Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Microbial Ecology and Functional Diversity of Natural Habitats

Molecular characterization of the spatial diversity and novel lineages of mycoplankton in Hawaiian coastal waters

Abstract

Microbial community diversity and composition have critical biogeochemical roles in the functioning of marine ecosystems. Large populations of planktonic fungi exist in coastal ocean waters, yet their diversity and role in carbon and nutrient cycling remain largely unknown. Lack of information on critical functional microbial groups limits our understanding of their ecological roles in coastal oceans and hence our understanding of its functioning in the ocean's carbon and nutrient cycles. To address this gap, this study applied the molecular approach denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) coupled with clone library construction to investigate mycoplankton communities in Hawaiian coastal waters. Mycoplankton communities displayed distinct lateral and vertical variations in diversity and composition. Compared with the open ocean, surface (<100 m) near-shore waters had the greatest diversity and species richness of mycoplankton, whereas no differences were found among stations at depths below 150 m. Vertical diversity profiles in the coastal waters suggested that diversity and species richness were positively correlated to phytoplankton biomass in the coastal waters, but not in offshore waters. A total of 46 species were identified and belonging to two phyla Basidiomycota and Ascomycota, with the basidiomycetes as the dominant group (n=42). The majority (n=27) of the basidiomycetes are novel phylotypes showing less than 98% identity in the 18S rRNA gene with any sequence in GenBank. This study provides insight into mycoplankton ecology and is the first molecular analysis of planktonic fungi in the oceans.

Introduction

Microbial community diversity and composition have critical biogeochemical roles in the functioning of marine ecosystems. Recent advances in molecular techniques and ecological genomics have greatly advanced our understanding of the processes mediated by bacteria and archaea in the oceans, particularly in carbon and nutrient cycles. As one of the most variable marine habitats, coastal waters are generally characterized by a high biodiversity and high primary production (Jickells, 1998; Danovaro and Pusceddu, 2007). The primary production of the coastal waters often exceeds the consumption of herbivores, and therefore, a large fraction of primary organic matter becomes available to consumers as detritus (Newell, 1982). A large fraction of this detritus is degraded by heterotrophic microbes before entering higher trophic levels (Manini et al., 2003; Pusceddu et al., 2003). Heterotrophic bacteria and archaea are known to have a large role in this degradation, export and storage of organic matter in the coastal oceans (Moran and Miller, 2007; Mou et al., 2008). Although large populations of heterotrophic eukaryotes are well-documented in coastal waters, their diversity and function in carbon and nutrient cycles remain largely unexplored (Giovannoni and Stingl, 2005; Hallam et al., 2006; Fenchel, 2008; Strom, 2008).

Fungi have long been known to exist in the world's oceans. Although the populations of planktonic fungi in coastal waters can be quite large, their diversity and function in biogeochemical cycling remain largely unknown. Nevertheless, they fulfill a wide range of important ecological functions, particularly those associated with the decomposition of organic matter, nutrient and carbon cycling and biodegradation of hydrocarbons in both marine and terrestrial habitats (Christensen, 1989; Pang and Mitchell, 2005). Much of what is known regarding the fungal diversity and functioning in marine environments is based on the data derived from marine substrata (for example, wood, mangroves and sands) using culture-based techniques (Kis-Papo, 2005; Pang and Mitchell, 2005; Vogel et al., 2007). These methods detect only a small fraction of fungal communities, and hence, their results provide only a selective and invariably biased window on diversity (Wang et al., 2008b). Of an estimated 10 000 marine fungal species, only about 5% of them have been described (Kis-Papo, 2005). Recently, substantial advances have been made in our understanding of the fungal community ecology in natural environments through the application of molecular techniques, including clone library construction (Borneman and Hartin, 2000), automated rRNA intergenic space analysis (Ranjard et al., 2001), terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (Lord et al., 2002) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) (May et al., 2001; Smit et al., 2003). DGGE coupled with clone library construction has been shown to be an efficient molecular approach to study fungal communities in diverse terrestrial environments (May et al., 2001; Anderson et al., 2003; Smit et al., 2003; Anderson and Cairney, 2004; Arenz et al., 2006; Artz et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2008b). However, none of these molecular methods has been used to explore mycoplankton (that is, planktonic aquatic fungi) communities.

Two types of food chains, namely the classical grazing food chain and the microbial food chain, dominate the flow of elements and energy in ocean ecosystems (Wang, 2002). Microbes salvage organic materials such as phytoplankton exudates and phyto-/zoodetritus from the grazing food chain (Pomeroy and Wiebe, 1993). The large pool of dissolved organic carbon at the base of the microbial food chain has been thought to be primarily used by bacterioplankton (Sherr and Sherr, 1987). However, several lines of evidence suggest that mycoplankton can also use dissolved organic carbon and contribute to secondary production in the microbial food web as well (Kimura and Naganuma, 2001; Kimura et al., 2001). A typical milliliter of seawater contains from 103 to 104 fungal cells (Kubanek et al., 2003). Coastal waters may contain much larger mycoplankton populations because these waters contain significant fungal and nutritional inputs from terrestrial sources (Kimura et al., 1999, 2001; Vogel et al., 2007). However, mycoplankton diversity in coastal oceans remains largely uncharacterized. In this study, we used molecular methods to explore planktonic fungal communities and present the first molecular analysis of the diversity of fungal communities in the Hawaiian coastal waters.

Materials and methods

Oceanographic sampling and environmental data

To evaluate spatial variability in mycoplankton structure in the Hawaiian coastal waters, samples were collected along a shipboard sampling transect on the northeast side of the island of Oahu (Hawaii) (Figure 1) on a cruise aboard the R/V Kilo Moana in January 2007. Water samples were collected from six depths (5, 15, 50, 100, 150 and 200 m) with 12-l polyvinyl chloride bottles attached to a Sea Bird CTD rosette sampler. Vertical profiles of water temperature, salinity, dissolved oxygen and fluorescence were monitored at each sampling site using the corresponding sensors, meters or probes equipped on the CTD sampler. Chlorophyll-a concentration was measured using the method described by Holm-Hansen and Riemann (1978) and Welschmeyer (1994).

Figure 1
figure 1

CTD sampling sites at the windward of the island of Oahu during the cruise of R/V Kilo Moana in January 2007.

Nucleic acid extraction and DGGE analysis

Seawater samples were filtered through 0.2-μm of polycarbonate filters. Filters for DNA extraction were stored at −80 °C until further processing. Total genomic DNA was extracted from the filters using the FastDNA kit (Qbiogene, Irvine, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. All PCRs for DGGE analysis were performed using the Expand High Fidelity PCR System (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA) according to the manufacturer's instruction. Genomic DNA extracted from water samples was used as a PCR template for the amplification of the small subunit rRNA gene using the nested PCR approach following the procedure described by Gao et al. (2008), based on Kowalchuk et al (1997). All PCR applications were performed in 50 μl reactions for 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 1 min and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min. PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV transillumination. PCR products from three separate amplification reactions were precipitated using ethanol to clean the product and to increase DNA concentrations.

DGGE analysis was performed using a model DGGE-2001 electrophoresis system (CBS Scientific Company Inc., CA, USA) with a denaturing gradient of 30–70% in a 7.5% polyacrylamide gel, following the manufacturer's instructions. The gel was made from 12 ml of 0% denaturing solution (2 ml of 50 × TAE, 18.8 ml of 40% Acrylamide/Bis-acrylamide (37.5:1) and 79.2 ml of water) and 12 ml of 100% denaturing solution (2 ml of 50 × TAE, 18.8 ml of 40% polyacrylamide solution, 40 ml of formamide, and 42 g of urea) using a GM-40 Gradient Maker according to the manufacturer's instructions. Before casting, 80 μl of ammonium persulfate (APS) and 6 μl of TEMED were added to each solution. PCR products were mixed with 1/3 volume of 10 × sucrose loading buffer, and DNA fragments were separated for 16 h at 100 V and 60 °C. The gel was stained for 20 min with ethidium bromide and documented using a UV transillumination and VisiDoc-It imaging systems (UVP).

Individual bands were stabbed with pipette tips and each stab was placed into 0.5-ml microcentrifuge tubes with 20 μl sterile water. The tubes were vortexed vigorously and incubated overnight at 4 °C. PCR amplifications were carried out using 1 μl of the DNA eluted from the bands and the corresponding regular (non-GC-clamped) primers of these bands for 30 cycles as described previously. Again, PCR products were separated on a 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV transillumination. The correctly sized products were cloned into pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) before being transformed into E. coli cells. Clones derived from individual bands were treated as a mini clone library. The plasmid carrying inserts of correct size were sequenced using the T7 or SP6 primers. Sequences obtained in this study were available at the GenBank under accession numbers FJ889078–FJ889125.

Sequence, phylogenetic and statistical analysis

Plasmids were sequenced at the University of Hawaii DNA Core Sequencing Facility on an Applied Biosystems 3730 automated DNA sequencer. Sequences were edited with Chromas Lite, version 2 (Technelysium). Sequence identifications were determined using the BLAST (National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI); http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ on 15 January 2009). All clone sequences with 99% sequence identity were assigned into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) using the software package DOTUR (Schloss and Handelsman, 2005) and were considered to represent the same species, based on the definitions used in other studies of ITS–rRNA in fungi (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998; Landeweert et al., 2003; Lynch and Thorn, 2006). Each of the fungal 18S rRNA sequences from each species and the matched sequences from GenBank were aligned with BioEdit, version 7.0.5.3 (Hall, 1999). The aligned sequences were imported into PAUP* 4.0b10 (Swofford, 2002). Neighbor-joining trees were estimated based on pairwise genetic distances on the basis of all substitutions with the Jukes–Cantor distance parameter. The robustness of the branching patterns was assessed by bootstrap resampling of the data sets with 1000 replications. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) and probability values (P) were calculated to check for colinearity between band number and the measured environmental variables using CORR program in the SAS software package.

Results

DGGE band pattern analysis

DGGE analysis of PCR products amplified from water samples collected at two sites (1 and 4) indicated that band patterns of mycoplankton communities varied at different depths of the same site and the same depth of two different sites (Figures 2a-b). More bands were detected in samples from surface waters (0 to 100 m) at site 1 than those from corresponding depths of site 4, suggesting that more diverse fungal communities are present at these depths in the coastal waters than those in the open ocean. No difference in band numbers was observed in deeper samples (greater than 150 m) at either site. As the depth increased, DGGE band numbers of water samples from site 1 increased and reached the maximum at a depth of 50 m (16 bands) and then declined. However, for the site 4, the highest band number was detected in the 150-m sample (11 bands) and the second highest from 5 m (10 bands). Therefore, band pattern analysis suggested that the vertical profiles of mycoplankton communities in the coastal water (site 1) and open-ocean water (site 4) differed dramatically, with more diverse mycoplankton in the coastal water than those in open-ocean waters at depths of 100 m. No diversity difference was observed in waters from depths >150 m at both sites. Two common bands (A and B) were found in samples from all depths of site 1 whereas three bands (C, D and E) were detected only in top 3 depths. In contrast, although 4 bands (F, G, H and I) were detected in samples from more than one sample, no common bands were detected in samples collected from site 4. This difference may result from differential mixing and/or nutrients at the two sites. Finally, composition of mycoplankton communities at site 1 displayed less variation across the vertical profile; on the other hand, those at site 4 were more heterogeneous (Figure 2b).

Figure 2
figure 2

DGGE analysis of planktonic fungi derived from the coastal waters of the island of Oahu (a). DGGE bands cloned are side-labeled with dot and number. UPMA tree based on matrix of distance calculated from the difference in DGGE band patterns among water samples from sites 1 and 4 (b).

Effects of physical, biological and geochemical features of seawater

Concentrations of chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) and fluorescence increased with depth, reaching the maximum at 50 m, and then declined at site 1 as the depth increased (Figure 3). They displayed the same general vertical patterns in site 4, but with the maximum found deeper at the depth of 100 m (Figure 3). Concentrations of Chl-a and fluorescence of water samples at depths of 50 m at site 1 were much higher (about 1.2–2 and 3–4.5 folds for Chl-a and fluorescence, respectively) than those depths at site 4. However, these two parameters were lower at 100 m or below at site 1 compared with those at site 4 (Figure 3). Overall the peak in photosynthetic biomass was comparable between the sites, but the biomass peak within the water column was deeper in the open ocean station, due to the increase in water transparency. Integrated photosynthetic biomass was higher in the coastal waters than in the open-ocean site. Salinity of seawater did not display any correlation with band patterns and band numbers at both sites (data not shown). However, seawater temperature (r=0.91, P=0.01) and Chl-a (r=0.85, P=0.04) displayed significantly correlations with band number at site 1, but not site 4. This further indicated that mechanisms regulating mycoplankton diversity in the coastal and open-ocean waters might vary.

Figure 3
figure 3

Vertical profile of DGGE band numbers, fluorescence and chlorophyll-a of Hawaiian waters.

Diversity and phylogenetic analysis

Major bands were excised from DGGE gel and were cloned for sequencing analysis. Of 124 clone sequences, a total of 46 fungal operational taxonomic units, or ‘species,’ were identified using the method described by Gao et al. (2008). These unique fungal species belonged to two phyla: Basidiomycota (n=42) and Ascomycota (n=4). All the ascomycete species were members of the class Dothideomycetes. However, the vast majority (n=39, 93%) of basidiomycete species were not affiliated with any member of the known fungal taxa and, hence, are likely new fungal phylotypes (Table 1 and Figure 4). Of the four asomycete species, MF4.6.2.5 was a member of the order Pleosporales, most of which are saprobes or parasites on terrestrial plants. The species MF4.1.1.1 was closely matched to the marine yeast Aureobasidium pullulans, a complex commonly found in marine environments, and was a member of the order Dothideales. The other two phylotypes did not have immediate phylogenetic neighbors and were new fungal phylotypes. Furthermore, ascomycete species were only detected in water samples from three depths (5, 150 and 200 m) at site 4 and absent at depths of 15, 50 and 100 m at the same site.

Table 1 Taxonomic distribution of 18S rRNA clone sequences derived from DGGE analysis of planktonic fungi
Figure 4
figure 4

Neighbor-joining tree based on fungal 18S rRNA gene sequences derived from Hawaiian waters.

Basidiomycete species were found in all depths at the two sites. Among 42 basidiomycete species, 19 of them were from site 1 and the rest from site 4. The majority (n=29, 69%) of the basidiomycete species were clustered into four clades (A, B, C and D), which did not include the known taxa from GenBank (Figure 4). Therefore, these sequences are new fungal phylotypes. Five species were included in clade A and present at depths 100 m or below at both sampling sites. Clade B contained 12 species from both sites and further branched into two subclades (B1 and B2). Members of subclade B1 included phylotypes derived from samples collected at both sites at several depths whereas subclade B2 only contained those derived from depths 100 to 150 m. Phylotypes of clade C were present at both sites and not depth-specific. Members of clade D were unique to the depth of 150 m at site 4. Finally, members of clades C and D belonged to unknown basidiomycetes because they did not have phylogenetic neighbors in GenBank. Overall, our results suggest that some basidiomycete phylotypes are depth-specific and others belong to ‘cosmopolitan phylotypes’.

Two basidiomycete species (MF4.3.2.7, and MF1.1.2.7) did not cluster with any fungal sequences, with unknown phylogenetic affiliations (Figure 4). Still, an additional three basidiomycete species belonged to members of Agaricomycetes and further branched with members of Boletales (MF4.1.3.5) and Polyporales (MF1.1.8.1 and MF4.3.2.8). Species MF4.3.1.5 and M1.5.1.7 were affiliated with puccinomycete fungal clone sequences derived from sediment of a contaminated aquifer. Finally, along with fungal sequence derived from marine sponges, marine sediments of aquifer, hypersaline basin and other natural habitats, four species derived from site 1 and 4 branched into clade E. Particularly, three sequences (MF1.1.2.3, MF4.2.1.1 and MF4.3.2.2) belonged to the same phylotype group and were closely affiliated with the fungal clone sequence 8-1p-11 derived from the Hawaiian sponge Suberites zeteki.

Discussion

Small subunit rRNA genes have been recognized as powerful markers for both identifying fungi and resolving taxonomic positions at different levels (Bruns et al., 1991; Sugiyama, 1994). Application of PCR in amplifying 18S rRNA genes has contributed to our better understanding of evolutionary relationship between fungi (White et al., 1990; Wilmotte et al., 1993) and also enhanced our ability to describe fungal communities with respect to environmental factors and perturbations (Kowalchuk et al., 1997; Malosso et al., 2006; Oros-Sichler et al., 2006; Jumpponen, 2007). DGGE analysis based on 18S rRNA fragments has been used to reveal fungal communities in many terrestrial natural habitats (Kowalchuk et al., 1997; Borneman and Hartin, 2000; Vainio and Hantula, 2000; May et al., 2001; Brodie et al., 2003; Nikolcheva et al., 2003), but its application for investigating fungal communities in marine environments remains rare (Pang and Mitchell, 2005; Gao et al., 2008). This report describes the first use of a DGGE-based strategy targeting this gene to characterize planktonic fungal communities in the Hawaiian coastal waters.

Marine fungi have been defined as those that can complete their entire life cycles within the sea, that is, those that can grow and sporulate exclusively in a marine or estuarine habitat (Kohlmeyer and Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, 2003). Several lines of evidence suggest the existence of ‘marine fungal phylotypes’ (Gao et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008a; Li and Wang, 2009), but marine fungi are still considered as an ecologically, but not taxonomically, defined group (Kohlmeyer and Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, 2003). Marine fungi primarily include the Ascomycetes, the Basidiomycetes, and the Chytridiomycetes (Kohlmeyer and Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, 2003; Fell and Newell, 1998; Pang and Mitchell, 2005). In addition, the Oomycetes and Labyrinthulomycetes, formerly known as pseudofungi or fungal-like organisms were originally classified as fungi and have now been reclassified under the new Kingdom of Straminipila (Raghukumar, 2004; Wang and Johnson, 2009). As they are still commonly studied by marine mycologists and mycoplankton ecologists (Fell and Newell, 1998; Kimura and Naganuma, 2001; Raghukumar, 2004), marine mycoplankton can be broadly defined to include marine filamentous fungi, yeasts and fungal-like protists in water column (Wang and Johnson, 2009). Results of this study revealed two phyla of marine fungi in the Hawaiian coastal water, with basidiomycetes as the dominant phylotypes (Table 1 and Figure 4). Several factors could contribute to the absence of other mycoplankton groups in the coastal waters. First, the abundance of the other mycoplankton groups may be low in the analyzed samples, and it can particularly be the case for the Chitridiomycetes and the Oomycetes. Nonetheless, based on reports from others (Raghukumar, 2004; Wang and Johnson, 2009), this is not likely to be the case for the fungal-like protists.

Second, fungal 18S rRNA gene primers used in this study may have a low specificity to the other mycoplankton groups in the presence of many ribosomal genes from other marine eukaryotes. The primer pair (NS1/NS2-10) used in this study yields the 18S rRNA gene regions with the size of 600 bp. The fragment contains useful sequence information to allow phylogenetic inference and is of suitable size for DGGE analysis (Teske et al., 1996; Kowalchuk et al., 1997). However, they have also been reported to match sequences from Acantharea, Amastigomonas, Alveolata, Bangiophyceae, Centroheliozoa, Cercozoa, Eumetazoa, Lobosea, Metazoa, Rhodophyta, Stramenopiles and Viridiplantae (Pang and Mitchell, 2005). In addition, direct application of this PCR primer pair in terrestrial samples have been suggested to yield plant material (White et al., 1990). In our study, direct amplification using these two primers on seawater samples did amplify 18S rRNA genes from Acantharea, Polycystinea, Alveolata, Cnidaria, Arthropoda, Streptophyta and Chlorophyta (data not shown). A nested PCR can successfully circumvent the low-specificity problem, with the first step designed to target the fungi and the second designed to amplify products suitable for DGGE analysis (Kowalchuk et al., 1997; Gao et al., 2008). This approach was shown to provide a satisfactory degree of success in discriminating against other environmental DNA while maintaining a broad range of fungal compatibility in fungi-infected marram grass and marine sponges (Kowalchuk et al., 1997; Gao et al., 2008). The drawback of PCR-based approaches is the introduction of biases due to the preferential amplification of certain templates, the nested PCR could augment such biases further (Kowalchuk et al., 1997). Hence, some mycoplankton may be neglected by this strategy. However, this nested PCR protocol enabled to amplify broad taxonomic fungal groups, including members of Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, Chytridomycota and Zygomycota from terrestrial environmental samples (Kowalchuk et al., 1997) and there is no direct evidence that this nested PCR approach failed to detect any major fungal groups in our seawater samples.

Third, properties of fungal cells may enable some fungi more resistant than others to the cell lysis method used and result in a low yield of fungal genomic DNA for certain fungal groups. Finally, some marine fungal groups such as the oomycetes are known to be difficult to be amplified due to inhibitory materials in (personal communication with L Baker). Thus, the diversity uncovered in our study represents a lower boundary and there likely exists other mycoplankton phylotypes not found here.

The majority of the basidiomycete phylotypes did not cluster with any described fungal sequence in GenBank. This strongly suggests that these phylotypes are novel mycoplankton species and more novel fungal species in the world's ocean remain to be discovered. Particularly, 27 of basidiomycete phylotypes were closely related to the basidiomycete clone 8-2-5 from the Hawaiian alien sponge Suberites zeteki, with the sequence identity ranging from 93 to 100%. It indicates the abundant and unique presence of this group of mycoplankton abundant in the Hawaiian waters. This also reveals the incompleteness of the marine fungal 18S rRNA database. Several phylotypes found here are similar to those fungal clones found from other ocean provinces, suggesting they are potentially cosmopolitan in the marine environment (Figure 4). The close affiliation of the ascomycetes phylotypes with other cosmopolitan fungal isolates seemed to support this observation. However, it is still premature to conclude that these novel phylotypes of marine fungi are endemic to Hawaii. Finally, none of the phylotypes discovered in this study matched with cultured fungi from Hawaiian seawaters or marine substrates (Steele, 1967; van Uden and Fell, 1968; Fell, 1976; Wang et al., 2008a; Li and Wang, 2009 and Wang et al. unpublished data). Likely, mycoplankton phylotypes derived from cultivation and molecular methods belong to different populations similar to what has been observed in many ecological studies of other microbial communities in other natural environments (Hentschel et al., 2006).

Our results suggest that mycoplankton communities show noticeable spatial diversity on both lateral and vertical gradients. In this study, mycoplankton diversity in water samples from the surface to 100 m in the coastal waters was greater than that in the open-ocean waters (Figure 3). This is consistent with the report that fewer culturable fungal isolates were found in water samples collected from pelagic regions than those from coastal waters (Steele, 1967). The biological and chemical variables (fluorescence, Chl-a, temperature, salinity) suggest that higher primary production and higher photosynthetic biomass were present at these depths at site 1 (coastal) than those in site 4 (open ocean). The primary production of the coastal waters is known to commonly exceed the consumption of herbivores, and therefore, most of such primary organic matter becomes available to the consumers as detritus (Newell, 1982). Furthermore, mycoplankton use phytoplankton exudates and detritus as nutrient sources (Kimura and Naganuma, 2001; Raghukumar, 2004). Therefore, it is not surprising to observe more diverse mycoplankton communities in the coastal waters than open-ocean waters at these depths. However, based on the scatter analysis, detrital organic carbon remains relatively high at depths of 150 m in coastal waters (data not shown) whereas phytoplankton biomass were similar (Figure 3). Thus, our results suggest that the phytoplankton and primary production has a more dominant role in determining mycoplankton diversity in deep samples. Finally, this study shows for the first time that diversity of mycoplankton communities displays vertical variations. The vertical diversity profile in coastal waters differs dramatically from those in the open ocean. Therefore, biological, geochemical and chemical factors, which govern diversity and composition of mycoplankton in the coastal waters, may differ from those in the open ocean. Because of the dynamic nature of the marine ecosystem, the relationship between planktonic fungi and their biotic and/or abiotic environmental conditions could be very complicated and should be a promising research topic for future exploration of functional ecology of marine mycoplankton.

Accession codes

Accessions

GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ

References

  • Anderson IC, Cairney JWG . (2004). Diversity and ecology of soil fungal communities: Increased understanding through the application of molecular techniques. Environ Microbiol 6: 769–779.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson IC, Campbell CD, Prosser JI . (2003). Diversity of fungi in organic soils under a moorland—Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) gradient. Environ Microbiol 5: 1121–1132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenz BE, Held BW, Jurgens JA, Farrell RL, Blanchette RA . (2006). Fungal diversity in soils and historic wood from the Ross Sea Region of Antarctica. Soil Biol Biochem 38: 3057–3064.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artz RRE, Anderson IC, Chapman SJ, Hagn A, Schloter M, Potts JM et al. (2007). Changes in fungal community composition in response to vegetational succession during the natural regeneration of cutover peatlands. Microb Ecol 54: 508–522.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borneman J, Hartin RJ . (2000). PCR primers that amplify fungal rRNA genes from environmental samples. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 4356–4360.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie E, Edwards S, Clipson N . (2003). Soil fungal community structure in a temperate upland grassland soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45: 105–114.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns TD, White TJ, Taylor JW . (1991). Fungal molecular systematics. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 22: 525–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M . (1989). A view of fungal ecology. Mycologia 81: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro R, Pusceddu A . (2007). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in coastal lagoons: does microbial diversity play any role? Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 75: 4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fell JW . (1976). Yeasts in oceanic regions. In: Jones EBG (ed). Recent Advances in Aquatic Mycology. Elek Science: London. pp 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell JW, Newell SY . (1998). Biochemical and molecular methods for the study of marine fungi. In: Cooksey KE (ed). Molecular Approaches to the Study of the Ocean. Chapman & Hall: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenchel T . (2008). The microbial loop-25 years later. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 366: 99–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Z, Li BL, Zheng CC, Wang GY . (2008). Molecular detection of fungal communities in the Hawaiian Marine sponges Suberites zeteki and Mycale armata. Appl. Environ Microbiol 74: 6091–6101.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giovannoni SJ, Stingl U . (2005). Molecular diversity and ecology of microbial plankton. Nature 437: 343–348.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall TA . (1999). BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41: 95–98.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hallam SJ, Mincer TJ, Schleper C, Preston CM, Roberts K, Richardson PM et al. (2006). Pathways of carbon assimilation and ammonia oxidation suggested by environmental genomic analyses of marine Crenarchaeota. PLoS Biol 4: 520–536.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hentschel U, Usher KM, Taylor MW . (2006). Marine sponges as microbial fermenters. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol 55: 167–177.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm-Hansen O, Riemann B . (1978). Chlorophyll a determination—improvements in methodology. Oikos 30: 438–447.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jickells TD . (1998). Nutrient biogeochemistry of the coastal zone. Science 281: 217–222.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jumpponen A . (2007). Soil fungal communities underneath willow canopies on a primary successional glacier forefront: RDNA sequence results can be affected by primer selection and chimeric data. Microb Ecol 53: 233–246.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura H, Naganuma T . (2001). Thraustochytrids: a neglected agent of the marine microbial food chain. Aquat Ecosyst Health Mangage 4: 13–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura H, Fukuba T, Naganuma T . (1999). Biomass of thraustochytrid protoctists in coastal water. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 189: 27–33.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura H, Sato M, Sugiyama C, Naganuma T . (2001). Coupling of thraustochytrids and POM, and of bacterio- and phytoplankton in a semi-enclosed coastal area: implication for different substrate preference by the planktonic decomposers. Aquat Microb Ecol 25: 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kis-Papo T . (2005). Marine fungal communities. In: Dighton J, White JF, and Oudemans P (eds). The Fungal Community: its Organization and Role in the Ecosystem. Taylor & Francis: Boca Raton, FL. pp 61–92.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlmeyer J, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer B . (2003). Mycological research news. Mycol Res 107: 385–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalchuk GA, Gerards S, Woldendorp JW . (1997). Detection and characterization of fungal infections of Ammophila arenaria (Marram grass) roots by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of specifically amplified 18S rDNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3858–3865.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kubanek J, Jensen PR, Keifer PA, Sullards MC, Collins DO, Fenical W . (2003). Seaweed resistance to microbial attack: a targeted chemical defense against marine fungi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 6916–6921.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtzman CP, Robnett CJ . (1998). Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 73: 331–371.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landeweert R, Leeflang P, Kuyper TW, Hoffland E, Rosling A, Wernars K et al. (2003). Molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal mycelium in soil horizons. Applied and Environ Microbiol 69: 327–333.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Wang G . (2009). Diversity of fungal isolates from three Hawaiian marine sponges. Microbiol Res 164: 233–241.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord NS, Kaplan CW, Shank P, Kitts CL, Elrod SL . (2002). Assessment of fungal diversity using terminal restriction fragment (TRF) pattern analysis: Comparison of 18S and ITS ribosomal regions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 42: 327–337.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch MDJ, Thorn RG . (2006). Diversity of basidiomycetes in Michigan agricultural soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 7050–7056.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malosso E, Waite IS, English L, Hopkins DW, O’Donnell AG . (2006). Fungal diversity in maritime Antarctic soils determined using a combination of culture isolation, molecular fingerprinting and cloning techniques. Polar Biol 29: 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manini E, Fiordelmondo C, Gambi C, Pusceddu A, Danovaro R . (2003). Benthic microbial loop functioning in coastal lagoons: a comparative approach. Oceanolog Acta 26: 27–38.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • May LA, Smiley B, Schmidt MG . (2001). Comparative denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of fungal communities associated with whole plant corn silage. Can J Microbiol 47: 829–841.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran MA, Miller WL . (2007). Resourceful heterotrophs make the most of light in the coastal ocean. Na Rev Microbiol 5: 792–800.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mou XZ, Sun SL, Edwards RA, Hodson RE, Moran MA . (2008). Bacterial carbon processing by generalist species in the coastal ocean. Nature 451: 708–U704.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell RC . (1982). The energetics of detritus utilisation in coastal lagoons and nearshore waters. In: Laserre P, Postma H (eds). Proceedings of International Symposium on Coastal Lagoos; 8–14 September 1981; Oceanologica Acta (Special issue). SCOR/IABO/UNESCO: Bordeaux. pp 347–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikolcheva LG, Cockshutt AM, Barlocher F . (2003). Determining diversity of freshwater fungi on decaying leaves: comparison of traditional and molecular approaches. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 2548–2554.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oros-Sichler M, Gomes NCM, Neuber G, Smalla K . (2006). A new semi-nested PCR protocol to amplify large 18S rRNA gene fragments for PCR-DGGE analysis of soil fungal communities. J Microbiol Methods 65: 63–75.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pang KL, Mitchell JI . (2005). Molecular approaches for assessing fungal diversity in marine substrata. Bot Mar 48: 332–347.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy LR, Wiebe WJ . (1993). Energy sources for microbial food webs. Mar Microb Food Webs 7: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusceddu A, Dell'Anno A, Danovaro R, Manini E, Sara G, Fabiano M . (2003). Enzymatically hydrolyzable protein and carbohydrate sedimentary pools as indicators of the trophic state of detritus sink systems: a case study in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Estuaries 26: 641–650.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukumar S . (2004). The role of fungi in marine detrital processes. In: Ramaiah N (ed). Marine Microbiology: Facets and Opportunities. National Institute of Oceanography: Goa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranjard L, Poly F, Lata JC, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Nazaret S . (2001). Characterization of bacterial and fungal soil communities by automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis fingerprints: Biological and methodological variability. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 4479–4487.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schloss PD, Handelsman J . (2005). Introducing DOTUR, a computer program for defining operational taxonomic units and estimating species richness. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 1501–1506.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherr EB, Sherr BF . (1987). High-rates of consumption of bacteria by pelagic ciliates. Nature 325: 710–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit E, Veenman C, Baar J . (2003). Molecular analysis of ectomycorrhizal basidiomycete communities in a Pinus sylvestris L. stand reveals long-term increased diversity after removal of litter and humus layers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 45: 49–57.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele CW . (1967). Fungus populations in marine waters and coastal sands of the Hawaiian, Line, and Phoenic islands. Pac Sci 21: 317–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strom SL . (2008). Microbial ecology of ocean biogeochemistry: A community perspective. Science 320: 1043–1045.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama J . (1994). Fungal molecular systematics: towards a phylogenetic classification for the fungi. J Agric Chem Soc Jpn 68: 48–53.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swofford DL . (2002). PAUP: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and other programs, 4.0 Beta. Sinauer Associates: Sunderland, MA, USA.

  • Teske A, Wawer C, Muyzer G, Ramsing NB . (1996). Distribution of sulfate-reducing bacteria in a stratified fjord (Mariager fjord, Denmark) as evaluated by most-probable-number counts and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified ribosomal DNA fragments. Appl Environ Microbiol 62: 1405–1415.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vainio EJ, Hantula J . (2000). Direct analysis of wood-inhabiting fungi using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of amplified ribosomal DNA. Mycol Res 104: 927–936.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Uden N, Fell JW . (1968). Marine yeasts. In: Droop MR, Ferguson Wood EF (eds). Advances in Microbiology of the Sea. Academic Press: London. pp 167–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel C, Rogerson A, Schatz S, Laubach H, Tallman A, Fell J . (2007). Prevalence of yeasts in beach sand at three bathing beaches in South Florida. Water Res 41: 1915–1920.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Li Q, Zhu P . (2008a). Phylogenetic diversity of culturable fungi associated with the Hawaiian sponges Suberites zeteki and Gelliodes fibrosa. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 93: 163–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang GY, Johnson ZI . (2009). Impact of parasitic fungi on the diversity and functional ecocology of marine phytoplankton. In: Kersey TW and Munger SP (eds). Marine Phytoplankton. Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang P, Xiao X, Zhang H, Wang F . (2008b). Molecular survey of sulphate-reducing bacteria in the deep-sea sediments of the west Pacific Warm Pool. J Ocean Univ China 7: 269–275.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang WX . (2002). Interactions of trace metals and different marine food chains. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243: 295–309.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welschmeyer NA . (1994). Fluorometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in the presence of chlorophyll-B and pheopigments. Limnol Oceanogr 39: 1985–1992.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J . (1990). Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds). PCR protocols: A Guide To Methods and Application. Academic Press Inc: San Diego. pp 315–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmotte A, Vandepeer Y, Goris A, Chapelle S, Debaere R, Nelissen B et al. (1993). Evolutionary relationships among higher fungi inferred from small ribosomal-subunit RNA sequence-analysis. System Appl Microbiol 16: 436–444.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by NOAA Grant no. NA04OAR4600196, the University of Hawaii Sea Grant under institutional Grants no. NA05OAR4171048 and no. NA16RG2254 and NSF Grant nos. OCE05-26462 and OCE05-50798. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NOAA or any of its subagencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangyi Wang.

Additional information

State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian 271000, PR China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Z., Johnson, Z. & Wang, G. Molecular characterization of the spatial diversity and novel lineages of mycoplankton in Hawaiian coastal waters. ISME J 4, 111–120 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.87

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2009.87

Keywords

  • mycoplankton
  • biodiversity
  • functional ecology
  • microbial loop
  • chlorophyll

Further reading

Search

Quick links