Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Blood pressure variability and prevalence of hypertension using automated readings from multiple visits to a pharmacy-based community-wide programme

Journal of Human Hypertension volume 23, pages 585–589 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) measurements taken outside the routine office context may be a useful adjunct strategy to monitor BP. Community-based BP data can also provide estimates of the prevalence of elevated BP. We compared multiple readings taken on different days in pharmacies using an automated BpTRU device during a cardiovascular health programme targeting community-dwelling older adults. Mean systolic (S) and diastolic (D) BP values were compared over time using repeated measures analysis of variance for all participants with at least three separate sets of readings (n=317). BP variability was then examined among four subgroups based on report of antihypertensive medication or no treatment, and normal or elevated SBP at the initial visit (< or ⩾140, or 130 if diabetes reported). Prevalence of elevated BP was compared across visits. Overall, mean SBP decreased between visits 1 and 2 (140.4 vs 137.1 mm Hg; P<0.001). Among participants with normal SBP at the initial visit, SBP did not vary significantly, whether or not antihypertensive treatment was reported. Those with initially elevated SBP experienced a significant decrease between visits 1 and 2, also regardless of treatment status. Prevalence of elevated BP decreased from visits 1 to 2 (55.8 vs 48.9%; P=0.026) and from visits 1 to 3 (55.8 vs 42.9%; P<0.001). Analyses of BP data from a community-based programme using an accurate device showed that initial readings may inflate the population estimate of elevated BP. Findings suggest that more than one set of BP readings measured on different occasions are needed, particularly if the first set is elevated.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chambers LW, Kaczorowski J, Levitt C, Karwalajtys T, McDonough B, Lewis J . Blood pressure self-monitoring in pharmacies: building on existing resources. Can Fam Physician 2002; 48: 1594–1595.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan SM, Kaczorowski J, Myers MG, Karwalajtys T, Chambers LW . Use of automated blood pressure measurement to reduce white coat response in a pharmacy setting. Canadian Cardiovascular Congress Canadian Hypertension Society (CCC/CHS). 20 October 2007. Quebec City (Poster).

  3. Roubsanthisuk W, Wongsurin U, Saravich S, Buranakitjaroen P . Blood pressure determination by traditionally trained personnel is less reliable and tends to underestimate the severity of moderate to severe hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12: 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nietert PJ, Wessell AM, Feifer C, Ornstein SM . Effect of terminal digit preference on blood pressure measurement and treatment in primary care. Am J Hypertens 2006; 19: 147–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Myers MG . Automated blood pressure measurement in routine clinical practice. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Beckett L, Godwin M . The BpTRU automatic blood pressure monitor compared to 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in the assessment of blood pressure in patients with hypertension. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2005; 5: 18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mattu G, Perry T, Wright J . Comparison of the oscillometric blood pressure monitor (BPM-100Beta) with the auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6: 153–159.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Graves JW, Nash C, Burger K, Bailey K, Sheps SG . Clinical decision making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17: 823–827.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Culleton B, McKay D, Campbell N . Performance of the automated BpTRU measurement device in the assessment of white-coat hypertension and white-coat effect. Blood Press Monit 2006; 11: 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers LW, Kaczorowski J, Dolovich L, Karwalajtys T, Hall H, McDonough B . A community-based program for cardiovascular health awareness. Can J Public Health 2005; 96: 294–298.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Campbell NR, Conradson HE, Kang J, Brant R, Anderson T . Automated assessment of blood pressure using BpTRU compared with assessments by a trained technician and a clinic nurse. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10: 257–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karwalajtys T, Kaczorowski J, Chambers L, Levitt C, Dolovich L, McDonough B et al. A randomized trial of mail vs telephone invitation to a community-based cardiovascular health awareness program for older family practice patients. BMC Fam Pract 2005; 6: 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Botomino A, Martina B, Ruf D, Bruppacher R, Hersberger KE . White coat effect and white coat hypertension in community pharmacy practice. Blood Press Monit 2005; 10: 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program (SHEP) Cooperative Research Group. Rationale and design of a randomized clinical trial on prevention of stroke in isolated systolic hypertension. J Clin Epidemiol 1988; 41: 1197–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Myers MG, McInnis NH, Fodor GJ, Leenen FHH . Comparison between an automated and manual sphygmomanometer in a population survey. Am J Hypertens 2008; 21 (3): 280–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_05_06/PE.pdf. (section 4.2: Physician protocol). Accessed 12 January 2008.

  17. Report by the Management Committee. The Australian therapeutic trial in mild hypertension. Lancet 1980; 1: 1261–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Millar JA, Isles CG, Lever AF . Blood pressure, ‘white coat’ pressor responses and cardiovascular risk in placebo-group patients of the MRC Mild Hypertension Trial. J Hypertens 1995; 13: 175–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    T Karwalajtys

  2. Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

    J Kaczorowski

  3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    B Hutchison & L Lohfeld

  4. Division of Cardiology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

    M G Myers

  5. Élisabeth Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    S M Sullivan & L W Chambers

Authors
  1. T Karwalajtys
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Kaczorowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B Hutchison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M G Myers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S M Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. L W Chambers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. L Lohfeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T Karwalajtys.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on the Journal of Human Hypertension website (http://www.nature.com/jhh)

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karwalajtys, T., Kaczorowski, J., Hutchison, B. et al. Blood pressure variability and prevalence of hypertension using automated readings from multiple visits to a pharmacy-based community-wide programme. J Hum Hypertens 23, 585–589 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2008.163

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jhh.2008.163

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links