Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Post-Transplant Events

Impact of lymphocyte and monocyte recovery on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT with fludarabine and melphalan conditioning

Abstract

We have recently shown that lymphocyte and monocyte recovery by day +100 are associated with survival post myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic transplant for acute leukemia. We hypothesized that lymphocyte and monocyte recovery would have a similar impact on survival in the reduced intensity setting. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed clinical data from 118 consecutive fludarabine/melphalan-conditioned patients by correlating peripheral blood absolute lymphocyte counts and monocyte counts (ALC and AMC, respectively) at days +15, +30, +60 and +100 with the outcomes. Multivariate analysis revealed that day +100 AMC (risk ratio (RR) 0.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07–0.73, P=0.01) and mild chronic GVHD (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.005–0.43, P=0.008) were independently associated with survival. To explore whether the patterns of lymphocyte and monocyte recovery had a prognostic value, we performed unsupervised hierarchical clustering on the studied hematopoietic parameters and identified three patient clusters, A–C. Patient clusters A and B both had improved OS compared with cluster C (77.8 months vs not reached vs 22.3 months, respectively, P<0.001). No patient in cluster C had a day +100 AMC >300. Both severe acute GVHD and relapse occurred more frequently in cluster C. Our data suggest that patients with low AMC by day +100 post fludarabine/melphalan-conditioned allogeneic hematopoietic SCT may be at risk for poor outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pasquini MC, Wang Z . Current use and outcome of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: CIBMTR Summary Slides, 2011. Available at http://www.cibmtr.org, 2011.

  2. Morecki S, Gelfand Y, Nagler A, Or R, Naparstek E, Varadi G et al. Immune reconstitution following allogeneic stem cell transplantation in recipients conditioned by low intensity vs myeloablative regimen. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 243–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jimenez M, Martinez C, Ercilla G, Carreras E, Urbano-Ispizua A, Aymerich M et al. Reduced-intensity conditioning regimen preserves thymic function in the early period after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Exp Hematol 2005; 33: 1240–1248.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman TM, Varadi G, Hopely DD, Filicko J, Wagner J, Ferber A et al. Nonmyeloablative conditioning allows for more rapid T-cell repertoire reconstitution following allogeneic matched unrelated bone marrow transplantation compared to myeloablative approaches. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2001; 7: 656–664.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hentschke P, Omazic B, Mattsson J, Nasman-Bjork I, Lundkvist I, Gigliotti D et al. T-cell receptor Vbeta repertoire after myeloablative and reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Scand J Immunol 2005; 61: 285–294.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klyuchnikov E, Asenova S, Kern W, Kilinc G, Ayuk F, Wiedemann B et al. Post-transplant immune reconstitution after unrelated allogeneic stem cell transplant in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 2010; 51: 1450–1463.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jimenez M, Ercilla G, Martinez C . Immune reconstitution after allogeneic stem cell transplantation with reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. Leukemia 2007; 21: 1628–1637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pavletic ZS, Joshi SS, Pirruccello SJ, Tarantolo SR, Kollath J, Reed EC et al. Lymphocyte reconstitution after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant 1998; 21: 33–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Chen MG, Gastineau DA, Gertz MA, Inwards DJ, Lacy MQ et al. Effect of slow lymphocyte recovery and type of graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis on relapse after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute myelogenous leukemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 951–956.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar S, Chen MG, Gastineau DA, Gertz MA, Inwards DJ, Lacy MQ et al. Lymphocyte recovery after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation predicts risk of relapse in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemia 2003; 17: 1865–1870.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DH, Sohn SK, Won DI, Lee NY, Suh JS, Lee KB . Rapid helper T-cell recovery above 200 × 10 6/l at 3 months correlates to successful transplant outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 1119–1128.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heining C, Spyridonidis A, Bernhardt E, Schulte-Monting J, Behringer D, Grullich C et al. Lymphocyte reconstitution following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective study including 148 patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 39: 613–622.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Le Blanc K, Barrett AJ, Schaffer M, Hagglund H, Ljungman P, Ringden O et al. Lymphocyte recovery is a major determinant of outcome after matched unrelated myeloablative transplantation for myelogenous malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 1108–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthews K, Lim Z, Pearce L, Pagliuca A, Alejandro MJ, Mufti GJ et al. Rapid recovery of lymphocyte subsets is not associated with protection from relapse of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and alemtuzumab. Br J Haematol 2010; 149: 879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Buhlmann L, Buser AS, Cantoni N, Gerull S, Tichelli A, Gratwohl A et al. Lymphocyte subset recovery and outcome after T-cell replete allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010; 46: 1357–1362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burke MJ, Vogel RI, Janardan SK, Brunstein C, Smith AR, Miller JS et al. Early lymphocyte recovery and Outcomes after Umbilical Cord Blood Transplantation (UCBT) for Hematologic Malignancies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010; 17: 831–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thoma MD, Huneke TJ, Decook LJ, Johnson ND, Wiegand RA, Litzow MR et al. Peripheral blood lymphocyte and monocyte recovery and survival in acute leukemia postmyeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2012; 18: 600–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cox CJ, Habermann TM, Payne BA, Klee GG, Pierre RV . Evaluation of the Coulter counter model S-Plus IV. Am J Clin Pathol 1985; 84: 297–306.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Glucksberg H, Storb R, Fefer A, Buckner CD, Neiman PE, Clift RA et al. Clinical manifestations of graft-versus-host disease in human recipients of marrow from HL-A-matched sibling donors. Transplantation 1974; 18: 295–304.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Filipovich AH, Weisdorf D, Pavletic S, Socie G, Wingard JR, Lee SJ et al. National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005; 11: 945–956.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaplan E, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hands S, Everitt B . A Monte Carlo Study of the recovery of cluster structure in binary data by techniques clustering techniques. Multivariate Behav Res 1987; 22: 235–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Matthews K, Lim Z, Pearce L, Pagliuca A, Alejandro Madrigal J, Mufti GJ et al. Rapid recovery of lymphocyte subsets is not associated with protection from relapse of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukaemia after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation using a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and alemtuzumab. Br J Haematol 2010; 149: 879–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Arpinati M, Chirumbolo G, Saunthararajah Y, Stanzani M, Bonifazi F, Bandini G et al. Higher numbers of blood CD14+ cells before starting conditioning regimen correlate with greater risk of acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic stem cell transplantation from related donors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007; 13: 228–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramirez P, Brunstein CG, Miller B, Defor T, Weisdorf D . Delayed platelet recovery after allogeneic transplantation: a predictor of increased treatment-related mortality and poorer survival. Bone Marrow Transplant 2011; 46: 981–986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mielcarek M, Martin PJ, Torok-Storb B . Suppression of alloantigen-induced T-cell proliferation by CD14+ cells derived from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Blood 1997; 89: 1629–1634.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Aranha FJ, Vigorito AC, De Sousa CA, Oliveira GB, Zulli R, Lorand-Metze I . The influence of the graft monocytes in the outcome of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Haematologica 2002; 87: 219–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Arpinati M, Chirumbolo G, Marzocchi G, Baccarani M, Rondelli D . Increased donor CD86+CD14+ cells in the bone marrow and peripheral blood of patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease. Transplantation 2008; 85: 1826–1832.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rommeley M, Spies-Weisshart B, Schilling K, Hochhaus A, Sayer HG, Scholl S . Reconstitution and functional analyses of neutrophils and distinct subsets of monocytes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2011; 137: 1293–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We extend our gratitude to the blood and marrow transplant database managers who assisted in data collection for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S G Holtan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeCook, L., Thoma, M., Huneke, T. et al. Impact of lymphocyte and monocyte recovery on the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT with fludarabine and melphalan conditioning. Bone Marrow Transplant 48, 708–714 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2012.211

Keywords

Search

Quick links