Graft Source

Multi-color immune-phenotyping of CD34 subsets reveals unexpected differences between various stem cell sources


Flow cytometric routine CD34 analysis enumerates hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells irrespective of their subpopulations although this might predict engraftment dynamics and immune reconstitution. We established a multi-color CD34 assay containing CD133, CD45RA, CD10, CD38 and CD33. We examined PBSC, donor bone marrow (BMd) and BM of patients 1 year after allografting (BM1y) regarding their CD34 subset composition, which differed significantly amongst those materials: the early CD45RACD133+CD38low subpopulations were significantly more frequent in PBSC than in BMd, and very low in BM1y. Vice versa, clearly more committed CD34 stages prevailed in BM, particularly in BM1y where the proportion of multi-lymphoid and CD38++ B-lymphoid precursors was highest (mean 59%). CD33 was expressed at different intensity on CD45RA±CD133± subsets allowing discrimination of earlier from more committed myeloid precursors. Compared with conventional CD34+ cell enumeration, the presented multi-color phenotyping is a qualitative approach defining different CD34 subtypes in any CD34 source. Its potential impact to predict engraftment kinetics and immune reconstitution has to be evaluated in future studies.


Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPC) were originally described by simple flow cytometric methods using only CD34 to characterize them.1, 2 Since 1996 the two-color ISHAGE protocol focusing on CD45 and CD34 has served as the standard for CD34+ cell enumeration.3 Addition of 7-AAD to define cell viability, and the use of beads for standardized quantification expanded the test to a single-platform three-color analysis tool to enumerate CD34+ cell numbers in bone marrow (BM), blood or cord blood.4, 5 In the clinical setting, these analyses have not changed and address only CD34+ cells as such. However, one important issue concerning repopulation and engraftment after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is to define distinct subsets of CD34+ cells.6, 7, 8 Markers like CD45RA and CD38 were suggested in research experiments.9, 10, 11, 12 Expression studies of CD34 with CD10, CD38, CD45RA or CD90 led to the discovery of functional HSPC-subpopulations and to the presentation of the classic model of the human hematopoietic lineage tree.13, 14 Some studies correlated the co-expression of CD38 and CD71 with neutrophil and platelet recovery.6, 15 CD133/Prominin-1 was included only recently into a panel of markers to define different CD34 subsets.16 Based on these studies, Görgens et al.17 suggested a revision of the most recent model of human hematopoiesis, the composite model (Figure 1), originally proposed by the Jacobsen group.14, 18 According to this, multi-potent progenitors (MPP) represent early CD34 developmental stages enriched within the CD45RACD133+CD38lowCD10 cell fraction most of which dividing asymmetrically.19 Tracking CD133 segregation in functional single cell analysis, the authors showed that MPP create pairs of daughter cells, the lymphoid-primed multi-potent progenitors (LMPP) and the erythro-myeloid progenitors (EMP). Whereas LMPP upregulate CD45RA and remain CD133+ (CD45RA+CD133+CD38lowCD10), EMP remain CD45RA but lose CD133 expression (CD45RACD133−/lowCD38+CD10). LMPP harbor the potential to create neutrophil and macrophage progenitors (GMP) as well as CD10 upregulating multi-lymphoid precursors (MLP). Among others, these MLP create CD34+CD19+ B-lymphoid progenitors (BLP), which downregulated CD133 (CD45RA+CD133CD38++CD10+). Based on the definition of these subsets, we established a multi-color approach to define and enumerate CD34 subpopulations in the three different HSPC sources. CD34, CD45, 7-AAD and scatter properties were used to define viable CD34+ cells, which were then further classified using CD45RA, AC133, CD7, CD10, CD19, CD3, CD33 and CD38.

Figure 1

Model of the human hematopoietic tree, adapted from the recent version by Görgens et al.17 Only CD34+ cell stages are depicted. The CD45RACD133+CD38lowCD10 multi-potent progenitors (MPP, upper) either remain CD45RA and downregulate CD133 (middle right) to form cells of the erythro-myeloid lineage (EMP), or they acquire CD45RA and become CD133+ lympho-myeloid progenitors (LMPP, middle left) that also comprise neutrophil and monocyte precursors (GMP). Upon downregulation of CD133 (lower left), these form late GMP and, in case of CD10 acquisition, cells of the B-lymphoid lineage (BLP).

Materials and methods

Specimen collection

All cell specimens used in this study were obtained for routine CD34 enumeration. Donor BM samples (BMd, n=31) were from healthy allogeneic BM donors aged from 2 to 48 (median 26) years. Patient BM specimens (BM1y, n=21) were from biopsies routinely drawn for clinical examination 1 year after allografting. Six of these were paired samples, that is, we analyzed both BMd and BM1y from these patients. The BM recipients (11 males, 10 females) had been diagnosed with AML (4), ALL (6), MDS (4), CML (2), RCC (2), SCID (1), SAA (1) and Hyper IG E syndrome (1). Their median age was 10 years (range 0.8–18). Conditioning regimens were myeloablative (n=11) and reduced intensity (n=10). Fifteen BM recipients had received antithymocyte globulin. PBSC samples (n=35) were from autologous stem cell collections from adult patients (22 males, 13 females) with multiple myeloma (n=19) and Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n=16), with a median age of 54 years (range 22–73). The mobilization regimen comprised Cht (chemotherapy) and hGF (hematopoietic growth factors) n=13), Cht+hGF and plerixafor (n=6), hGF alone (n=5) or hGF and plerixafor (n=11). Informed consent was obtained from all patients and the extended staining experiments had been approved by the local ethical committee.

Cell processing and immune staining

Blood cell counts were obtained from a Sysmex KX-21N (Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan). If necessary, cells were diluted with Dulbecco's PBS (Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the WBC adjusted to 5–15 × 106 cells/mL prior to immune staining. All monoclonal antibodies were used at pretested concentrations and after respective compensation. Isotype controls and fluorescence-minus-one analyses were used to define gating and compensation.

Single platform protocol

In total, 100 μL of the cell sample were reverse-pipetted into a Trucount tube (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). After adding the monoclonal antibodies cocktail, cells were mixed and incubated light-shielded at room temperature for 20 min. RBCs were lysed by adding 2 ml of ammonium chloride working solution (BD Biosciences) for 10 min before samples were analyzed on the flow cytometer. The monoclonal antibody cocktail contained the stem cell enumeration kit (BD Biosciences) comprising CD45 FITC, CD34 PE and 7-AAD, as well as the following monoclonal antibody: AC133-1 APC, CD7 PeCF594, CD10 BV421, CD19 APC-Cy7, CD38 PE-Cy7, CD45RA BV510, CD3 PerCPeFl710, and CD33 APC-R700. For detailed information please see Supplementary Table 1.

Flow cytometry

Acquisition of 150 000 CD45+events was done on a FACS Fortessa (BD Biosciences) equipped with four solid state lasers with excitation wave lengths (nm) of 488, 405, 561 and 640. The FACSDiVa 6 software (BD Biosciences) was used for cell acquisition and data evaluation. For quality control of the instrument’s performance, CS&T beads (BD Biosciences) were used at least weekly.

Gating strategy

Viable WBC were defined by their CD45 expression, negativity for 7-AAD, and typical position in the forward- and side scatter (FSC/SSC) dot plot. According to the ISHAGE guidelines,4 viable and true HSPC were determined by their positivity for CD34, their weak expression of CD45, their typical position in the lympho-monocytic area of the FSC/SSC dot plot and their negativity for 7-AAD. To define subpopulations, CD34+ cells were first divided into an earlier CD45RA and a more committed CD45RA+ cell fraction. These were then separately depicted in a CD133 vs CD10 contour plot (Figure 2, Supplementary Figure 1D). The resulting subpopulations were examined for their expression of CD38, CD33, CD10 and CD7. Beads were double-gated in two different dot plots (APC vs SSC and APC-Cy7 vs FITC) to exclude false-positive events, and the following formula was used to calculate the number of target cells/μL:

Figure 2

Multi-color CD34 subtype analysis: representative examples of autologous PBSC (top), donor bone marrow (BMd, middle) and patient bone marrow 1 year after allogeneic transplantation (BM1y, bottom). Only viable and true CD34+ events are depicted (see Supplementary Figure 1 for the gating strategy). Cells were first separated into fractions negative or positive for CD45RA (larger plots). The proportion of earlier CD45RA progenitors was generally higher among PBSC than BMd and, particularly, BM1y cells. All CD34+CD45RA+ or CD34+CD45RA events are shown in CD133 vs CD10 contour plots, where they form the CD45RACD133+CD10 MPP, the CD45RA+CD133+CD10 LMPP, the CD45RACD133CD10 EMP, the CD45RA+CD133CD10 late GMP, the CD45RA+CD133+CD10+ MLP and CD45RA+CD133CD10+ BLP.

To calculate absolute cell numbers in donor BM, an additional dilution factor of 1.1 was considered to compensate for the anticoagulant added.

Statistical analyses

Differences in cell counts (both absolute and relative) between the three HSPC sources were assessed with the unpaired one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test. A P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant (*<0.05, **<0.01, ***<0.001). Mean values (±s.d.) are provided in the text. In depicted Box-and-Whisker plots, boxes range from first to third quartile (containing 50% of data points). The median value is indicated by a thick horizontal line. Whiskers extend to the most extreme data point, which is <1.5 times the interquartile range (=box height) away from the box, and indicate the range that contains 95% of data points in a normally distributed sample. R version 3.2.0 (2 015-04-16) was used for all statistical analyses.


Enumeration of total HSPC irrespective of CD34 subtypes revealed significant differences between the three cell sources (Figure 3a). Results were expressed as absolute numbers (viable CD34/μL) and as relative values (viable CD34+ cells as percentage of viable WBC). The mean percentage (±s.d.) of total CD34+ cells was highest in BMd (2.1%±2), followed by BM1y (1.1%±0.6) and by autologous PBSC (0.8%±0.9). In terms of absolute CD34 numbers, the highest values were obtained in PBSC (1402/μL±1049), followed by BMd (794/μL±753) and by BM1y (255/μL±253). The majority of PBSC samples described in the present work was from adult patients diagnosed with different lymphoid malignancies. Since most of the pediatric patients had been allografted with BMd, only few PBSC samples had been obtained and analyzed from healthy mobilized donors, but their comparison revealed a similar distribution of CD34 subtypes in patient and donor PBSC (data not shown).

Figure 3

Comparison of median absolute and relative values of (a) total CD34+ cells and (b) CD34 subpopulations in autologous PBSC (n=35), donor bone marrow (BMd, n=31) and patient bone marrow one year after allogeneic transplantation (BM1y, n=21). For total CD34+ cells (a), absolute numbers (left) were significantly higher in PBSC (open circles) than in BMd (gray), and higher in BMd than in BM1y (black), whereas relative values (right) were highest in BMd and lowest in PBSC. Regarding the CD34 subgroups (b), absolute numbers (upper graph) of MPP, EMP and LMPP were significantly higher in PBSC than in BMd, and higher in BMd than in BM1y. Relative values (lower graph) of MPP and EMP were also significantly more frequent in PBSC than in BMd, and more frequent in BMd than in BM1y, and LMPP fractions were higher in BMd than in BM1y. This was in contrast to late GMP, which were clearly higher in BMd than PBSC, and particularly to the more mature MLP and BLP subsets, which were much more frequent in BMd and BM1y than in PBSC, showing the highest proportions (mean 59%) in BM1y.

CD34 subtyping was always started with CD45RA, as this marker allows definition of two distinct subgroups in all materials, separating earlier CD45RA from more committed CD45RA+ HSPC (Figure 2, Supplementary Figure 1). Both subpopulations were then further evaluated in CD133/CD10 contour plots where they formed at least six distinct CD34 subpopulations. Between the three cell sources analyzed, we observed considerable differences regarding the composition of CD34 subsets, both for absolute cell numbers and relative values (Figure 3b). The mean cell proportion (in % CD34+ cells±s.d.) of the early MPP cells was significantly higher in PBSC (42%±13.7) than in BMd (16%±8; P<0.001). In BM1y, their frequency was only 2.5%±1.8, which was significantly lower than in BMd (P<0.001) and roughly 17-fold less than in PBSC. Analogous results were obtained for absolute MPP numbers, which were significantly higher in PBSC (608/μL;±475) than in BMd (138/μL±156; P<0.001), and in BMd than in BM1y (5/μL±6; P<0.001).

MPP differentiate to either LMPP (CD45RA+CD133+) or EMP (CD45RACD133−/low). Both subsets showed a higher CD38 expression than MPP supporting their higher differentiation (Figure 4). As shown in Figure 3b, the mean frequency of LMPP was similar between PBSC and BMd (25.6%±11.1, and 23.7%±10.1; ns), but significantly lower in BM1y (16.3%±8.3) than in BMd (P<0.01). Absolute LMPP cell numbers differed significantly between PBSC (383/μL±412) and BMd (170/μL±158; P<0.01), and between BMd and BM1y (33/μL±28; P<0.001). This may suggest a higher proportion of neutrophil progenitors in favor of BLP in the LMPP subfraction of PBSC compared with BMd. EMP that give rise to erythrocytes, megakaryocytes and granulocytes other than neutrophils, showed results comparable to those obtained for LMPP. Their mean frequency was similar in PBSC (24.5%±8.7) and BMd (19.5%±6.5; P<0.05) but differed significantly between BMd and BM1y (11.9%±7.3; P<0.001). Absolute EMP numbers differed clearly and were 331/μL±261 for PBSC vs 162/μL±176 for BMd (P<0.001), and 24/μL±25 for BM1y vs BMd (P<0.001). In terms of LMPP and EMP, BM1y thus mediates an impression of exhaustion when compared with BMd. Late myeloid progenitors (late GMP) with a CD45RA+CD133CD33+CD10 phenotype differed mainly with regard to relative values, which were significantly lower in PBSC (4%±3.1) than in BMd (8.5%±4.1; P<0.001), but similar between BMd and BM1y (11.1%±6.5; ns). In terms of absolute values, they were 51/μL±62 in PBSC vs 72/μL±91 in BMd (ns), and slightly lower in BM1y (23/μL±20) than in BMd (P<0.01). Owing to the low frequency of the CD133+ MLP, this CD34 subset was evaluated together with the CD133 BLP. These cells were hardly detectable in PBSC (5%±7.9) but clearly present in BMd (31.9%±15.1; P<0.001). In BM1y, they represented the largest CD34 subfraction (58.5%±17.6), which was significantly higher than in BMd (P<0.001).

Figure 4

Rise of CD38 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values on HSPC with increasing differentiation of CD34+ subsets. Representative bone marrow sample from a patient 1 one year after allogeneic transplantation (BM1y) depicting CD45RACD133+CD10 multi-potent progenitors (MPP), CD45RA+CD133+CD10 lymphoid-primed multi-potent progenitors (LMPP), CD45RACD133CD10 erythro-myeloid precursors (EMP), CD45RA+CD133CD10 late granulocyte monocyte progenitors (late GMP) and CD45RA+CD133CD10+ B-lymphoid progenitors (BLP). See Supplementary Figure 1 for the gating strategy.

Despite the rather low proportions of the CD133dim MLP in the BM samples, it has to be noted that this CD34 subset, when expressed as percentage of the MLP/BLP fraction, represented a clearly lower median cell proportion (P=1.66e-09; one-sided unpaired Wilcoxon rank sum test) in BM1y (3.6%) than in BMd (11.9%). A representative example is depicted in Figure 2. In terms of absolute CD10+ stem cell numbers, significant differences were observed between PBSC (43/μL±83) and BMd (255/μL±302; P<0.001), whereas the values were similar between BMd and BM1y (171/μL±191; ns). Out of the 31 BMd and 21 BM1y specimens analyzed, six were paired samples, that is, we examined BMd and BM1y pairs from the same patients. The results were virtually identical to those obtained from the whole groups: The median proportions of the CD34 subsets for BMd/BM1y were 12.1%/1.8% (MPP), 22%/17.4% (LMPP), 20.1%/10% (EMP), 5.5%/9.1% (late GMP) and 34%/65.2% (MLP and BLP).

The expression intensity of distinct markers often correlates with differentiation as shown for CD38 (see below). Such differences were also observed for CD33 and CD133. Expression of CD133 on MPP and LMPP was generally higher in PBSC than in BMd and BM1y (not depicted), suggesting that these cell stages are more differentiated in BM than in PBSC. Nevertheless, it was possible to distinguish the different CD133+/− subpopulations in all cell samples (Figure 2). The myeloid marker CD33 was expressed in all CD34 subfractions, although it was weaker on MPP in PBSC with high CD133 expression than on MPP in BM with weaker CD133 expression (not depicted). Distinct CD10+ (and CD19+) HSPC subsets were detectable among both the CD45RA+ and the CD133 progenitors, and the CD33 expression was clearly higher in BM1y than PBSC (Figure 5). In all cell sources, a potential co-expression of CD7 as a marker of T- and NK-cell progenitors was only seen on 0–2.8% of CD34+ cells (see Supplementary Figure 1 D3). As non-specific staining could not be excluded, this subtype was not pursued any further.

Figure 5

Multi-color CD34 subtype analysis: CD10 vs CD33 expression of CD45RA and CD133 subsets in PBSC and BM1y. Only viable and true CD34+ events are depicted (see Supplementary Figure 1 for the gating strategy). The CD10 vs CD33 dot plots depict all CD34+ cells positive or negative for CD45RA or CD133 (as indicated). CD10+ (and CD19+) B-lymphoid progenitors are present in the CD34+CD45RA+ and CD34+CD133 HSPC subsets. Expression of CD33 is higher in BM1y than in PBSC, and higher among CD45RA+ than CD45RA precursors. Similar results were obtained for 10 CD10/CD33 analyses performed.

We used the PE-Cy7-labeled H7 clone of CD38 in all experiments performed. Virtually, all CD34+ cells were positive for this Ab, albeit at clearly different intensity (Figure 4). MPP showed the lowest expression intensity, followed by LMPP and EMP. The intensity was higher among CD45RA+ late myeloid precursors, and highest among the CD45RA+CD10+CD19+ BLP. This differential CD38 expression was generally observed in all specimens examined although the differences were not always as clear as depicted in the BM1y sample shown in Figure 4 (see also Supplementary Figure 2). Owing to the considerable overlap between the different CD34 subgroups, CD38 was never used as first-line Ab for subgroup discrimination.


Based on previously presented data,13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 we extended our recently described five-color CD34 enumeration protocol23 to an 11-color single-platform analysis tool, which we used to describe at least six distinct CD34 subpopulations differing in terms of maturation und lineage commitment. We have thus reenacted and translated into clinical routine application what the above authors described in their extensive functional analyses, and we show that the composition of the CD34 subsets differs substantially between the three CD34 sources examined. We assume that routine application of the presented protocol will allow high from medium or poor quality transplant materials to be distinguished and may thus predict engraftment characteristics as addressed by several authors,6, 7, 8, 15, 24 but this will have to be proven in future studies. The present results show clearly that PBSC contain significantly higher proportions of MPP, LMPP and EMP than BMd. This may be the reason for the more rapid sustained engraftment after infusion of PBSC instead of BM.25, 26 In BM1y, these earlier CD34 subtypes are again significantly lower than in BMd. In contrast, the more committed CD34 stages, that is, MLP and particularly BLP, are significantly higher in BM1y than in BMd, whereas they are hardly present in PBSC. Our data may be biased by the fact that the PBSC were from autologous patients with a median age of 54 years, whereas the BMd specimens were from younger and healthy donors (median age 26 years). However, one can assume that PBSC from younger and healthy donors (or from cord blood samples) display a more immature rather than a more committed phenotype thus making the difference between PBSC and BM early CD34 subtypes rather larger than smaller.

In normal BM, B-cell precursors may represent a considerable CD34 subfraction, which in our BMd cohort, accounted for median 32%. These cells represent predominantly (~90%) the more mature CD133CD10+CD19+ BLP, but only few MLP still exhibiting a weak CD133 expression. During mobilization, such rather committed precursors hardly appear in the circulation, which is in contrast to MPP and EMP of which high proportions enter the blood stream. Reasons for the differential mobilization of the various CD34 subsets from the BM into the circulation may be that the earlier CD34 subsets show a better stimulation response to the myeloid growth factor G-CSF than late GMP and B-lineage progenitors. However, it can also not be excluded that the earlier progenitors are less adherent to the BM niche because they prevail not only in mobilized PBSC but also in non-mobilized blood or in cord blood.18, 27

The differences described between PBSC and BMd in terms of CD34 subset composition confirm an earlier observation of higher proportions of CD45RA progenitors in PBSC than in BM. Cell sorting and culture in semisolid medium revealed that the CD45RA vs CD45RA+ cells formed compact vs dispersed colonies originating from earlier and more committed myeloid progenitors, respectively.10 A differential mobilization is also supported by the observation that mobilized PBSC are not or hardly in G2S phase,28, 29 which is in contrast to BMd CD34+ cells and, particularly, to BM1y cells.30 In 1997, Anderlini & Körbling assumed a more primitive phenotype of CD34+ cells contained in PBSC compared with BM.25 Furthermore, they postulated a faster engraftment after PBSC transplantation compared with BM allografting as described before.26 This was later confirmed by different authors, who reported no differences in both overall and event-free survival between PBSC and BM, but observed a clearly faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment after infusion of PBSC.31, 32, 33 The most likely reason for this is the higher number of LMPP and EMP giving rise to neutrophil- and platelet-forming cells, respectively.17 It is also noteworthy that the GMP which form monocytes and neutrophils, are contained in the LMPP cohort, which, in BM, contains significantly more B-lineage progenitors. The relative fraction of neutrophil progenitors should therefore be clearly larger in PBSC than in BM although similar frequencies of LMPP (which can give rise to both neutrophil and B-lineage precursors) were found in these two stem cell sources.

CD38 was used by several authors to distinguish earlier from more committed CD34 cell stages.24, 34, 35 Despite a relatively high expression on all HSPC subsets, its mean fluorescence intensity values were clearly lower on CD133+ HSPC subtypes than on more committed CD34 stages. However, owing to the substantial overlap between the different CD34 subtypes, CD38 could never be used to unambiguously separate early from more committed progenitors. It was therefore important that CD34 subtyping was started with CD45RA and followed by CD133 and CD10. When the resulting subsets were then analyzed for their CD38 mean fluorescence intensity, the gradational increase became obvious, ranging from the lowest expression among the young MPP, over LMPP and EMP to the highest among BLP.

One year after allogeneic BM transplantation, MPP accounted for only 2.5% of CD34+ cells in BM1y, which is ~6 times and 17 times lower than in BMd and PBSC, respectively. In contrast, MLP and BLP in particular represented almost 2/3 of CD34+ cells in BM1y, which is significantly more than in BMd. One possible explanation for the marked relative and absolute loss of MPP may be the ‘replicative stress’. Another reason could be the destructive effect of conditioning radio- and/or chemotherapy,36 leading to an unfavorable impact on the homing capabilities and thus to a disturbance of asymmetrical cell division, which was reported for MPP, but not for the more committed CD34 subfractions.19, 29 Both observations, the loss of earlier and the gain of more committed CD34 subtypes are in line with other reports. Selleri et al.37 found an eightfold decrease of long-term culture initiating cells in the BM of patients as compared with donors, and Thornley et al.30 described a higher telomere loss in the BM of patients with full donor chimerism. Woolthuis et al.38 reported a loss of quiescence and impaired function of CD34+/CD38low cells 1 year after autologous stem cell reinfusion. These reports are in line with our observation of a significant increase of CD133dim MLP and CD133 BLP in BM1y, which was also described by Wolf et al.39

BM biopsies 1 year after transplantation are usually only performed after allogeneic, but not after autologous transplantation. However, Bhatia et al.40 examined BM of Non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma patients 0.5–3 years after autologous PBSC reinfusion. They also reported a profound and persistent reduction in primitive and an increase of more committed progenitors. This suggests that our observed high proportions of BLP are not a result of allogeneic B-cell activation but rather the consequence of profound B-cell depletion in the context of high-dose chemotherapy. This is supported by the fact that all our patients displaying high numbers of BLP were free of chronic GvHD, in contrast to one patient with chronic GvHD who showed very low MLP and BLP counts.41 As nearly all our patients who underwent allogeneic transplantation during the past 2 years had received BMd but not PBSC, we cannot establish whether the MPP compartment in BM1y would be significantly larger after transplantation of allogeneic PBSC instead of BMd. However, the data presented by Bhatia et al.40 and own preliminary results from two patients who had received allogeneic PBSC comprising MPP numbers clearly higher than those analyzed in BMd suggest that the proportion of early precursors is strongly reduced even after transplantation of allogeneic PBSC.

We conclude that the presented analysis can identify and enumerate distinct CD34 subfractions in any conventional CD34 cell source. This approach may provide a solid basis for future studies to determine the impact of different CD34 subsets in the graft as well as in post-transplant BM on engraftment kinetics and immune reconstitution. Whether or not the analysis will allow prediction of engraftment kinetics on a routine basis remains to be examined.


  1. 1

    Siena S, Bregni M, Brando B, Belli N, Ravagnani F, Gandola L et al. Flow cytometry for clinical estimation of circulating hematopoietic progenitors for autologous transplantation in cancer patients. Blood 1991; 77: 400–409.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    Siena S, Bregni M, Brando B, Ravagnani F, Bonadonna G, Gianni AM . Circulation of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells in the peripheral blood of high-dose cyclophosphamide-treated patients: enhancement by intravenous recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor. Blood 1989; 74: 1905–1914.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    Sutherland DR, Anderson L, Keeney M, Nayar R, Chin-Yee I . The ISHAGE guidelines for CD34+ cell determination by flow cytometry. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. J Hematother 1996; 5: 213–226.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    Keeney M, Chin-Yee I, Weir K, Popma J, Nayar R, Sutherland DR . Single platform flow cytometric absolute CD34+ cell counts based on the ISHAGE guidelines. International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering. Cytometry 1998; 34: 61–70.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    Gratama JW, Orfao A, Barnett D, Brando B, Huber A, Janossy G et al. Flow cytometric enumeration of CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. European Working Group on Clinical Cell Analysis. Cytometry 1998; 34: 128–142.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    Gonzalez-Requejo A, Madero L, Diaz MA, Villa M, Garcia-Escribano C, Balas A et al. Progenitor cell subsets and engraftment kinetics in children undergoing autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Br J Haematol 1998; 101: 104–110.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    Saraceni F, Shem-Tov N, Olivieri A, Nagler A . Mobilized peripheral blood grafts include more than hematopoietic stem cells: the immunological perspective. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50: 886–891.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    Udomsakdi C, Eaves CJ, Sutherland HJ, Lansdorp PM . Separation of functionally distinct subpopulations of primitive human hematopoietic cells using rhodamine-123. Exp Hematol 1991; 19: 338–342.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    Terstappen LW, Huang S, Safford M, Lansdorp PM, Loken MR . Sequential generations of hematopoietic colonies derived from single nonlineage-committed CD34+CD38- progenitor cells. Blood 1991; 77: 1218–1227.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    Fritsch G, Buchinger P, Printz D, Fink FM, Mann G, Peters C et al. Rapid discrimination of early CD34+ myeloid progenitors using CD45-RA analysis. Blood 1993; 81: 2301–2309.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    Kondo M, Wagers AJ, Manz MG, Prohaska SS, Scherer DC, Beilhack GF et al. Biology of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitors: implications for clinical application. Annu Rev Immunol 2003; 21: 759–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    Bender JG, Williams SF, Myers S, Nottleman D, Lee WJ, Unverzagt KL et al. Characterization of chemotherapy mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cells for use in autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1992; 10: 281–285.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    Reya T, Morrison SJ, Clarke MF, Weissman IL . Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 2001; 414: 105–111.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    Adolfsson J, Mansson R, Buza-Vidas N, Hultquist A, Liuba K, Jensen CT et al. Identification of Flt3+ lympho-myeloid stem cells lacking erythro-megakaryocytic potential a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment. Cell 2005; 121: 295–306.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    Kamel AM, El-Sharkawy N, Mahmoud HK, Khalaf MR, El Haddad A, Fahmy O et al. Impact of CD34 subsets on engraftment kinetics in allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2005; 35: 129–136.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16

    Takahashi M, Matsuoka Y, Sumide K, Nakatsuka R, Fujioka T, Kohno H et al. CD133 is a positive marker for a distinct class of primitive human cord blood-derived CD34-negative hematopoietic stem cells. Leukemia 2014; 28: 1308–1315.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    Gorgens A, Radtke S, Horn PA, Giebel B . New relationships of human hematopoietic lineages facilitate detection of multipotent hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Cell Cycle 2013; 12: 3478–3482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    Gorgens A, Radtke S, Mollmann M, Cross M, Durig J, Horn PA et al. Revision of the human hematopoietic tree: granulocyte subtypes derive from distinct hematopoietic lineages. Cell Rep 2013; 3: 1539–1552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    Gorgens A, Ludwig AK, Mollmann M, Krawczyk A, Durig J, Hanenberg H et al. Multipotent hematopoietic progenitors divide asymmetrically to create progenitors of the lymphomyeloid and erythromyeloid lineages. Stem Cell Rep 2014; 3: 1058–1072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    Doulatov S, Notta F, Eppert K, Nguyen LT, Ohashi PS, Dick JE . Revised map of the human progenitor hierarchy shows the origin of macrophages and dendritic cells in early lymphoid development. Nat Immunol 2010; 11: 585–593.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    Mori Y, Iwasaki H, Kohno K, Yoshimoto G, Kikushige Y, Okeda A et al. Identification of the human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor: revision of phenotypic definition of the human common myeloid progenitor. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 183–193.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    Radtke S, Gorgens A, Kordelas L, Schmidt M, Kimmig KR, Koninger A et al. CD133 allows elaborated discrimination and quantification of haematopoietic progenitor subsets in human haematopoietic stem cell transplants. Br J Haematol 2015; 169: 868–878.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    Fritsch G, Witt V, Spengler HP, Pichler J, Scharner D, Zipperer E et al. Robust multi-parameter single-platform quantification of myeloid and B-lymphoid CD34 progenitor cells in all clinical CD34 cell sources and in thawed PBSC. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2012; 29: 595–610.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    Roug AS, Hokland LB, Segel E, Nielsen K, Toft-Petersen M, Van Kooten Niekerk PB et al. Unraveling stem cell and progenitor subsets in autologous grafts according to methods of mobilization: implications for prediction of hematopoietic recovery. Cytotherapy 2014; 16: 392–401.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    Anderlini P, Korbling M . The use of mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from normal donors for allografting. Stem Cells 1997; 15: 9–17.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    Schmitz N, Linch DC, Dreger P, Goldstone AH, Boogaerts MA, Ferrant A et al. Randomised trial of filgrastim-mobilised peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation versus autologous bone-marrow transplantation in lymphoma patients. Lancet 1996; 347: 353–357.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27

    Fritsch G, Stimpfl M, Kurz M, Printz D, Buchinger P, Fischmeister G et al. The composition of CD34 subpopulations differs between bone marrow, blood and cord blood. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 169–178.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    Leitner A, Strobl H, Fischmeister G, Kurz M, Romanakis K, Haas OA et al. Lack of DNA synthesis among CD34+ cells in cord blood and in cytokine-mobilized blood. Br J Haematol 1996; 92: 255–262.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    Thornley I, Nayar R, Freedman MH, Stephens D, Crump M, Messner HA et al. Differences in cell cycle kinetics of candidate engrafting cells in human bone marrow and mobilized peripheral blood. Exp Hematol 2001; 29: 525–533.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    Thornley I, Sutherland R, Wynn R, Nayar R, Sung L, Corpus G et al. Early hematopoietic reconstitution after clinical stem cell transplantation: evidence for stochastic stem cell behavior and limited acceleration in telomere loss. Blood 2002; 99: 2387–2396.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    Meisel R, Enczmann J, Balzer S, Bernbeck B, Kramm C, Schonberger S et al. Similar survival following HLA-identical sibling transplantation for standard indication in children with haematologic malignancies: a single center comparison of mobilized peripheral blood stem cell with bone marrow transplantation. Klin Padiatr 2005; 217: 135–141.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    Fan ZP, Yang K, Liu QF, Sun J, Xu D, Zhang Y et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between unrelated donor peripheral blood stem cell transplantation and bone marrow transplantation for leukemia. Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 2006; 27: 525–528.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33

    Irfan M, Hashmi K, Adil S, Shamsi T, Farzana T, Ansari S et al. Beta-thalassaemia major: bone marrow versus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. J Pak Med Assoc 2008; 58: 107–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34

    Varmavuo V, Mantymaa P, Nousiainen T, Valonen P, Kuittinen T, Jantunen E . Blood graft composition after plerixafor injection in patients with NHL. Eur J Haematol 2012; 89: 128–135.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35

    Varmavuo V, Mantymaa P, Silvennoinen R, Nousiainen T, Kuittinen T, Jantunen E . CD34+ cell subclasses and lymphocyte subsets in blood grafts collected after various mobilization methods in myeloma patients. Transfusion 2013; 53: 1024–1032.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36

    Quach JM, Askmyr M, Jovic T, Baker EK, Walsh NC, Harrison SJ et al. Myelosuppressive therapies significantly increase pro-inflammatory cytokines and directly cause bone loss. J Bone Miner Res 2015; 30: 886–897.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37

    Selleri C, Maciejewski JP, De Rosa G, Raiola A, Risitano AM, Picardi M et al. Long-lasting decrease of marrow and circulating long-term culture initiating cells after allogeneic bone marrow transplant. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 23: 1029–1037.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38

    Woolthuis CM, Brouwers-Vos AZ, Huls G, de Wolf JT, Schuringa JJ, Vellenga E . Loss of quiescence and impaired function of CD34(+)/CD38(low) cells one year following autologous stem cell transplantation. Haematologica 2013; 98: 1964–1971.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39

    Wolf E, Harms H, Winkler J, Reulbach U, Kirchner T, Niedobitek G et al. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-positive cells in trephine biopsies following bone marrow or peripheral stem cell transplantation reflect vigorous B-cell generation. Histopathology 2005; 46: 442–450.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40

    Bhatia R, Van Heijzen K, Palmer A, Komiya A, Slovak ML, Chang KL et al. Longitudinal assessment of hematopoietic abnormalities after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 6699–6711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41

    Fedoriw Y, Samulski TD, Deal AM, Dunphy CH, Sharf A, Shea TC et al. Bone marrow B cell precursor number after allogeneic stem cell transplantation and GVHD development. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 968–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We would like to thank Daniela Scharner, Dijana Trbojevic and Elke Zipperer for their excellent commitment and input when establishing the described flow cytometric assay, and for their continuous support with cell preparation and data acquisition and evaluation. Dieter Printz is particularly acknowledged for his technical support in all issues of flow cytometry.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to G Fritsch.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Bone Marrow Transplantation website

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dmytrus, J., Matthes-Martin, S., Pichler, H. et al. Multi-color immune-phenotyping of CD34 subsets reveals unexpected differences between various stem cell sources. Bone Marrow Transplant 51, 1093–1100 (2016).

Download citation

Further reading