Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Translation and validation of the Greek version of the female sexual function index questionnaire

Abstract

The clinical evaluation of female sexual dysfunctions should be supplemented by validated questionnaires; however, there is no specific instrument available in Greek language. The study was designed to linguistically validate the Greek version of Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Ninety-nine healthy women and eighteen women with a sexual dysfunction were recruited through a survey and were asked to voluntarily complete the FSFI questionnaire in Greek (FSFI-Gr) at baseline and after 2 weeks. We assessed validity, internal consistency reliability and test–retest reliability of the FSFI greek version. Subscales of the FSFI showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's=0.92, P<0.01). Test-retest reliability median 14 days apart was excellent with intraclass coefficient 0.91 (P<0.01). The FSFI-Gr discriminated between women with and without sexual dysfunction with an optimal cutoff score 26 (sensitivity 71.4%, specificity 92.2%). The Greek version of the FSFI is a reliable tool for the assessment of female sexual dysfunction. The results show that it is comparable to the outcome of studies in English-speaking countries.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.

from$8.99

All prices are NET prices.

References

  1. 1

    Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing: : Arlington, 2013.

  2. 2

    Kirana PS, Tripodi F, Reisman Y, Porst H (eds). The EFS and ESSM Syllabus of Clinical Sexology. Medix: : Amsterdam, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Reisman Y, Porst H, Lowenstein L, Tripodi F, Kirana PS (eds) The ESSM Manual of Sexual Medicine, 2nd edn. Medix: : Amsterdam, 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Andrews WC . Approaches to taking a sexual history. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 2000; 9 (Suppl 1): S21–S24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J, Leiblum S, Meston C, Shabsigh R et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 191–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hatzichristou D, Kirana P, Banner L, Althof S, Lonnee-Hoffman R, Dennerstein L et al. Diagnostic evaluation of sexual dysfunctions in men and women and the use of symptom scales and questionnaires. J Sex Med 2016; 13: 1166–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Kriston L, Gunzler C, Rohde A, Berner MM . Is one question enough to detect female sexual dysfunctions? A diagnostic accuracy study in 6,194 women. J Sex Med 2010; 7: 1831–1841.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Filocamo MT, Serati M, Li Marzi V, Costantini E, Milanesi M, Pietropaolo A et al. The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): linguistic validation of the Italian version. J Sex Med 2014; 11: 447–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Blumel J, Binfa L, Cataldo P, Carrasco A, Izaguirre H, Sarrá S . Indicede Función Sexual Femenina: un test para evaluar la sexualidad de la mujer. Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol 2004; 69: 118–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Nowosielski K, Wrobel B, Sioma-Markowska U, Poreba R . Development and validation of the Polish version of the Female Sexual Function Index in the Polish population of females. J Sex Med 2013; 10: 386–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Ryding EL, Blom C . Validation of the Swedish version of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 2015; 12: 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Witting K, Santtila P, Jern P, Varjonen M, Wager I, Hoglund M et al. Evaluation of the female sexual function index in a population based sample from Finland. Arch Sex Behav 2008; 37: 912–924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Oksuz E, Malhan S . Prevalence and risk factors for female sexual dysfunction in Turkish women. TJ Urol 2006; 175: 654–658; discussion 8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Sun X, Li C, Jin L, Fan Y, Wang D . Development and validation of Chinese version of female sexual function index in a Chinese population-a pilot study. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 1101–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Anis TH, Gheit SA, Saied HS, Al kherbash SA . Arabic translation of Female Sexual Function Index and validation in an Egyptian population. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 3370–3378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Ghassamia M, Asghari A, Shaeiri MR, Safarinejad MR . Validation of psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Female Sexual Function Index. Urol J 2013; 10: 878–885.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Sidi H, Abdullah N, Puteh SE, Midin M . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): validation of the Malay version. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1642–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Rillon-Tabil N, Malong C, Vicera J, Gomez H, Vol P . 51 NO-D, 2013. Translation and Validity of the Female Sexual Function Index Filipino Version (FSFI-Fil). Phil J Intern Med 2013; 51: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Lee Y, Lim MC, Joo J, Park K, Lee S, Seo S et al. Development and validation of the Korean version of the Female Sexual Function Index-6 (FSFI-6 K). Yonsei Med J 2014; 55: 1442–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Takahashi M, Inokuchi T, Watanabe C, Saito T, Kai I . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): development of a Japanese version. J Sex Med 2011; 8: 2246–2254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Rehman KU, Asif Mahmood M, Sheikh SS, Sultan T, Khan MA . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): Translation, Validation, and Cross-Cultural Adaptation of an Urdu Version ‘FSFI-U’. Sex Med 2015; 3: 244–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, Eremenco S, McElroy S, Verjee-Lorenz A et al. Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health: 2005; 8: 94–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R . The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther 2005; 31: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hayes RD, Dennerstein L, Bennett CM, Fairley CK . What is the ‘true’ prevalence of female sexual dysfunctions and does the way we assess these conditions have an impact? J Sex Med 2008; 5: 777–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Meston CM . Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther 2003; 29: 39–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    ter Kuile MM, Brauer M, Laan E . The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): psychometric properties within a Dutch population. J Sex Marital Ther 2006; 32: 289–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Verit FF, Verit A . Validation of the female sexual function index in women with chronic pelvic pain. J Sex Med 2007; 4: 1635–1641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Basson R . The female sexual response: a different model. J Sex Marital Ther 2000; 26: 51–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Basson R . Human sex-response cycles. J Sex Marital Ther 2001; 27: 33–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P S Kirana.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zachariou, A., Filiponi, M. & Kirana, P. Translation and validation of the Greek version of the female sexual function index questionnaire. Int J Impot Res 29, 171–174 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijir.2017.18

Download citation

Further reading

Search

Quick links