Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Food Labelling to Advance Better Education for Life

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

Nutrition labels are potentially a major instrument for enabling consumers to make healthier food choices, but current insights into how nutrition labels are used by consumers in real-world shopping situations are limited, making the science-based formulation of new labelling policies and the evaluation of existing ones difficult. The objective of the European Union-funded project Food Labelling to Advance Better Education for Life (FLABEL) is to determine how nutrition labelling can affect dietary choices, consumer habits and food-related health issues.

Subjects/Methods:

A wide range of qualitative and quantitative consumer research methods is being used, including physical auditing, label sorting tasks, eye tracking and electrodermal response, structured interviews and analysis of retail scanner data.

Results:

First results from the project show that, on the basis of consumer responses, nutrition labels available in Europe can be categorised as non-directive, semidirective or directive. Penetration of nutrition labelling on food and drink packages in five product categories seems widespread, with the nutrition table on the back of packs being the most prominent format (found on 84% of over 37 000 products audited in 28 countries). The higher penetration observed in Northern Europe is paralleled by more public health campaigns in this region alerting consumers to nutrition labelling systems and elements covered therein (for example, calories, salt and fat).

Conclusions:

The findings to date indicate that nutrition labelling is widespread in Europe but formats and level of detail may differ between countries and products. Upcoming studies within FLABEL will decipher whether and how the various elements of nutrition labels affect attention, liking, understanding, use and dietary choices, and what the implications are for stakeholders such as policy makers.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bialkova S, van Trijp H, on behalf of the FLABEL consortium (2010): What determines consumer attention to labels? Food Qual Prefer, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.001.

  • Bundesen C (1990). A theory of visual attention. Psych Rev 97, 4, 523–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan J, Humphreys GW (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psych Rev 96, 433–458.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Advisory Services (2004). The Introduction of Mandatory Nutrition Labelling in the European Union—Impact Assessment Undertaken for DG SANCO. European Commission, Brussels, p 76.

  • EC (2008). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 January 2008 on the provision of food information to consumers (COM (2008) 40—not published in the official journal). Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/food/food/labellingnutrition/foodlabelling/publications/proposal_regulation_ep_council.pdf

  • Grunert K, Wills J (2007). A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ormrod RP, Grunert KG, on behalf of the FLABEL consortium: EU Food Nutrition Label Policy: identification and prioritisation of issues for policy assessment. (Paper submitted to Food Policy, still under review.)

  • Rayner K (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psych Bull 124, 3, 372–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner M, Scarborough P, Stockley L (2004). Nutrient profiles: options for definitions for use in relation to food promotion and children's diets. Final report. British Heart Foundation Health Promotion Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Oxford: Oxford. Available at: http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutrientprofilingfullreport.pdf (accessed on March 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rugg G, McGeorge P (1997). The Sorting Techniques: a tutorial paper on card sorts, picture sorts and item sorts. Expert Syst 14, 2, 80–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storcksdieck genannt Bonsmann S, Celemín LF, Larrañaga A, Egger S, Wills JM, Hodgkins C, Raats MM (2010). Penetration of nutrition information on food labels across the EU-27 plus Turkey: Eur J Clin Nutr [e-pub ahead of print 1 September 2010], doi:10.1038/ejcn.2010.179.

  • Treisman A, Gelade G (1980). A feature integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychol 12, 97–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson MA (1995). Structuring Qualitative Data: Multidimensional Scalogram Analysis. In: Breakwell GM, Hammond S, Fife-Shaw C (eds). Research Methods in Psychology, 1st edn. Sage: London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the 7th EU Framework Programme Small Collaborative Project FLABEL (Contract no. 211905) has been the major source of information for this article. The content of the article reflects only the views of the authors; the European Commission is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained in this article. The help of Laura Smillie in preparing this paper is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L Fernández Celemín.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonsmann, S., Celemín, L., Grunert, K. et al. Food Labelling to Advance Better Education for Life. Eur J Clin Nutr 64 (Suppl 3), S14–S19 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.204

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2010.204

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links