State of the Art | Published:

State-of-the-Art

Clarifying nipple confusion

Journal of Perinatology volume 35, pages 895899 (2015) | Download Citation

Subjects

Abstract

Nipple confusion, an infant’s difficulty with or preference for one feeding mechanism over another after exposure to artificial nipple(s), has been widely debated. This is in part due to conflicting statements, one by the American Academy of Pediatrics in 2005 suggesting that infants should be given a pacifier to protect against Sudden Infant Death Syndrome, and the other by the World Health Organization in 2009 stating that breastfeeding infants should never be given artificial nipples. Despite the limited and inconsistent evidence, nipple confusion is widely believed by practitioners. Therefore, there is a unique opportunity to examine the evidence surrounding nipple confusion by assessing the research that supports/refutes that bottle feeding/pacifier use impedes breastfeeding efficacy/success/duration. This review examined 14 articles supporting and refuting nipple confusion. These articles were reviewed using the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale. Based on our review, we have found emerging evidence to suggest the presence of nipple confusion only as it relates to bottle usage and found very little evidence to support nipple confusion with regards to pacifier use. The primary difficulty in conclusively studying nipple confusion is establishing causality, namely determining whether bottles’/pacifiers’ nipples are causing infants to refuse the breast or whether they are simply markers of other maternal/infant characteristics. Future research should focus on prospectively examining the causality of nipple confusion.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    , , . Nipple confusion: toward a formal definition. J Pediatr 1995; 126(6): 125–129.

  2. 2.

    , . Nipple confusion, alternative feeding methods, and breast-feeding supplementation: state of the science. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2001; 1(4): 217–223.

  3. 3.

    UNICEF/WHOSection 1 Background and Implementation. UNICEF/WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.

  4. 4.

    American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Sudden Infant Death S. The changing concept of sudden infant death syndrome: diagnostic coding shifts, controversies regarding the sleeping environment, and new variables to consider in reducing riskPediatrics 2005; 116(5): 1245–1255.

  5. 5.

    , , , , . Which method of breastfeeding supplementation is best? The beliefs and practices of paediatricians and nurses. Paediatr Child Health 2010; 15(7): 427–431.

  6. 6.

    , , , , . The cup-versus-bottle debate: a theme from an ethnographic study of the supplementation of breastfed infants in hospital in the United Kingdom. J Hum Lact 2005; 21: 151–162.

  7. 7.

    , , , , . The Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Rating Scale. The Johns Hopkins Hospital: Baltimore, MD, USA, 2005.

  8. 8.

    , , , . Research on treating neuropsychiatric symptoms of advanced dementia with non-pharmacological strategies, 1998–2008: a systematic literature review. Int Psychogeriatr 2009; 21(5): 825–843.

  9. 9.

    , . Communication education for pre-licensure nursing students: literature review 2002–2013. Nurse Educ Today 2014; 13: 1375–1381.

  10. 10.

    , , , , , et al. Mechanics of sucking: comparison between bottle feeding and breastfeeding. BMC Pediatr 2010; 10: 6.

  11. 11.

    , , . UNICEF/WHO baby-friendly hospital initiative: does the use of bottles and pacifiers in the neonatal nursery prevent successful breastfeeding? Eur J Pediatr 1997; 156: 874–877.

  12. 12.

    , , , , . Early weaning among Japanese women in Hawaii. J Biosoc Sci 2003; 35(2): 227–241.

  13. 13.

    , , , . Association between breast-feeding practices and sucking habits: a cross-sectional study of children in their first year of life. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008; 26: 102–106.

  14. 14.

    . Are breastfeeding problems related to incorrect breastfeeding technique and the use of pacifiers and bottles? Birth 1998; 25(1): 40–44.

  15. 15.

    , , , , . Transitioning preterm infants with nasogastric tube supplementation: increased likelihood of breastfeeding. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 1998; 28(3): 264–273.

  16. 16.

    , . Nipple confusion—who is confused? J Pediatr 1996; 129(1): 174–179.

  17. 17.

    , , , , , . Use of pacifiers is associated with decreased breast-feeding duration. Pediatrics 1995; 95(4): 497.

  18. 18.

    , , , , . Pacifier use and short breastfeeding duration: cause, consequence, or coincidence? Pediatrics 1997; 99(3): 445–453.

  19. 19.

    , , , , , . Exclusive breastfeeding in southern brazil: prevalence and associated factors. Breastfeed Med 2010; 5(2): 79–85.

  20. 20.

    , , , , , et al. Randomized clinical trial of pacifier use and bottle-feeding or cupfeeding and their effect on breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2003; 111(3): 511–518.

  21. 21.

    , , , , . Pacifier restriction and exclusive breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2013; 131(4): e1101–e1107.

  22. 22.

    , , , , , et al. Pacifier use, early weaning, and cry/fuss behavior: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 2001; 286(3): 322–326.

  23. 23.

    , , , , , . Effect of bottles, cups, and dummies on breast feeding in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2004; 329(7459): 193–198.

  24. 24.

    , . Pacifier stiffness alters the dynamics of the suck central pattern generator. J Neonatal Nurs 2008; 14(3): 79–86.

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA

    • E Zimmerman
    •  & K Thompson

Authors

  1. Search for E Zimmerman in:

  2. Search for K Thompson in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Zimmerman.

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.83

Further reading