Letter to the Editor | Open Access | Published:

Differential expression of hERG1A and hERG1B genes in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia identifies different prognostic subgroups

Leukemia volume 28, pages 13521355 (2014) | Download Citation

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy of childhood, with 85% of cases being of B-cell lineage (B-cell precursor (BCP)-ALL) and 15% of T-cell lineage (T-ALL).1 With wider use of intensive chemotherapy, the prognosis of childhood ALL has improved remarkably, and nearly 80% of BCP-ALL2 patients can currently be cured. The prognosis of children with T-ALL has improved and has been reported to be similar to that for BCP-ALL (no differences in the 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate).3 However, long-term survival rates for pediatric T-ALL are still lower than those for BCP-ALL by up to 20%.3 Systemic toxicity and chemoresistance are nowadays the main shortcomings of standard chemotherapy.2

Current interest focuses on identifying new specific molecular targets to be exploited either for risk stratification or for identification of novel, patient-tailored, therapeutic approaches that can improve therapy efficacy and reduce toxicity in pediatric ALL.

We have provided evidence that K+ channels encoded by the ether-a-gò-gò-related gene 1 (hERG1), hERG1 channels, besides exploiting a relevant role in cardiac physiology,4 are often aberrantly expressed in human cancers including leukemias.5, 6 In pediatric BCP-ALL, hERG1 channels sustain the development of chemoresistance,7 as they modulate pro-survival signals triggered by the bone marrow microenvironment. In adult acute myeloid leukemias (AML), hERG1 regulates cell motility and transendothelial migration through an interplay with angiogenic signaling pathways. This effectively correlates with the worse prognosis in AML patients displaying high hERG1 expression.5

The hERG1 encoding gene shows two main alternative transcripts, hERG1A and hERG1B. hERG1B encodes a protein, hERG1B, with a unique N-terminus that justifies the peculiar biophysical features of hERG1B-sustained currents.8 The two hERG1 isoforms are expressed at different ratios and differentially contribute to sustain hERG1 currents in the tissues where hERG1 is functionally expressed. For example, whereas hERG1B is expressed at low levels in the human heart,9 it represents the main hERG1 isoform in tumor cells, such as neuroblastomas and leukemias.10 This fact makes hERG1B a promising tumor-specific target.6 To be exploited for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, the differential expression of hERG1A and hERG1B transcripts in primary tumors must be well defined. Whereas a high expression of hERG1B has been reported in adult primary AML cases,5 no data on the differential expression of hERG1A and hERG1B in ALL have been reported so far.

In the present study, we analyzed the expression and prognostic impact of the two hERG1 encoding genes in two cohorts of pediatric ALL patients, BCP-ALL and T-ALL. In particular, we examined the expression of hERG1A and hERG1B mRNA by SYBR Green real-time quantitative PCR (Rt-qPCR) in 100 BCP-ALL (n=94 children and n=6 infants below 1 year of age) and 111 T-ALL patients. Expression values were compared with those obtained in pooled CD19+ B and CD3+ T cells, respectively. All the patients studied were enrolled in the AIEOP LAL 2000-R2006 therapy protocol, whose details are reported in.11 The clinico-pathological characteristics of the patients, along with the expression of the two hERG1 transcripts, are shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Distribution of clinical and biological features and results of the univariate analysis in children with BCP-ALL and T-ALL

In BCP-ALL children (Table 1, upper panel) the hERG1A isoform was downregulated (median value=0.03; 0.01–0.07), whereas hERG1B was upregulated (median value=6.68; 2.48–16.63), compared with normal B cells. Although generally hypo-expressed, hERG1A was higher in CALL and pre-B immunophenotype subgroups (P=0.0326) and in prednisone poor responder (PPR) patients compared with prednisone good responder (PGR) patients (P=0.0492). A marginally statistically significant higher expression was evidenced in BCP-ALL patients with no chromosomal translocations, compared with patients with either the 12;21 or the 4;11 translocation (P=0.0593).

In the infant subgroup of BCP-ALL, both hERG1A and hERG1B transcripts were hypo-expressed (median values: 0.03 and 0.24, respectively; Supplementary Table 1S).

Similarly to BCP-ALL patients, T-ALL patients (Table 1, lower panel) showed an overexpression of the hERG1B transcript and a downregulation of hERG1A, although the gap between the two isoforms was less evident (median values: 5.11; 2.00–19.98 and 0.76; 0.17–4.08, respectively). A higher expression of hERG1A was detected in T-ALL patients with a WBC count 50.000 compared with patients with a WBC count <50.000 (median value: 1.85 vs 0.23; P=0.001) and in PPR compared with PGR patients (median value: 2.13 vs 0.49; P=0.005). An indication of overexpression was evidenced also in patients with involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) (P=0.096). The hERG1B transcript was in general overexpressed, in particular in patients with WBC count <50.000 (P=0.031) and, although not significantly, in standard-risk (SR) patients.

Finally, we evaluated the impact of the differential expression of hERG1A and hERG1B on relapse in the two cohorts of BCP-ALL and T-ALL patients. The optimal cutoff value was determined on the basis of the receiver operator characteristic analysis. In BCP-ALL, a cutoff value with proper sensitivity and specificity was found only for the hERG1A transcript. The cumulative relapse rate at 5 years was 32.3% in patients with hERG1A <0.03 and 13.4% in patients with hERG1A 0.03 (P=0.04) (Figure 1a). After adjusting for risk groups in a multivariate Cox model, this association was not statistically significant (HR of relapse in patients with hERG1A <0.03 versus 0.03:1.88; CI 0.77–4.60; P=0.166).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Cumulative incidence of relapse in BCP-ALL and T-ALL patients according to the expression of hERG1A and hERG1B. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated by adjusting for competing risks (death) and compared using the Gray test. Statistical analyses were performed with R. (a) Cumulative incidence of relapse in BCP-ALL patients according to the expression of hERG1A. (b) Cumulative incidence of relapse in T-ALL patients according to the expression of hERG1A. (c) Cumulative incidence of relapse in T-ALL patients relative to the expression of hERG1B, according to different cutoffs (6.8 and 1.3) and multivariate analysis.

In T-ALL patients, discriminant values of expression were obtained for both hERG1A and hERG1B. The cumulative relapse rate at 5 years was 37% in patients with hERG1A 0.74 and 22% in patients with hERG1A <0.74 (P=0.020) (Figure 1b). On multivariate analysis, hERG1A lost its statistically significant association with relapse (HR=1.61 95%CI 0.73–3.54 P=0.2404). Patients with hERG1B 6.8 relapsed with higher frequency compared with patients <6.8 (5 years’ cumulative incidence of relapse: 38 vs 22%, P=0.17). The Cox model after adjusting for classical prognostic factors (immunophenotype, risk group and WBC) identified hERG1B as an independent factor of higher risk of relapse (HR 2.6; CI 1.26–5.30, P=0.009) (Figure 1c, left panel). Notably, a lower hERG1B cutoff value of 1.3 identified a group of patients (with hERG1B<1.3) with no relapse (Figure 1c, right panel, P=0.03). In a limited set of four patients classified as early T-cell precursor leukemia (ETP-ALL), usually associated with a very high risk of relapse,12 hERG1B expression was always higher than the cutoff value of 1.3 (Supplementary Table 2S).

In the present study we investigated, for the first time, the differential expression of the two main isoforms of hERG1 potassium channels, hERG1A and hERG1B, in ALL pediatric patients. hERG1 channels exert a relevant role in tumor biology,6 and their use as prognostic markers in human malignancies is emerging.5, 13 In leukemias, hERG1 channels regulate either cell migration and transendothelial migration (in AML), or chemoresistance (in ALL). We previously reported that AML blasts from adult patients express both hERG1A and hERG1B transcripts5 and that several leukemia cell lines preferentially express the hERG1B isoform.10 However, no data regarding the prognostic relevance of the differential expression of the two hERG1 isoforms in leukemia patients have been reported so far. We show here that, in ALL blasts, either B or T lineage, the hERG1 transcript that is overexpressed compared with normal CD19+B or CD3+T cells is exclusively hERG1B. The genetic mechanisms underlying such overexpression could be related to the GpC islands and consensus sites for transcription factors,14 which differentiate the hERG1B from the hERG1A promoter. Moreover, the hERG1B-encoded protein, hERG1B, has peculiar biophysical features, which makes hERG1B-sustained currents optimal to allow cell cycle progression in tumor cells.10

Notably, the two hERG1 transcripts may have diagnostic and therapeutic relevance in ALL. In particular, the hERG1A transcript, which is generally hypo-expressed in both BCP-ALL and T-ALL, could identify groups of patients with a higher rate of relapse either when deeply downregulated (in BCP-ALL) or when slightly upregulated (in T-ALL).

The most relevant data provided here clearly show that, in the T-ALL cohort, the overexpression of hERG1B has a negative impact on outcome. Indeed, hERG1B expression displays a hazard ratio comparable to that of other factors used for patients’ stratification in pediatric T-ALL. The high expression of hERG1B in ETP-ALL, although obtained in very few patients, further reinforces the negative impact of hERG1B on T-ALL outcome. In T-ALL no independent prognostic molecular marker, except Notch1 mutation profile,15 has clinical relevance, and patients’ stratification relies on MRD status and the T cell phenotype.16 Hence, the expression of hERG1B isoform could be exploited for future stratification of pediatric T-ALL.

Finally, the hERG1B overexpression may have a therapeutic relevance, independently of the ALL immunophenotype, either B or T. In fact, we provided evidence that hERG1 blockers can overcome chemoresistance both in vitro and in leukemia mouse models.7 However, several of the many hERG1 blocking drugs that are available on the market can cause severe cardiotoxicity. Hence, the preferential targeting of the hERG1B isoform could be an approach for overcoming such hindrances.6 Indeed, we have recently provided evidence that a novel pyrimido-indole compound has a clear antileukemic effect as it preferentially blocks hERG1B-sustained currents, with no adverse cardiac effect (Gasparoli L, unpublished results). This, or similar drugs, could hence be proposed for a patient’s tailored therapeutic approach especially in nonresponsive pediatric T-ALL, such as ETP-ALL, with a high hERG1B expression.

References

  1. 1.

    , , , , . A systematic literature review of the clinical and epidemiological burden of acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Eur J Cancer Care 2005; 14: 53–62.

  2. 2.

    , . Treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 166–178.

  3. 3.

    , , , , , et al. Childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Consortium experience. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3616–3622.

  4. 4.

    , . hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia. Nature 2006; 440: 463–469.

  5. 5.

    , , , , , et al. VEGFR-1 (FLT-1), β1 integrin and hERG K+ channel form a macromolecular signaling complex in acute myeloid leukemia: role in cell migration and clinical outcome. Blood 2007; 110: 1238–1250.

  6. 6.

    , , . Targeting ion channels in leukemias: a new challenge for treatment. Curr Med Chem 2012; 19: 683–696.

  7. 7.

    , , , , , et al. Chemotherapy resistance in acute lymphoblastic leukemia requires hERG1 channels and is overcome by hERG1 blockers. Blood 2011; 117: 902–914.

  8. 8.

    , , , , , et al. Two isoforms of the mouse ether-a-go-go-related gene coassemble to form channels with properties similar to the rapidly activating component of the cardiac delayed rectifier K+ current. Circ Res 1997; 81: 870–878.

  9. 9.

    , , , , . Cardiac IKr channels minimally comprise hERG 1a and 1b subunits. J Biol Chem 2004; 279: 44690–44694.

  10. 10.

    , , , , , et al. Cell cycle-dependent expression of HERG1 and HERG1B isoforms in tumor cells. J Biol Chem 2003; 278: 2947–2955.

  11. 11.

    , , , , , et al. Molecular response to treatment redefines all prognostic factors in children and adolescents with B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results in 3184 patients of the AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000 study. Blood 2010; 115: 3206–3214.

  12. 12.

    , , , , , et al. Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 147–156.

  13. 13.

    , , , , , et al. hERG1 channels and Glut-1 as independent prognostic indicators of worse outcome in Stage I and II colorectal cancer: a pilot study. Transl Oncol 2012; 5: 105–112.

  14. 14.

    , , , , , . Genomic structure, transcriptional control, and tissue distribution of HERG1 and KCNQ1 genes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2008; 294: 1371–1380.

  15. 15.

    , . The NOTCH signaling pathway: role in the pathogenesis of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and implication for therapy. Ther Adv Hematol 2013; 4: 199–210.

  16. 16.

    , , , , , et al. Clinico-biologic features of 5202 acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients enrolled in the Italian AIEOP and GIMEMA Protocols and stratified in age-cohorts. Haematologica 2013; 98: 1702–1710.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the Associazione Genitori contro le Leucemie e Tumori Infantili Noi per Voi, Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro, Istituto Toscano Tumori to AA, from the Fondazione Citta' della Speranza to GB and from a grant from the European Commission (FP7-HEALTH-F2-2011 261474) to PR and MGV.

Author information

Author notes

    • S Pillozzi
    •  & B Accordi

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

    • G Basso
    •  & A Arcangeli

    These authors contributed equally to this work.

Affiliations

  1. Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine-Section of Internal Medicine, University of Firenze, Firenze, Italy

    • S Pillozzi
    •  & A Arcangeli
  2. Oncohematology Laboratory, Department of Woman and Child Health, University of Padova, Padova, Italy

    • B Accordi
    • , V Serafin
    •  & G Basso
  3. Center of Biostatistics for Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy

    • P Rebora
    •  & M G Valsecchi

Authors

  1. Search for S Pillozzi in:

  2. Search for B Accordi in:

  3. Search for P Rebora in:

  4. Search for V Serafin in:

  5. Search for M G Valsecchi in:

  6. Search for G Basso in:

  7. Search for A Arcangeli in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Arcangeli.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2014.26

Author contributions

SP, BA and VS performed the research and biological assays; PR performed and MGV supervised the statistical analysis and reviewed the manuscript; AA and SP designed the research and wrote the manuscript; GB contributed primary samples and edited the manuscript.

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on the Leukemia website (http://www.nature.com/leu)

Further reading