Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Stem Cell Procurement

Growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor is superior to CY and growth factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cells mobilization

Bone Marrow Transplantation volume 46, pages 523–528 (2011)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

The ideal method to mobilize autologous hematopoietic stem cells (AHSCs) in patients with lymphoma or multiple myeloma remains to be determined. The use of plerixafor, added to growth factor, may overcome the limitations to the use of growth factor mobilization without chemotherapy. We developed and validated a cost-based decision-making algorithm that uses the CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood on the fourth day of G-CSF administration and the target CD34+ cell count for the specific patient to decide on the use of plerixafor (MUSC algorithm). We compared this approach (MA cohort) with a historical cohort of patients undergoing mobilization with CY 2000 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF and GM-CSF (CY cohort). Fifty individuals are included in the MA cohort and 81 in the CY cohort. The mobilization failure rate was 2% in the MA cohort vs 22% in the CY cohort (P=0.01). Fewer patients in the MA cohort than in the CY cohort had infectious complications during mobilization requiring hospitalization (2 vs 30% P<0.01). There was significant shortening in the median number of days between starting mobilization and undergoing transplantation in the MA cohort (14 vs 43 days, P<0.01). In conclusion, growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor provides safer hematopoietic stem cell mobilization and faster access to AHSC transplantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Stoppa AM, Sotto JJ, Fuzibet JG, Rossi JF et al. A prospective, randomized trial of autologous bone marrow transplantation and chemotherapy in multiple myeloma. Intergroupe Francais du Myelome. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 91–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Child JA, Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Owen RG, Bell SE, Hawkins K et al. High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2003; 348: 1875–1883.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Palumbo A, Bringhen S, Petrucci MT, Musto P, Rossini F, Nunzi M et al. Intermediate-dose melphalan improves survival of myeloma patients aged 50 to 70: results of a randomized controlled trial. Blood 2004; 104: 3052–3057.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmitz N, Pfistner B, Sextro M, Sieber M, Carella AM, Haenel M et al. Aggressive conventional chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy with autologous haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation for relapsed chemosensitive Hodgkin's disease: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 359: 2065–2071.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van der Lelie H, Bron D et al. Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med 1995; 333: 1540–1545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schouten HC, Qian W, Kvaloy S, Porcellini A, Hagberg H, Johnson HE et al. High-dose therapy improves progression-free survival and survival in relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from the randomized European CUP trial. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 3918–3927.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desikan KR, Barlogie B, Jagannath S, Vesole DH, Siegel D, Fassas A et al. Comparable engraftment kinetics following peripheral-blood stem-cell infusion mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with or without cyclophosphamide in multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1998; 16: 1547–1553.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alegre A, Tomas JF, Martinez-Chamorro C, Gil-Fernandez JJ, Fernandez-Villalta MJ, Arranz R et al. Comparison of peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus GM-CSF vs G-CSF alone. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997; 20: 211–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gertz MA, Kumar SK, Lacy MQ, Dispenzieri A, Hayman SR, Buadi FK et al. Comparison of high-dose CY and growth factor with growth factor alone for mobilization of stem cells for transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 43: 619–625.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moskowitz CH, Glassman JR, Wuest D, Maslak P, Reich L, Gucciardo A et al. Factors affecting mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells in patients with lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 1998; 4: 311–316.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Micallef IN, Apostolidis J, Rohatiner AZ, Wiggins C, Crawley CR, Foran JM et al. Factors which predict unsuccessful mobilisation of peripheral blood progenitor cells following G-CSF alone in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Hematol J 2000; 1: 367–373.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Koc ON, Gerson SL, Cooper BW, Laughlin M, Meyerson H, Kutteh L et al. Randomized cross-over trial of progenitor-cell mobilization: high-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus G-CSF. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 1824–1830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dingli D, Nowakowski GS, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman S, Litzow MR et al. Cyclophosphamide mobilization does not improve outcome in patients receiving stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2006; 6: 384–388.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Stewart AK, Vescio R, Schiller G, Ballester O, Noga S, Rugo H et al. Purging of autologous peripheral-blood stem cells using CD34 selection does not improve overall or progression-free survival after high-dose chemotherapy for multiple myeloma: results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 2001; 19: 3771–3779.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Vescio R, Schiller G, Stewart AK, Ballester O, Noga S, Rugo H et al. Multicenter phase III trial to evaluate CD34(+) selected versus unselected autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation in multiple myeloma. Blood 1999; 93: 1858–1868.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Gastineau DA et al. Impact of lenalidomide therapy on stem cell mobilization and engraftment post-peripheral blood stem cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Leukemia 2007; 21: 2035–2042.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Popat U, Saliba R, Thandi R, Hosing C, Qazilbash M, Anderlini P et al. Impairment of filgrastim-induced stem cell mobilization after prior lenalidomide in patients with multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 718–723.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuittinen T, Nousiainen T, Halonen P, Mahlamaki E, Jantunen E . Prediction of mobilisation failure in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 33: 907–912.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stewart DA, Smith C, MacFarland R, Calandra G . Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of plerixafor in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 39–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lack NA, Green B, Dale DC, Calandra GB, Lee H, MacFarland RT et al. A pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model for the mobilization of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells by AMD3100. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2005; 77: 427–436.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DiPersio JF, Stadtmauer EA, Nademanee A, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, Kaufman JL et al. Plerixafor and G-CSF versus placebo and G-CSF to mobilize hematopoietic stem cells for autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma. Blood 2009; 113: 5720–5726.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. DiPersio JF, Micallef IN, Stiff PJ, Bolwell BJ, Maziarz RT, Jacobsen E et al. Phase III prospective randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of plerixafor plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor compared with placebo plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for autologous stem-cell mobilization and transplantation for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 4767–4773.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tricot G, Cottler-Fox MH, Calandra G . Safety and efficacy assessment of plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma proven or predicted to be poor mobilizers, including assessment of tumor cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 45: 63–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stiff P, Micallef I, McCarthy P, Magalhaes-Silverman M, Weisdorf D, Territo M et al. Treatment with plerixafor in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and multiple myeloma patients to increase the number of peripheral blood stem cells when given a mobilizing regimen of G-CSF: implications for the heavily pretreated patient. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2009; 15: 249–256.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Costa LJ, Alexander ET, Hogan KR, Schaub C, Fouts TV, Stuart RK . Development and validation of a decision-making algorithm to guide the use of plerixafor for autologous hematopoietic stem cell mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 2010 (e-pub ahead of print 12 April 2010; doi:10.1038/bmt.2010.78).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kuderer NM, Dale DC, Crawford J, Cosler LE, Lyman GH . Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients. Cancer 2006; 106: 2258–2266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S, Giralt S, Stadtmauer EA, Harousseau JL, Palumbo A, Bensinger W et al. Mobilization in myeloma revisited: IMWG consensus perspectives on stem cell collection following initial therapy with thalidomide-, lenalidomide-, or bortezomib-containing regimens. Blood 2009; 114: 1729–1735.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shaughnessy P, Islas-Ohlmayer M, Murphy J, Hougham M, MacPherson J, Winkler K et al. Plerixafor plus G-CSF compared to chemotherapy plus G-CSF for mobilization of autologous CD34+ cells resulted in similar cost but more predictable days of apheresis and less hospitalization. Blood 2009; 114: 897.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to Theo Fouts, Cindy Kramer and Louan Russ for invaluable support in the management of the patients included in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA

    L J Costa, A N Miller, E T Alexander, K R Hogan, M Shabbir, C Schaub & R K Stuart

Authors
  1. L J Costa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A N Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E T Alexander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. K R Hogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M Shabbir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. C Schaub
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R K Stuart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L J Costa.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costa, L., Miller, A., Alexander, E. et al. Growth factor and patient-adapted use of plerixafor is superior to CY and growth factor for autologous hematopoietic stem cells mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant 46, 523–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.170

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2010.170

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links