Cardiovascular death represents the single largest cause of mortality in women with 70% of deaths attributable to modifiable risk factors, such as hypertension. This analysis aims at evaluating, whether there are gender disparities in antihypertensive drug usage and blood pressure (BP) control. We included 18 017 patients with arterial hypertension from the International Survey Evaluating Microalbuminuria Routinely by Cardiologists in patients with Hypertension (I-SEARCH). The study was conducted between September 2005 and March 2006 in 26 countries, and data on patient demographics, cardiovascular disease and risk factors, BP, and cardiovascular drug treatment were collected. Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 2.1 mm Hg higher in women (150.6±0.35 mm Hg, n=8357/18 017) than in men (148.5±0.35 mm Hg; P<0.0001, n=9526/18 017), whereas no difference in diastolic BP was seen (88.2±0.20 vs 88±0.20 mm Hg; P=0.198). Gender differences in SBP were more pronounced in diabetic as compared with non-diabetic patients (3.5 vs 1.7 mm Hg, n=4272 vs n=13 611; P<0.0001) and became evident at an age 55 years old. Overall BP-control rate was 33.6% in men and 30.6% in women (P<0.0001) and was lower in diabetic as compared with non-diabetic patients. In all, 30% of patients used one, 40% used two and 30% used ⩾3 drugs without gender differences. Response rates to different drug regimens appeared to be similar. However, women received more frequently thiazides and β-blockers, and less frequently ACE-inhibitors as monotherapy. Major efforts are required to improve BP-management, especially in women.
Arterial hypertension represents a major therapeutic challenge to health-care systems, affects almost one billion people worldwide and its prevalence is expected to increase from 26.4% in 2000 to 29.2% in 2025.1 Although various pharmacological treatment options exist, BP control is suboptimal and major efforts are necessary to improve patients’ awareness and compliance as well as physicians’ adherence to treatment guidelines.2, 3Whereas recent evidence suggests that the association of blood pressure (BP) and the risk of ischaemic heart disease and stroke is similar in men and women and that BP lowering provides broadly similar mortality benefits, irrespective of the drug regimen used, other data suggest potential gender differences with regard to treatment efficacy.4, 5, 6, 7 Furthermore, women with known cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk factors are less likely to receive guideline-recommended drug therapy as compared with men, and BP-control rates appear to be lower in women at a higher age.8, 9, 10, 11 As cardiovascular disease is considered to be the single largest cause of mortality in women with 70% of cardiovascular deaths attributable to modifiable risk factors, such as hypertension, it is important to better understand gender disparities in hypertension management on a worldwide basis to ensure equal standards in treatment for both, men and women.12 This analysis from a large international survey in hypertensive patients aims at analysing, whether there are gender disparities with regard to BP levels, BP control and antihypertensive drugs usage.
Patients and methods
A large international survey was conducted in 26 countries in Europe, North America, Latin America, Middle East and Asia as well as in Turkey, Australia and Morocco between 14 September 2005 and 24 March 2006. In total, 22 282 consecutive patients, aged >18 years with currently treated or newly diagnosed arterial hypertension (seated systolic/diastolic blood pressure (SBP/DBP) >140/90 mm Hg at the office visit) were screened, out of which 21 794 patients gave written informed consent. Patients were enroled by hospital-based cardiologists or in the outpatient cardiology setting. Furthermore, data on patient demographics, cardiovascular risk profile- and co-morbidities, BP, antihypertensive- and cardiovascular drug therapy were collected on a case report form as described elsewhere.13 Institutional review board approval was obtained in each participating centre and the study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the International Conference on Harmonization of Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP).
This analysis was conducted in 11 782 patients from Europe (Belgium, Germany, Greece, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland), 1559 patients from North America (Canada), 2868 patients from Asia (Hong Kong, Indonesia, Korea, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand and Vietnam) and 1637 patients from Latin America (Colombia, Mexico and Peru) as well as 171 patients from Australia (total=18 017 patients). Patients with Caucasian, Asian or Hispanic ethnicity have been included in this analysis. For 17 883 patients, gender-specific data on demographics, cardiovascular risk factors/co-morbidities as well as SBP and DBP, and drug usage by drug class were available and analysed. SBP and DBP control was defined as BP⩽140 and 90 mm Hg for non-diabetic patients, and ⩽130 and 80 mm Hg for diabetic patients. Left ventricular hypertrophy was determined using 12-lead electrocardiogram and was defined as a Sokolow index of ⩾3.5 mV. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS version 9.1.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and STATA version 9.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX, USA). Statistical hypotheses were tested using t-test or χ2 test with a level of significance of 0.05 (two-sided). A linear model was used to estimate the least square means of BP according to gender, adjusted for age, the presence of antihypertensive treatment and ethnicity (Caucasian, Asian and Hispanic) as well as according to nine different age groups (adjusted for presence of antihypertensive treatment, diabetes and ethnicity). A logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate the prevalence of antihypertensive drug usage according to gender (adjusted for age, treatment, ethnicity and diabetes), and BP-control rate according to gender (adjusted for age, diabetes, ethnicity and antihypertensive treatment) using predictive marginal probabilities. Adjusted continuous variables are depicted as adjusted means (LS mean)±s.e., unadjusted continuous variables as means±s.d. Categorical variables are depicted as percentages with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).
A total of 9526 (53.3%) men and 8357 (46.7%) women were included in this analysis. Women were about 2 years older than men (64.5 and 62.2 years, respectively; P<0.0001), had a longer duration of hypertension (9.5 vs 8.8 years; P<0.0001) and higher total, low-density lipoprotein and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels than men (5.4 vs 5.1 mg per 100ml, P<0.0001; 3.3 vs 3.1 mg per 100ml, P<0.0001; and 1.4 vs 1.3 mg per 100ml, P<0.0001, respectively). Prevalence of diabetes and a family history of myocardial infarction and coronary artery disease were similar in both populations, whereas cardiovascular co-morbidities, such as coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, left ventricular hypertrophy, ischaemic stroke, congestive heart failure and peripheral artery disease were seen more frequently in men. For details, see Table 1. Overall, 93.5% of hypertensive patients received pharmacological treatment (93.5% (95%CI 92.93–93.96%) of men (n=8723/9526) and 93.4% (92.86–93.95%) of women (n=7739/8357); P=0.925).
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure in men and women with or without diabetes
Mean SBP was 148.5±0. 35 mm Hg in men and 150.6±0.35 mm Hg in women in the overall population (Δ 2.1 mm Hg; P<0.0001). In patients without diabetes mellitus, mean SBP was 148.6±0.40 mm Hg in men and 150.3±0.40 mm Hg in women (Δ 1.7 mm Hg; P<0.0001). Men with diabetes mellitus had a mean SBP of 147.7±0.88 mm Hg, whereas SBP in women was 151.2±0.88 mm Hg (Δ 3.5 mm Hg, P<0.0001).
In the overall population, mean DBP was 88±0.20 mm Hg in men and 88.2±0.20 mm Hg in women (Δ 0.2 mm Hg, P=0.198). In patients without diabetes, DBP was 88.6±0.23 mm Hg in men and 88.8±0.23 in women (Δ 0.2 mm Hg, P=0.336), whereas in patients with diabetes mellitus, DBP was 85.1±0.51 mm Hg in men and 85.4±0.51 in women (Δ 0.3 mm Hg, P=0.477). For details see Table 2. Similar results were obtained after additionally adjusting for waist circumference (data not shown).
SBP and DBP in men and women by age group
Systolic blood pressure was 148.3±2. 79 mm Hg at the age of 35–39 years in men and was not significantly higher at higher age (149.1±1.15 mm Hg at the age of ⩾75 years). In contrast, in women, BP was 148.2±2.92 mm Hg at the age of 35–39 years and 153.7±1.14 mm Hg at the age of ⩾75 years. A significant gender difference in SBP was observed at the age of ⩾55 years, in which SBP in women was about 2 mm Hg higher as compared with men (P<0.05 for all age groups ⩾55 years). DBP was lower at higher age (93.3±1.88 mm Hg in men and 93.1±1.97 mm Hg in women at the age of 35–39 years and 82.9±0.68 mm Hg in men and 83.8±0.67 mm Hg in women at the age of ⩾75 years, P=0.031). At the age of 45–49 and 50–54 years DBP was significantly higher in men as compared with women (P=0.021 and P=0.017, respectively). For details, see Figure 1.
Pulse pressure in men and women by age group
The pulse pressure was 55±2.00 mm Hg in men and 55.1±2.10 mm Hg in women at the age of 35–39 years (P=0.9854), compared with 66.3±0.97 mm Hg in men and 69.9±0.96 mm Hg in women (P<0.0001) at the age of ⩾75 years. The gender difference became statistically significant at an age higher than 45–49 years. For details, see Figure 2.
Blood pressure-control rates in men and women with or without diabetes mellitus
Systolic blood pressure-control rates
In the overall population, SBP control was achieved in 37.7%. (36.69–38.75%) of men and 34% (32.92–35.06%) of women (P<0.0001). In patients without diabetes, 42.3% (41.12–43.51%) of men and 39.2% (37.91–40.42%) of women achieved SBP control (P=0.0004), whereas SBP control was achieved in only 22.8% (21.08–24.65%) of diabetic men and 18.8% (17.03–20.64%) of diabetic women (P=0.0018). For details, see Figure 3.
Diastolic blood pressure-control rates
Diastolic blood pressure control was 63.6% (62.61–64. 66%) in the overall population in men as compared with 64.1% (63.01–65.19%) in women (P=0.545). In patients without diabetes, DBP was controlled in 70.3% (CI 69.31–71.38%) of men and 70% (CI 68.84–71.23%) of women (P=0.800), whereas in only 44.3% (42.19–46.47%) of diabetic men and 44.5% (42.17–46.86%) of diabetic women, DBP was controlled (P=0.908). For details, see Figure 3.
Overall blood pressure-control rates
Systolic and diastolic blood pressure-control rate in the overall population was achieved in 33.6% (32.56–34. 57%) of men and 30.6% (29.55–31.64%) of women (P<0.0001). In patients without diabetes, SBP/DBP-control rate was 38.4% (37.22–39.62%) in men and 34.9% (33.67–36.15%) in women (P<0.0001), whereas in patients with diabetes, only 19% (17.37–20.70%) of men and 16.1% (95% CI 14.45;17.84) of women achieved BP control (P=0.016). For details, see Figure 3.
Number of antihypertensive drugs used in men and women
In the overall population, 30.1% (29.12–31.04%) of men and 30.9% (29.84–31.90%) of women used one drug, 40% (38.95–41.00%) of men and 39.4% (38.32–40.50%) of women used two drugs, and 29.9% (28.98–30.90%) of men and 29.7% (28.70–30.74%) of women used three or more drugs (P=0.403 for comparison of three groups). With regard to the mean number of drugs used, no major gender disparities were observed in patients with either controlled or uncontrolled BP (2.05 drugs in men and 2.01 women in controlled patients (P=0.063); 2.11 drugs in men and 2.09 in women in uncontrolled patients (P=0.248)). In patients without diabetes, the average number of drugs used was 2.02 in men and 1.99 in women (P=0.155), whereas 2.31 drugs were used in diabetic men and 2.29 drugs in diabetic women (P=0.402). Significantly more drugs were used in diabetic vs non-diabetic men and women (P<0.0001 for both). For details, see Figure 4.
Classes of antihypertensive treatments used in men and women
Drug classes used in men and women with antihypertensive monotherapy
No disparities between men and women were seen for the usage of loop diuretics (0.7% (0.43–1.10%) vs 0.8% (0.54–1.33%), P=0.482), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; 24.2% (22.51–25.90%) vs 21.9% (20.21–23.65%), P=0.064), calcium channel blockers (CCB) (15.1% (13.77–16.65%) vs 15.6% (14.11–17.18%), P=0.689), and α receptor blockers (0.7% (0.46–1.16%) vs 0.4% (0.21–0.75%), P=0.100). However, more women were treated with thiazide diuretics (2.4% (1.84–3.05%) vs 4.4% (3.57–5.31%), P<0.0001) and β-blockers (27.6% (25.75–29.49%) vs 24.2% (22.53–25.95%), but were less likely to receive angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I; 29.8% (27.99–31.64%) vs 26.3% (24.47–28.14%), P=0.007). For details, see Figure 5a.
Drug classes used in men and women with antihypertensive dual therapy
Significantly more women received thiazide-containing dual therapies. Thiazides+CCBs were administered to 2.1%. (1.69–2.68%) of men and 3.2% (2.64–3.96%) of women (P=0.003), thiazides+ACE-Is to 9.3% (8.39–10.40%) of men and 11.1% (9.97–12.28%) of women (P=0.025) and thiazides+ARBs to 10.3% (9.29–11.41%) of men and 12.6% (11.38–13.85%) of women (P=0.004). No significant gender differences were seen for the combination of CCBs+β-blockers (8.6% (7.70–9.64%) in men and 8.7% (7.75–9.83%) in women, P=0.870), and CCBs+ACE-Is (10.8% (9.78–11.91%) in men and 9.7% (8.71–10.89%) in women, P=0.175). However, CCBs+ARBs were prescribed less frequently in women (9.8% (8.80–10.85%) in men and 8.2% (7.29–9.31%) in women, P=0.035). Other non-guideline-recommended dual therapy was used in 46.3% (44.54–47.99%) of men and 43.3% (41.51–45.16%) of women (P=0.022): β-blockers+ACE-Is were used in 22% (20.61–23.49%) of men and 15.2% (13.97–16.62%) of women (P<0.0001), followed by β-blockers+ARBs (11.2% (10.13–12.31%) for men and 10.9% (9.78–12.08%) for women). Other non-guideline-recommended therapies were thiazides+β-blockers and loop diuretics+ACE-Is or ARBs, in which no gender differences were observed. Drug combinations used in <1% are not depicted. For details, see Figure 5b.
Blood pressure-control rates in patients receiving guideline-recommended dual therapies
The control rate was 44.1% (33.04–55.88%) in men and 39% (30.07–48.68%) in women using thiazides+CCBs (P=0.50), and 41.7% (36.21–47.39%) in men and 31.4% (26.51–36.81%) in women using thiazides+ACE-Is (P=0.008). BP was controlled in 39% (33.86–44.33) of men and 40.9% (35.78–46.21%) of women, treated with thiazides+ARBs (P=0.607), and 39.2% (33.68–44.98%) in men and 34.5% (29.08–40.42%) in women treated with CCBs+β-blockers (P=0.260). CCBs+ACE-Is were associated with a BP-control rate of 31.2% (26.38–36.54%) in men and 28% (22.92–33.77%) women (P=0.389), whereas CCBs+ARBs with a control rate of 33.2% (28.20–38.69%) in men and 34.1% (28.35–40.38%) in women (P=0.833). For details, see Figure 6.
This analysis provides insights from a recent, large international study in men and woman with currently treated or newly diagnosed arterial hypertension. Earlier data from NHANES (1999–2004) has shown significant gender disparities in BP levels, in which SBP was about 4 mm Hg higher in women, but DBP was 3.5 mm Hg lower than in men, resulting in a trend towards a lower BP-control rate in women (50.8% men vs 55.9% women uncontrolled).14 These findings are supported by data from the Framingham cohort, in which control rates in women >60 years old were markedly lower than in men.11 However, another analysis from a large sample of patients, including five European countries, suggested higher BP-control rates in women as compared with men, which differed from country to country.15
Our data from an international sample of pharmacologically treated patients shows a significantly higher mean SBP ( 2.1 mm Hg), but no difference in mean DBP ( 0.2 mm Hg) in women as compared with men, resulting in a SBP-control rate of 37.7% in men, but only 34% in women. The overall BP-control rate was generally low, and significantly lower in women (30.6%) as compared with men (33.6%), driven by the observed disparity in SBP. When looking at patients with concomitant diabetes mellitus, overall BP-control rate was not only expectedly lower, but gender disparity in SBP levels was more pronounced ( 3.5 mm Hg); data that have been described earlier by Kjeldsen et al.12 in a large survey conducted in Europe. Although the absolute difference in BP-control rate seems somewhat small, the detected difference in mean SBP of 2.1 mm Hg (3.5 mm Hg in the diabetic population) appears to be clinically meaningful, because it has been shown that a decrease in mean SBP of 2 mm Hg is associated with a 7% reduction in ischaemic heart disease-mortality and a 10% reduction in stroke-mortality.16 Furthermore, the potential health burden of the observed gender disparity in SBP levels at an age ⩾55 years is even more concerning in light of the fact that the prevalence of hypertension appears to be higher in elderly women than men.17 Our data also shows significant gender disparities with regard to pulse pressure, occurring already at the age of 45 years, about 10 years earlier than the observed differences in SBP. This finding highlights the importance of using pulse pressure at an early stage of hypertension as a risk stratification tool, because pulse pressure—as opposed to SBP and DBP alone—has been shown to be a better predictor for adverse outcomes, especially in women.18
Data from previous large hypertension trials have shown that most patients need combination therapy to achieve sufficient BP control. However, in only 50% of trials, patients actually reached this goal.19 Recent data from NHANES (1999–2004) shows that approximately 30% of patients were treated with two drugs and 15% of patients with three or more antihypertensive drugs, and no gender differences could be detected;20 findings that were also confirmed by a recent cross-sectional US-survey in about 12 000 patients treated in the primary care setting.21 Our data do not show gender disparities in the usage of antihypertensive drug combination therapy and indicates, that physicians obviously apply international treatment guidelines equally well to men and women, irrespective of the presence or absence of controlled BP. Nevertheless, gender disparities with regard to SBP levels and BP control are more pronounced in diabetics. Our data further shows that more antihypertensive drugs are prescribed to both, diabetic men and women.
Another potential explanation for the observed gender disparities in BP control could be a preferential prescription of certain antihypertensive drug classes in men or women. Our analysis shows no major differences in the prescription of certain drug classes. However, significantly less ACE-Is as monotherapy, but more thiazides (monotherapy and combination therapy) and β-blockers (monotherapy) were prescribed in women, data that have been described by other groups.11, 20, 21, 22 These findings might be partly explained by the threefold increased risk of women to develop ACE-inhibitor-related cough or potential beneficial effects of thiazides on bone density in postmenopausal women.23, 24 Furthermore, safety concerns in prescribing ACEs to women of childbearing age might have contributed to the lower number of ACE-inhibitor prescriptions. However, only a small proportion of women aging 18–40 years were included (2.5%), and about two-thirds of women were >60 years old. According to our data, a high proportion of patients (>40%) used non-guideline-recommended dual-combination therapy, the majority β-blockers together with RAS-blocking agents. It can only be speculated, why β-blockers and ACE-Is were the most frequently prescribed combination therapy overall, and why there was a significantly higher prescription rate of this combination in men as compared with women, whereas no such gender difference could be observed for β-blockers and ARBs. However, 28% of men but only 15.2% of women had coronary artery disease, in which β-blockers and ACE-Is are a recommended and inexpensive standard therapy. Furthermore, men had more frequently congestive heart failure, left ventricular hypertrophy and a history of atrial fibrillation, all of which can be effectively treated with β-blockers and ACE-Is.
Our study did not analyse, whether antihypertensive drugs were dosed differently in men and women. However, it has been shown, that women seem to be more prone to develop side effects and might metabolise antihypertensive agents differently, factors that could also have an effect on drug dosing.25 Thus, drug doses might have been lower in women. Furthermore, gender differences in drug response (ability to control BP) might contribute to the lower BP-control rates observed in women. Our data indicate broadly similar BP-control levels in all guideline-recommended dual therapies and supports findings from a recent large analysis in more than 100 000 patients from prospective clinical trials, in which BP reduction appeared to be comparable in men and women, irrespective of drug classes used.6, 26 However, our data have to be interpreted with caution because of the observational design of our study, which did not take into consideration gender differences in patient profiles and BP levels before initiation of antihypertensive treatment in the different patient groups.
In summary, our data from a recent worldwide study in pharmacologically treated hypertensive patients reveal a poorer BP control and a higher pulse pressure in women as compared with men. These differences were because of higher SBP levels in women at the age of ⩾55 years. Gender disparities with regard to SBP levels appeared to be more pronounced in diabetics, and differences in pulse pressure were detected about 10 years earlier than disparities in SBP. Combination therapy was prescribed equally to both men and women and drug response to guideline-recommended dual therapy appeared to be similar, but gender disparities with regard to antihypertensive drug class prescription, drug dosage or drug response could represent potential explanations for our findings. Generally, BP-control rates were low, because only one-third of patients achieved the BP goal. Major efforts are required to improve BP control in both, men and women.
Kearney PM, Whelton M, Reynolds K, Muntner P, Whelton PK, He J . Global burden of hypertension: analysis of worldwide data. Lancet 2005; 365: 217–223.
Bramlage P, Thoenes M, Kirch W, Lenfant C . Clinical practice and recent recommendations in hypertension management—reporting a gap in a global survey of 1259 primary care physicians in 17 countries. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23: 783–791.
Bakris G, Hill M, Mancia G, Steyn K, Black HR, Pickering T et al. Achieving blood pressure goals globally: five core actions for health-care professionals. A worldwide call to action. J Hum Hypertens 2008; 22: 63–70.
Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–1913.
Gueffiyer F, Boutitie F, Boissel JP, Pocock S, Coope J, Cutler J et al. Effect of antihypertensive drug treatment on cardiovascular outcomes in women and men. A metaanalysis of individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. Ann Intern Med 1997; 126: 761–767.
Turnbull F, Woodward M, Neal B, Barzi F, Ninomyya T, Chalmers J et al. Do men and women respond differently to blood pressure-lowering treatment? Results of prospectively designed overviews of randomized trials. Eur Heart J 2008; 29: 2669–2680.
Quan A, Kerlikowske K, Gueffiyer F, Boissel JP, the INDIANA investigators. Efficacy of treating hypertension in women. J Gen Intern Med 1999; 14: 718–729.
Abuful A, Gidron Y, Henkin Y . Physicians’ attitude toward preventive therapy for coronary artery disease: is there a gender bias? Clin Cardiol 2005; 28: 389–393.
Holroyd-Leduc JM, Kapral MK, Austin PC, Tu JV . Sex differences and similarities in the management and outcome of stroke patients. Stroke 2000; 31: 1833–1837.
Wexler DJ, Grant RW, Meigs JB, Nathan DM, Cagliero E . Sex disparities in treatment of cardiac risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 514–520.
Lloyd-Jones DM, Evans JC, Levy D . Hypertension in adults across the spectrum: current outcomes and control in the community. JAMA 2005; 294: 466–472.
Kjeldsen SE, Naditch-Brule L, Perlini S, Zidek W, Farsang C . Increased prevalence of metabolic syndrome in uncontrolled hypertension across Europe: the global cardiometabolic risk profile in patients with hypertension disease survey. J Hypertens 2008; 26: 2064–2070.
Böhm M, Thoenes M, Danchin N, Bramlage P, Lapuerta P, Volpe M . Association of cardiovascular risk factors to microalbuminuria in hypertensive individuals. The i-SEARCH global study. J Hypertens 2007; 25: 2317–2324.
Ong KL, Tso AWK, Lam KSL, Cheung BMY . Gender difference in blood pressure control and cardiovascular risk factors in Americans with diagnosed hypertension. Hypertension 2008; 51: 1142–1148.
Wolf-Maier K, Cooper RS, Kramer H, Banegas JR, Giampaoli S, Joffres MR et al. Hypertension treatment and control in five European countries, Canada, and the United States. Hypertension 2004; 43: 10–17.
Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R . Prospective Studies Collaboration. Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality; a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet 2002; 360: 1903–1913.
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics 2009 Update. A report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 2009; 119: 480–486.
Casiglia E, Tikhonoff V, Mazza A, Piccoli A, Pessina AC . Pulse pressure and coronary mortality in elderly men and women from general population. J Hum Hypertens 2002; 16: 611–620.
Mancia G, Grassi G . Systolic and diastolic blood pressure control in antihypertensive drug trials. J Hypertens 2002; 20: 1461–1464.
Gu Q, Burt VL, Paulose-Ram R, Dillon CF . Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 789–798.
Keyhani S, Scobie JV, Hebert P, McLaughlin MA . Gender disparities in blood pressure control and cardiovascular care in a national sample of ambulatory care visits. Hypertension 2008; 51: 1149–1155.
McInnis NH, Fodor G, Lum-Kwong MM, Leenen FHH . Antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control: a community-based cross-sectional survey (ON-BP). Am J Hypertens 2008; 21: 1210–1215.
Visser LE, Stricker BH, van der Velden J . Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor associated cough: a population-based case-control study. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 851–857.
Bolland MJ, Ames RW, Horne AM . The effect of treatment with thiazide diuretic for 4 years on bone density in normal postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 2007; 18: 479–486.
Taler SJ . Hypertension in women. Curr Hypertens Rep 2009; 11: 23–28.
2003 European Society of Hypertension-European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension. Guidelines Committee. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1001–1053.
This study was funded by a research grant of Sanofi Aventis. MT, MB, MV and BVK received support from Sanofi Aventis. We thank Sam Zhong for the statistical support provided. HRN and MB are supported by a grant of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KFO 196: NE 1460/1-1 and Zentralprojekt).
About this article
Cite this article
Thoenes, M., Neuberger, HR., Volpe, M. et al. Antihypertensive drug therapy and blood pressure control in men and women: an international perspective. J Hum Hypertens 24, 336–344 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2009.76
- blood pressure
- drug usage
Dissociation between reduced pain and arterial blood pressure following epidural spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain: A retrospective study
Clinical Autonomic Research (2021)
Beneficial Effects of a Perindopril/Indapamide Single-Pill Combination in Hypertensive Patients with Diabetes and/or Obesity or Metabolic Syndrome: A Post Hoc Pooled Analysis of Four Observational Studies
Advances in Therapy (2021)
Effectiveness and Adherence to Treatment with Perindopril/Indapamide/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination in a Greek Population with Hypertension
Clinical Drug Investigation (2019)
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention (2018)
The Antihypertensive Efficacy of the Triple Fixed Combination of Perindopril, Indapamide, and Amlodipine: The Results of the PETRA Study
Advances in Therapy (2017)