Abstract
Objectives:
In the popular news media, public health officials routinely emphasize the health risks of obesity and portray weight as under personal control. These messages may increase support for policies designed to reduce rates of obesity, but can also increase antifat stigma. Less often, the media cover ‘Health at Every Size’ or ‘Fat Rights’ perspectives that may have the opposite effects. We investigated how exposure to different ‘fat frames’ shifts attitudes about weight and support for obesity policies.
Methods:
Across four experiments (n=2187), people read constructed news articles framing fatness as negative (unhealthy, controllable, acceptable to stigmatize) or positive (healthy, uncontrollable, unacceptable to stigmatize).
Results:
Compared with people who read fat-positive frames, people who read fat-negative frames expressed more: belief in the health risks of being fat (d=0.95–1.22), belief weight is controllable (d=0.38–0.55), support for charging obese people more for health insurance (d=0.26–0.77), antifat prejudice (in three out of four experiments, d=0.28–0.39), willingness to discriminate against fat people (d=0.39–0.71) and less willingness to celebrate body size diversity (d=0.37–0.64). They were also less willing to say that women at the lower end of the obese range could be healthy at their weights. Effects on support for public policies, however, were generally small and/or nonsignificant. Compared with a control condition, exposure to fat-positive frames generally shifted attitudes more than fat-negative frames. In experiment 4, adding a message about the unacceptability of weight-based discrimination to unhealthy/controllable news articles only reduced antifat stigma on one of three measures compared with articles adding a discrimination-acceptable message.
Conclusions:
Exposure to different news frames of fat can shift beliefs about weight-related health risks and weight-based stigma. Shifting policy attitudes, however, is more challenging.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Saguy AC, Almeling R . Fat in the fire? Science, the news media, and the 'obesity epidemic’. Sociol Forum 2008; 23: 53–83.
Saguy AC . What's Wrong with Fat?. Oxford University Press: New York, 2013.
Saguy AC, Gruys K, Gong S . Social problem construction and national context: news reporting on ‘overweight’ and ‘obesity’ in the U.S. and France. Soc Probl 2010; 57: 586–610.
Crandall CS, Eshleman A . A justification-suppression model of the expression and experience of predudice. Psychol Bull 2003; 129: 414–446.
Crandall CS, D’Anello S, Sakalli N, Lazarus E, Nejtardt GW, Feather NT . An attribution-value model of prejudice: anti-fat attitudes in six nations. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2001; 27: 30–37.
Crandall CS . Prejudice against fat people: ideology and self-interest. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 66: 882–894.
Puhl RM, Latner JD . Stigma, obesity, and the health of the nation’s children. Psychol Bull 2007; 133: 557–580.
Muennig P, Bench KK . Obesity-associated stigma and physiological markers of stress: evidence from the Dominican Republic. Stress Health 2008; 25: 241–246.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1019–1028.
Pace G . CBSNews 2006.
Saguy AC, Gruys K . Morality and health: news media constructions of overweight and eating disorders. Soc Probl 2010; 57: 231–250.
Heuer CA, McClure KJ, Puhl RM . Obesity stigma in online news: a visual content analysis. J Health Commun 2011; 16: 976–987.
Puhl RM, Peterson JL, DePierre JA, Joerg L . Headless, hungry, and unhealthy: a video content analysis of obese persons portrayed in online news. J Health Commun 2013; 18: 686–702.
Bacon L . Health at Every Size: The Surprising Truth about Your Weight. BenBella Books: Dallas, 2010.
Mann T, Tomiyama AJ, Westling E, Lew A-M, Samuels B, Chatman J . Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer. Am Psychol 2007; 62: 220–233.
Campos P, Saguy AC, Ernsberger P, Oliver E, Gaesser G . The epidemiology of overweight and obesity: public health crisis or moral panic? Int J Epidemiol 2006; 35: 55–60.
Dodge R . Experts seek to sort out confusion over obesity reports. Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service 2005.
Marchione M . Diet: CDC chief stresses that extra pounds are harmful. The Associated Press 2005.
Cooper C . Fat and Proud: The Politics of Size. Women's Press: London, 1998.
Wann M . FAT!SO?: Because You Don't Have to Apologize for Your Size. Ten Speed Press: Berkeley, CA, 1999.
Rothblum ED, Solovay S . eds The Fat Studies Reader. New York University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2009.
Harding K, Kirby M . Lessons from the Fat-O-Sphere: Quit Dieting and Declare a Truce with Your Body. Pengine Group: New York, NY, 2009.
Saguy AC, Riley KW . Weighing both sides: morality, mortality and framing contests over obesity. J Health Polit Policy Law 2005; 30: 869–921.
Daníelsdóttira S, O'Brien KS, Ciao A . Anti-fat prejudice reduction: a review of published studies. Obes Facts 2010; 3: 47–58.
Saguy AC, Frederick D, Gruys K . Reporting risk, producing prejudice: how news reporting on obesity shapes attitudes about health risk, policy, and prejudice. Soc Sci Med 2014; 111: 125–133.
McClure KJ, Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Obesity in the news: do photographic images of obese persons influence antifat attitudes? J Health Commun 2011; 16: 359–371.
Pearl RL, Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Positive media portrayals of obese persons: impact on attitudes and image preferences. Health Psychol 2012; 31: 821–829.
Puhl RM, Heuer CA, Sarda V . Framing messages about weight discrimination: impact on public support for legislation. Int J Obes 2011; 35: 863–872.
Brochu PM, Pearl RL, Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Do media portrayals of obesity influence support for weight-related medical policy? Health Psychol 2014; 33: 197–200.
Gollust SE, Niederdeppe J, Barry CL . Framing the consequences of childhood obesity to increase public support for obesity prevention policy. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: e1–e7.
Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, Lenz GS . Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Pol Anal 2012; 20: 351–368.
Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD . Amazon's Mechanical Turk a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspect Psychol Sci 2011; 6: 3–5.
Paolacci G, Chandler J, Ipeirotis PG . Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgm Decis Mak 2010; 5: 411–419.
Gray PB, Frederick DA . Body image and body type preferences in St. Kitts, Caribbean: a cross-cultural comparison with U.S. samples regarding attitudes towards muscularity, body fat, and breast size. Evol Psychol 2012; 10: 631–655.
Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 992–1000.
Morrison TG, O'Connor WE . Psychometric properties of a scale measuring negative attitudes toward overweight individuals. J Soc Psychol 1999; 139: 436–445.
Barry CL, Brescoll VL, Brownell KD, Schlesinger M . Obesity metaphors: how beliefs about the causes of obesity affect support for public policy. Milbank Q 2009; 87: 7–47.
Cumming G . The new statistics: why and how. Psychol Sci 2014; 25: 7–29.
Hyde JS . The gender similarities hypothesis. Am Psychol 2005; 60: 581–592.
Simonsohn U Data Colada, 2014.
Gollust SE, Eboh I, Barry CL . Picturing obesity: analyzing the social epidemiology of obesity conveyed through US news media images. Soc Sci Med 2012; 74: 1544–1551.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on International Journal of Obesity website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frederick, D., Saguy, A., Sandhu, G. et al. Effects of competing news media frames of weight on antifat stigma, beliefs about weight and support for obesity-related public policies. Int J Obes 40, 543–549 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.195
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.195
This article is cited by
-
The Value of Integrating Evolutionary and Sociocultural Perspectives on Body Image
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2022)
-
30+ years of media analysis of relevance to chronic disease: a scoping review
BMC Public Health (2020)
-
Media and Its Influence on Obesity
Current Obesity Reports (2018)
-
Differences in Orgasm Frequency Among Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Heterosexual Men and Women in a U.S. National Sample
Archives of Sexual Behavior (2018)