Abstract
Up to 10% of germ cell tumor patients require salvage high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support, achieving cure rates in the range of 10–60%. Stem cell mobilization may be difficult in these patients because of multiple lines of treatment known to seriously hamper stem cell recovery. Plerixafor significantly enhances the success of the CD34+ cell harvest, even in cases where prior mobilization attempts have failed. Six germ cell tumor patients provided informed consent and were included in the compassionate use program. All patients were heavily pretreated, with a median of 3.5 prior lines of therapy. All failed prior mobilization with G-CSF in combination with chemotherapy. Five patients yielded a median of 2.6 × 106 CD34+ cells per kg body weight in a median of 4 apheresis days when plerixafor was used. Three patients underwent subsequent high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell support. Median time to leukocyte engraftment was 11 days. Median time to platelet engraftment was 12.5 days, both of which are comparable to previous historical data. Accordingly, plerixafor seems to be safe and effective in germ cell tumor patients who have failed prior mobilization therapy. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further assess its use in germ cell cancer.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Daugaard G . Management of poor-prognosis or relapsed germ-cell cancer. BJU Int 2009; 104 (Part B): 1392–1397.
Kollmannsberger C, Beyer J, Bokemeyer C . High-dose chemotherapy in nonseminomatous germ cell cancer. BJU Int 2009; 104 (Part B): 1398–1403.
Leung AY, Kwong YL . Haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: current concepts and novel therapeutic strategies. Br Med Bull 2010; 93: 85–103.
Ford CD, Green W, Warenski S, Petersen FB . Effect of prior chemotherapy on hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 33: 901–905.
DiPersio JF, Uy GL, Yasothan U, Kirkpatrick P . Plerixafor. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009; 8: 105–106.
Devine SM, Vij R, Rettig M, Todt L, McGlauchlen K, Fisher N et al. Rapid mobilization of functional donor hematopoietic cells without G-CSF using AMD3100, an antagonist of the CXCR4/SDF-1 interaction. Blood 2008; 112: 990–998.
Tricot G, Cottler-Fox MH, Calandra G . Safety and efficacy assessment of plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma proven or predicted to be poor mobilizers, including assessment of tumor cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 45: 63–68.
DiPersio JF, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, Bolwell BJ, Maziarz RT, Jacobsen E et al. Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin′s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4767–4773.
Donahue RE, Jin P, Bonifacino AC, Metzger ME, Ren J, Wang E et al. Plerixafor (AMD3100) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) mobilize different CD34+ cell populations based on global gene and microRNA expression signatures. Blood 2009; 114: 2530–2541.
Fruehauf S, Veldwijk MR, Seeger T, Schubert M, Laufs S, Topaly J et al. A combination of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and plerixafor mobilizes more primitive peripheral blood progenitor cells than G-CSF alone: results of a European phase II study. Cytotherapy 2009; 11: 992–1001.
Pusic I, Jiang SY, Landua S, Uy GI, Rettig MP, Cashen AF et al. Impact of mobilization and remobilization strategies on achieving sufficient stem cell yields for autologous transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2008; 14: 1045–1056.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
SK received a travel grant for the EHA meeting 2010 held in Barcelona, Spain from Genzyme. The authors declare no other conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kobold, S., Isernhagen, J., Hübel, K. et al. Plerixafor is effective and safe for stem cell mobilization in heavily pretreated germ cell tumor patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 46, 1053–1056 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.264
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.264
Keywords
This article is cited by
-
High-dose chemotherapy for relapsed testicular germ cell tumours
Nature Reviews Urology (2023)
-
Approaches of stem cell mobilization in a large cohort of metastatic germ cell cancer patients
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2022)
-
Efficacy and safety of hematopoietic stem cell remobilization with plerixafor+G-CSF in adult patients with germ cell tumors
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2012)
-
Mobilization of PBSCs in poor mobilizers with POEMS syndrome using G-CSF with plerixafor
Bone Marrow Transplantation (2012)