Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Response to Cameron et al.

Subjects

We welcome Cameron et al.’s letter highlighting the interesting findings of their recent review.1 We agree that ratio measures of anthropometry such as the waist to hip ratio (WHR) may be less predictive for mortality than their underlying pair of parameters, that is, waist (WC) and hip circumference (HC), although neither our nor their review was designed to specifically address this comparison. As indicated by Cameron et al. HC was associated with mortality in some studies.1, 2 However, it is important to note that the significance of this association heavily depends on the degree of adjustment for other anthropometric variables. In contrast to WC, HC was not significantly associated with mortality in a multivariable adjusted model that also included body mass index (BMI) in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) and other cohort studies.3, 4 It was the rationale of our review to analyse and compare cohort studies investigating BMI and at least one abdominal obesity measure, such as WC, WHR or WHtR.5 We feel that our findings provide further evidence that mortality prediction may be improved by combining BMI and an abdominal obesity measure such as WHR or WC.

References

  1. 1

    Cameron AJ, Magliano DJ, Söderberg S . A systematic review of the impact of including both waist and hip circumference in risk models for cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and mortality. Obes Rev 2013; 12: 86–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Lissner L, Björkelund C, Heitmann BL, Seidell JC, Bengtsson C . Larger hip circumference independently predicts health and longevity in a Swedish female cohort. Obes Res 2001; 9: 644–646.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Pischon T, Boeing H, Riboli E . Obesity and risk of death. Author reply. N Engl J Med 2009; 360: 1043–1044.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Pischon T, Boeing H, Hoffmann K, Bergmann M, Schulze MB, Overvad K et al. General and abdominal adiposity and risk of death in Europe. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 2105–2120.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Carmienke S, Freitag MH, Pischon T, Schlattmann P, Fankhaenel T, Goebel H et al. General and abdominal obesity parameters and their combination in relation to mortality: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 2013; 67: 573–585.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M H Freitag.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carmienke, S., Freitag, M., Pischon, T. et al. Response to Cameron et al.. Eur J Clin Nutr 68, 141 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2013.188

Download citation

Search

Quick links