Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Case–control association study of 59 candidate genes reveals the DRD2 SNP rs6277 (C957T) as the only susceptibility factor for schizophrenia in the Bulgarian population

Abstract

The development of molecular psychiatry in the last few decades identified a number of candidate genes that could be associated with schizophrenia. A great number of studies often result with controversial and non-conclusive outputs. However, it was determined that each of the implicated candidates would independently have a minor effect on the susceptibility to that disease. Herein we report results from our replication study for association using 255 Bulgarian patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder and 556 Bulgarian healthy controls. We have selected from the literatures 202 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 59 candidate genes, which previously were implicated in disease susceptibility, and we have genotyped them. Of the 183 SNPs successfully genotyped, only 1 SNP, rs6277 (C957T) in the DRD2 gene (P=0.0010, odds ratio=1.76), was considered to be significantly associated with schizophrenia after the replication study using independent sample sets. Our findings support one of the most widely considered hypotheses for schizophrenia etiology, the dopaminergic hypothesis.

Introduction

Schizophrenia (F20, International Classification of Diseases—10th Revision (ICD X)) is a severe mental illness characterized by the alteration of higher functions, deterioration of behavior, cognition, emotions, motivation and perception, and marked by socio-occupational dysfunction. A wide variety of positive (auditory hallucinations, paranoid delusions), negative (affective flattening, anhedonia, alogia) and cognitive (declined attention, memory) symptoms comprise its diverse clinical heterogeneity, which, together with the lack of decisive laboratory tests, set obstacles for unanimous diagnosis.1 Typically, the onset in male patients is in young adulthood, between 15 and 25 years, and in women it emerges about a decade later.2 The lifetime incidence of schizophrenia is estimated to be about 1% worldwide, with untypical rates among certain groups of the society.2 In DSM-IV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision, 2000), the criteria of schizoaffective disorder (F25, ICD X) include both characteristic schizophrenia symptoms (generally hallucinations or delusions) and affective symptoms (manic, depressive or mixed), which can be observed during the same episode of the illness, although during some periods the psychotic symptoms can be observed independently from prominent mood disorder features. Similar to schizophrenia, the onset of schizoaffective disorder is also usually in early adulthood, but it is more common in women than in men.3

The high heritability of schizophrenia was estimated to be about 80% and its complex (non-Mendelian) mode of transmission was suspected through the abundance of data from family, twin and adoption studies.1, 4 It was also suggested that the disorder is a result of the complicated additive interaction between multiple genes, each having a small effect.2, 5, 6 The multifactorial polygenic threshold model, sustained by a number of linkage and association studies, proposes that both genetic background and environmental factors, including infections, stress and trauma, are necessary for triggering schizophrenia.4, 5 The case–control association studies have been proven to be a more appropriate method for detection of genes with small effect, compared with linkage studies, as they allow recognition of relatively small differences if the sample size and the selection criteria are adequate.1, 7

Several hypotheses concerning the etiology of schizophrenia have been proposed, and most of them have focused on the alterations during neuronal development.8 According to the developmental model, various prenatal and perinatal noxae cause formation of inappropriate synaptic contacts, irregular cell signaling and migration during the fetal period in brain areas important for development of integration in the society. Such maldevelopment does not interfere with the basic brain functioning in the early years, but expresses itself when the subject is stressed by demands for integration in young adulthood.9, 10

The biochemical models are based on alterations in the neurotransmitter pathways supported by the effect of some of the antipsychotic medicaments that block certain receptors in the brain. The classical dopaminergic hypothesis asserts that the excessive dopaminergic signaling causes the psychotic symptoms, and is a result of increased sensitivity and density of dopamine D2 receptors in some brain regions.2, 11 Similar are the serotonin, glutamate and other metabolic hypotheses, but none of them can sufficiently explain the complex symptoms of schizophrenia, and it is still unclear whether the affection of those circuits is a consequence of the treatment and years of persistency, rather than a cause for the disease.1, 2

Despite the incontestable significance of the genetic background of schizophrenia and great efforts in a large number of studies to clarify it, none of the candidates suspected to be involved in the pathogenesis was conclusively confirmed. To date, there are still no causative genes that are commonly accepted, even though some candidates were replicated in different studies and seemed to be promising.12 Population heterogeneity, phenotypic heterogeneity, interweaving diagnostic criteria and misclassification, overestimated risk in the initial study, small sample size, influence of multiple loci (causal heterogeneity) and genetic–environmental interactions are among the indicated causes for the failure of replication of association studies.5, 7, 12, 13 Some of the strongest causative candidates to date are considered to be DISC1, DTNBP1, COMT, NRG1 and RGS4.

The aim of this study was to research the association between the common genetic variants in candidate genes, recently reported in the literature, and schizophrenia in an independent collective group from Bulgarian patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, who differ in their genetic background from patients analyzed in other studies.

Materials and methods

Subjects

In this study, we have collected 811 unrelated Caucasians from Bulgaria, namely 198 patients with schizophrenia, 57 with schizoaffective disorder and 556 unrelated healthy control individuals. Samples from patients with schizophrenia (paranoid form) or schizoaffective disorder were recruited at four regional University psychiatric clinics—1st Psychiatric Dispensary of Sofia, Psychiatric Dispensary of Plovdiv, Psychiatric Dispensary of Blagoevgrad, and Psychiatric Dispensary of Radnevo. The patients were examined and diagnosed, according to the criteria of the DSM-IV, by two psychiatrists independently. The psychiatrists conducted interviews and provided written information to the participants. A written informed consent form was signed before the collection of blood samples. The identity of the patients was known only by the interviewing psychiatrists and by the head of the corresponding psychiatric clinic. All samples and accompanying information (age, gender, severity and length of affection) were identified only by a unique code. All patients were on antipsychotic therapy. The mean age of the patients was 45.3 years (range: 23–81; s.d.±10.9) and the mean age of disease onset was 26.9 years (range: 13–52; s.d.±8.4). Of the 255 affected patients, 124 (49%) were males and 131 (51%) were females.

The control samples were collected from healthy volunteers in Bulgaria, who have provided written informed consents as well. This group included 289 (52%) males and 267 (48%) females, with an average age of 50.5 years (range: 18–86; s.d.±16.0). Each individual of the control group was interviewed by a physician so that any psychiatric disorder could be excluded, and data on their general medical history and information about their age, gender and ethnos were obtained. Ethical approvals for conducting the study were obtained from the Ethical Committees in the SNP Research Center (present name: Center for Genomic Medicine), Yokohama Institute, The Institutes of Physical and Chemical Research (RIKEN, Yokohama, Japan) and the Local Medical Ethic Committees from each of the participating institutions.

DNA sampling

DNA was extracted from the peripheral venous blood (30 ml) and was stored in the DNA Bank at the Department of Medical Genetics (Medical Faculty, Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria). Each tube was marked with a unique identification code. The DNAs were extracted by a standard phenol–chloroform procedure and stored at −20 °C before their transportation to Japan, where the genotyping was performed.

Genotyping

A total of 64 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from 25 genes were determined with commercially available pre-designed TaqMan probes and primers by means of the GeneAmp PCR System 9700 from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The genotypes were determined by an ABI PRISM 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The remaining 119 SNPs were genotyped by a combined Multiplex PCR and Invader assay, as described elsewhere.14

Gene and SNP selection

A total of 59 candidate genes from 18 chromosomes were selected if they met at least one of the following criteria: evidence for positive association with schizophrenia from previous case–control or family-based studies; positional candidates—located in some of the most promising candidate regions from genome-wide scans and large-scale studies of schizophrenia; or functional candidates—plausible involvement in the disease pathogenesis consistent with the neurodevelopment and biochemical (neurotransmitter and cell signaling) etiological models. Some candidate genes were excluded when most of their previously reported markers were already examined in Bulgarian trios in earlier studies.

We have selected 202 candidate SNPs from 59 candidate genes according to the public information in NCBI (Builds 35 and 36), the Schizophrenia Research Forum (http://www.schizophreniaforum.org) and the literatures. Most of the SNPs had minor allele frequencies of >0.05, although exceptions were made for non-synonymous SNPs with an unknown frequency from genes of interest as well as from six SNPs with minor allele frequencies of <0.05 showing an association in Caucasian studies. For some genes (DISC1, DTNBP1, RGS4, GABRB2, ERBB4 and ERBB3), we have selected additional non-synonymous SNPs, and polymorphisms at the 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions with presumptive effect over the transcriptional level. Detailed information about genotyped SNPs is illustrated in Table 1.

Table 1 Candidate genes and SNPs successfully genotyped in the first screening for association with schizophrenia

Statistical analyses

Genotype and allele frequencies were evaluated by using the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test in allelic, dominant- and recessive-inheritance models. Deviations from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium were evaluated by the HAPLOVIEW 4.0 program (Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard).

Results

This study was performed in two subsequent screenings. In the first screening, all selected candidate SNPs were genotyped in 185 cases and 184 controls collected in three major psychiatric centers in Bulgaria. During the first screening, additional samples for verification were collected from the dispensary in Radnevo. All SNPs showing a P-value of <0.05 in the two-tailed Fisher’s exact test in the first screening proceeded to the second screening. Three SNPs (two from DISC1 and one from DTNBP1 genes) showed deviation from the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium in the case group and were excluded from further analysis. Six SNPs (two from the ERBB3 gene and four from the ERBB4 gene) were found to be monomorphic in this population.

The genotyping in the initial set of samples identified 21 SNPs as possible candidates for susceptibility for schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder with a P-value of <0.05 by Fisher’s exact test. Subsequently, these 21 variants were genotyped in an additional 70 case samples from Bulgarian patients with schizophrenia and 372 Bulgarian control samples. Two polymorphisms—rs2255340 from DISC1 gene and rs909706 from DTNBP1 gene—were included in the follow-up screening, because some trend for association was considered in the initial genotyping and because those two candidates were suggested to be important functional candidates in previous studies. Probably because of the small sample size of the additional independent case group, only one SNP (rs6277) from the DRD2 gene revealed a positive association (P=0.00067, Table 2). The SNP remained significantly associated with schizophrenia after the adjustment for multiple testing, according to strict Bonferroni’s correction. These data, together with the negligible discrepancies of the allele and genotype frequencies with previous studies in Caucasian populations: Northern European populations living in Australia, Spain, Finland and Russia,15, 16, 17, 18 support the association of DRD2 with schizophrenia.

Table 2 Genotyping results for 21 SNPs after the first and the second screening

Discussion

We have performed a case–control association study for schizophrenia in the Bulgarian population using 183 SNPs present in 59 candidate genes, the implication of which in the disease etiology had been previously reported. We have successfully assessed 180 SNPs in a group of 185 cases and 184 controls, and selected 21 SNPs from 15 genes to be possible candidates for the association (P<0.05). Later, we managed to obtain additional sets and performed adjustments for multiple testing, according to strict Bonferroni’s correction. Finally, we implied that the marker, rs6277 (DRD2), preserved statistical significance for association with schizophrenia/schizoaffective disorder. We could replicate only rs6277 (corrected P-value of 0.014). However, the previously reported markers were not replicated, either because of the limitations in the number of patients and controls (lack of the power) or because of false-positive results in papers reported earlier.

Neurotransmitters have been considered to be involved in the development of schizophrenia in the past. Dysfunction of the dopaminergic pathway in its pathogenesis has been extensively discussed in the literature for the last few decades. The classical dopaminergic hypothesis remains one of the most commonly acknowledged hypotheses, although it still remains unclear whether the observed alterations are causal or result from long-term treatment with antipsychotic medications. It postulates that psychotic symptoms are a consequence of dopamine excess in specific brain regions (particularly in the mesolimbic and nigrostriatal areas).2 Postmortem and in vivo neuroimaging studies indicate increased dopamine D2 receptor density and binding affinity in the striatum of schizophrenic patients.11, 19, 20 Enhanced expression of DRD2 in the caudate nucleus was implicated in the cognitive dysfunction of affected individuals.2 Furthermore, common antipsychotic medications are capable of affecting the positive symptoms of the disease2 as a result of antagonistic or partially agonistic interactions with the dopamine D2 receptor, whereas dopamine agonists, such as amphetamines, provoke schizophrenia-like psychosis.2, 11, 21

The dopamine receptor genes comprise a large superfamily that encodes G-protein-coupled receptors important for regulation of some higher functions, such as locomotion, cognition and emotions.22, 23, 24 Five human dopamine receptors are described and classified into two major groups, dopamine 1-like (D1) and dopamine 2-like (D2), in accordance with their transcriptional and pharmacological properties.25 The dopamine D2 receptors (DRD2) are abundant on the postsynaptic membranes in the mesocortical pathway,26 implicated in the control of the feelings of reward and pleasure. At least two different isoforms of the protein exist as a result of alternative splicing of exon 6.23, 27

Several case–control association studies have been performed to evaluate the likely contribution of variants in the DRD2 gene to schizophrenia susceptibility. Positive results for the association between the A allele of the TaqI A polymorphism (rs1800497) and schizophrenia were discovered by case–control studies in few independent groups, where an overtransmission of certain haplotypes, including the TaqI A2 allele, was observed.28, 29 After Itokawa et al.30 focused on the implication of the Ser311Cys polymorphism, Arinami et al.31 were the first to describe a positive association between this non-synonymous SNP of the Dopamine D2 receptor gene and schizophrenia. However, over 20 subsequent studies attempted to elucidate this variant’s contribution to the disorder and most of them failed to reveal that correlation. Comprehensive meta-analyses suggested a weak but positive effect of the Cys allele as the risk factor for susceptibility to schizophrenia (P=0.007)32, 33 In another study, Arinami et al.34 reported a positive association for another DRD2 gene polymorphism, −141C (Ins/Del), which became one of the most commonly tested in the quest for susceptibility variants. In an attempt to replicate these data, several case–control studies and meta-analyses were conducted, with controversial results.2, 35

Our results in the Bulgarian sample group (Table 2) are consistent with the previous reports by other researchers on the positive association between the synonymous C957T (rs6277) polymorphism and schizophrenia, in different Caucasian populations.15, 16, 17, 18 In our study, the G allele (allele 2), which corresponds to the C allele in the single nucleotide polymorphism database (dbSNP) and the literature, was identified as the risk allele. After the initial study by Lawford et al.,17 reporting association of rs6277 in the Australian (Caucasian) population, three subsequent studies confirmed significantly higher frequencies of the C allele and the C/C genotype in patients with schizophrenia who were of European descent (in the Finnish,15 Spanish16 and Russian18 populations). However, a case–control study using subjects from India failed to confirm the positive relation with schizophrenia, although some tendency for association was seen.36 Furthermore, the results of two meta-analyses, including the data from all five studies18 or those from Caucasian populations,37 found a nominally significant association of the C allele and the C/C genotype with schizophrenia with pooled allelic odds ratios (ORs) of 1.42 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.26–1.61)18 and 1.45 (95% CI: 1.21–1.73],37 and summary OR for the genotype of 1.60 (95%CI 1.32–1.95).18 As all positive associations were found in populations from European descent, ancestry-specific effect must be taken into consideration, and the genetic effect of this variant across populations with different ancestral descents must be evaluated.37

Our findings have provided additional evidence for the importance of variants in the DRD2 genes for the vulnerability to schizophrenia. Despite rs6277 being a synonymous polymorphism causing no amino acid substitution (Pro319Pro), it was reported to cause some effect on the gene expression in an in vitro assay, suggesting that the 957T variant significantly affects the stability and the expression level of the DRD2 mRNA.15, 17, 23

Recent in vivo study in healthy volunteers discovered a correlation between the C957T polymorphic variants and the intrasynaptic dopamine levels and D2 receptor-binding affinity in the striatum. In support of the dopaminergic hypothesis for the etiology of schizophrenia, the highest binding potential of the receptor was found in the C/C homozygotes, whereas the T/T homozygotes showed the lowest affinity.15, 17, 38 Furthermore, C957T showed a population attributable risk for schizophrenia of 24% and an attributable risk in patients with schizophrenia of 42%.17

In summary, our findings further suggest that DRD2 may play an important, but most probably not independent, role in the pathogenesis of schizophrenia in the Bulgarian population. Previous genetic and functional studies point out this gene as a possible candidate for implication in schizophrenia etiology. Although the association of NOTCH4, DISC1, DTNBP1, RGS4 and other highly putative candidate genes was not confirmed after the statistical evaluation, we observed some tendency for association with schizophrenia in the Bulgarian population. Hence, these genes should be further evaluated using a larger set of samples.

References

  1. 1

    Owen, M. J., Williams, N. M. & O’Donovan, M. C. The molecular genetics of schizophrenia: new findings promise new insights. Mol. Psychiatry 9, 14–27 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Lang, U. E., Puls, I., Muller, D. J., Strutz-Seebohm, N. & Gallinat, J. Molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 20, 687–702 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Lake, C. R. & Hurwitz, N. Schizoaffective disorders are psychotic mood disorders; there are no schizoaffective disorders. Psychiatry Res. 143, 255–287 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Sullivan, P. F. The genetics of schizophrenia. PLoS Med. 2, e212 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Riley, B. & Kendler, K. S. Molecular genetic studies of schizophrenia. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 14, 669–680 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Harrison, P. J. & Owen, M. J. Genes for schizophrenia? Recent findings and their pathophysiological implications. Lancet 361, 417–419 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Costas, J., Torres, M., Cristobo, I., Phillips, C. & Carracedo, A. Relative efficiency of the linkage disequilibrium mapping approach in detecting candidate genes for schizophrenia in different European populations. Genomics 86, 280–286 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Rapoport, J. L., Addington, A. M., Frangou, S. & Psych, M. R. The neurodevelopmental model of schizophrenia: update 2005. Mol. Psychiatry 10, 434–449 (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Moises, H. W., Zoega, T. & Gottesman, I. I. The glial growth factors deficiency and synaptic destabilization hypothesis of schizophrenia. BMC Psychiatry 2, 8 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Thome, J., Foley, P. & Riederer, P. Neurotrophic factors and the maldevelopmental hypothesis of schizophrenic psychoses. Review article. J. Neural. Transm. 105, 85–100 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Seeman, P., Guan, H. C., Nobrega, J., Jiwa, D., Markstein, R., Balk, J. H. et al. Dopamine D2-like sites in schizophrenia, but not in Alzheimer's, Huntington's, or control brains, for [3H]benzquinoline. Synapse 25, 137–146 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Talkowski, M. E., Seltman, H., Bassett, A. S., Brzustowicz, L. M., Chen, X., Chowdari, K. V. et al. Evaluation of a susceptibility gene for schizophrenia: genotype based meta-analysis of RGS4 polymorphisms from thirteen independent samples. Biol. Psychiatry 60, 152–162 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Glatt, S. J., Wang, R. S., Yeh, Y. C., Tsuang, M. T. & Faraone, S. V. Five NOTCH4 polymorphisms show weak evidence for association with schizophrenia: evidence from meta-analyses. Schizophr. Res. 73, 281–290 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Ohnishi, Y., Tanaka, T, Ozaki, K, Yamada, R, Suzuki, H & Nakamura, Y. A high-throughput SNP typing system for genome-wide association studies. J. Hum. Genet. 46, 471–477 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Hanninen, K., Katila, H., Kampman, O., Anttila, S., Illi, A., Rontu, R. et al. Association between the C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor gene and schizophrenia. Neurosci. Lett. 407, 195–198 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Hoenicka, J., Aragüés, M., Rodríguez-Jiménez, R., Ponce, G., Martínez, I., Rubio, G. et al. C957T DRD2 polymorphism is associated with schizophrenia in Spanish patients. Acta. Psychiatr. Scand. 114, 435–738 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Lawford, B. R., Young, R. M., Swagell, C. D., Barnes, M., Burton, S. C., Ward, W. K. et al. The C/C genotype of the C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor is associated with schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 73, 31–37 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Monakhov, M., Golimbet, V., Abramova, L., Kaleda, V. & Karpov, V. Association study of three polymorphisms in the dopamine D2 receptor gene and schizophrenia in the Russian population. Schizophr. Res. 100, 302–307 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Seeman, P. & Kapur, S. Schizophrenia: more dopamine, more D2 receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7673–7675 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Zakzanis, K. K. & Hansen, K. T. Dopamine D2 densities and the schizophrenic brain. Schizophr. Res. 32, 201–206 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Miyamoto, S., Snouwaert, J. N., Koller, B. H., Moy, S. S., Lieberman, J. A., Duncan, G. E. et al. Amphetamine-induced Fos is reduced in limbic cortical regions but not in the caudate or accumbens in a genetic model of NMDA receptor hypofunction. Neuropsychopharmacology 29, 2180–2188 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Cravchik, A., Sibley, D. R. & Gejman, P. V. Functional analysis of the human D2 dopamine receptor missense variants. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 26013–26017 (1996).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Duan, J., Wainwright, M. S., Comeron, J. M., Saitou, N., Sanders, A. R., Gelernter, J. et al. Synonymous mutations in the human dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) affect mRNA stability and synthesis of the receptor. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12, 205–216 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Seeman, P. & Van Tol, H. H. Dopamine receptor pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 15, 264–270 (1994).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Sibley, D. R. & Monsma, F. J. Jr Molecular biology of dopamine receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 13, 61–69 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Neville, M. J., Johnstone, E. C. & Walton, R. T. Identification and characterization of ANKK1: a novel kinase gene closely linked to DRD2 on chromosome band 11q23.1. Hum. Mutat. 23, 540–545 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Usiello, A., Baik, J. H., Rougé-Pont, F., Picetti, R., Dierich, A., LeMeur, M. et al. Distinct functions of the two isoforms of dopamine D2 receptors. Nature 408, 199–203 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Dubertret, C., Gouya, L., Hanoun, N., Deybach, J. C., Adès, J., Hamon, M. et al. The 3′ region of the DRD2 gene is involved in genetic susceptibility to schizophrenia. Schizophr. Res. 67, 75–85 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Suzuki, A., Kondo, T., Mihara, K., Furukori, H., Nagashima, U., Ono, S. et al. Association between Taq1 a dopamine D2 receptor polymorphism and psychopathology of schizophrenia in Japanese patients. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 24, 1105–1113 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Itokawa, M., Arinami, T., Futamura, N., Hamaguchi, H. & Toru, M. A structural polymorphism of human dopamine D2 receptor, D2(Ser311 → Cys). Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 196, 1369–1375 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Arinami, T., Itokawa, M., Enguchi, H., Tagaya, H., Yano, S., Shimizu, H. et al. Association of dopamine D2 receptor molecular variant with schizophrenia. Lancet 343, 703–704 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Glatt, S. J., Faraone, S. V. & Tsuang, M. T. Meta-analysis identifies an association between the dopamine D2 receptor gene and schizophrenia. Mol. Psychiatry 8, 911–915 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Glatt, S. J. & Jonsson, E. G. The Cys allele of the DRD2 Ser311Cys polymorphism has a dominant effect on risk for schizophrenia: evidence from fixed- and random-effects meta-analyses. Am. J. Med. Genet B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 141, 149–154 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Arinami, T., Gao, M., Hamaguchi, H. & Toru, M. A functional polymorphism in the promoter region of the dopamine D2 receptor gene is associated with schizophrenia. Hum. Mol. Genet. 6, 577–582 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Glatt, S. J., Faraone, S. V. & Tsuang, M. T. DRD2 -141C insertion/deletion polymorphism is not associated with schizophrenia: results of a meta-analysis. Am. J. Med. Genet. B Neuropsychiatr. Genet. 128, 21–23 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Kukreti, R., Tripathi, S., Bhatnagar, P., Gupta, S., Chauhan, C., Kubendran, S. et al. Association of DRD2 gene variant with schizophrenia. Neurosci. Lett. 392, 68–71 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Allen, N. C., Bagade, S., McQueen, M. B., Ioannidis, J. P., Kavvoura, F. K., Khoury, M. J. et al. Systematic meta-analyses and field synopsis of genetic association studies in schizophrenia: the SzGene database. Nat. Genet. 40, 827–834 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Hirvonen, M., Laakso, A., Någren, K., Rinne, J. O., Pohjalainen, T. & Hietala, J. C957T polymorphism of the dopamine D2 receptor (DRD2) gene affects striatal DRD2 availability in vivo. Mol. Psychiatry 9, 1060–1061 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all members of the SNP Research Center (The Institute of Physical and Chemical Research) for their contribution to the completion of our study. We thank all patients, their families and all the healthy volunteers for their generous participation in this project. We are also grateful to the doctors from all the participating clinics in Bulgaria.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Nakamura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Betcheva, E., Mushiroda, T., Takahashi, A. et al. Case–control association study of 59 candidate genes reveals the DRD2 SNP rs6277 (C957T) as the only susceptibility factor for schizophrenia in the Bulgarian population. J Hum Genet 54, 98–107 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2008.14

Download citation

Keywords

  • Bulgarian population
  • case–control study
  • DRD2
  • schizophrenia
  • SNP

Further reading

Search

Quick links