We report a STK11 splicing variant comprising a 131-bp insertion that is derived from intron 1, which has previously been reported to possess potent pathogenicity. The same variant was detected in a Peutz–Jeghers syndrome patient harboring a genomic deletion in the vicinity of exon 1 of the STK11 gene, which indicated that this variant was derived from the wild-type allele. We also found the same variant in other normal subjects. This variant corresponds to the predicted transcript variant of STK11 (XM_011528209), which is derived from the genomic sequence of Chr19 (NT_011295.12). Therefore, we concluded that the splicing variant was not pathogenic.
Peutz–Jeghers syndrome (PJS) is an autosomal dominant disease characterized by intestinal polyposis, mucocutaneous pigmentation, and malignancies. Germline mutations in the STK11 (LKB1) gene have been identified as the major cause of PJS.1,2 STK11 contains nine coding exons and one non-coding exon. STK11 is a 433 residue serine threonine protein kinase that controls the activity of AMP-activated protein kinase family members and has roles in cell metabolism, cell polarity, chromatin remodeling, cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA damage responses.3 Reportedly, half of the mutations in STK11 have been identified as point mutations; however, a large genomic deletion has also been found in 30% of patients with PJS.4 Direct sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification are both recommended in the analysis of subjects with PJS. Splicing variants of STK11 have also been suggested to be mutations that cause PJS.5,6
We herein report one STK11 splicing variant found in a PJS patient, which was difficult to ascertain as a normal variant or a pathogenic form. The patient was a 30-year-old female who developed some hamartomas in the sigmoid colon, pigmentation on the oral mucosa, lips, and fingers, and cervical cancer, as we previously described.7 She had a genomic deletion comprising exon 1 in the STK11 gene and had been diagnosed as PJS. Her pedigree is shown in Figure 1a. We also detected a STK11 splicing variant in the reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) products from the blood samples treated with puromycin. The variant contained a 131-bp insertion, which was derived from the middle part of intron 1 (9,064-bp downstream of exon 1), between exons 1 and 2 (Figure 2c). Without puromycin, no splicing variant was found in the patient by RT-PCR/direct sequencing (Figure 1b). Puromycin, a protein-translation inhibitor, is known to reduce the effects of nonsense-mediated mRNA (messenger RNA) decay (NMD); therefore, we expected the signals from this splicing variant to be suppressed by NMD.8 This splicing variant resulted in a premature termination codon in exon 2 (Figure 2d).
Because the pathogenic mutation in this patient comprised the genomic deletion of exon 1, as reported in Kobayashi et al., and the forward RT-PCR primer was located in this exon, no PCR product was amplified by RT-PCR. Therefore, this splicing variant was derived from the wild-type allele and assumed to be non-pathogenic (Figure 2d). This splicing isomer was not detected in RT-PCR using total RNA extracted from peripheral blood lymphocytes without the puromycin treatment.
Abed et al. have previously presented a case of PJS with a compound heterozygosity for STK11 splice mutations. One mutation contained an A>G transition that inactivated the acceptor splice site consensus of intron 1 (STK11 IVS1–2A>G). The other mutation was the same splicing mutation as in our case, which contained 131 bp derived from intron 1 that were inserted between exons 1 and 2. This mutation was shared and segregated with the patient’s son and daughter.9 Abed concluded that it was unclear whether this splicing form was deleterious or normal.
To address this question, we performed RT-PCR spanning exons 1–3 and direct sequencing for subjects who did not carry a germline mutation in STK11. In the RT-PCR analysis spanning exons 1 and 3, we found wild-type bands and weak upper bands by RT-PCR spanning exons 1–3 in four subjects (Figure 2a). The upper bands from the RT-PCR products were excised from the gel, and extracted DNAs were reamplified. The same splicing variant carrying the 131-bp insertion derived from intron 1 between exons 1 and 2 was detected in all subjects (Figure 2b). Because we also identified the same upper bands in other normal controls (data not shown), we concluded that the splicing variant was not pathogenic but was a normal splicing isomer.
In addition, immunohistochemistry using an anti-STK11 antibody recognizing amino acids 73–122 of human STK11 protein (ab58786; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was performed in this patient to confirm whether the allele with this splicing variant expressed normal STK11 protein. The results showed that STK11 protein expression was not attenuated in the normal endometrium, but it was attenuated in cervical cancer tissue (Figure 1c). STK11 is a tumor suppressor gene, which was originally assigned to the chromosomal locus showing a frequently deleted region of Chr19p13.3, implying that the inactivation of STK11 occurs in the late stage of carcinogenesis.10 Signals from the splicing variant were difficult to detect by RT-PCR of the puromycin non-treated sample, implying the absence of the mutated protein. However, it may be possible to detect an aberrantly spliced protein harboring the peptide residues 73 through 97 of the STK11 protein, using this rabbit polyclonal antibody whose reactivity was thought to be weak (but present).
To establish the mechanism by which this splicing variant occurred, we analyzed the 131-bp sequence inserted in intron 1. Using the software RepeatMasker (Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA, USA), long interspersed element-1 (LINE-1/L1) and Alu elements were identified in the 131-bp sequence.11 A previous study has reported that some L1 elements have multiple splice donor sites and splice acceptor sites, and lead to the aberrant splicing of genes,12 and we hypothesized that this splicing variant was caused by the GT–AG motif present in the L1 and Alu repeat in intron 1 of the STK11 gene (Figure 2c). Another piece of evidence supporting our hypothesis that this phenomenon is caused by cryptic splice sites located in intron 1 and not allelic mutations has been submitted to a database as a putative transcript variant X2 (XM_011528209.1). This sequence, predicted by automated computational analysis, contains the same sequence as in our case, comprising 131 bp derived from intron 1 that was inserted between exons 1 and 2. This transcript variant X2 has its coding sequence located in the 131 bp derived from intron 1 and exon 2, and its mRNA is suppressed by NMD.
Sugano, Kokichi HGV Database http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.hgv.774 (2015)
About this article
Familial Cancer (2017)