Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Milk production after preterm, late preterm and term delivery; effects of different breast pump suction patterns

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two different breast pump suction patterns (BPSP) during the initiation of lactation in mothers of term, late preterm and preterm infants.

Methods:

Breast pump-dependent mothers (n=130) of term (n=19), late preterm (n=44) and preterm (n=67) infants were assigned to either a standard or irregular-BPSP after birth until the onset of secretory activation. Both groups used the same standard maintenance BPSP thereafter. Time to secretory activation, time to full milk production and daily milk output were compared between the standard and I-BPSP groups, and between the term, late preterm and preterm groups.

Results:

Mothers using the irregular-BPSP demonstrated significantly greater daily milk output and established secretory activation significantly earlier. This effect was observed in mothers of term, late preterm and preterm infants.

Conclusion:

The irregular-BPSP mimicking sucking of healthy newborns is more effective at achieving secretory activation and an earlier adequate milk supply than the standard-BPSP. The irregular-BPSP can be used successfully for mothers of preterm up to term infants who are breast pump dependent during the establishment of lactation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Isaacs CE . Human milk inactivates pathogens individually, additively, and synergistically. J Nutr 2005; 135: 1286–1288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartick M, Reinhold A . The burden of suboptimal breastfeeding in the United States: a pediatric cost analysis. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (5): e1048–e1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen DC, Nommsen-Rivers L, Dewey KG, Lönnerdal B . Stress during labor and delivery and early lactation performance. Am J Clin Nutr 1998; 68 (2): 335–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Meier P, Engstrom JL . Evidence-based practices to promote exclusive feeding of human milk in very low-birthweight infants. Neoreviews 2007; 8: e467–e477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lau C . Effects of stress on lactation. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48: 221–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterton RT Jr, Hill PD, Aldag JC, Hodges KR, Belknap SM, Zinaman MJ . Relation of plasma oxytocin and prolactin concentrations to milk production in mothers of preterm infants: influence of stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2000; 85: 3661–3668.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Janes JE, Jegier BJ, Loera F . Breast pump suction patterns that mimic the human infant during breastfeeding: greater milk output in less time spent pumping for breast pump-dependent mothers with premature infants. J Perinatol 2012; 32 (2): 103–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowen-Jones A, Thompson C, Drewett RF . Milk flow and sucking rates during breast-feeding. Dev Med Child Neurol 1982; 24 (5): 626–633.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mizuno K . Ueda K2 changes in sucking performance from nonnutritive sucking to nutritive sucking during breast- and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res 2006; 59: 728–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Santoro W Jr, Martinez FE, Ricco RG, Jorge SM . Colostrum ingested during the first day of life by exclusively breastfed healthy newborn infants. J Pediatr 2010; 156 (1): 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sakalidis VS, Williams TM, Garbin CP, Hepworth AR, Hartmann PE, Paech MJ et al. Ultrasound imaging of infant sucking dynamics during the establishment of lactation. J Hum Lact 2013; 29 (2): 205–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sakalidis VS, Kent JC, Garbin CP, Hepworth AR, Hartmann PE, Geddes DT . Longitudinal changes in suck-swallow-breathe, oxygen saturation, and heart rate patterns in term breastfeeding infants. J Hum Lact 2013; 29 (2): 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kent JC, Ramsay DT, Doherty D, Larsson M, Hartmann PE . Response of breasts to different stimulation patterns of an electric breast pump. J Hum Lact 2003; 19 (2): 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mitoulas LR, Lai CT, Gurrin LC, Larsson M . HartmannPE. Effect of vacuum profile on breastmilk expression using an electric breast pump. J Hum Lact 2002; 18 (4): 353–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meier PP, Engstrom JL, Hurst NM, Ackerman B, Allen M, Motykowski JE et al. A comparison of the efficiency, efficacy, comfort, and convenience of two hospital-grade electric breast pumps for mothers of very low birthweight infants. Breastfeed Med 2008; 3 (3): 141–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Neville MC, Morton J . Physiology and endocrine changes underlying human lactogenesis II. J Nutr 2001; 131 (11): 3005S–3008S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wall EH, McFadden TB . The milk yield response to frequent milking in early lactation of dairy cows is locally regulated. J Dairy Sci 2007; 90 (2): 716–720.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Neville MC, Morton J, Umemura S . Lactogenesis. The transition from pregnancy to lactation. Pediatr Clin North Am 2001; 48 (1): 35–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rasmussen KM, Kjolhede CL . Prepregnant overweight and obesity diminish the prolactin response to suckling in the first week postpartum. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (5): e465–e471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dewey KG, Nommsen-Rivers LA, Heinig MJ, Cohen RJ . Risk factors for suboptimal infant breastfeeding behavior, delayed onset of lactation, and excess neonatal weight loss. Pediatrics 2003; 112 (3 Pt 1): 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hill PD, Aldag JC, Chatterton RT, Zinaman M . Comparison of milk output between mothers of preterm and term infants: the first 6 weeks after birth. J Hum Lact 2005; 21 (1): 22–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wall EH, Crawford HM, Ellis SE, Dahl GE, McFadden TB . Mammary response to exogenous prolactin or frequent milking during early lactation in dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2006; 89 (12): 4640–4648.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Medela for making the Preemie+TM cards available to our neonatal ward for this study, and Vanessa Sakalidis for her editorial assistance.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Disclosure

Authors declare not to have received any grants for this work Medela made the Preemie+TM cards available to the neonatal ward for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E D M Post.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This study was not funded. No honorarium, grant or other form of payment was given to anyone to produce the manuscript. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Post, E., Stam, G. & Tromp, E. Milk production after preterm, late preterm and term delivery; effects of different breast pump suction patterns. J Perinatol 36, 47–51 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.152

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2015.152

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links