Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Qol and Patients' Care

Preliminary efficacy of a brief family intervention to prevent declining quality of life secondary to parental bone marrow transplantation

Abstract

The primary purpose of this research was to develop and evaluate the efficacy and feasibility of a brief, cost-effective family-focused intervention to promote adaptive coping and quality of life throughout a parent’s bone marrow transplantation (BMT). Targeted outcomes were cohesion, decreased use of avoidance coping, open communication and effective management of emotional distress. Participants included an intervention group of 31 families and 29 families in a control group who received usual care. Each family included the BMT recipient, a partner/caregiver and children 10–18 years old. The intervention included two dyadic sessions for the BMT recipient and the partner/caregiver, one individual session for the caregiver and two digital video discs (DVDs) for children. Statistical analyses indicated that the intervention had a positive impact on at least one aspect of the adaptation of each family member. Caregivers reported the most distress but benefitted least from the intervention, whereas recipients and children reported improvement in distress. Ratings of satisfaction/acceptability were high, with 97% responding that they would recommend the intervention to others. Plans for future research include increased intervention intensity for the caregiver, a larger more diverse sample and implementation over an extended period post BMT.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2091–2101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fife B, Fausel C . Hematopoietic Dycrasias and Stem Cell/Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Keogh F, O'Riordan J, McNamara C, Duggan C, McCann SR . Psychosocial adaptation of patients and families following bone marrow transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal study. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 22: 905–911.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bishop MM, Beaumont JL, Hahn EA, Cella D, Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ et al. Late effects of cancer and hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation on spouses or partners compared with survivors and survivor-matched controls. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 1403–1411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mosher CE, Redd WH, Rini CM, Burkhalter JE, DuHamel KN . Physical, psychological, and social sequelae following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a review of the literature. Psychooncology 2009; 18: 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Langer S, Abrams J, Syrjala K . Caregiver and patient marital satisfaction and affect following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective, longitudinal investigation. Psychooncology 2003; 12: 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fife BL, Monahan PO, Abonour R, Wood LL, Stump TE . Adaptation of family caregivers during the acute phase of adult BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 959–966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Von Ah D, Spath M, Nielsen A, Fife B . The caregiver's role across the bone marrow transplantation trajectory. Cancer Nurs 2016; 39: E12–E19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fife BL, Weaver MT, Cook WL, Stump TT . Partner interdependence and coping with life-threatening illness: the impact on dyadic adjustment. J Fam Psychol 2013; 27: 702–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Spath ML, Fife BL, Monahan PO, Decker CL, Austin JK, Abonour R et al. Children's emotional adaptation to parental BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2013; 48: 135–140.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cox MJ, Paley B . Families as systems. Annu Rev Psychol 1997; 48: 243–267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Watson D, Clark LA. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded Form. Ames, The University of Iowa: Iowa City, Iowa, USA, 1988.

  13. Landgraf J, Abetz L, Ware J . Child Health Questionnaire (CHQ): A User's Manual. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center: Boston, MA, USA, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lazarus R, Folkman S . Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. Springer Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Connor-Smith JK, Compas BE, Wadsworth ME, Thomsen AH, Saltzman H . Responses to stress in adolescence: measurement of coping and involuntary stress responses. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 976–992.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Moos R, Moos B . Family Environment Scale (FES). CPP/Consulting Psychologists Press: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cowan P, Hetherington EM . Family Transitions. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ, USA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenbaum P, Rubin D . Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 1984; 79: 516–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cohen J . Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Routledg: London, UK, 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Spanier G . Measuring dyadic adjustment: new scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads. J Marriage Fam 1976; 38: 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamilton BK, Law AD, Rybicki L, Abounader D, Dabney J, Dean R et al. Prognostic significance of pre-transplant quality of life in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2015; 50: 1235–1240.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Harris J, Bowen DJ, Badr H, Hannon P, Hay J, Regan Sterba K . Family communication during the cancer experience. J Health Commun 2009; 14 (Suppl 1): 76–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the participating families for sharing their experiences with us. We thank the BMT Programs of Jewish Hospital of Cincinnati and St Francis Medical Center of Indianapolis for the participation of their BMT recipients and families. We also thank Lyn Sontag and Vickie Alfrey respectively for their coordination with this study. We also thank our colleagues Linda Brown and Daniel Pesut for the roles they assumed in creation of the DVDs. Grants from the American Cancer Society (RSGPB-05-012-01-CPPB) and NIH (R21NR01223) supported this research. The content in this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B L Fife.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fife, B., Von Ah, D., Spath, M. et al. Preliminary efficacy of a brief family intervention to prevent declining quality of life secondary to parental bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 52, 285–291 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.267

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2016.267

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links