Original Article | Published:

Clinical Studies and Practice

Effects of aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages on postprandial glucose, insulin and energy intake

International Journal of Obesity volume 41, pages 450457 (2017) | Download Citation

Abstract

Background:

Substituting sweeteners with non-nutritive sweeteners (NNS) may aid in glycaemic control and body weight management. Limited studies have investigated energy compensation, glycaemic and insulinaemic responses to artificial and natural NNS.

Objectives:

This study compared the effects of consuming NNS (artificial versus natural) and sucrose (65 g) on energy intake, blood glucose and insulin responses.

Methods:

Thirty healthy male subjects took part in this randomised, crossover study with four treatments: aspartame-, monk fruit-, stevia- and sucrose-sweetened beverages. On each test day, participants were asked to consume a standardised breakfast in the morning, and they were provided with test beverage as a preload in mid-morning and ad libitum lunch was provided an hour after test beverage consumption. Blood glucose and insulin concentrations were measured every 15 min within the first hour of preload consumption and every 30 min for the subsequent 2 h. Participants left the study site 3 h after preload consumption and completed a food diary for the rest of the day.

Results:

Ad libitum lunch intake was significantly higher for the NNS treatments compared with sucrose (P=0.010). The energy 'saved' from replacing sucrose with NNS was fully compensated for at subsequent meals; hence, no difference in total daily energy intake was found between the treatments (P=0.831). The sucrose-sweetened beverage led to large spikes in blood glucose and insulin responses within the first hour, whereas these responses were higher for all three NNS beverages following the test lunch. Thus, there were no differences in total area under the curve (AUC) for glucose (P=0.960) and insulin (P=0.216) over 3 h between the four test beverages.

Conclusions:

The consumption of calorie-free beverages sweetened with artificial and natural NNS have minimal influences on total daily energy intake, postprandial glucose and insulin compared with a sucrose-sweetened beverage.

Access optionsAccess options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from $8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1.

    N. C. D. Risk Factor Collaboration. Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4·4 million participants. Lancet 2016; 387: 1513–1530.

  2. 2.

    , , , , , et al. Global, regional, and national prevalence of overweight and obesity in children and adults during 1980–2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2014; 384: 766–781.

  3. 3.

    . Reducing intake of sugar-sweetened beverages is vital to improving our nation’s health. Circulation 2016; 133: 347–349.

  4. 4.

    . New dietary guidelines place added sugars in the crosshairs. JAMA 2016; 315: 1440–1441.

  5. 5.

    World Health OrganizationGuideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. World Health Organization: Geneva, 2015.

  6. 6.

    . Non-nutritive sweeteners: evidence for benefit vs. risk. Curr Opin Lipidol 2014; 25: 80–84.

  7. 7.

    , . Nonnutritive sweetener consumption in humans: effects on appetite and food intake and their putative mechanisms. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 89: 1–14.

  8. 8.

    , , , , , et al. Does low-energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obes 2016; 40: 381–394.

  9. 9.

    , , , . Substitution of sugar-sweetened beverages with other beverage alternatives: a review of long-term health outcomes. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015; 115: 767–779.

  10. 10.

    , , , , , et al. The evidence for medical nutrition therapy for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults. J Am Diet Assoc 2010; 110: 1852–1889.

  11. 11.

    , , . The role of low-calorie sweeteners in diabetes. US Endocrinol 2013; 9: 13–15.

  12. 12.

    , , , , , et al. Nonnutritive sweeteners: current use and health perspectives: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation 2012; 126: 509–519.

  13. 13.

    , . Trends in the consumption of low-calorie sweeteners. Physiol Behav 2016; 164: 446–450.

  14. 14.

    . How sweet it is: chemicals structure, properties and applications of high intensity sweeteners. EC Nutr 2015; 1: 57–66.

  15. 15.

    US Food and Drug Administration.High-intensity sweeteners. 2014. Available from .

  16. 16.

    , , . Sweeteners from plants—with emphasis on stevia rebaudiana (Bertoni) and Siraitia grosvenorii (Swingle). Anal Bioanal Chem 2013; 405: 4397–4407.

  17. 17.

    , , , , , et al. Effects of stevia, aspartame, and sucrose on food intake, satiety, and postprandial glucose and insulin levels. Appetite 2010; 55: 37–43.

  18. 18.

    , . Phytochemical and pharmacological aspects of Siraitia grosvenorii, luo han kuo. Orient Pharm Exp Med 2012; 12: 233–239.

  19. 19.

    , , , , , et al. Chemistry and pharmacology of Siraitia grosvenorii: a review. Chin J Nat Med 2014; 12: 89–102.

  20. 20.

    , , , . Mogrosides extract from Siraitia grosvenori scavenges free radicals in vitro and lowers oxidative stress, serum glucose, and lipid levels in alloxan-induced diabetic mice. Nutr Res 2008; 28: 278–284.

  21. 21.

    , , , , , . Antidiabetic effect of long-term supplementation with Siraitia grosvenori on the spontaneously diabetic Goto–Kakizaki rat. Br J Nutr 2007; 97: 770–775.

  22. 22.

    , . Are caloric beverages compensated for in the short-term by young adults? An investigation with particular focus on gender differences. Appetite 2010; 55: 137–146.

  23. 23.

    , , , . The influence of the menstrual cycle on energy balance and taste preference in Asian Chinese women. Eur J Nutr 2015; 54: 1323–1332.

  24. 24.

    , , . Removing energy from a beverage influences later food intake more than the same energy addition. Appetite 2016; 105: 549–556.

  25. 25.

    , , . Impact of dose-response calorie reduction or supplementation of a covertly manipulated lunchtime meal on energy compensation. Physiol Behav 2016; 165: 15–21.

  26. 26.

    , , , , , et al. Glycaemic index methodology. Nutr Res Rev 2005; 18: 145–171.

  27. 27.

    , , . Glycaemic responses to liquid food supplements among three Asian ethnic groups. Eur J Nutr 2016; 55: 2493–2498.

  28. 28.

    , , , . Effect of chicken, fat and vegetable on glycaemia and insulinaemia to a white rice-based meal in healthy adults. Eur J Nutr 2014; 53: 1719–1726.

  29. 29.

    . Intense sweeteners, appetite for the sweet taste, and relationship to weight management. Curr Obes Rep 2015; 4: 106–110.

  30. 30.

    , . Low-calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2014; 100: 765–777.

  31. 31.

    , , . Postprandial and basal glucose in type 2 diabetes: assessment and respective impacts. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011; 13: S25–S32.

  32. 32.

    , . Glycemic index, postprandial glycemia and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 2005; 16: 69–75.

  33. 33.

    , , , , , et al. Effect of the artificial sweetener, sucralose, on gastric emptying and incretin hormone release in healthy subjects. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2009; 296: G735–G739.

  34. 34.

    , , , . Short-term consumption of sucralose, a nonnutritive sweetener, is similar to water with regard to select markers of hunger signaling and short-term glucose homeostasis in women. Nutr Res 2011; 31: 882–888.

  35. 35.

    , , , . Sweet taste receptors in rat small intestine stimulate glucose absorption through apical GLUT2. J Physiol 2007; 582: 379–392.

  36. 36.

    , , , , , et al. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 15075–15080.

  37. 37.

    , . Sweet-taste receptors, low-energy sweeteners, glucose absorption and insulin release. Br J Nutr 2010; 104: 1415–1420.

  38. 38.

    , , , , . Sucralose affects glycemic and hormonal responses to an oral glucose load. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: 2530–2535.

  39. 39.

    , , , , , et al. Artificial sweeteners have no effect on gastric emptying, glucagon-like peptide-1, or glycemia after oral glucose in healthy humans. Diabetes Care 2013; 36: e202–e203.

  40. 40.

    , , , . Inverse association between the effect of carbohydrates on blood glucose and subsequent short-term food intake in young men. Am J Clin Nutr 2002; 76: 1023–1030.

  41. 41.

    , . Effect of glycemic carbohydrates on short-term satiety and food intake. Nutr Rev 2003; 61: S17–S26.

  42. 42.

    , . Glycemic index, cholecystokinin, satiety and disinhibition: is there an unappreciated paradox for overweight women? Int J Obes 2008; 32: 1647–1654.

  43. 43.

    , , . Low-glycaemic index sweetener-based beverages reduce 24- h glucose profiles in healthy adults. J Hum Nutr Diet 2009; 22: 77–80.

  44. 44.

    , , , , , et al. Increased postprandial glycaemia, insulinemia, and lipidemia after 10 weeks’ sucrose-rich diet compared to an artificially sweetened diet: a randomised controlled trial. Food Nutr Res 2011; 55: 5961.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all the participants for taking part in this study and Mr Edwin Chia for his assistance in entering all the diet records. This research was supported by the Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, A*STAR, Singapore.

Author contributions

SLT, JH and CGF designed the research; SLT and NBS conducted the research; SLT performed statistical analyses and drafted the manuscript; all authors approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Clinical Nutrition Research Centre, Singapore Institute for Clinical Sciences, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore

    • S L Tey
    • , N B Salleh
    • , J Henry
    •  & C G Forde
  2. Department of Biochemistry, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    • J Henry
  3. Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore

    • C G Forde

Authors

  1. Search for S L Tey in:

  2. Search for N B Salleh in:

  3. Search for J Henry in:

  4. Search for C G Forde in:

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C G Forde.

Supplementary information

About this article

Publication history

Received

Revised

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2016.225

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website (http://www.nature.com/ijo)