Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Body Composition, Energy Expenditure and Physical Activity

Changes in phase angle and body composition induced by resistance training in older women

Abstract

Background:

Resistance training (RT) has selective effects on body composition that may counteract the deleterious effects of aging. Changes in phase angle (PhA) may serve to monitor the influence of RT in older people.

Objectives:

To describe the effect of RT in training, detraining and retraining on body composition, including PhA in older women.

Subjects/methods:

Thirty-three older women (60 years old) participated. The RT program was carried out over 12 weeks for each stage (training, detraining and retraining). Whole-body fat-free mass and fat mass (FM) and appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) measurements were carried out using a dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Bioimpedance spectroscopy was used to estimate total body water (TBW), intra (ICF) and extracellular (ECF) fluids, whole-body resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) and PhA. Upper and lower body muscle strength were also assessed.

Results:

From baseline to after training muscle strength, ALST and PhA significantly (P<0.05) increased. In detraining, significant (P<0.05) reductions in muscle strength, TBW, ECF, ICF and PhA along with significant (P<0.05) increases in R were observed, with the greatest magnitude observed for PhA (Δ=−7.6%). From detraining to retraining a significant reduction in FM along with increases in Xc, PhA and muscle strength were observed. Although an increase was observed from detraining to retraining in PhA, the values were still lower than baseline PhA.

Conclusions:

In untrained older women, a RT is associated with increases in PhA, whereas detraining results in a marked decrease in PhA, and more time may be required in retraining to counteract the negative influence of absence of exercise stimulus.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hurley BF, Hanson ED, Sheaff AK . Strength training as a countermeasure to aging muscle and chronic disease. Sports Med 2011; 41: 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips SM . Resistance exercise: good for more than just Grandma and Grandpa's muscles. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007; 32: 1198–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson MD, Gordon PM . Resistance exercise for the aging adult: clinical implications and prescription guidelines. Am J Med 2011; 124: 194–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peterson MD, Rhea MR, Sen A, Gordon PM . Resistance exercise for muscular strength in older adults: a meta-analysis. Ageing Res Rev 2010; 9: 226–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson MD, Sen A, Gordon PM . Influence of resistance exercise on lean body mass in aging adults: a meta-analysis. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Gomez JM et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis—part I: review of principles and methods. Clin Nutr 2004; 23: 1226–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyle UG, Bosaeus I, De Lorenzo AD, Deurenberg P, Elia M, Manuel Gomez J et al. Bioelectrical impedance analysis-part II: utilization in clinical practice. Clin Nutr 2004; 23: 1430–1453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lukaski HC . Evolution of bioimpedance: a circuitous journey from estimation of physiological function to assessment of body composition and a return to clinical research. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67 (Suppl 1), S2–S9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Basile C, Della-Morte D, Cacciatore F, Gargiulo G, Galizia G, Roselli M et al. Phase angle as bioelectrical marker to identify elderly patients at risk of sarcopenia. Exp Gerontol 2014; 58: 43–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Marini E, Buffa R, Saragat B, Coin A, Toffanello ED, Berton L et al. The potential of classic and specific bioelectrical impedance vector analysis for the assessment of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity. Clin Interv Aging 2012; 7: 585–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Taaffe DR, Henwood TR, Nalls MA, Walker DG, Lang TF, Harris TB . Alterations in muscle attenuation following detraining and retraining in resistance-trained older adults. Gerontology 2009; 55: 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Norman K, Wirth R, Neubauer M, Eckardt R, Stobaus N . The bioimpedance phase angle predicts low muscle strength, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality in old patients with cancer. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 173.e117–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ruiz M . Capsule commentary on Wilhelm-Leen et al., phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29: 183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wilhelm-Leen ER, Hall YN, Horwitz RI, Chertow GM . Phase angle, frailty and mortality in older adults. J Gen Intern Med 2014; 29: 147–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Beberashvili I, Azar A, Sinuani I, Kadoshi H, Shapiro G, Feldman L et al. Longitudinal changes in bioimpedance phase angle reflect inverse changes in serum IL-6 levels in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Nutrition 2014; 30: 297–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beberashvili I, Azar A, Sinuani I, Shapiro G, Feldman L, Stav K et al. Bioimpedance phase angle predicts muscle function, quality of life and clinical outcome in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68: 683–689.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Walker DG, Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation. In: World Health Organization technical report series, Geneva. 2001/03/10 ed, 2000, pp i-xii, 1-253.

  18. Piccoli A, Nigrelli S, Caberlotto A, Bottazzo S, Rossi B, Pillon L et al. Bivariate normal values of the bioelectrical impedance vector in adult and elderly populations. Am J Clin Nutr 1995; 61: 269–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Amarante do Nascimento M, Januario RS, Gerage AM, Mayhew JL, Cheche Pina FL, Cyrino ES . Familiarization and reliability of one repetition maximum strength testing in older women. J Strength Cond Res 2013; 27: 1636–1642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. American College of Sports Medicine. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Garber CE, Blissmer B, Deschenes MR, Franklin BA, Lamonte MJ, Lee IM et al. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Quantity and quality of exercise for developing and maintaining cardiorespiratory, musculoskeletal, and neuromotor fitness in apparently healthy adults: guidance for prescribing exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1334–1359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bosy-Westphal A, Danielzik S, Dorhofer RP, Later W, Wiese S, Muller MJ . Phase angle from bioelectrical impedance analysis: population reference values by age, sex, and body mass index. JPEN. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2006; 30: 309–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Norman K, Stobaus N, Pirlich M, Bosy-Westphal A . Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis—clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters. Clin Nutr 2012; 31: 854–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Torres AG, Oliveira KJF, Oliveira-Junior AV, Gonçalves MC, Koury JC . Biological determinants of phase angle among Brazilian elite athletes. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 30 June–3 July 2008; 67, (OCE8) Nottingham, UK: E332 doi:10.1017/S0029665108000062.

  25. Rondanelli M, Klersy C, Terracol G, Talluri J, Maugeri R, Guido D et al. Whey protein, amino acids, and vitamin D supplementation with physical activity increases fat-free mass and strength, functionality, and quality of life and decreases inflammation in sarcopenic elderly. Am J Clin Nutr 2016; 103: 830–840.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to express our gratitude to all the participants for their cooperation in this study. LS and MA, conducted this work during a visiting scholar period to the Faculty of Human Kinetics, University of Lisbon, Portugal, supported by the Capes Foundation within the Ministry of Education, Brazil (Process: 88887.065407/2014-00 and process: 88887.090477/2014-00, respectively). DAS is supported by a scholarship from the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (SFRH/BPD/92462/2013).

Author contributions

LBS: study concept and design. DS: acquisition of subjects and data analysis. All authors: data analysis, interpretation and preparation of the paper. Sponsor’s Role: No study sponsors had any role in the study design, conduct of the study, data collection, data interpretation or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L B Sardinha.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

dos Santos, L., Cyrino, E., Antunes, M. et al. Changes in phase angle and body composition induced by resistance training in older women. Eur J Clin Nutr 70, 1408–1413 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.124

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2016.124

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links