Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation
  • Published:

Perinatal/Neonatal Case Presentation

Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound

Journal of Perinatology volume 35, pages 229–230 (2015)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Noninvasive prenatal testing utilizing free fetal DNA is commonly used in pregnancy to screen for trisomy 13, 18, 21 and also fetal sex aneuploidy. We report on two cases of discrepancy between phenotypic and genotypic sex and potential medical implications. In our first case, a patient with known male gender via cell free fetal DNA (cffDNA) testing had an ultrasound at 18 weeks’ gestation, which identified Dandy–Walker malformation and female-appearing ambiguous genitalia. As Dandy–Walker malformation could not be considered isolated in the presence of ambiguous genitalia, this finding allowed for more complete counseling of the parents as well as extensive genetic workup. Our second case involved a fetus with intrauterine growth restriction diagnosed by ultrasound and normal-appearing female genitalia. After birth, adrenal insufficiency was diagnosed and chromosome analysis identified normal male chromosomes. These two cases showed that fetal sex determination by cffDNA can be used as a tool for earlier identification of affected pregnancies, allowing for parental decision-making, genetic testing and earlier intervention.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swanson A, Sehnert AJ, Bhatt S . Non-invasive prenatal testing: technologies, clinical assays and implementation strategies for women's healthcare practitioners. Curr Genet Med Rep 2013; 1 (2): 113–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Benn P, Cuckle H, Pergament E . Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy: current status and future prospects. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (1): 15–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mazloom AR, Džakula Ž, Oeth P, Wang H, Jensen T, Tynan J et al. Noninvasive prenatal detection of sex chromosomal aneuploidies by sequencing circulating cell-free DNA from maternal plasma. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (6): 591–597.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hill M, Barrett AN, White H, Chitty LS . Uses of cell free fetal DNA in maternal circulation. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2012; 26 (5): 639–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gil MM, Quezada MS, Bregant B, Ferraro M, Nicolaides KH . Implementation of maternal blood cell-free DNA testing in early screening for aneuploidies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42 (1): 34–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Devaney SA, Palomaki GE, Scott JA, Bianchi DW . Noninvasive fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306 (6): 627–636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright CF, Wei Y, Higgins JP, Sagoo GS . Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis. BMC Res Notes 2012; 5: 476.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Torres B, Stoffel TJ, Oro D, Rossi EM, de Miranda GB, Houenou LJ et al. Early non-invasive fetal RHD genotyping and sex determination by conventional and multiplex PCR performing a rapid and low-cost cell-free fetal DNA extraction method. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012; 165 (2): 370.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis C, Hill M, Skirton H, Chitty LS . Fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32 (8): 735–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chitty LS, Chatelain P, Wolffenbuttel KP, Aigrain Y . Prenatal management of disorders of sex development. J Pediatr Urol 2012; 8 (6): 576–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Devaney SA, Palomaki GE, Scott JA, Bianchi DW . Noninvasive fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 306: 627–636.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hill M, Taffinder S, Chitty LS, Morris S . Incremental cost of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis versus invasive prenatal diagnosis of fetal sex in England. Prenat Diagn 2011; 31: 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Daley R, Hill M, Chitty LS . Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potential. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2014; 99: F426–F430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Maternal Fetal Medicine Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA

    J I Iruretagoyena & D Shah

  2. Meriter Hospital, Madison, WI, USA

    M Grady

Authors
  1. J I Iruretagoyena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M Grady
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Shah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J I Iruretagoyena.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Iruretagoyena, J., Grady, M. & Shah, D. Discrepancy in fetal sex assignment between cell free fetal DNA and ultrasound. J Perinatol 35, 229–230 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.231

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2014.231

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links