
Sebbah P . Waves and Imaging Through Complex Media. Netherlands: Springer; 2001.
 4
Anderson PW . Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices. Phys Rev 1958; 109: 1492–1505.
 5
Wiersma DS, Bartolini P, Lagendijk A, Righini R . Localisation of light in a disordered medium. Nature 1997; 390: 671–673.
 6
Chabanov AA, Stoytchev M, Genack AZ . Statistical signatures of photon localization. Nature 2000; 404: 850–853.
 7
Schwartz T, Bartal G, Fishman S, Segev M . Transport and Anderson localization in disordered twodimensional photonic lattices. Nature 2007; 446: 52–55.
 8
Lahini Y, Avidan A, Pozzi F, Sorel M, Morandotti R et al. Anderson localization and nonlinearity in onedimensional disordered photonic lattices. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 013906.
 9
Billy J, Josse V, Zuo ZC, Bernard A, Hambrecht B et al. Direct observation of Anderson localization of matter waves in a controlled disorder. Nature 2008; 453: 891–894.
 10
Roati G, D’Errico C, Fallani L, Fattori M, Fort C et al. Anderson localization of a noninteracting BoseEinstein condensate. Nature 2008; 453: 895–898.
 11
Lagendijk A, Tiggelen BV, Wiersma DS . Fifty years of Anderson localization. Phys Today 2009; 62: 24–29.
 12
Segev M, Silberberg Y, Christodoulides DN . Anderson localization of light. Nat Photonics 2013; 7: 197–204.
 13
Beenakker CWJ . Randommatrix theory of quantum transport. Rev Mod Phys 1997; 69: 731.
 14
Mosk AP, Lagendijk A, Lerosey G, Fink M . Controlling waves in space and time for imaging and focusing in complex media. Nat Photonics 2012; 6: 283–292.
 15
Rotter S, Gigan S . Light fields in complex media: Mesoscopic scattering meets wave control. Rev Mod Phys 2017; 89: 015005.
 16
Vellekoop IM, Mosk AP . Focusing coherent light through opaque strongly scattering media. Opt Lett 2007; 32: 2309–2311.
 17
Popoff SM, Lerosey G, Carminati R, Fink M, Boccara AC et al. Measuring the transmission matrix in optics: an approach to the study and control of light propagation in disordered media. Phys Rev Lett 2010; 104: 100601.
 18
Vellekoop IM, Lagendijk A, Mosk AP . Exploiting disorder for perfect focusing. Nat Photonics 2010; 4: 320–322.
 19
Katz O, Small E, Bromberg Y, Silberberg Y . Focusing and compression of ultrashort pulses through scattering media. Nat Photonics 2011; 5: 372–377.
 20
McCabe DJ, Tajalli A, Austin DR, Bondareff P, Walmsley IA et al. Spatiotemporal focusing of an ultrafast pulse through a multiply scattering medium. Nat Commun 2011; 2: 447.
 21
Yaqoob Z, Psaltis D, Feld MS, Yang CH . Optical phase conjugation for turbidity suppression in biological samples. Nat Photonics 2008; 2: 110–115.
 22
Riboli F, Caselli N, Vignolini S, Intonti F, Vynck K et al. Engineering of light confinement in strongly scattering disordered media. Nat Mater 2014; 13: 720–725.
 23
Bruck R, Vynck K, Lalanne P, Mills B, Thomson DJ et al. An alloptical spatial light modulator for fieldprogrammable silicon photonic circuits. Optica 2016; 3: 396–402.
 24
Bachelard N, Gigan S, Noblin X, Sebbah P . Adaptive pumping for spectral control of random lasers. Nat Phys 2014; 10: 426–431.
 25
Hisch T, Liertzer M, Pogany D, Mintert F, Rotter S . Pumpcontrolled directional light emission from random lasers. Phys Rev Lett 2013; 111: 023902.
 26
Schönhuber S, Brandstetter M, Hisch T, Deutsch C, Krall M et al. Random lasers for broadband directional emission. Optica 2016; 3: 1035–1038.
 27
Ge L, Malik O, Türeci HE . Enhancement of laser powerefficiency by control of spatial hole burning interactions. Nat Photonics 2014; 8: 871–875.
 28
Liew SF, Redding B, Ge L, Solomon GS, Cao H . Active control of emission directionality of semiconductor microdisk lasers. Appl Phys Lett 2014; 104: 231108.
 29
Bender CM, Boettcher S . Real spectra in nonHermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry. Phys Rev Lett 1998; 80: 5243–5246.
 30
Bender CM, Brody DC, Jones HF . Complex extension of quantum mechanics. Phys Rev Lett 2002; 89: 270401.
 31
Makris KG, ElGanainy R, Christodoulides DN, Musslimani ZH . Beam dynamics in PT symmetric optical lattices. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 103904.
 32
ElGanainy R, Makris KG, Christodoulides DN, Musslimani ZH . Theory of coupled optical PTsymmetric structures. Opt Lett 2007; 32: 2632–2634.
 33
Musslimani ZH, Makris KG, ElGanainy R, Christodoulides DN . Optical solitons in PT periodic potentials. Phys Rev Lett 2008; 100: 030402.
 34
Guo A, Salamo GJ, Duchesne D, Morandotti R, VolatierRavat M et al. Observation of PTsymmetry breaking in complex optical potentials. Phys Rev Lett 2009; 103: 093902.
 35
Ruter CE, Makris KG, ElGanainy R, Christodoulides DN, Segev M et al. Observation of paritytime symmetry in optics. Nat Phys 2010; 6: 192–195.
 36
Kottos T . Optical physics: broken symmetry makes light work. Nat Phys 2010; 6: 166–167.
 37
Chong YD, Ge L, Stone AD . PTsymmetry breaking and laserabsorber modes in optical scattering systems. Phys Rev Lett 2011; 106: 093902.
 38
Lin Z, Ramezani H, Eichelkraut T, Kottos T, Cao H et al. Unidirectional invisibility induced by PTsymmetric periodic structures. Phys Rev Lett 2011; 106: 213901.
 39
Regensburger A, Bersch C, Miri MA, Onishchukov G, Christodoulides DN et al. Paritytime synthetic photonic lattices. Nature 2012; 488: 167–171.
 40
Ambichl P, Makris KG, Ge L, Chong YD, Stone AD et al. Breaking of PTsymmetry in bounded and unbounded scattering systems. Phys Rev X 2013; 3: 041030.
 41
Feng L, Xu YL, Fegadolli WS, Lu MH, Oliveira JEB et al. Experimental demonstration of a unidirectional reflectionless paritytime metamaterial at optical frequencies. Nat Mater 2013; 12: 108–113.
 42
Liertzer M, Ge L, Cerjan A, Stone AD, Türeci HE et al. Pumpinduced exceptional points in lasers. Phys Rev Lett 2012; 108: 173901.
 43
Peng B, Özdemir ŞK, Lei FC, Monifi F, Gianfreda M et al. Paritytimesymmetric whisperinggallery microcavities. Nat Phys 2014; 10: 394–398.
 44
Hodaei H, Miri MA, Heinrich M, Christodoulides DN, Khajavikhan M . Paritytimesymmetric microring lasers. Science 2014; 346: 975–978.
 45
Feng L, Wong ZJ, Ma RM, Wang Y, Zhang X . Singlemode laser by paritytime symmetry breaking. Science 2014; 346: 972–975.
 46
Peng B, Özdemir ŞK, Rotter S, Yilmaz H, Liertzer M et al. Lossinduced suppression and revival of lasing. Science 2014; 346: 328–332.
 47
Brandstetter M, Liertzer M, Deutsch C, Klang P, Schöberl J et al. Reversing the pump dependence of a laser at an exceptional point. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 4034.
 48
Peng B, Özdemir ŞK, Liertzer M, Chen W, Kramer J et al. Chiral modes and directional lasing at exceptional points. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113: 6845–6850.
 49
Miao P, Zhang ZF, Sun JB, Walasik W, Longhi S et al. Orbital angular momentum microlaser. Science 2016; 353: 464–467.
 50
Feng L, Zhu XF, Yang S, Zhu HY, Zhang P et al. Demonstration of a largescale optical exceptional point structure. Opt Express 2014; 22: 1760–1767.
 51
Makris KG, Ge L, Türeci HE . Anomalous transient amplification of waves in nonnormal photonic media. Phys Rev X 2014; 4: 041044.
 52
Makris KG, Musslimani ZH, Christodoulides DN, Rotter S . Constantintensity waves and their modulation instability in nonHermitian potentials. Nat Commun 2015; 6: 7257.
 53
ElGanainy R, Dadap JI, Osgood RM Jr . Optical parametric amplification via nonHermitian phase matching. Opt Lett 2015; 40: 5086–5089.
 54
Demange G, Graefe EM . Signatures of three coalescing eigenfunctions. J Phys A Math Theor 2012; 45: 025303.
 55
Doppler J, Mailybaev A, Böhm J, Kuhl U, Girschik A et al. Dynamically encircling an exceptional point for asymmetric mode switching. Nature 2016; 537: 76–79.
 56
Xu H, Mason D, Jiang LY, Harris JGE . Topological energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points. Nature 2016; 537: 80–83.
 57
Gbur G . Designing directional cloaks from localized fields. Opt Lett 2015; 40: 986–989.
 58
Bender CM, Orszag SA . Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers: Asymptotic Methods and Perturbation Theory. New York: Springer; 1999.
 59
Yeh P . Optical Waves in Layered Media 2nd edn New York: WileyInterscience; 2005.
 60
Wang J, Genack AZ . Transport through modes in random media. Nature 2011; 471: 345–348.
 61
Peña A, Girschik A, Libisch F, Rotter S, Chabanov AA . The singlechannel regime of transport through random media. Nat Commun 2014; 5: 3488.
 62
Berini P, De Leon I . Surface plasmonpolariton amplifiers and lasers. Nat Photonics 2012; 6: 16–24.
 63
Szameit A, Nolte S . Discrete optics in femtosecondlaserwritten photonic structures. J Phys B At Mol Opt Phys 2010; 43: 163001.
 64
Schrans T, Yariv A . Semiconductor lasers with uniform longitudinal intensity distribution. Appl Phys Lett 1990; 56: 1526–1528.
 65
Kasraian M, Botez D . Singlelobed farfield radiation pattern from surfaceemitting complexcoupled distributedfeedbak diode lasers. Appl Phys Lett 1995; 67: 2783–2785.
 66
Carlson NW, Liew SK, Amantea R, Bour DP, Evans G et al. Mode discrimination in distributed feedback grating surface emitting lasers containing a buried secondorder grating. IEEE J Quantum Electron 1991; 27: 1746–1752.
 67
Wadati M . Construction of paritytime symmetric potential through the soliton theory. J Phys Soc Jpn 2008; 77: 074005.
 68
Tsoy EN, Allayarov IM, Abdullaev FK . Stable localized modes in asymmetric waveguides with gain and loss. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 4215–4218.
 69
Nixon S, Yang JK . Allreal spectra in optical systems with arbitrary gainandloss distributions. Phys Rev A 2016; 93: 031802.
 70
Miri MA, Heinrich M, Christodoulides DN . Supersymmetrygenerated complex optical potentials with real spectra. Phys Rev A 2013; 87: 043819.
 71
Yang JK . Symmetry breaking of solitons in onedimensional paritytimesymmetric optical potentials. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 5547–5550.
 72
Konotop VV, Zezyulin DA . Families of stationary modes in complex potentials. Opt Lett 2014; 39: 5535–5538.
Acknowledgements
This project was supported by the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under REA Grant Agreement No. PIOFGA2011–303228 (Project NOLACOME). KGM is also supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7REGPOT201220131) under grant agreement 316165. ZHM was supported in part by NSF Grant No. DMS0908599. SR acknowledges financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) through Project SFB NextLite (F49P10) and Project GePartWave (I1142). The computational results presented were achieved in part using the Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC). KGM and SR developed the concept of the study. KGM, AB, PA and SR conducted the analysis, data interpretation and drafted the manuscript. ZHM contributed to the development of the numerical and analytical methods, data interpretation and drafting of the manuscript.
Author information
Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Note: Supplementary Information for this article can be found on the Light: Science & Applications’ website.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Makris, K., Brandstötter, A., Ambichl, P. et al. Wave propagation through disordered media without backscattering and intensity variations. Light Sci Appl 6, e17035 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2017.35
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
Keywords
 Anderson localisation
 complex media
 nonHermitian physics
 scattering
Further reading

Flexible PT Symmetric Optical Metasurfaces
Physical Review Applied (2020)

Universal form of arrays with spectral singularities
Optics Letters (2020)

Scatteringfree channels of invisibility across nonHermitian media
Optica (2020)

Waveguiding and focusing in a biomedium with an optofluidic cell chain
Acta Biomaterialia (2020)

A universal form of localized complex potentials with spectral singularities
New Journal of Physics (2020)