We investigated the implicit preference in terms of food portion in obesity using the affective priming paradigm. Primes representing different portions of fast food (small, medium and large) were used to assess participants’ readiness to respond to a positive or negative target word. A self-reported affective rating scale of food portion and a portion judgment task were administered to determine the explicit preference for food portion and portion misperception, respectively. The results of the affective priming paradigm showed an implicit preference for large food portions in the obese group. No implicit preference in terms of food portion was found in the non-obese group. The explicit preference measure of food portion demonstrated a rather negative attitude for large portions in the obese group, whereas the non-obese group reported no explicit preference in terms of food portion. Thus, unlike the non-obese group, the obese group showed clear discrepancies between implicit and explicit preferences in terms of food portion: obese participants demonstrated an implicit, but not an explicit preference for large food portions. These results could not be attributed to a misperception of food portion, as revealed by the portion judgment task. The current findings suggest that social desirability might conceal self-reported preference in terms of food portion and/or that obese individuals are less aware of their internal preferences.
Your institute does not have access to this article
Subscribe to Journal
Get full journal access for 1 year
only $9.92 per issue
All prices are NET prices.
VAT will be added later in the checkout.
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.
All prices are NET prices.
Vermeer WM, Steenhuis IH, Poelman MP . Small, medium, large or supersize? The development and evaluation of interventions targeted at portion size. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 38 (Suppl 1): S13–S18.
Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM . Patterns and trends in food portion sizes, 1977-1998. JAMA 2003; 289: 450–453.
Wansink B, Wansink CS . The largest Last Supper: depictions of food portions and plate size increased over the millennium. Int J Obes 2010; 34: 943–944.
Zlatevska N, Dubelaar C, Holden SS . "Sizing Up the Effect of Portion Size on Consumption: A Meta-Analytic Review". J Mark 2014; 78: 140–154.
Burger KS, Kern M, Coleman KJ . Characteristics of a self-selected portion size in Young Adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2007; 107: 611–618.
Livingstone MBE, Black AE . Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 2003; 133 (Suppl 3): 895S–920S.
Lichtman SW, Pisarska K, Berman ER, Pestone M, Dowling H, Offenbacher E et al. Discrepancy between self-reported and actual caloric intake and exercise in obese subjects. New Engl J Med 1992; 327: 1893–1898.
Brunstrom JM, Rogers PJ, Pothos EM, Calitri R, Tapper K . Estimating everyday portion size using a ‘method of constant stimuli’: in a student sample, portion size is predicted by gender, dietary behaviour, and hunger, but not BMI. Appetite 2008; 51: 296–301.
Chandon P, Wansink B . Is obesity caused by calorie underestimation? A psychophysical model of mealsize estimation. J Marketing Res 2007; 44: 84–99.
Macdiarmid J, Blundell J . Assessing dietary intake: Who, what and why of under-reporting. Nutr Res Rev 1998; 11: 231–253.
Fazio RH, Towles-Schwen T The MODE model of attitude-behavior processes In Chaiken S, Trope Y (eds), Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. Guilford: New York, USA 1999, pp 97–116.
Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A . E-prime User’s Guide. Psychology Software Tools Inc: Pittsburgh, 2002.
Cserjesi R, Vermeulen N, Luminet O, Marechal C, Nef F, Simon Y et al. Explicit vs Implicit body image evaluation in restrictive anorexia nervosa. Psychiatry Res 2010; 175: 148–153.
This study was supported by Bolyai János Research Fellowship of the Hungarian Academic of Science.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Affective priming task’s primes of small, medium and big portions of a typical fast food
About this article
Cite this article
Cserjesi, R., De Vos, I. & Deroost, N. Discrepancy between implicit and explicit preferences for food portions in obesity. Int J Obes 40, 1464–1467 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.91