Abstract
In the most recent Health Risk and Exposure Assessment (HREA) for Ozone, the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) used an exposure–response function estimated on clinical data to calculate the risk of lung function decrements in a series of population-level simulations. These risk estimates are subject to both statistical uncertainty (which arises because the exposure–response function was estimated on a sample of clinical observations) and model uncertainty (which arises because there are different plausible ways to model the relationship between ozone exposure and lung function decrement). In this paper, we describe and apply an approach that allows us to estimate the statistical uncertainty present in these risk estimates. In the example we consider, statistical uncertainty produces 95% confidence intervals on the risk estimates that in some cases include zero, suggesting that in these cases we cannot exclude the possibility of no health risk to lung function owing to ozone exposure. Model uncertainty is also apparent, with a plausible alternative model specification leading to a substantially different distribution of risk.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 6 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $43.17 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
US EPA. Health Risk and Exposure Assessment for Ozone (Final Report). EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2014a, EPA-452/R-14-004a.
US EPA. Total Risk Integrated Methodology (TRIM) - Air Pollutants Exposure Model Documentation (TRIM.Expo / APEX, Version 4.5) Volume I: User’s Guide. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2012a, EPA-452/B-12-001a.
US EPA. Total Risk Integrated Methodology (TRIM) - Air Pollutants Exposure Model Documentation (TRIM.Expo / APEX, Version 4.5) Volume II: Technical Support Document. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2012b, EPA-452/B-12-001b.
McDonnell WF, Stewart PW, Smith MV, Kim CS, Schelegle ES . Prediction of lung function response for populations exposed to a wide range of ozone conditions. Inhal Toxicol 2012; 24: 619–633.
US EPA. Health Risk and Exposure Assessment for Ozone (Final Report), Chapter 6 Appendices. EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards: Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. 2014b, EPA-452/R-14-004d.
Smith AE, Gans W . Enhancing the characterization of epistemic uncertainties in PM2.5 risk analyses. Risk Anal 2015; 35: 361–378.
Krinsky I, Robb AL . On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities. Rev Econ Stat 1986; 68: 715–719.
Krinsky I, Robb AL . On approximating the statistical properties of elasticities: a correction. Rev Econ Stat 1990; 72: 189–190.
Cameron AC, Trivedi PK . Microeconomics: Methods and Applications. Cambridge University Press: New York, USA. 2005, 1034 pp.
McDonnell WF, Stewart PW, Smith MV . Ozone exposure-response model for lung function changes: an alternate variability structure. Inhal Toxicol 2013; 25: 348–353.
Acknowledgements
An earlier version of this work was conducted with funding from the American Petroleum Institute. We thank Will Ollison for helpful comments on an earlier draft of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Glasgow, G., Smith, A. Uncertainty in the estimated risk of lung function decrements owing to ozone exposure. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 27, 535–538 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.39
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jes.2016.39