Abstract
Introduction:
Studies such as IDEFICS (Identification and prevention of dietary- and lifestyle-induced health effects in children and infants) seek to compare data across several different countries. Therefore, it is important to confirm that body composition indices, which are subject to intra- and inter-individual variation, are measured using a standardised protocol that maximises their reliability and reduces error in analyses.
Objective:
To describe the standardisation and reliability of anthropometric measurements. Both intra- and inter-observer variability of skinfold thickness (triceps, subscapular, biceps, suprailiac) and circumference (neck, arm, waist, hip) measurements were investigated in five different countries.
Methods:
Central training for fieldwork personnel was carried out, followed by local training in each centre involving the whole survey staff. All technical devices and procedures were standardised. As part of the standardisation process, at least 20 children participated in the intra- and inter-observer reliability test in each centre. A total of 125 children 2–5 years of age and 164 children 6–9 years of age took part in this study, with a mean age of 5.4 (±1.2) years.
Results:
The intra-observer technical error of measurement (TEM) was between 0.12 and 0.47 mm for skinfold thickness and between 0.09 and 1.24 cm for circumference measurements. Intra-observer reliability was 97.7% for skinfold thickness (triceps, subscapular, biceps, suprailiac) and 94.7% for circumferences (neck, arm, waist, hip). Inter-observer TEMs for skinfold thicknesses were between 0.13 and 0.97 mm and for circumferences between 0.18 and 1.01 cm. Inter-observer agreement as assessed by the coefficient of reliability for repeated measurements of skinfold thickness and circumferences was above 88% in all countries.
Conclusion:
In epidemiological surveys it is essential to standardise the methodology and train the participating staff in order to decrease measurement error. In the framework of the IDEFICS study, acceptable intra- and inter-observer agreement was achieved for all the measurements.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Maynard LM, Wisemandle W, Roche AF, Chumlea WC, Guo SS, Siervogel RM . Childhood body composition in relation to body mass index. Pediatrics 2001; 107: 344–350.
Nagy E, Vicente-Rodriguez G, Manios Y, Béghin L, Iliescu C, Censi L . Harmonization process and reliability assessment of anthropometric measurements in a multicenter study in adolescents. Int J Obes (Lond) 2008; 32 (Suppl 5): S58–S65.
Daniels SR, Morrison JA, Sprecher DL, Khoury P, Kimball TR . Association of body fat distribution and cardiovascular risk factors in children and adolescents. Circulation 1999; 99: 541–545.
Radley D, Gately PJ, Cooke CB, Carroll S, Oldroyd B, Truscott JG . Estimates of percentage body fat in young adolescents: a comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and air displacement plethysmography. Eur J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 1402–1410.
Brambilla P, Bedogni G, Moreno LA, Goran MI, Gutin B, Fox KR et al. Crossvalidation of anthropometry against magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue in children. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2006; 30: 23–30.
Rodríguez G, Moreno LA, Blay MG, Blay VA, Garagorri JM, Sarría A . Body composition in adolescents: measurements and metabolic aspects. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28 (Suppl 3): S54–S58.
Frainer DE, Adami F, Vasconcelos FdeA, Assis MA, Calvo MC, Kerpel R . Standardization and reliability of anthropometric measurements for population surveys. Arch Latinoam Nutr 2007; 57: 335–342.
de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea Wm C, Martorell R . Measurement and standardisation protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull 2004; 25: 27–36.
Moreno LA, Joyanes M, Mesana MI, Gonzalez-Gross M, Gil CM, Sarria A et al. Harmonization of anthropometric measurements for a multicenter nutrition survey in Spanish adolescents. Nutrition 2003; 19: 481–486.
Stone EJ, Norman JE, Davis SM, Stewart D, Clay TE, Caballero B . Design and quality control in the pathways American-Indian multicenter trial. Prev Med 2003; 37: 132.
Ulijaszek SJ, Kerr DA . Anthropometric measurement error and the assessment of nutritional status. Br J Nutr 1999; 82: 165.
Mueller WH, Martorell R . ‘Reliability and accuracy of measurement’, In: Lohman TG, Roche AF, Martorell R (eds), Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual. Human Kinetics Books: Champaign, IL, 1988, pp 83–86.
Luciano A, Livieri C, Di Pietro ME, Bergamaschi G, Maffeis C . Definition of obesity in childhood: criteria and limits. Minerva Pediatr 2003; 55: 453–459.
Eisenmann JC, Heelan KA, Welk GJ . Assessing body composition among 3- to 8-year-old children: anthropometry, BIA, and DXA. Obes Res 2004; 12: 1633–1640.
Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau RA, Stillman RJ, Van Loan M, Horswill CA et al. Influence of maturation on relationship of skinfolds to body density: a cross-sectional study. Hum Biol 1988; 56: 681–689.
Acknowledgements
We thank all the children who took part in the survey and all the centres that provided data. This study was conducted as part of the IDEFICS study (http://www.idefics.eu). We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the European Community within the Sixth RTD Framework Programme Contract No. 016181 (FOOD) and the grant support from the EU for the IDEFICS study. We thank the IDEFICS children for their participation in this extensive examination. The information in this document reflects the author's view and is provided as it is.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Statement of ethics
We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations regarding the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during this research. Approval by the appropriate ethical committees was obtained by each of the eight centres engaged in the fieldwork. Participants were not subjected to any study procedure before both the children and their parents gave their consent for examinations, collection of samples, subsequent analysis and storage of personal data and collected samples. The participating children and their parents could consent to single components of the study while refraining from others.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stomfai, S., Ahrens, W., Bammann, K. et al. Intra- and inter-observer reliability in anthropometric measurements in children. Int J Obes 35 (Suppl 1), S45–S51 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.34
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2011.34
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Prediction of fat mass from anthropometry at ages 7 to 9 years in Samoans: a cross-sectional study in the Ola Tuputupua’e cohort
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2023)
-
Trajectories of objectively measured physical activity and childhood overweight: longitudinal analysis of the IDEFICS/I.Family cohort
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2021)
-
The association of circulating miR-191 and miR-375 expression levels with markers of insulin resistance in overweight children: an exploratory analysis of the I.Family Study
Genes & Nutrition (2021)
-
Media use trajectories and risk of metabolic syndrome in European children and adolescents: the IDEFICS/I.Family cohort
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2021)
-
Novel clinical and radiological measures of lower limb obesity
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology (2021)