Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

An efficient, non-viral dendritic vector for gene delivery in tissue engineering


Recent developments within the field of tissue engineering (TE) have shown that biomaterial scaffold systems can be augmented via the incorporation of gene therapeutics. The objective of this study was to assess the potential of the activated polyamidoamine dendrimer (dPAMAM) transfection reagent (SuperfectTM) as a gene delivery system to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in both monolayer and 3D culture on collagen based scaffolds. dPAMAM-pDNA polyplexes at a mass ratio (M:R) 10:1 (dPAMAM : pDNA) (1 ug pDNA) were capable of facilitating prolonged reporter gene expression in monolayer MSCs which was superior to that facilitated using polyethylenimine (PEI)-pDNA polyplexes (2 ug pDNA). When dPAMAM-pDNA polyplexes (1 ug pDNA) were soak loaded onto a collagen-chondroitin sulphate (CS) scaffold prolonged transgene expression was facilitated which was higher than that obtained for a PEI-pDNA polyplex (2 ug pDNA) loaded scaffold. Transgene expression was dependent on the composite nature of the collagen scaffold with varying expression profiles obtained from a suite of collagen constructs including a collagen alone, collagen-CS, collagen-hydroxyapatite, collagen-nanohydroxyapatite and collagen-hyaluronic acid scaffold. Therefore, the dPAMAM vector described herein represents a biocompatible, effective gene delivery vector for TE applications which, via matching with a particular composite scaffold type, can be tailored for regeneration of various tissue defects.

Access options

Rent or Buy article

Get time limited or full article access on ReadCube.


All prices are NET prices.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7


  1. 1

    Williams DF . To engineer is to create: the link between engineering and regeneration. Trends in biotechnology 2006; 24: 4–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Richardson TP, Peters MC, Ennett AB, Mooney DJ . Polymeric system for dual growth factor delivery. Nat Biotech 2001; 19: 1029–1034.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, Weiner BK . A critical review of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 trials in spinal surgery: emerging safety concerns and lessons learned. The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society 2011; 11: 471–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Quinlan E, Thompson EM, Matsiko A, O'Brien FJ, Lopez-Noriega A . Long-term controlled delivery of rhBMP-2 from collagen-hydroxyapatite scaffolds for superior bone tissue regeneration. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 2015; 207: 112–119.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Tierney EG, Duffy GP, Cryan SA, Curtin CM, O'Brien FJ . Non-viral gene-activated matrices: next generation constructs for bone repair. Organogenesis 2013; 9: 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Robbins PD, Ghivizzani SC . Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 1998; 80: 35–47.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Seow Y, Wood MJ . Biological Gene Delivery Vehicles: Beyond Viral Vectors. Molecular Therapy: the Journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy 2009; 17: 767–777.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Glover DJ, Lipps HJ, Jans DA . Towards safe, non-viral therapeutic gene expression in humans. Nature reviews Genetics. 2005; 6: 299–310.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Bonadio J, Smiley E, Patil P, Goldstein S . Localized, direct plasmid gene delivery in vivo: prolonged therapy results in reproducible tissue regeneration. Nat Med 1999; 5: 753–759.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Klüter H, Bieback K . Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem cells 2006; 24: 1294–1301.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Yannas IV . Tissue and organ regeneration in adults. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Zhang M, Yannas I Peripheral Nerve Regeneration In: Yannas I editor. Regenerative Medicine II. Advances in Biochemical Engineering 94. Springer: Berlin Heidelberg, 2005: 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Chamberlain LJ, Yannas IV, Hsu HP, Strichartz G, Spector M . Collagen-GAG substrate enhances the quality of nerve regeneration through collagen tubes up to level of autograft. Experimental neurology 1998; 154: 315–329.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Murphy CM, Haugh MG, O'Brien FJ . The effect of mean pore size on cell attachment, proliferation and migration in collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 461–466.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Matsiko A, Levingstone TJ, O'Brien FJ, Gleeson JP . Addition of hyaluronic acid improves cellular infiltration and promotes early-stage chondrogenesis in a collagen-based scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials 2012; 11: 41–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Gleeson J, Plunkett N, O’Brien F . Addition of hydroxyapatite improves stiffness, interconnectivity and osteogenic potential of a highly porous collagen-based scaffold for bone tissue regeneration. Eur Cell Mater 2010; 20: 218–230.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Cunniffe GM, Dickson GR, Partap S, Stanton KT, O'Brien FJ . Development and characterisation of a collagen nano-hydroxyapatite composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Journal of materials science Materials in medicine 2010; 21: 2293–2298.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Lyons FG, Al-Munajjed AA, Kieran SM, Toner ME, Murphy CM, Duffy GP et al. The healing of bony defects by cell-free collagen-based scaffolds compared to stem cell-seeded tissue engineered constructs. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 9232–9243.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Levingstone TJ, Thompson E, Matsiko A, Schepens A, Gleeson JP, O'Brien FJ . Multi-layered collagen-based scaffolds for osteochondral defect repair in rabbits. Acta Biomater. 2016; 32: 149–160.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Brougham CM, Levingstone TJ, Jockenhoevel S, Flanagan TC, O'Brien FJ . Incorporation of fibrin into a collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrix results in a scaffold with improved mechanical properties and enhanced capacity to resist cell-mediated contraction. Acta Biomater. 2015; 26: 205–214.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    O'Leary C, Cavanagh B, Unger RE, Kirkpatrick CJ, O'Dea S, O'Brien FJ et al. The development of a tissue-engineered tracheobronchial epithelial model using a bilayered collagen-hyaluronate scaffold. Biomaterials 2016; 85: 111–127.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    O’Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson LJ . The effect of pore size on cell adhesion in collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 2005; 26: 433–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Tierney EG, Duffy GP, Hibbitts AJ, Cryan S-A, O'Brien FJ . The development of non-viral gene-activated matrices for bone regeneration using polyethyleneimine (PEI) and collagen-based scaffolds. Journal of Controlled Release. 2012; 158: 304–311.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Raftery RM, Tierney EG, Curtin CM, Cryan SA, O'Brien FJ . Development of a gene-activated scaffold platform for tissue engineering applications using chitosan-pDNA nanoparticles on collagen-based scaffolds. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 2015; 210: 84–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Curtin CM, Cunniffe GM, Lyons FG, Bessho K, Dickson GR, Duffy GP et al. Innovative collagen nano-hydroxyapatite scaffolds offer a highly efficient non-viral gene delivery platform for stem cell-mediated bone formation. Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla) 2012; 24: 749–754.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Godbey WT, Wu KK, Hirasaki GJ, Mikos AG . Improved packing of poly(ethylenimine)/DNA complexes increases transfection efficiency. Gene Ther 1999; 6: 1380–1388.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Dufès C, Uchegbu IF, Schätzlein AG . Dendrimers in gene delivery. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 2005; 57: 2177–2202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Abbasi E, Aval SF, Akbarzadeh A, Milani M, Nasrabadi HT, Joo SW et al. Dendrimers: synthesis, applications, and properties. Nanoscale Research Letters. 2014; 9: 247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Holladay C, Keeney M, Greiser U, Murphy M, O'Brien T, Pandit A . A matrix reservoir for improved control of non-viral gene delivery. Journal of controlled release: official journal of the Controlled Release Society 2009; 136: 220–225.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Dennig J, Duncan E . Gene transfer into eukaryotic cells using activated polyamidoamine dendrimers. Reviews in Molecular Biotechnology 2002; 90: 339–347.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    De Jong G, Telenius A, Vanderbyl S, Meitz A, Drayer J . Efficient in-vitro transfer of a 60-Mb mammalian artificial chromosome into murine and hamster cells using cationic lipids and dendrimers. Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology 2001; 9: 475–485.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Maruyama-Tabata H, Harada Y, Matsumura T, Satoh E, Cui F, Iwai M et al. Effective suicide gene therapy in vivo by EBV-based plasmid vector coupled with polyamidoamine dendrimer. Gene Ther 2000; 7: 53–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Rudolph C, Lausier J, Naundorf S, Muller RH, Rosenecker J . in vivo gene delivery to the lung using polyethylenimine and fractured polyamidoamine dendrimers. The journal of gene medicine 2000; 2: 269–278.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Mathew A, Cao H, Collin E, Wang W, Pandit A . Hyperbranched PEGmethacrylate linear pDMAEMA block copolymer as an efficient non-viral gene delivery vector. International journal of pharmaceutics 2012; 434: 99–105.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Gheisari Y, Soleimani M, Azadmanesh K, Zeinali S . Multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: optimization and comparison of five cationic polymer-based gene delivery methods. Cytotherapy 2008; 10: 815–823.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Braun CS, Vetro JA, Tomalia DA, Koe GS, Koe JG, Middaugh CR . Structure/function relationships of polyamidoamine/DNA dendrimers as gene delivery vehicles. Journal of pharmaceutical sciences 2005; 94: 423–436.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Kiefer K, Clement J, Garidel P, Peschka-Süss R . Transfection Efficiency and Cytotoxicity of Nonviral Gene Transfer Reagents in Human Smooth Muscle and Endothelial Cells. Pharmaceutical research 2004; 21: 1009–1017.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Gabrielson NP, Pack DW, Khademhosseini A, Kobayashi H . DNA nanoparticles encapsulated in 3D tissue-engineered scaffolds enhance osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of biomedical materials research Part A. 2008; 85: 47–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Ow Sullivan MM, Green JJ, Przybycien TM . Development of a novel gene delivery scaffold utilizing colloidal gold-polyethylenimine conjugates for DNA condensation. Gene Ther 2003; 10: 1882–1890.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Capan Y, Woo BH, Gebrekidan S, Ahmed S, DeLuca PP . Preparation and Characterization of Poly (D,L-Lactide-Co-Glycolide) Microspheres for Controlled Release of Poly(L-Lysine) Complexed Plasmid DNA. Pharmaceutical research 1999; 16: 509–513.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Castano IM, Curtin CM, Shaw G, Murphy JM, Duffy GP, O'Brien FJ . A novel collagen-nanohydroxyapatite microRNA-activated scaffold for tissue engineering applications capable of efficient delivery of both miR-mimics and antagomiRs to human mesenchymal stem cells. Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society 2015; 200: 42–51.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Hosseinkhani H, Azzam T, Kobayashi H, Hiraoka Y, Shimokawa H, Domb AJ et al. Combination of 3D tissue engineered scaffold and non-viral gene carrier enhance in vitro DNA expression of mesenchymal stem cells. Biomaterials 2006; 27: 4269–4278.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    Xie Y, Yang ST, Kniss DA . Three-dimensional cell-scaffold constructs promote efficient gene transfection: implications for cell-based gene therapy. Tissue Eng. 2001; 7: 585–598.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    O’Rorke S, Keeney M, Pandit A . Non-viral polyplexes: Scaffold mediated delivery for gene therapy. Progress in Polymer Science. 2010; 35: 441–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bao T, Wang H, Zhang W, Xia X, Zhou J, Weng W et al. Application of Dendrimer/Plasmid hBMP2 complexes loaded into a B-TCP/Collagen Scaffold in the treatment of femoral rat defects Biomedical Engineering: Applications. Basis and Communications 2014; 26: 1450005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Keeney M, van den Beucken JJJP, van der Kraan PM, Jansen JA, Pandit A . The ability of a collagen/calcium phosphate scaffold to act as its own vector for gene delivery and to promote bone formation via transfection with VEGF165. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2893–2902.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Kitchens KM, Foraker AB, Kolhatkar RB, Swaan PW, Ghandehari H . Endocytosis and Interaction of Poly (Amidoamine) Dendrimers with Caco-2 Cells. Pharmaceutical research 2007; 24: 2138–2145.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Rejman J, Oberle V, Zuhorn IS, Hoekstra D . Size-dependent internalization of particles via the pathways of clathrin- and caveolae-mediated endocytosis. The Biochemical journal 2004; 377 (Pt 1): 159–169.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Zhou D, Cutlar L, Gao Y, Wang W, O’Keeffe-Ahern J, McMahon S et al. The transition from linear to highly branched poly(β-amino ester)s: Branching matters for gene delivery. Science Advances 2016; 2: e1600102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Georgiou TK, Phylactou LA, Patrickios CS . Synthesis, Characterization, and Evaluation as Transfection Reagents of Ampholytic Star Copolymers: Effect of Star Architecture. Biomacromolecules 2006; 7: 3505–3512.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51

    Shi S-L, Dan B, Liu F, Lin L-R, Fu Z-G, Jing G-J et al. Synthesis and characterization of a novel cationic polymer gene delivery vector. International journal of molecular medicine 2010; 26: 491.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52

    Newland B, Zheng Y, Jin Y, Abu-Rub M, Cao H, Wang W et al. Single Cyclized Molecule Versus Single Branched Molecule: A Simple and Efficient 3D 'Knot' Polymer Structure for Nonviral Gene Delivery. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2012; 134: 4782–4789.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53

    Banerjee P, Reichardt W, Weissleder R, Bogdanov A Jr. . Novel hyperbranched dendron for gene transfer in vitro and in vivo. Bioconjugate chemistry 2004; 15: 960–968.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54

    Jones CF, Campbell RA, Franks Z, Gibson CC, Thiagarajan G, Vieira-de-Abreu A et al. Cationic PAMAM dendrimers disrupt key platelet functions. Mol Pharm. 2012; 9: 1599–1611.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55

    Li C, Liu H, Sun Y, Wang H, Guo F, Rao S et al. PAMAM nanoparticles promote acute lung injury by inducing autophagic cell death through the Akt-TSC2-mTOR signaling pathway. Journal of molecular cell biology 2009; 1: 37–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56

    Lee JH, Cha KE, Kim MS, Hong HW, Chung DJ, Ryu G et al. Nanosized polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer-induced apoptosis mediated by mitochondrial dysfunction. Toxicology letters 2009; 190: 202–207.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57

    Santos JL, Oramas E, Pêgo AP, Granja PL, Tomás H . Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells using PAMAM dendrimers as gene delivery vectors. Journal of Controlled Release. 2009; 134: 141–148.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58

    Choi YJ, Kang SJ, Kim YJ, Lim YB, Chung HW . Comparative studies on the genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of polymeric gene carriers polyethylenimine (PEI) and polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer in Jurkat T-cells. Drug and chemical toxicology 2010; 33: 357–366.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59

    Akhtar S . Cationic nanosystems for the delivery of small interfering ribonucleic acid therapeutics: a focus on toxicogenomics. Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology 2010; 6: 1347–1362.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60

    Akhtar S, Chandrasekhar B, Attur S, Yousif MHM, Benter IF . On the nanotoxicity of PAMAM dendrimers: Superfect® stimulates the EGFR–ERK1/2 signal transduction pathway via an oxidative stress-dependent mechanism in HEK 293 cells. International journal of pharmaceutics 2013; 448: 239–246.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61

    Duncan R, Izzo L . Dendrimer biocompatibility and toxicity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2005; 57: 2215–2237.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62

    Huang YC, Simmons C, Kaigler D, Rice KG, Mooney DJ . Bone regeneration in a rat cranial defect with delivery of PEI-condensed plasmid DNA encoding for bone morphogenetic protein-4 (BMP-4). Gene Ther 2005; 12: 418–426.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63

    Curtin CM, Tierney EG, McSorley K, Cryan SA, Duffy GP, O'Brien FJ . Combinatorial gene therapy accelerates bone regeneration: non-viral dual delivery of VEGF and BMP2 in a collagen-nanohydroxyapatite scaffold. Advanced healthcare materials 2015; 4: 223–227.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64

    Endo M, Kuroda S, Kondo H, Maruoka Y, Ohya K, Kasugai S . Bone regeneration by modified gene-activated matrix: effectiveness in segmental tibial defects in rats. Tissue Eng. 2006; 12: 489–497.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65

    Park J, Lutz R, Felszeghy E, Wiltfang J, Nkenke E, Neukam FW et al. The effect on bone regeneration of a liposomal vector to deliver BMP-2 gene to bone grafts in peri-implant bone defects. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2772–2782.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66

    Hortensius RA, Becraft JR, Pack DW, Harley BA . The effect of glycosaminoglycan content on polyethylenimine-based gene delivery within three-dimensional collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials science 2015; 3: 645–654.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67

    O'Brien FJ, Harley BA, Yannas IV, Gibson L . Influence of freezing rate on pore structure in freeze-dried collagen-GAG scaffolds. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1077–1086.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


This study was undertaken as part of the Translational Research in Nanomedical Devices (TREND) research group, School of Pharmacy, RCSI, facilitated via a Science Foundation Ireland Investigators Program 13/IA/1840. The authors would like to thank Brenton Cavanagh, RCSI, Ireland, for his assistance in obtaining TEM & Live/Dead images.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to S-A Cryan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Gene Therapy website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walsh, D., Heise, A., O’Brien, F. et al. An efficient, non-viral dendritic vector for gene delivery in tissue engineering. Gene Ther 24, 681–691 (2017).

Download citation


Quick links