Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Anthropometric, metabolic, dietary and psychosocial profiles of underreporters of energy intake: a doubly labeled water study among overweight/obese postmenopausal women—a Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team study

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 64, pages 68–74 (2010)Cite this article

Abstract

Background/Objectives:

To analyze the anthropometric, metabolic, psychosocial and dietary profiles of underreporters, identified by the doubly labeled water technique, in a well-characterized population of overweight and obese postmenopausal women.

Subjects/Methods:

The study population consisted of 87 overweight and obese sedentary postmenopausal women (age: 57.7±4.8 years, body mass index: 32.4±4.6 kg/m2). Subjects were identified as underreporters based on the energy intake to energy expenditure ratio of <0.80. We measured (1) body composition (by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), (2) visceral fat (by computed tomography), (3) blood profile, (4) resting blood pressure, (5) peak oxygen consumption (VO2 peak), (6) total energy expenditure, (7) muscle strength and (8) psychosocial and dietary profiles.

Results:

Out of 87 subjects, 50 (57.5%) were identified as underreporting subjects in our cohort. Underreporters showed higher levels of body mass index, fat mass, visceral fat, hsC-reactive protein, perceived stress and percentage of energy from protein, as well as lower levels of VO2 peak, dietary intake of calcium, fiber, iron, vitamin B-1 and 6, as well as servings of fruit and vegetables. Logistic regression analysis showed that fat mass, odd ratio 1.068 (95% confidence interval 1.009–1.130) and perceived stress, odd ratio 1.084 (95% confidence interval 1.011–1.162) were independent characteristics of underreporters.

Conclusions:

Results from this study show significant differences in anthropometric, metabolic, psychosocial and dietary profiles between underreporters and non-underreporters in our cohort of overweight and obese postmenopausal women.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Get just this article for as long as you need it

$39.95

Learn more

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  • Abbot JM, Thomson CA, Ranger-Moore J, Teixeira PJ, Lohman TG, Taren DL et al. (2008). Psychosocial and behavioral profile and predictors of self-reported energy underreporting in obese middle-aged women. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 114–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asbeck I, Mast M, Bierwag A, Westenhofer J, Acheson KJ, Muller MJ (2002). Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating. Public Health Nutr 5, 683–690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baranowski T, Perry C, Parcel G (2003). How individuals, environments, and health behavior interact. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice. Jossey-Bass Inc.: San Francisco, pp 165–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazelmans C, Matthys C, De Henauw S, Dramaix M, Kornitzer M, De Backer G et al. (2007). Predictors of misreporting in an elderly population: the ‘Quality of life after 65’ study. Public Health Nutr 10, 185–191.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black AE, Cole TJ (2000). Within- and between-subject variation in energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water technique: implications for validating reported dietary energy intake. Eur J Clin Nutr 54, 386–394.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Black AE, Cole TJ (2001). Biased over- or under-reporting is characteristic of individuals whether over time or by different assessment methods. J Am Diet Assoc 101, 70–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Briefel RR, Sempos CT, McDowell MA, Chien S, Alaimo K (1997). Dietary methods research in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: underreporting of energy intake. Am J Clin Nutr 65, 1203S–1209S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav 24, 385–396.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer J, Picciano MF, Raiten DJ (2003). Estimation of usual intakes: what we eat in America-NHANES. J Nutr 133, 609S–623S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghiselli EE, Campbell JP, Zedeck S (1981). Measurement Theory for the Behavioral Sciences. WH Freeman: San Francisco. p 494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill RJ, Davies PS (2001). The validity of self-reported energy intake as determined using the doubly labelled water technique. Br J Nutr 85, 415–430.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvonen T, Mannisto S, Roos E, Pietinen P (1997). Increasing prevalence of underreporting does not necessarily distort dietary surveys. Eur J Clin Nutr 51, 297–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang TT, Roberts SB, Howarth NC, McCrory MA (2005). Effect of screening out implausible energy intake reports on relationships between diet and BMI. Obes Res 13, 1205–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal R, Anand S, Ounpuu S, Islam S, Zhang X, Rangarajan S et al. (2008). Dietary patterns and the risk of acute myocardial infarction in 52 countries: results of the INTERHEART study. Circulation 118, 1929–1937.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Janz NK, Champion VL, Strecher VJ (2003). The Health Belief Model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds). Health Behavior and Health Education. Theory, Research, and Practice, 3rd edn. Jossey-Bass Inc.: San Francisco, pp 45–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanctot JQ, Klesges RC, Stockton MB, Klesges LM (2008). Prevalence and characteristics of energy underreporting in African-American girls. Obesity (Silver Spring) 16, 1407–1412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB, Black AE (2003). Markers of the validity of reported energy intake. J Nutr 133 (Suppl 3), 895S–920S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone MB, Robson PJ, Black AE, Coward WA, Wallace JM, McKinley MC et al. (2003). An evaluation of the sensitivity and specificity of energy expenditure measured by heart rate and the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake: basal metabolic rate for identifying mis-reporting of energy intake by adults and children: a retrospective analysis. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 455–463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDowell I, Newell C (1996). Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: New York. p 523.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQueen MJ, Hawken S, Wang X, Ounpuu S, Sniderman A, Probstfield J et al. (2008). Lipids, lipoproteins, and apolipoproteins as risk markers of myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): a case-control study. Lancet 372, 224–233.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR (2001). Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess 76, 90–106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Messier V, Malita FM, Rabasa-Lhoret R, Brochu M, Karelis AD (2008). Association of cardiorespiratory fitness with insulin sensitivity in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team study. Metabolism 57, 1293–1298.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Novotny JA, Rumpler WV, Riddick H, Hebert JR, Rhodes D, Judd JT et al. (2003). Personality characteristics as predictors of underreporting of energy intake on 24-h dietary recall interviews. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price GM, Paul AA, Cole TJ, Wadsworth ME (1997). Characteristics of the low-energy reporters in a longitudinal national dietary survey. Br J Nutr 77, 833–851.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pryer JA, Vrijheid M, Nichols R, Kiggins M, Elliott P (1997). Who are the ‘low energy reporters’ in the dietary and nutritional survey of British adults? Int J Epidemiol 26, 146–154.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosell MS, Hellenius ML, de Faire UH, Johansson GK (2003). Associations between diet and the metabolic syndrome vary with the validity of dietary intake data. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 84–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press: Princeton. p 326.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosengren A, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, Sliwa K, Zubaid M, Almahmeed WA et al. (2004). Association of psychosocial risk factors with risk of acute myocardial infarction in 11 119 cases and 13 648 controls from 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): case-control study. Lancet 364, 953–962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel-Hodge CD, Fernandez LM, Henriquez-Roldan CF, Johnston LF, Keyserling TC (2004). A comparison of self-reported energy intake with total energy expenditure estimated by accelerometer and basal metabolic rate in African-American women with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 27, 663–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St-Pierre DH, Cianflone K, Smith J, Coderre L, Karelis AD, Imbeaut P et al. (2009). Change in plasma acylation stimulating protein during euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a MONET study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 70, 539–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, Wells K, Rogers WH, Berry SD et al. (1989). Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA 262, 907–913.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strychar I, Lavoie M, Messier L, Karelis A, Fontaine J, Doucet E et al. (2009). Metabolic, psychosocial, and dietary characteristics of overweight/obese postmenopausal women with a history of weight cycling: A MONET Study. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 512–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stunkard AJ, Messick S (1985). The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res 29, 71–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tooze JA, Subar AF, Thompson FE, Troiano R, Schatzkin A, Kipnis V (2004). Psychosocial predictors of energy underreporting in a large doubly labeled water study. Am J Clin Nutr 79, 795–804.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trabulsi J, Schoeller DA (2001). Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 281, E891–E899.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Voss S, Kroke A, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Boeing H (1998). Is macronutrient composition of dietary intake data affected by underreporting? Results from the EPIC-Potsdam Study. European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. Eur J Clin Nutr 52, 119–126.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (University of Montreal and University of Ottawa New Emerging Team project). Dr Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Dr Antony Karelis, Marie-Eve Lavoie and Virginie Messier are supported by the Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec. Dr Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret is the recipient of the J-A DeSeve Research Chair for Clinical Research. Éric Doucet is a recipient of a CIHR/Merck-Frosst New Investigator Award, a Canadian Foundation for Innovation New Opportunities Award and an Early Research Award (Ontario).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Kinanthropology, University of Quebec at Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    A D Karelis

  2. Department of Nutrition, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    M-E Lavoie, J Fontaine, V Messier, I Strychar & R Rabasa-Lhoret

  3. Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    I Strychar & R Rabasa-Lhoret

  4. Montreal Diabetes Research Center of the CRCHUM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    I Strychar & R Rabasa-Lhoret

  5. Institut de recherches cliniques de Montréal (IRCM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

    R Rabasa-Lhoret

  6. School of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

    É Doucet

Authors
  1. A D Karelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M-E Lavoie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J Fontaine
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. V Messier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I Strychar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R Rabasa-Lhoret
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. É Doucet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A D Karelis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karelis, A., Lavoie, ME., Fontaine, J. et al. Anthropometric, metabolic, dietary and psychosocial profiles of underreporters of energy intake: a doubly labeled water study among overweight/obese postmenopausal women—a Montreal Ottawa New Emerging Team study. Eur J Clin Nutr 64, 68–74 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2009.119

Keywords

  • underreporters
  • body composition
  • obesity
  • perceived stress
  • energy expenditure and doubly labeled water

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links