Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Timing of prophylactic antibiotic at cesarean section: a double-blinded, randomized trial

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose was to determine the effect of the timing of prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section on post-operative infectious complications.

Study Design:

This was a prospective, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial in which patients were randomized to receive cefazolin or clindamycin either before skin incision or after cord clamp. The primary outcome was maternal infectious morbidity at 6 weeks postpartum, a composite infectious outcome, which included endometritis, urinary tract infection, wound infection and pneumonia.

Result:

Data on 896 women were analyzed; 449 randomized to skin incision, 447 to cord clamp. Postpartum infections were seen in a total of 8.4% of patients. Timing of antibiotic administration did not significantly affect any maternal postpartum infection rates or selected neonatal outcomes.

Conclusion:

Our results suggest that, in a largely non-laboring population, the timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration does not impact post-operative infectious complications of the mother. Despite being one of the largest randomized controlled trials to address this question, our study still lacked sufficient power to make definitive conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Menacker F, Hamilton BE . Recent trends in cesarean delivery in the United States. NCHS. Data Brief 2010; 35: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carlson C, Duff P . Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: is an extended-spectrum agent necessary? Obstet Gynecol 1990; 76: 343–346.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burke JF . The effective period of preventive antibiotic action in experimental incisions and dermal lesions. Surgery 1961; 50: 161–168.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cunningham G, Leveno K, DePalma R, Roark M, Rosenfeld C . Perioperative antimicrobials for cesarean delivery: before or after cord clamping? Obstet Gynecol 1983; 62: 151–154.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thigpen BD, Hood WA, Chauhan S, Bufkin L, Bofill J, Magann E et al. Timing of prophylactic administration in the uninfected laboring gravid: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192: 1864–1868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Fejgin MD, Markov S, Goshen S, Segal J, Arbel Y, Lang R . Antibiotic for cesarean section: the case for ‘true’ prophylaxis. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1993; 43: 257–261.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wax JR, Hersey K, Philput C, Wright MS, Nichols KV, Eggleston MK et al. Single dose cefazolin prophylaxis for postcesarean infections: before vs. after cord clamping. J Matern Fetal Med 1997; 6: 61–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sullivan SA, Smith T, Chang E, Hulsey T, Vandorsten JP, Soper D . Administration of cefazolin prior to skin incision is superior to cefazolin at cord clamping in preventing postcesarean infectious morbidity: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 196 (455): e1–e5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kaimal AJ, Zlatnik MG, Cheng YW, Thiet MP, Connatty E, Creedy P et al. Effect of a change in policy regarding the timing of prophylactic antibiotics on the rate of postcesarean delivery surgical-site infections. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (310): e1–e5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nokiani FA, Akbari H, Rezaei M . Timing of prophylactic antibiotic administration in term cesarean section: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Clinic Infect Dis 2009; 4: 71–76.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Owens SM, Brozanski BS, Meyn LA, Wiesenfeld HC . Antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery before skin incision. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 573–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yildirim G, Gungorduk K, Guven HZ, Aslan H, Celikkol O, Sudolmus S et al. When should we perform prophylactic antibiotics in elective cesarean cases? Arch Gynecol Obstet 2009; 280: 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Witt A, Döner M, Petricevic L, Berger A, Germann P, Heinze G et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis before surgery vs after cord clamping in elective cesarean delivery. Arch Surg 2011; 146: 1404–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Macones GA, Cleary KL, Parry S, Stamilio DM, Cahill AG, Odibo AO et al. The timing of antibiotics at cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Perinatol 2011; 29: 273–276.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, Gilbert S, Hauth JC, Landon MB et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and fetal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 108: 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costantine MM, Rahman M, Ghulmiyah L, Byers BD, Longo M, Wen T et al. Timing of perioperative antibiotics for cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (301): e1–e6.

    Google Scholar 

  17. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion no. 465: antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean delivery: timing of administration. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116: 791–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordon HR, Phelps D, Blanchard K . Prophylactic cesarean section antibiotics: maternal and neonatal morbidity before or after cord clamping. Obstet Gynecol 1979; 53: 151–156.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sotlanifar S, Russell R . The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for caesarean section, 2011 update: implications for the anaesthetist. Int J Obstet Anesth 2012; 21: 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. CG132 Caesarean Section. November 2011. Available at http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG132 [Accessed August 2012].

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the St Vincent Foundation (Grant no. 1-7175-1220701).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E A Strand.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Francis, C., Mumford, M., Strand, M. et al. Timing of prophylactic antibiotic at cesarean section: a double-blinded, randomized trial. J Perinatol 33, 759–762 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.56

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2013.56

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links