Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Perioral movements and sucking pattern during bottle feeding with a novel, experimental teat are similar to breastfeeding

Subjects

Abstract

Objective:

To measure intraoral pressure and perioral movement in infants during breastfeeding (BF) and feeding with experimental teat (ET). The teat has a wide base, firm shaft and a valve at the base, such that milk flows only when the baby provides a hold pressure.

Study Design:

Twenty healthy term infants, between 1 and 8 months old, were enrolled in the study. Feeding sessions (BF and ET) were recorded using a digital video camera. During both BF and ET feeding sessions, recordings during feeding were taken of jaw and throat movements (n=20) as well as intraoral pressure (n=18). The efficiency of milk transfer and the angle of the mouth were also measured.

Result:

There was no significant difference in either the jaw or throat movements between BF and ET. The sucking burst pattern, the efficiency (ml min−1), and the angle of the mouth did not differ between both feeding methods. The intraoral negative pressure observed during ET was significantly smaller than that observed during BF.

Conclusion:

There were no significant differences in perioral movements. Although the value was smaller, a hold pressure was observed during ET. From these results, the novel, ET may decrease BF problems related to bottle use.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dowling DA, Tycon L . Bottle/nipple systems. Nursing for Women’s Health 2010; 14: 61–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kent JC, Ramsay DT, Doharty DA, Larsson M, Hartmann PE . Response of breasts to different stimulation patterns of an electric breast pump. J Hum Lact 2003; 19: 179–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Prime DK, Geddes DT, Hepworth AR, Trengove NJ, Hartmann PE . Comparison of the patterns of milk ejection during repeated breast expression sessions in women. Breastfeed Med 2011; 6: 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zimmerman E, Barlow S . Pacifier stiffness alters the dynamics of the suck central pattern generator. J Neonat Nurs 2008; 14: 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mizuno K, Aizawa M, Saito S, Kani K, Tanaka S, Kawamura H et al. Analysis of feeding behavior with direct linear transformation. Early Hum Dev 2006; 82 (3): 199–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Aizawa M, Mizuno K, Tamura M . Neonatal sucking behavior –comparison of perioral movement during breastfeeding and bottle feeding. Pediatr Int 2010; 52: 104–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizuno K, Kani K . Sipping/lapping is a safe alternative feeding method to suckling for preterm infants. Acta Paediatr 2005; 94 (5): 574–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nowak AJ, Smith WL, Erenberg A . Imaging evaluation of breast-feeding and bottle-feeding systems. J Pediatr 1995; 126: S130–S134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Weber F, Woolridge MW, Baum JD . An ultrasonographic study of the organization of sucking and swallowing by newborn infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986; 28: 19–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Mizuno K, Ueda A . Changes in sucking performance from nonnutritive sucking to nutritive sucking during breast- and bottle-feeding. Pediatr Res 2006; 59 (5): 728–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taki M, Mizuno K . Maturational changes in the feeding behavior of infants—a comparison between breast-feeding and bottle-feeding. Acta Paediatr 2010; 1: 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geddes DT, Kent JC, Mitoulas LR, Hartmann PE . Tongue movement and intra-oral vacuum in breastfeeding infants. Early Hum Dev 2008; 84: 471–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mathew OP . Nipple units for newborn infants: a functional comparison. Pediatrics 1988; 81: 688–691.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mizuno K, Nishida K, Mizuno N, Taki M, Murase M, Itabashi K . The important role of deep attachment in the uniform drainage of breast milk from mammary lobe. Acta Paediatr 2008; 97: 1200–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hoover K . Visual assessment of the baby’s wide open mouth. J Hum Lact 1996; 12: 9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blaymore Bier JA, Ferguson AE, Morales Y, Liebling JA, Oh W, Vohr BR . Breastfeeding infants who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 1997; 100: e3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dowling DA . Physiological responses of preterm infants to breast-feeding and bottle-feeding with the orthodontic nipple. Nurs Res 1999; 48: 78–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the mothers and infants who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K Mizuno.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

This study is financially supported by Medela AG (Switzerland).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Segami, Y., Mizuno, K., Taki, M. et al. Perioral movements and sucking pattern during bottle feeding with a novel, experimental teat are similar to breastfeeding. J Perinatol 33, 319–323 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.113

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2012.113

Keywords

Search

Quick links