Abstract
Background/Objectives:
There is strong evidence for the beneficial effects of perioperative nutrition in patients undergoing major surgery. We aimed to evaluate implementation of current guidelines in Switzerland and Austria.
Subjects/Methods:
A survey was conducted in 173 Swiss and Austrian surgical departments. We inquired about nutritional screening, perioperative nutrition and estimated clinical significance.
Results:
The overall response rate was 55%, having 69% (54/78) responders in Switzerland and 44% (42/95) in Austria. Most centres were aware of reduced complications (80%) and shorter hospital stay (59%). However, only 20% of them implemented routine nutritional screening. Non-compliance was because of financial (49%) and logistic restrictions (33%). Screening was mainly performed in the outpatient's clinic (52%) or during admission (54%). The nutritional risk score was applied by 14% only; instead, various clinical (78%) and laboratory parameters (56%) were used. Indication for perioperative nutrition was based on preoperative screening in 49%. Although 23% used preoperative nutrition, 68% applied nutritional support pre- and postoperatively. Preoperative nutritional treatment ranged from 3 days (33%), to 5 (31%) and even 7 days (20%).
Conclusions:
Although malnutrition is a well-recognised risk factor for poor post-operative outcome, surgeons remain reluctant to implement routine screening and nutritional support according to evidence-based guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force (2002). Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 26, 1SA–138SA.
Bozzetti F, Gianotti L, Braga M, Di Carlo V, Mariani L (2007). Postoperative complications in gastrointestinal cancer patients: the joint role of the nutritional status and the nutritional support. Clin Nutr 26, 698–709.
Cerantola Y, Hubner M, Grass F, Demartines N, Schafer M (2011). Immunonutrition in gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg 98, 37–48.
Demartines N, Freiermuth O, Mutter D, Heberer M, Harder F (2000). Knowledge and acceptance of telemedicine in surgery: a survey. J Telemed Telecare 6, 125–131.
Hiesmayr M, Schindler K, Pernicka E, Schuh C, Schoeniger-Hekele A, Bauer P et al. (2009). Decreased food intake is a risk factor for mortality in hospitalised patients: the NutritionDay survey 2006. Clin Nutr 28, 484–491.
Jones NE, Heyland DK (2008). Pharmaconutrition: a new emerging paradigm. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 24, 215–222.
Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, Vellas B, Plauth M (2003a). ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr 22, 415–421.
Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, Stanga Z (2003b). Nutritional risk screening (NRS 2002): a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr 22, 321–336.
Mariette C, Alves A, Benoist S, Bretagnol F, Mabrut JY, Slim K (2005). [Perioperative care in digestive surgery. Guidelines for the French society of digestive surgery (SFCD)]. Ann Chir 130, 108–124.
Schiesser M, Muller S, Kirchhoff P, Breitenstein S, Schafer M, Clavien PA (2008). Assessment of a novel screening score for nutritional risk in predicting complications in gastro-intestinal surgery. Clin Nutr 27, 565–570.
Schindler K, Pernicka E, Laviano A, Howard P, Schutz T, Bauer P et al. (2010). How nutritional risk is assessed and managed in European hospitals: a survey of 21 007 patients findings from the 2007–2008 cross-sectional nutritionDay survey. Clin Nutr 29, 552–559.
Sorensen J, Kondrup J, Prokopowicz J, Schiesser M, Krahenbuhl L, Meier R et al. (2008). EuroOOPS: an international, multicentre study to implement nutritional risk screening and evaluate clinical outcome. Clin Nutr 27, 340–349.
Stratton RJ, Elia M (2007). Who benefits from nutritional support: what is the evidence? Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 19, 353–358.
Waitzberg DL, Saito H, Plank LD, Jamieson GG, Jagannath P, Hwang TL et al. (2006). Postsurgical infections are reduced with specialized nutrition support. World J Surg 30, 1592–1604.
Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, Laviano A, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P et al. (2006). ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition: surgery including organ transplantation. Clin Nutr 25, 224–244.
Xu J, Zhong Y, Jing D, Wu Z (2006). Preoperative enteral immunonutrition improves postoperative outcome in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. World J Surg 30, 1284–1289.
Acknowledgements
We thank Giustina Mariotti and Bettina Scuffi for their valuable help in data acquisition and management.
We kindly thank all responding centres:
Switzerland: University Basel, University Bern, University Lausanne, University Zürich, Aarau, Aarberg, Affoltern, Altdorf, Biel, Baden, Bellinzona, Bruderholz Basel, Bern Tiefenau, Burgdorf, Bülach, Chur, Davos, Frauenfeld, Fribourg, Glarus, Grabs, Herisau, Ilanz, Interlaken, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Lachen, Laufen, Liestal, Luzern, Mendrisio, Monthey, Morges, Münsingen, Münsterlingen, Olten, Payerne, Rheinfelden, Riaz, Samedan, Sarnen, Schaffhausen, Schlieren, Sion, St Gallen, Sursee, Triemli Zürich, Uster, Waid Zürich, Wetzikon, Winterthur, Yverdon, Zofingen, Zollikerberg, Zug.
Austria: University Innsbruck, University Wien, Bad Aussee, Barmherzige Brüder Salzburg, Barmherzige Schwestern Wien, Braunau, Bregenz, Bruck a.d. Mur, Deutschlandsberg, Dornbirn, Donauspital Wien, Eisenstadt, Feldkirch-Tisis, Elisabethinen Graz, Elisabethinen Linz, Elisabethinen Klagenfurt, Floridsdorf Wien, Friesach, Gmunden, Hainburg/Donau, Hall in Tirol, Hartberg, Hollabrunn, Horn, Judenburg, Kufstein, Lienz, LKH Graz, Mistelbach, Neunkirchen, Rottenmann, Scheibbs, Schladming, Schwarzach im Pongau, St. Johann in Tirol, Tamsweg, Tulln, Villach, Vöcklabruck, Waidhofen an der Ybbs, Wels, Wiener Neustadt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Contributors: MH and SM designed the study. FG, MH, MS and YC carried out the study, performed data analyses and drafted the manuscript. ND conceived the study, and participated in its design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Supplementary Information accompanies the paper on European Journal of Clinical Nutrition website
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grass, F., Cerantola, Y., Schäfer, M. et al. Perioperative nutrition is still a surgical orphan: results of a Swiss–Austrian survey. Eur J Clin Nutr 65, 642–647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.13
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2011.13
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
Patient Characteristics Influencing Adherence to Enhanced Recovery Protocols for Colorectal Surgery: a Multicentric Prospective Study
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery (2022)
-
Screening, assessment and management of perioperative malnutrition: a survey of UK practice
Perioperative Medicine (2021)
-
Surgical patients and the risk of malnutrition: preoperative screening requires assessment and optimization
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie (2021)
-
Prevalence and risk factors of preoperative malnutrition risk in older patients and its impact on surgical outcomes: a retrospective observational study
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie (2021)
-
A qualitative exploration of factors influencing medical staffs’ decision-making around nutrition prescription after colorectal surgery
BMC Health Services Research (2019)