Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

History of the birth certificate: from inception to the future of electronic data

Subjects

Abstract

Enumerations of people were carried out long before the birth of Jesus. Data related to births were recorded in church registers in England as early as the 1500s. However, not until the 1902 Act of Congress was the Bureau of Census established as a permanent agency to develop birth registration areas and a standard registration system. Although all states had birth records by 1919, the use of the standardized version was not uniformly adopted until the 1930's. In the 1989 US Standard Birth Certificate revision, the format was finally uniformly adopted to include checkboxes to improve data quality and completeness. The evolution of the 12 federal birth certificate revisions is reflected in the growth of the number of items from 33 in 1900 to more than 60 items in the 2003 birth certificate. As birth registration has moved from paper to electronic, the birth certificate's potential utility has broadened, yet issues with updating the electronic format and maintaining quality data continue to evolve. Understanding the birth certificate within its historical context allows for better insight as to how it has been and will continue to be used as an important public-health document shaping medical and public policies.

Your institute does not have access to this article

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

$32.00

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. Hetzel AM . History and organization of the vital statistics system. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown E . Value of the Vital Statistics Data on birth and death certificates in county health work. Am J Public Health 1938; 28: 1398–1402.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. US Census Bureau Overview of History. Available at: http://www.census.gov/history/www/through_the_decades/overview/. Accessed on 1 December 2011.

  4. CDC/National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, Vital Certificate Revisions, 2003 Revisions of the US Standard Certificates of Live Birth and Death and the Fetal Death Report. Available at: www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htm. Accessed on 1 December 2011.

  5. Schoendorf K, Branum A . The use of United States Vital Statistics in perinatal and obstetric research. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194: 911–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zemach R . What the vital statistics system can and cannot do. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 756–758.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shapiro S, Schachter J . Birth registration completeness United States, 1950. Public Health Rep 1952; 67: 513–524.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Northam S, Polancich S, Restrepo E . Birth certificate methods in five hospitals. Public Health Nurs 2003; 20: 318–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Plecker WA . A standard certificate of birth. Am J Public Health 1915; 5: 1044–1047.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lilienfeld AM, Parkhurst E, Patton R, Schlesinger ER . Accuracy of supplemental medical information on birth certificates. Public Health Rep 1951; 66: 191–204.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Philip AG . The evolution of neonatology. Pediatr Res 2005; 58: 799–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Halliday HL . Surfactants: past, present and future. J Perinatol 2008; 28: S47–S56.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Frost F, Starzyk P, George S, McLaughlin J . Birth complication reporting: the effect of birth certificate design. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 505–506.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Freedman MA, Gay G, Brockert J, Potrzebowski P, Rothwell C . The 1989 revisions of the US standard certificate of live birth and death and the US standard report of fetal death. Am J Public Health 1988; 78: 168–172.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Joseph KS, Huang L, Liu S, Ananth CV, Allen AC, Sauve R et al. Reconciling the high rates of preterm and postterm birth in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2007; 109: 813–822.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Starr P, Starr S . Reinventing Vital Statistics. The impact of changes in information technology, welfare policy, and health care. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 534–544.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirby R, Salihu H . Back to the future? A critical commentary on the 2003 US National Standard Certificate of live birth. Birth 2006; 33: 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. User Guide to the 2008 Natality Public Use File. Available at: ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Dataset_Documentation/DVS/natality/UserGuide2008.pdf. Accessed on 1 December 2011.

  19. Rothwell CJ . Reengineering vital registration and statistics systems for the United States. Prev Chronic Dis (serial online) (2004 Oct 11). Available at: www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2004/oct/04_0074.htm. Accessed on 1 December 2011.

  20. National Association for Public Health Statistics and Information Systems. Available at: www.naphsis.org/index.asp?bid=980. Accessed 1 December 2011.

  21. Dobie SA, Baldwin LM, Rosenblatt RA, Fordyce MA, Andrilla CH, Hart LG . How well do birth certificates describe the pregnancies they report? The Washington State experience with low-risk pregnancies. Matern Child Health J 1998; 2: 145–154.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ . Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. J Community Health 2003; 28: 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gould JB, Chavez G, Marks AR, Liu H . Incomplete birth certificates: a risk marker for infant mortality. Am J Public Health 2002; 92: 79–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Reiling J (Asst ed). The Registration of Births. JAMA 1908; 50: 1612. From JAMA 100 Years Ago. JAMA 2008; 299: 2220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Woolbright LA, Harshbarger DS . The revised standard certificate of live birth: analysis of medical risk factor data from birth certificates in Alabama, 1988-92. Public Health Rep 1995; 110: 59–63.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the assistance of Anand Lakhkar, MBBS and Agata Pluzyczka. We also thank Charles J Rothwell, MS, MBA, Joshua C Brumberg, PhD and Stephan F Brumberg, PhD for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H L Brumberg.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumberg, H., Dozor, D. & Golombek, S. History of the birth certificate: from inception to the future of electronic data. J Perinatol 32, 407–411 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.3

Keywords

  • history of medicine
  • birth certificate
  • vital statistics

Further reading

Search

Quick links