Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Effectiveness of No-Sting skin protectant and Aquaphor on water loss and skin integrity in premature infants

Journal of Perinatology volume 30, pages 414–419 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of No-Sting skin protectant and Aquaphor, a water-based emollient, on skin integrity measured by Neonatal Skin Condition Score (NSCS) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) in premature infants. In addition, with no data regarding the use of No-Sting in the neonatal population and its desirability because it requires less infant manipulation and less nursing time, it was important to evaluate the use of this product.

Study Design:

In all, 69 premature infants born at <33 weeks gestation were randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups: (1) No-Sting or (2) Aquaphor for a total of 14 days.

Result:

Gestational age and total fluid intake were related to NSCS whereas gestational age, incubator humidity levels and total daily fluid intake were significantly related to TEWL. Infants receiving Aquaphor had significantly higher NSCS, but the mean scores in both groups over the 14-day period were in the normal range (<4). There were no differences between Aquaphor and No-Sting in the rate of TEWL over the 14-day period.

Conclusion:

This study provides the first information regarding the use of No-Sting in the neonatal population. This skin protectant seems as effective as Aquaphor in decreasing TEWL and maintaining skin integrity, and is less resource intensive.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Modi N . Management of fluid balance in the very immature neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2004; 89 (2): 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shwayder T, Akland T . Neonatal skin barrier: structure, function, and disorders. Dermatol Ther 2005; 18: 87–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mancini AJ . Skin. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (4 Suppl): 1114–1119.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lund CH, Osborne JW, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA . Neonatal skin care: clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30 (1): 41–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nonato LB, Lund CH . Transepidermal water loss in the intensive care nursery: Measuring techniques and research recommendations. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev 2001; 1 (1): 11–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalia YN, Nonato LB, Lund CH, Guy RH . Development of skin barrier function in premature infants. J Invest Dermatol 1998; 111 (2): 320–326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nopper AJ, Horii KA, Sookdeo-Drost S, Wang TH, Mancini AJ, Lane AT . Topical ointment therapy benefits premature infants. J Pediatr 1996; 128 (5 Pt 1): 660–669.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lund CH, Kuller J, Lane AT, Lott JW, Raines DA, Thomas KK . Neonatal skin care: evaluation of the AWHONN/NANN research-based practice project on knowledge and skin care practices. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses/National Association of Neonatal Nurses. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2001; 30 (1): 30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sedin G, Agren J . Water and heat—the priority for the newborn infant. Ups J Med Sci 2006; 111 (1): 45–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoath SB . The stickiness of newborn skin: bioadhesion and the epidermal barrier. J Pediatr 1997; 131 (3): 338–340.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lund CH, Nonato LB, Kuller JM, Franck LS, Cullander C, Durand DJ . Disruption of barrier function in neonatal skin associated with adhesive removal. J Pediatr 1997; 131 (3): 367–372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gordon M, Montgomery LA . Minimizing epidermal stripping in the very low birth weight infant: integrating research and practice to affect infant outcome. Neonatal Netw 1996; 15 (1): 37–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dollison EJ, Beckstrand J . Adhesive tape vs pectin-based barrier use in preterm infants. Neonatal Netw 1995; 14 (4): 35–39.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cartlidge P . The epidermal barrier. Semin Neonatol 2000; 5 (4): 273–280.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dykes PJ, Heggie R, Hill SA . Effects of adhesive dressings on the stratum corneum of the skin. J Wound Care 2001; 10 (2): 7–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Edwards WH, Conner JM, Soll RF . The effect of prophylactic ointment therapy on nosocomial sepsis rates and skin integrity in infants with birth weights of 501 to 1000 g. Pediatrics 2004; 113 (5): 1195–1203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lane AT, Drost SS, Lane AT, Drost SS . Effects of repeated application of emollient cream to premature neonates’ skin. Pediatrics 1993; 92 (3): 415–419.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pabst RC, Starr KP, Qaiyumi S, Schwalbe RS, Gewolb IH . The effect of application of aquaphor on skin condition, fluid requirements, and bacterial colonization in very low birth weight infants. J Perinatol 1999; 19 (4): 278–283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Darmstadt GL, Badrawi N, Law PA, Ahmed S, Bashir M, Iskander I et al. Topically applied sunflower seed oil prevents invasive bacterial infections in preterm infants in Egypt: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004; 23 (8): 719–725.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Conner JM, Soll RF, Edwards WH . Topical ointment for preventing infection in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (1) CD001150.

  21. Schuren J, Becker A, Sibbald RG . A liquid film-forming acrylate for peri-wound protection: a systematic review and meta-analysis (3M& # x2122; Cavilon& # x2122; no-sting barrier film). Int Wound J 2005; 2 (3): 230–238.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Lutz JB . Performance Assessment of Film Forming Skin Protectants (Sealants). 3M: St Paul, MN 2002; 4.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cameron J, Hoffman D, Wilson JR, Cherry G . Comparison of two peri-wound akin protectants in venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. J Wound Care 2005; 14 (5): 233–236.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lund CH, Osborne JW . Validity and reliability of the neonatal skin condition score. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2004; 33 (3): 320–327.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Cortex Technology. DermaLab User Manual Hadsund, Denmark, n.d.

  26. Grove GL, Grove MJ, Zerweck C, Pierce E . Computerized evaporimetry using the DermaLab(R) TEWL probe. Skin Res Technol 1999; 5 (1): 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Grove F, Grove M, Zemeck C, Pierce E . Comparative metrology of the evaporimeter and the Dermalab TEWL probe. Skin Res Technol 1999; (5): 1–8.

  28. Hammarlund K, Nilsson GE, Oberg PA, Sedin G . Transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. I. Relation to ambient humidity and site of measurement and estimation of total transepidermal water loss. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1977; 66 (5): 553–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hammarlund K, Sedin G . Transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. III. Relation to gestational age. Acta Paediatrica Scandinavica 1979; 68 (6): 795–801.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Rochon J . Application of GEE procedures for sample size calculations in repeated measures experiments. Stat Med 1998; 17 (14): 1643–1658.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cohen J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. vol xv, rev edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 1987, p 474.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Littell RCMGA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD . SAS System for Mixed Models. vol. xiv SAS Institute: Cary, NC, 1996, p 633.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Verbeke GMG . Linera Mixed Models in Practice: An SAS-oriented Approach. vol xiii Springer: New York, 1997, p 306.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Bryk AS, Raudenbush SW . Hierarchical linear model: applications and data analysis methods. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0655/91045334-dhtml Materials specifiedd: Publisher description http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0655/91045334-d.html Materials specified: Table of contents only http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0655/91045334-t.html(accessed on 3 September 2009). Sage Publications: Newbury Park, CA, 1992.

  35. Goldstein H . Multilevel statistical models. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0636/95207858-dhtml Materials specifieed: Publisher descriptionhttp://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0636/95207858-d.html Materials specified: Table of contents only http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0636/95207858-t.html(accessed on 3 September 2009). E Arnold, Oxford University Press: New York, 1995.

  36. SAS Institute Inc. The MIXED Procedure SAS/STAT Software: Changes and Enhancements SAS Technical Report P-229 Release 607. Cary, NC: SAS Institude Inc., 1992.

  37. Rabe-Hesketh S, Pickles A, Skrondal A GLLAMM Manual, Technical Report 2001/01. Institute of Psychiatry, Kings College, University of London: London, 2001.

  38. Campbell JR, Zaccaria E, Baker CJ . Systemic candidiasis in extremely low birth weight infants receiving topical petrolatum ointment for skin care: a case-control study. Pediatrics 2000; 105 (5): 1041–1045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoath SB, Narendran V . Adhesives and emollients in the preterm infant. Semin Neonatol 2000; 5 (4): 289–296.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Bautista MI, Wickett RR, Visscher MO, Pickens WL, Hoath SB . Characterization of vernix caseosa as a natural biofilm: comparison to standard oil-based ointments. Pediatr Dermatol 2000; 17 (4): 253–260.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wananukul S, Praisuwanna P, Kesorncam K . Effects of clear topical ointment on transepidermal water loss in jaundiced preterm infants receiving phototherapy. J Med Assoc Thai 2001; 84 (6): 837–841.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Agren J, Sjors G, Sedin G . Ambient humidity influences the rate of skin barrier maturation in extremely preterm infants. J Pediatr 2006; 148 (5): 613–617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Sedin G, Hammarlund K, Nilsson GE, Strömberg B, Oberg PA . Measurements of transepidermal water loss in newborn infants. Clin Perinatol 1985; 12 (1): 79–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Lund CH, Kuller JM . Integumentary system In: Kenner C, Lott JW (eds). Comprehensive Neonatal Care: An Interdisciplinary Approach. 4th edn Saunders Elsevier: St Louis, MO, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kuller JM, Lund CH . Assessment and management of intergumentary dysfunction In: Kenner C, Lott JW, Flandermeyer A (eds). Comprehensive Neonatal Nursing: A Physiologic Perspective. 2nd edn Saunders: Philadelphia, 1998; 648–681.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The preparation of this paper was supported by the Duke University School of Nursing, the Duke Neonatal Perinatal Research Institute and the Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Nursing, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC, USA

    D H Brandon

  2. Special Care Nursery, Durham Regional Hospital, Durham, NC, USA

    K Coe

  3. Newborn Critical Care, North Carolina Children's Hospital, Durham, NC, USA

    D Hudson-Barr

  4. Division of Neonatology, Brenner Children's Hospital, Durham, NC, USA

    T Oliver

  5. Office of Research Affairs, Duke University School of Nursing, Durham, NC, USA

    L R Landerman

Authors
  1. D H Brandon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K Coe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D Hudson-Barr
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T Oliver
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. L R Landerman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D H Brandon.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brandon, D., Coe, K., Hudson-Barr, D. et al. Effectiveness of No-Sting skin protectant and Aquaphor on water loss and skin integrity in premature infants. J Perinatol 30, 414–419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2009.174

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links