Body composition, energy expenditure and physical activity

Effect of resistance training on resting metabolic rate and its estimation by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry metabolic map



Fat-free mass (FFM) is the major predictor of resting metabolic rate (RMR). As protein supplementation during resistance training may augment gains in FFM, we investigated the effects of resistance training combined with protein supplementation on RMR and whether RMR responses could be estimated by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) metabolic map.


Healthy adults completed a whole-body periodized resistance training program consisting of 96 workouts (~9 months). Participants were randomly assigned to supplement with whey protein (whey; n=18), soy protein (soy; n=21) or carbohydrate (carb; n=22). RMR was measured using indirect calorimetry (RMRIC) and estimated by DXA metabolic mapping (RMRMM) pretraining and posttraining.


RMRIC increased from pretraining to posttraining in the whole cohort (1653±302 to 1726±291 kcal/day, P=0.001) without differences between the groups. Delta RMRIC and RMRMM (73±158 vs 52±41 kcal/day were not significantly different by t-test (P=0.303), although they were not significantly correlated (r=0.081; P=0.535). Stepwise regression identified 43% of the shared variance in delta RMRIC using total serum thyroxine, RMRIC and FFM at baseline (P=0.009).


These results indicate that 9 months of resistance training significantly increased RMR ~5% on average, but there was wide variability between individuals, which can be partially accounted for by changes in FFM and thyroid hormones.


Health agencies recommend resistance training as part of an adult fitness program to maintain overall good health and physical independence.1,2 However, the effects of resistance training on resting metabolic rate (RMR) are less clear, with studies showing increases,3,4 decreases5 and no changes.6,7 Resistance training has the potential to increase RMR and daily energy expenditure having a positive impact on weight management.3,8 The principal mechanism by which resistance training seems to increase RMR is by augmenting the fat-free mass (FFM).9,10 As protein supplementation during resistance training stimulates additional gains in FFM,11,12 we investigated the effects of resistance training with protein supplementation on RMR and whether RMR responses could be predicted by the major metabolic components of the FFM as determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) metabolic mapping.

FFM and thyroid hormones have a profound effect on RMR.13,14 Resistance training increases FFM, which is the major determinant (50–75%) of the resting metabolism.15,16 Although it is clear that thyroid hormones increase RMR, the exact mechanism remains unclear. Uncoupling of ATP synthesis and changes in the efficiency of futile cycles are among the mechanisms proposed.17,18 Particularly, at the skeletal muscle, thyroid hormones may increase RMR by uncoupling the ATP hydrolysis from the sarcoplasmic calcium cycling during contraction and rest; increasing the expression of the Na-K-ATPase and various myosin heavy-chain isoforms; and altering the glycogen–glycogenolysis cycle.17,18

FFM is a heterogeneous compartment that represents the sum of high and low metabolically active tissues and organs.19,20 Skeletal muscle has a low-metabolic rate (13 kcal/kg/day) compared with the brain and visceral organs (200–440 kcal/kg/day).21 Thus when FFM increases due to elevations in the skeletal muscle, a reduction in the metabolic rate per kilogram of FFM may occur,19,20 which makes interpretation of RMR responses to resistance exercise problematic.22,23 The use of metabolic mapping may overcome this difficulty.24,25 In contrast to indirect calorimetry, which provides an estimation of the energy consumed by the body as a whole, a metabolic map estimates the masses and energy consumed by the more active tissues and organs of the body to predict the RMR.24,25 Thus metabolic mapping may be useful to compare the changes in masses and metabolic activities of the organs and tissues in response to exercise interventions.24,25 Metabolic mapping has been shown to predict RMR in cross-sectional studies (R2=0.67–0.82)26, 27, 28 but, to our knowledge, has not been tested to estimate RMR changes in response to a resistance training program.

Protein supplementation during a resistance training program produces additional increases in FFM,29, 30, 31 but some controversy exists regarding the most effective source of dietary protein to stimulate FFM gains. We recently showed that supplementing daily with whey protein supplementation was more effective than soy or carbohydrate in augmenting gains in FFM in response to resistance training.32 Here we examine the effects of resistance training and supplementation on RMR in this same cohort and examine, for the first time, whether RMR responses can be predicted by the major metabolic components of the FFM using DXA metabolic mapping.

Materials and methods

Experimental approach

Details of the experimental approach and body composition results have previously been reported.32 A prospective parallel three-group study design was used to evaluate the effects of resistance training combined with protein supplementation on RMR. Healthy adults were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to supplement daily with whey protein (whey), soy protein (soy) or carbohydrate (carb). All participants performed a resistance training program of 96 workouts (9 months).


Recreationally active men and women aged 18–35 years who had not resistance trained for a minimum of 1 year prior to the study were recruited. Exclusion criteria were health conditions that restricted the practice of resistance training, hypertension, diabetes, a change in body weight >3 kg within the past 3 months, use of cholesterol-lowering and blood pressure medications, use of anti-inflammatory medications (aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), use of tobacco products, alcohol consumption >3 drinks/day or >21/week, pregnancy or the intent to become pregnant during the study and allergy to whey or soy protein. This study was approved by the University of Connecticut-Storrs Institutional Review Board, and all participants signed a written informed consent.

Resistance training program

All participants performed a whole-body, progressive, non-linear, periodized resistance training program 3 days/week until subjects accrued 96 workouts (9 months). The program was divided into three 12-week mesocycles and included heavy (3–6 repetitions, long rest periods of 2–3 min, high intensity); medium (8–10 repetitions, rest periods of 1–2 min, moderate intensity), light (12–15 repetitions, short rest period of 60–90 s, light intensity) and power (whole-body exercises, 30–45% of the estimated 1 repetition maximum, 3-min rest period) days. Exercises consisted of squats, hang cleans, bench press, biceps curls, calf exercises, abdominal exercises, lat pull downs, lunges, upright rows, push presses and weight plate lifts. Multiple sets (3–5) of each exercise were performed.


The supplements were isocaloric and isonitrogenous (whey and soy). Nutrient composition was for whey: 21.6 g of whey protein concentrate plus 22.5 g of maltodextrin; for soy: 20.0 g of soy isolate (isoflavone free) plus 24.5 g of maltodextrin, and for carb: 45.2 g of maltodextrin. Participants consumed the supplement every day, with breakfast on non-training days and immediately after exercise on training days. For supplement compliance, 200 mg of para-aminobenzoic acid was added to the supplements and subsequently measured from urine samples collected once per month on random days. Para-aminobenzoic acid was measured using the DACA (P-dimethylamino cinnamaldehyde) method as described by Yamato et al.33 The supplement compliance was 82%.

Diet counseling

Participants followed a diet meeting their individual energy requirements with a protein intake of 1.0–1.2 g/kg body mass (not including supplementation). Energy requirements were estimated by multiplying RMR times an activity factor according to the subjects’ physical activity level. Participants received diet counseling every 6 weeks or more frequently when needed. Prior to the diet counseling, the participants filled the 5-day diet records that were reviewed for monitoring energy and protein intake. To improve the quality of the diet information, volunteers were provided with a Personal Digital Assistant, a food scale and a booklet with portion sizes. The Personal Digital Assistant that was loaded with a dietary program Weightmania (Edward A. Greenwood, Inc., Brookline, MA, USA) facilitated tracking participants’ energy and protein intake.

Anthropometrics, body composition and DXA metabolic mapping

Body weight was measured to the nearest 0.1 kg on a calibrated digital scale (Defender 5000, Ohaus, Florham Park, NJ, USA). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm at baseline using a portable stadiometer (Seca, Hamburg, Germany). Body composition was measured using DXA (Lunar Prodigy, Madison, WI, USA) at baseline and 9 months. FFM and fat mass were calculated using the commercial software (enCore version 10.1 (GE Healthcare, Madison, WI, USA)). A DXA metabolic map was built by estimating the masses of brain, bone, trunk organs (that is, heart, liver kidneys and spleen), skeletal muscle, fat and residual mass from DXA measurements, as described by Bosy-Westphal et al.25 The masses of organs and tissues were multiplied by their specific metabolic rates described by Wang et al.21 and added to obtain the whole-body RMR.24,25

RMR and macronutrient oxidation

Participants were asked to abstain from food and beverages for a minimum of 12 h, alcohol and caffeine for 24 h and physical activity for 48 h before the test. They collected 24-h urine prior to the testing day and slept between 6 and 8 h the previous evening. On the testing day, participants were transported from their home to the laboratory. The test was conducted using a metabolic cart (TrueOne 2400, Parvomedics Inc., Sandy, UT, USA). After the 30-min rest period, participants were asked not to fidget, talk or sleep during the test. Continuous measures of CO2 and oxygen (O2) gasses were averaged and recorded every 30 s during 30 min of testing. CO2 and O2 values were used to calculate the 24-h RMR using the Weir equation.34 Macronutrient oxidation was calculated using the 24-h urinary urea excretion and O2 and CO2 values with the Jequier equation.35

Blood collection

Blood was drawn at baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months. A 12-h fasting blood sample was performed at the same time (0430–0830 hours) and was obtained from an antecubital vein into serum tubes. After coagulation, blood was centrifuged at 1500 g for 15 min at 4 °C. Serum was aliquoted, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C for further analysis.


Total triiodothyronine and total thyroxine were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Calbiotech, Spring Valley, CA, USA). Urinary urea concentrations, in the 24-h urine collection, were measured by enzymatic methods using commercial reagents and standards (Pointe Scientific, Canton, MI, USA). Analytes were analyzed using a Versamax tunable microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) at its appropriate wavelength.

Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance was used to compare baseline variables among groups and changes over specific time intervals. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was conducted to compare the effects of supplement (whey, soy, carb) and time (baseline, 3, 6 and 9 months). Bonferroni corrections were used for multiple comparisons. Paired t-test and Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to compare measured RMR and predicted RMR by metabolic mapping. Stepwise linear regression was used to identify the best predictors of the RMR change. Differences with a P≤0.05 were considered significant. Data are presented as means±s.d. if not otherwise indicated.


Sixty-one participants completed the study: whey; n=18 (6F/12M), soy; n=21 (11F/10M) and carb; n=22 (9F/13M). There were no significant differences between groups in physical characteristics at baseline (Table 1). The dietary energy intake remained constant during the study and was similar between groups, on average 28.2, 29.0 and 28.1 kcal/kg/day for whey, soy and carb, respectively. During the study, protein intake was higher in whey and soy than carb (1.3–1.4 vs 1.0–1.1 g/kg body mass, P<0.01) due to protein supplementation. There were no significant differences between groups in fat or carbohydrate intake during the study. The percentage of macronutrient energy distribution in the groups oscillated between 14% and 19% for protein, 52–59% for carbohydrates and 25–30% for fat.

Table 1 Participant characteristics

RMR and macronutrient oxidation

RMR significantly increased in the whole cohort (73±158 kcal/day, P<0.01) without differences between the groups (Figure 1). When RMR was normalized for FFM, no significant changes were observed (−0.10±3.4 kcal/day, P>0.05). There were no differences in RMR per kilogram of FFM between the groups (Table 2). Protein oxidation increased in the whole cohort (0.17±57 g/kg/day, P<0.05) without differences between the groups. There were no significant changes in carbohydrate and fat oxidation (Table 2).

Figure 1

Individual changes in resting metabolic rate with 9 months of resistance training in subjects supplemented with carbohydrate (n=22), whey protein (n=18) or soy protein (n=21).

Table 2 Change in resting metabolic rate and macronutrients oxidation

DXA metabolic mapping

Estimated metabolic map components and their resting energy expenditure are shown in Table 3. Compared with baseline, there was an increase at 9 months in the skeletal muscle (1.73±0.9 kg, P<0.001), trunk organs (0.1±0.1 kg, P<0.05) and residual mass (0.5±1.6 kg, P<0.05). The estimated energy expenditure of the skeletal muscle (22.8±12.2 kcal/day) and trunk organs (23.1±29.8 kcal/day) also increased (P<0.05) at the end of the study (Table 3). There were differences (P<0.001) between measured and estimated RMR at baseline (1653±302 vs 1548±257 kcal/day) and 9 months (1726±292 vs 1599±268 kcal/day). Yet, the measured and estimated RMR changes were similar (73±158 vs 52±41 kcal/day, P>0.05, respectively); however, they were not correlated (r=0.081; P>0.05).

Table 3 Estimated metabolic map components and their resting metabolic rate

Body mass and body composition

Compared with baseline, body mass increased at 9 months (2.3±3.0 kg, P<0.001) without differences between the groups (Table 4). The increase in FFM with whey (3.3±1.5 kg) was higher (P=0.01) than soy (1.8±1.6 kg) and carb (2.3±1.7 kg) (Table 4). There were no significant changes in fat mass in the whole cohort or any group.

Table 4 Body mass and body composition by group and time

Thyroid hormones

Total triiodothyronine concentrations decreased at 6 months (0.35±0.77 nmol/l, P<0.001) and returned to baseline at 9 months. There were no significant differences in triiodothyronine between the groups (Table 5). Total thyroxine concentrations decreased at 3 months (15.2±18.0 nmol/l, P<0.001) and returned to baseline at 6 months, with no significant changes at 9 months. There were no significant differences in thyroxine between the groups (Table 5).

Table 5 Hormone concentrations by group and time

The RMR correlated with FFM at baseline (r=0.760, P<0.01) and at 9 months (r=0.792, P<0.01). The RMR increase correlated with thyroxine at baseline (r=0.504, P<0.01), 9 months (r=0.271, P<0.05) and with the change in thyroxine from baseline to 9 months (r=−0.358, P<0.01). The stepwise regression analysis included the baseline levels of thyroxine, RMR and FFM in the best model predicting RMR change (43.0%, P<0.01). Thyroxine predicted 25.4% (P<0.001) of the variation, RMR predicted 9.0% (P<0.01) and FFM predicted 8.3% (P<0.01).


The primary aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of a long-term resistance training program combined with protein supplementation on RMR and whether the RMR response to exercise could be estimated by DXA metabolic mapping and thyroid hormones. In response to resistance training, RMR significantly increased by 5% in the whole cohort (73±158 kcal/day, P<0.01), but the supplement groups were not significantly different. Metabolic mapping from DXA failed to predict RMR at baseline, 9 months and the change in RMR, but inclusion of thyroid hormones improved the prediction such that 43% of the shared variance was accounted for in delta RMR.

Similar to previous studies, we found that the increase in RMR with resistance training is due, at least in part, to augmentation of FFM.3,36,37 This hypothesis is supported by the fact that the differences in RMR disappeared after normalizing the values per kilogram of FFM and by the correlations between FFM and RMR at baseline (r=0.760, P<0.01) and 9 months (r=0.792, P<0.01). If the increase in RMR was solely due to an augment in the skeletal muscle mass, the estimated RMR increase would be 31.2 kcal/day (13 kcal/kg/day × 2.4 kg FFM), less than half of the observed change (73 kcal/day). Thus an increase in mass of other metabolically active tissues may account for the unexplained variance.

Results from DXA metabolic mapping show significant increases in the skeletal muscle, trunk organs and residual mass (Table 3). Although metabolic mapping identified changes in the FFM components, it failed to predict the RMR change and the RMR at baseline and 9 months. These results are contrary to previous studies26, 27, 28 and could be due to an underestimation of the brain and trunk organs’ masses in our subjects. This is suggested by the higher RMR per kg of FFM in our group compared with previous studies (33.7 and 28, respectively) given the constancy of the metabolic rates of organ and tissues in healthy adults.21,38

The increased RMR was best predicted using a model that included thyroxine, RMR and FFM at baseline (R2=0.43, P<0.01). Higher initial values of thyroxine and FFM predict larger increases in RMR in response to resistance training, which is consistent with the known actions of thyroid hormone on the skeletal muscle. A study by Clement et al.39 evaluated the effects of supplementing with 75 μg/day of triiodothyronine during 14 days in healthy volunteers. They reported an increase of 13% in RMR and upregulation in the vastus lateralis muscle of 381 genes related to energy expenditure, protein turnover, signal transduction and protein trafficking.39

Protein supplementation and an accretion in brown adipose tissue activity in response to exercise training could have contributed to the increase in RMR. Protein supplementation may have contributed by: (a) increasing protein oxidation, observed in the whole group, as production of 1 mol of urea uses four ATPs,40 (b) increasing protein turnover, which might account as much as 20% of resting metabolism,41 and (c) increasing the food thermogenic effect, as the effects of protein is around 25–40% of the energy intake compared with carbohydrate, which is about 6–8%.40,42 Similarly, the presence of brown adipose has been confirmed in adult humans, and some evidence suggests that it can be activated by exercise.43,44 Recently, it was demonstrated that Irisin, a hormone released from the skeletal muscle during contraction, stimulates brown adipose tissue and energy expenditure in mice, and a similar process may occur in humans.45,46

The increase in RMR with whey was more than double that with carb supplementation; however, there were no statistical differences between the groups. The lack of differences may be due to a high individual variability in the RMR response to exercise (see Figure 1), which has been reported.47,48 The variability in RMR has a significant genetic component as was demonstrated by Poehlman et al.48 They studied the RMR changes to an endurance program of 22 days, where twins cycled ~116 min/day at 58% of maximal oxygen uptake. They found that the variability in RMR response between phenotypes was more than twice the variability among genotypes.48 This highlights the role that genetic background has in the RMR response and the fact that people may differ in the exercise intensity or work volume necessary to impact the RMR.3

The fact that the RMR increase was detected >48 h after the last exercise bout suggests that this is a chronic effect. This is encouraging given that resistance exercise is recommended by health agencies to be performed every other day.3 The effects of RT on RMR (increased by 73 kcal/day) and body composition (2.4 kg FFM increase and 0.3 kg loss of fat mass) were moderate and probably not of sufficient magnitude to justify its sole use as a treatment strategy to manage obesity, but it may be an excellent strategy to prevent obesity in college students, a population at high risk.49,50

In conclusion, a 9-month resistance training program significantly increased RMR on average by 5%; the addition of protein supplementation did not produce additional increases in RMR. DXA metabolic mapping failed to predict RMR at baseline and at 9 months and was not associated with the RMR change. Just under half the variability in RMR response to resistance training was accounted for by FFM and thyroxine, suggesting that other factors contributed to the metabolic response.


  1. 1

    WHO. Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. Accessed 23 July 2014.

  2. 2

    CDC. How much physical activity do adults need? Accessed 23 July 2014.

  3. 3

    Kirk EP, Donnelly JE, Smith BK, Honas J, Lecheminant JD, Bailey BW et al. Minimal resistance training improves daily energy expenditure and fat oxidation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 1122–1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Lemmer JT, Ivey FM, Ryan AS, Martel GF, Hurlbut DE, Metter JE et al. Effect of strength training on resting metabolic rate and physical activity: age and gender comparisons. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 532–541.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Geliebter A, Maher MM, Gerace L, Gutin B, Heymsfield SB, Hashim SA . Effects of strength or aerobic training on body composition, resting metabolic rate, and peak oxygen consumption in obese dieting subjects. Am J Clin Nutr 1997; 66: 557–563.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Hunter GR, Byrne NM, Sirikul B, Fernandez JR, Zuckerman PA, Darnell BE et al. Resistance training conserves fat-free mass and resting energy expenditure following weight loss. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 1045–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Meckling KA, Sherfey R . A randomized trial of a hypocaloric high-protein diet, with and without exercise, on weight loss, fitness, and markers of the Metabolic Syndrome in overweight and obese women. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2007; 32: 743–752.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Washburn RA, Donnelly JE, Smith BK, Sullivan DK, Marquis J, Herrmann SD . Resistance training volume, energy balance and weight management: rationale and design of a 9 month trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2012; 33: 749–758.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Campbell WW, Crim MC, Young VR, Evans WJ . Increased energy requirements and changes in body composition with resistance training in older adults. Am J Clin Nutr 1994; 60: 167–175.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Byrne HK, Wilmore JH . The effects of a 20-week exercise training program on resting metabolic rate in previously sedentary, moderately obese women. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2001; 11: 15–31.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Hulmi JJ, Lockwood CM, Stout JR . Effect of protein/essential amino acids and resistance training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy: a case for whey protein. Nutr Metab (Lond) 2010; 7: 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Phillips SM . The science of muscle hypertrophy: making dietary protein count. Proc Nutr Soc 2011.;70: 100–103.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Mullur R, Liu YY, Brent GA . Thyroid hormone regulation of metabolism. Physiol Rev 2014; 94: 355–382.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    McAninch EA, Bianco AC . Thyroid hormone signaling in energy homeostasis and energy metabolism. Ann NY Acad Sci 2014; 1311: 77–87.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Stiegler P, Cunliffe A . The role of diet and exercise for the maintenance of fat-free mass and resting metabolic rate during weight loss. Sports Med 2006; 36: 239–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Elia M . Organ and tissue contribution to metabolic rate. In: Kinney JM, Tucker HN (eds). Energy metabolism. Tissue Determinants and Cellular Corrolaries. Raven Press: New York, NY, USA, 1992, pp 61–67.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Reinehr T . Obesity and thyroid function. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2010; 316: 165–171.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Kim B . Thyroid hormone as a determinant of energy expenditure and the basal metabolic rate. Thyroid 2008; 18: 141–144.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Muller MJ, Bosy-Westphal A, Kutzner D, Heller M . Metabolically active components of fat-free mass and resting energy expenditure in humans: recent lessons from imaging technologies. Obes Rev 2002; 3: 113–122.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Muller MJ, Bosy-Westphal A, Later W, Haas V, Heller M . Functional body composition: insights into the regulation of energy metabolism and some clinical applications. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009; 63: 1045–1056.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Wang Z, Ying Z, Bosy-Westphal A, Zhang J, Schautz B, Later W et al. Specific metabolic rates of major organs and tissues across adulthood: evaluation by mechanistic model of resting energy expenditure. Am J Clin Nutr 2010; 92: 1369–1377.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Ravussin E, Bogardus C . Relationship of genetics, age, and physical fitness to daily energy expenditure and fuel utilization. Am J Clin Nutr 1989; 49 (5 Suppl): 968–975.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Muller MJ, Illner K, Bosy-Westphal A, Brinkmann G, Heller M . Regional lean body mass and resting energy expenditure in non-obese adults. Eur J Nutr 2001; 40: 93–97.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Hayes M, Chustek M, Wang Z, Gallagher D, Heshka S, Spungen A et al. DXA: potential for creating a metabolic map of organ-tissue resting energy expenditure components. Obes Res 2002; 10: 969–977.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Bosy-Westphal A, Reinecke U, Schlorke T, Illner K, Kutzner D, Heller M et al. Effect of organ and tissue masses on resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight and obese adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 2004; 28: 72–79.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Kosmiski LA, Ringham BM, Grunwald GK, Bessesen DH . Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry modeling to explain the increased resting energy expenditure associated with the HIV lipoatrophy syndrome. Am J Clin Nutr 2009; 90: 1525–1531.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Taguchi M, Ishikawa-Takata K, Tatsuta W, Katsuragi C, Usui C, Sakamoto S et al. Resting energy expenditure can be assessed by fat-free mass in female athletes regardless of body size. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo) 2011; 57: 22–29.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Usui C, Takahashi E, Gando Y, Sanada K, Oka J, Miyachi M et al. Resting energy expenditure can be assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in women regardless of age and fitness. Eur J Clin Nutr 2009; 63: 529–535.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Kalman D, Feldman S, Martinez M, Krieger DR, Tallon MJ . Effect of protein source and resistance training on body composition and sex hormones. J Int Soc Sports Nutr 2007; 4: 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Brown EC, DiSilvestro RA, Babaknia A, Devor ST . Soy versus whey protein bars: effects on exercise training impact on lean body mass and antioxidant status. Nutr J 2004; 3: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Candow DG, Burke NC, Smith-Palmer T, Burke DG . Effect of whey and soy protein supplementation combined with resistance training in young adults. Int J Sport Nutr Exerc Metab 2006; 16: 233–244.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Volek JS, Volk BM, Gómez AL, Kunces LJ, Kupchak BR, Freidenreich DJ et al. Whey protein supplementation during resistance training augments lean body mass. J Am Coll Nutr 2013; 32: 122–135.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Yamato C, Kinoshita K . A simple assay for measurement of urinary p-aminobenzoic acid in the oral pancreatic function test. Anal Biochem 1979; 98: 13–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Weir JB . New methods for calculating metabolic rate with special reference to protein metabolism. J Physiol 1949; 109: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Jequier E, Acheson K, Schutz Y . Assessment of energy expenditure and fuel utilization in man. Annu Rev Nutr 1987; 7: 187–208.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Dolezal BA, Potteiger JA . Concurrent resistance and endurance training influence basal metabolic rate in nondieting individuals. J Appl Physiol 1998; 85: 695–700.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Broeder CE, Burrhus KA, Svanevik LS, Wilmore JH . The effects of either high-intensity resistance or endurance training on resting metabolic rate. Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 55: 802–810.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Müller MJ, Wang Z, Heymsfield SB, Schautz B, Bosy-Westphal A . Advances in the understanding of specific metabolic rates of major organs and tissues in humans. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2013; 16: 501–508.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Clement K, Viguerie N, Diehn M, Alizadeh A, Barbe P, Thalamas C et al. In vivo regulation of human skeletal muscle gene expression by thyroid hormone. Genome Res 2002; 12: 281–291.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Feinman RD, Fine EJ . Thermodynamics and metabolic advantage of weight loss diets. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2003; 1: 209–219.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Welle S, Nair KS . Relationship of resting metabolic rate to body composition and protein turnover. Am J Physiol 1990; 258 (6 Pt 1): E990–E998.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42

    Mikkelsen PB, Toubro S, Astrup A . Effect of fat-reduced diets on 24-h energy expenditure: comparisons between animal protein, vegetable protein, and carbohydrate. Am J Clin Nutr 2000; 72: 1135–1141.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43

    van Marken Lichtenbelt WD, Vanhommerig JW, Smulders NM, Drossaerts JM, Kemerink GJ, Bouvy ND et al. Cold-activated brown adipose tissue in healthy men. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1500–1508.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44

    Nedergaard J, Bengtsson T, Cannon B . Unexpected evidence for active brown adipose tissue in adult humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2007; 293: E444–E452.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45

    Bostrom P, Wu J, Jedrychowski MP, Korde A, Ye L, Lo JC et al. A PGC1-alpha-dependent myokine that drives brown-fat-like development of white fat and thermogenesis. Nature 2012; 481: 463–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46

    Wu J, Bostrom P, Sparks LM, Ye L, Choi JH, Giang AH et al. Beige adipocytes are a distinct type of thermogenic fat cell in mouse and human. Cell 2012; 150: 366–376.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47

    Hopkins MGC, Caudwell P, Hellstrom PM, Naslund E, King NA, Finlayson G et al. The adaptive metabolic response to exercise-induced weight loss influences both energy expenditure and energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 2014; 68: 581–586.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48

    Poehlman ET, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, Dussault J, Theriault G, Bouchard C . Heredity and changes in hormones and metabolic rates with short-term training. Am J Physiol 1986; 250 (6 Pt 1), E711–E717.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49

    Lloyd-Richardson EE, Bailey S, Fava JL, Wing R . A prospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years. Prev Med 2009; 48: 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50

    Gropper SS, Newton A, Harrington P, Simmons KP, Connell LJ, Ulrich P . Body composition changes during the first two years of university. Prev Med 2011; 52: 20–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank a dedicated group of subjects and the research and medical staffs at the University of Connecticut for their support.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to J S Volek.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aristizabal, J., Freidenreich, D., Volk, B. et al. Effect of resistance training on resting metabolic rate and its estimation by a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry metabolic map. Eur J Clin Nutr 69, 831–836 (2015).

Download citation

Further reading