Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care

Abstract

Objective:

To determine whether very low birth weight (VLBW) newborns (<1500 g) wearing silicone earplugs grow larger and perform better on developmental exams than controls.

Study Design:

VLBW newborns (n=34) were randomized to wearing earplugs or not. Hospital outcomes were abstracted from medical charts by research staff masked to intervention status. Fourteen extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborns (<1000 g) were also evaluated at 18 to 22 months.

Result:

After adjusting for birth weight, 11 surviving newborns in the earplug group were 225 g (95% CI: 45, 405) heavier at 34 weeks post menstrual age than the 13 controls. Six ELBW earplug infants scored 15.53 points (95% CI: 3.03, 28.02) higher than six controls on the Bayley Mental Development Index. Their head circumferences were 2.59 cm (95% CI: 0.97, 4.21) larger.

Conclusion:

Earplugs may facilitate weight gain in VLBW newborns. Better outcomes may persist at 18 to 22 months at least in ELBW infants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Philbin MK, Lickliter R, Graven SN . Sensory experience and the developing organism: a history of ideas and view to the future. J Perinatol 2000; 20: S2–S5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bremmer P, Byers JF, Kiehl E . Noise and the premature infant: physiological effects and practice implications. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2003; 32: 447–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Berens RJ, Weigle CG . Noise measurements during high-frequency oscillatory and conventional mechanical ventilation. Chest 1995; 108: 1026–1029.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Busch-Vishniac IJ, West JE, Barnhill C, Hunter T, Orellana D, Chivukula R . Noise levels in Johns Hopkins Hospital. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 118: 3629–3645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Environmental Health. Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 724–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Williams AL, Van Drongelen W, Lasky RE . Noise in contemporary neonatal intensive care. J Acoust Soc Am 2007; 121: 2681–2690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lasky RE, Williams AL . Noise and light exposures for ELBW newborns during their stay in the NICU. Pediatrics. (in press).

  8. D'Agati S, Adams JA, Zabaleta IA, Abreu SJ, Sackner MA . The effect of noise reduction on behavioral states in newborns. Pediatr Res 1994; 35: 221A.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zahr LK, Traversay J . Premature infant responses to noise reduction by earmuffs: effects on behavioral and physiologic measures. J Perinatol 1995; 15: 448–455.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Symington A, Pinelli J . Developmental care for promoting development and preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; 2: CD001814.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ariagno RL, Thoman EB, Boeddiker MA, Kugener B, Constantinou JC, Mirmiran M et al. Developmental care does not alter sleep and development of premature infants. Pediatrics 1997; 100: 1–7e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleisher BE, Vandenberg K, Constantinou J, Heller C, Benitz WE, Johnson A et al. Individualized developmental care for very-low-birth-weight premature infants. Clin Pediatr 1995; 10: 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Resnick MB, Eyler FD, Nelson RM, Eitzman DV, Bucciarelli RL . Developmental intervention for low birth weight infants: improved early developmental outcome. Pediatrics 1987; 80: 68–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Resnick MB, Armstrong S, Carter RL . Developmental intervention program for high-risk premature infants: effects on development and parent-infant interactions. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1988; 9: 73–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mann NP, Haddow R, Stokes L, Goodley S, Rutter N . Effect of night and day on preterm infants in a newborn nursery; randomized trial. Br Med J 1986; 293: 1265–1271.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fajardo B, Browning M, Fisher D, Paton J . Effect of nursery environment on state regulation in very low-birth infants. Infant Behav Dev 1990; 13: 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strauch C, Brandt S, Edwards-Beckett J . Implementation of a quiet hour: effect on noise levels and infant sleep states. Neonatal Netw 1993; 12: 31–35.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Spiegelhalter DJ, Myles JP, Jones DR, Abrams KR . An introduction to Bayesian methods in health technology assessment. Br Med J 1999; 319: 508–512.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None of the authors had any arrangement with any company whose products are mentioned in this paper. This study was supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD R01 HD042639). We would like to thank the nursing staff at the Children's Memorial Hermann Neonatal Intensive Care Unit for their cooperation and support. This clinical trial has been listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00565357). The NICHD award supplied salary support for Amber L Williams and Robert E Lasky.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R E Lasky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abou Turk, C., Williams, A. & Lasky, R. A randomized clinical trial evaluating silicone earplugs for very low birth weight newborns in intensive care. J Perinatol 29, 358–363 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.236

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2008.236

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links