Abstract
Purpose To assess the effectiveness of optometrists as screeners for diabetic retinopathy using slit-lamp binocular indirect ophthalmoscopy through dilated pupils.
Methods Prospective study of a screening scheme. Screening was performed by 27 locally accredited optometrists in their practice. The referral protocol used a new simple grading system of retinopathy, especially designed for use in an optometrist screening programme. All positive referrals and 10% of negative referrals were re-examined by an ophthalmologist. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and technical failure rates were calculated.
Results The optometrists screened 4904 people with diabetes in 18 months. ‘Subthreshold’ (screen negative) reports accounted for 4438 (90.5% of 4904); 429 (9.67%) of these were re-examined at secondary screening. There was disagreement regarding grading in 13 patients, of whom 5 (1.16% of 429) had sight-threatening retinopathy (STDR); this extrapolates to 52 patients if all the 4438 test-negatives had been examined. Of the 371 ‘threshold’ patients, 112 (30.18%) were false positives; the commonest cause for false positive referral was drusen in patients with background diabetic retinopathy. The sensitivity for identification of STDR was 76% (95% CI 70% to 81%) and specificity 95% (95% CI 95% to 96%). The likelihood ratio of a positive test indicating STDR was 16.54 (95% CI 14.17 to 19.23) and that of a negative test 0.25 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.32). The technical failure rate was 0.2%.
Conclusions Suitably trained and accredited community optometrists performed well when screening for diabetic retinopathy using slit-lamp biomicroscopy through a dilated pupil. This was facilitated by the use of simple grading and referral criteria. The sensitivity, positive likelihood ratio and specificity were high.
Similar content being viewed by others
Article PDF
References
Bagga P, Verma D, Walton C, Masson EA, Hepburn DA . Survey of diabetic retinopathy screening services in England and Wales. Diabetic Med 1998;15:780–2.
Baker R, Grimshaw G, Thompson JR, Wilson A . Services for diabetic retinopathy screening in England and Wales: a survey of ophthalmologists. Practical Diabetes Int 1999;16(2):33–4.
Brechner RJ, Cowie CC, Howie LJ, Herman WH, Will JC, Harris ML . Ophthalmic examination among adults with diagnosed diabetes mellitus. JAMA 1993;270:1714–8.
Owens DR, Gibbins RL, Kohner E, Grimshaw GM, Greenwood R, Harding S . Diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabetic Med 2000;17:493–4.
UK National Screening Committee. Hot topics. Preservation of sight: reducing the risk of diabetic eye disease, http://www.doh.gov.uk/nsc/hottopics/hottopicsjnd.htm, accessed 19 September 2000.
Hutchison A, McIntosh A, Peters J, et al. Effectiveness of screening and monitoring tests for diabetic retinopathy. Diabetic Med 2000;17:495–506.
Prasad S, Jones K, Phillips RP . Creating a district diabetes register: input from primary and secondary care is necessary for success. Br J Gen Practice 2000;50:826.
ETDRS. Grading diabetic retinopathy from stereoscopic color fundus photographs: an extension of the modified Airlie House classification. ETDRS report no. 10. Ophthalmology 1991;98(5 Suppl):786–806.
Klein R, Klein BE, Magli YL, et al. An alternative method of grading diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology 1986;93:1183–7.
Aldington SJ, Kohner EM, Meuer S, Klein R, Sjolie AK . Methodology for retinal photography and assessment of diabetic retinopathy: the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetologia 1995;38:437–44.
Gibbins RL, Owens DR, Allen JC, Eastman L . Practical application of the European Field Guide in screening for diabetic retinopathy by using ophthalmoscopy and 35 mm retinal slides. Diabetologia 1998;41:59–64.
Harding SP, Broadbent DM, Neoh C, White MC, Vora J . Sensitivity and specificity of photography and direct ophthalmoscopy in screening for sight threatening eye disease: the Liverpool Diabetic Eye Study. BMJ 1995;311:1131–5.
Wells S, Benett I, Holloway G, Harlow V . Area-wide diabetes care: the Manchester experience with primary health care teams 1991-1997. Diabetic Med 1998;15(Suppl 3):S49–53.
Siann T, Duncan EM, Sullivan F, Matthews D, Cromie DT . Area-wide diabetes care: the Lanarkshire experience with primary health care teams 1994-1997. Diabetic Med 1998;15(Suppl 3):54–7.
Morris AD, Boyle DI, MacAlpine R, et al. The diabetes audit and research in Tayside Scotland (DARTS) study: electronic record linkage to create a diabetes register. DARTS/MEMO Collaboration. BMJ 1997;315:524–8.
Leslie PJ, McDonald S, McDonald IA . Impressive results can be obtained without record linkage. BMJ 1998;316:472.
Whitford DL, Roberts SH . Registers constructed from primary care databases have advantages. BMJ 1998;316:472.
Burns-Cox CJ, Hart JC . Screening of diabetics for retinopathy by ophthalmic opticians. BMJ 1985;290:1052–4.
Vinall H, Dodson PM, Gibson JM, Eames S, O'Leary MB, Terry AM . Screening for diabetic retinopathy by optometrists with ophthalmoscopy in an urban community: the community diabetic eye screening project. (Abstract of Poster 96, presented at The British Diabetic Association Annual Professional Conference.) Diabetic Med 1995;12(Suppl 1):S40.
Ryder RE, Close CF, Krentz AJ, et al. A ‘fail-safe’ screening programme for diabetic retinopathy. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1998;32:134–7.
Hurwitz B, Goodman C, Yudkin J . Prompting the clinical care of non-insulin dependent (type II) diabetic patients in an inner city area: one model of community care. BMJ 1993;306:624–30.
Burnett S, Hurwitz B, Davey C, et al. The implementation of prompted retinal screening for diabetic eye disease by accredited optometrists in an inner city district of North London: a quality of care study. Diabetic Med 1998;15(Suppl 3):S38–43.
Buxton MJ, Sculpher MJ, Ferguson BA, et al. Screening for treatable diabetic retinopathy: a comparison of different methods. Diabetic Med 1991;8:371–7.
Leese GP, Tesfaye S, Dengler-Harles M, et al. Screening for diabetic eye disease by optometrists using slit lamps. J R Coll Physicians Lond 1997;31:65–9.
Dorset Health Commission. Primary care development programme; extending the services provided by high street optometrists. Bournemouth and Dorchester: Dorset Health Commission, 1993/94.
Pointer JS, Baranyovits P, O'Malley BP . The Kettering Diabetic Monitoring Programme: twelve months experience of an optometric practice-based scheme. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics 1998;18:401–7.
Jowett C . Keeping an eye on care: Bandolier 1999, http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/Bandolier/ImpAct/imp02/i2-4.html, accessed 19 September 2000.
Owen DR, Gibbins RL, Lewis PA, Wall S, Allen JC, Morton R . Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies? Diabetic Med 1998;15:170–5.
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Complications of diabetes: screening for retinopathy, management of foot ulcers. Effective Health Care 1999;5(4):1–12.
Batchelder T, Barricks M . The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:702–3.
Klein R, Klein BE, Moss SE, Cruickshanks KJ . The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: in reply. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:703–4.
Vijan S, Hofer TP, Hayward RA . Cost-utility analysis of screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. JAMA 2000;283:889–96.
Williams R, Nussey S, Humphry R, Thompson G . Assessment of non-mydriatic fundus photography in detection of diabetic retinopathy. BMJ 1986;293:1140–2.
Lairson DR, Pugh JA, Kapadia AS, Lorimor RJ, Jacobson J, Velez R . Cost-effectiveness of alternative methods for diabetic retinopathy screening. Diabetes Care 1992;15:1369–77.
Hayes TM, Harries J . Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics. BMJ 1984;289:728–30.
Jones D, Dolben J, Owens DR, Vora JP, Young S, Creagh FM . Non-mydriatic Polaroid photography in screening for diabetic retinopathy: evaluation in a clinical setting. BMJ 1988;296:1029–30.
Mohan R, Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Nijhar I, Mohan V, Mather HM . Evaluation of a non-mydriatic camera in Indian and European diabetic patients. Br J Ophthalmol 1988;72:841–5.
Chantelau E, Zwecker M, Weiss H, Kluxen G, Berger M . Fundus polaroid screening for diabetic retinopathy. Is one print per patient enough? Diabetes Care 1989;12:223–6.
Leese GP, Newton RW, Jung RT, Haining W, Ellingford A . Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a widely spaced population using non-mydriatic fundus photography in a mobile unit. Tayside Mobile Eye Screening Unit. Diabetic Med 1992;9:459–62.
British Diabetic Association. Retinal photographic screening for diabetic eye disease. London: BDA, 1997.
Taylor R . Practical community screening for diabetic retinopathy using the mobile retinal camera: report of a 12 centre study. British Diabetic Association Mobile Retinal Screening Group. Diabetic Med 1996;13:946–52.
Taylor R, Lovelock L, Tunbridge WM, et al. Comparison of non-mydriatic retinal photography with ophthalmoscopy in 2159 patients: mobile retinal camera study. BMJ 1990;301:1243–7.
Klein R, Klein BE, Neider MW, Hubbard LD, Meuer SM, Brothers RJ . Diabetic retinopathy as detected using ophthalmoscopy, a nonmydriatic camera and a standard fundus camera. Ophthalmology 1985;92:485–91.
Higgs ER, Harney BA, Kelleher A, Reckless JP . Detection of diabetic retinopathy in the community using a non-mydriatic camera. Diabetic Med 1991;8:551–5.
Gibbins RL, Kinsella F, Young S, Saunders J, Owens DR . Screening for diabetic retinopathy in general practice using 35 mm colour transparency fundal photographs. Practical Diabetes 1994;11:203–6.
Pugh JA, Jacobson JM, Van Heuven WA, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the wide-angle retinal camera. Diabetes Care 1993;16:889–95.
Penman AD, Saaddine JB, Hegazy M, et al. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults. Diabetic Med 1998;15:783–7.
Gonzalez ME, Gonzalez C, Stern MP, Arredondo B, Martinez S . Concordance in diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy by fundus photography between retina specialists and a standardized reading center. Mexico City Diabetes Study Retinopathy Group. Arch Med Res 1995;26:127–31.
O'Hare JP, Hopper A, Madhaven C, et al. Adding retinal photography to screening for diabetic retinopathy: a prospective study in primary care. BMJ 1996;312:679–82.
Jacob J, Stead J, Sykes J, Taylor D, Tooke JE . A report on the use of technician ophthalmoscopy combined with the use of the Canon non-mydriatic camera in screening for diabetic retinopathy in the community. Diabetic Med 1995;12:419–25.
Ryder B . Screening for diabetic retinopathy [editorial]. BMJ 1995;311:207–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Presented at The Oxford Ophthalmological Congress, Oxford, 2-5 July 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Prasad, S., Kamath, G., Jones, K. et al. Effectiveness of optometrist screening for diabetic retinopathy using slit-lamp biomicroscopy. Eye 15, 595–601 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.192
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2001.192
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Sensitivity and specificity of Norwegian optometrists’ evaluation of diabetic retinopathy in single-field retinal images – a cross-sectional experimental study
BMC Health Services Research (2013)
-
Tear fluid proteomics multimarkers for diabetic retinopathy screening
BMC Ophthalmology (2013)
-
Suspected retinopathies in Norwegian optometric practice with emphasis on patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional study
BMC Health Services Research (2008)
-
Ophthalmic nurse practitioner led diabetic retinopathy screening. Results of a 3-month trial
Eye (2006)
-
Comparison of optometry vs digital photography screening for diabetic retinopathy in a single district
Eye (2004)