Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Graft-Versus-Host Disease

Tacrolimus use in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients receiving voriconazole: preemptive dose modification and therapeutic drug monitoring

Abstract

Concomitant use of tacrolimus and voriconazole, both competitive inhibitors of the CYP450 3A4 isoenzyme, requires tacrolimus dose reduction. On the basis of clinical observations, we developed a preemptive dose-reduction strategy in allograft recipients who received voriconazole to maintain tacrolimus concentrations within a target range. A total of 27 patients started i.v. tacrolimus at an average daily dose of 0.022 mg/kg on day −1 (30% lesser than the usual starting dose). The dose was reduced by 30–40% if the 48-h steady-state concentration was 7–10 ng/ml, and by 40–50% if it was 10–15 ng/ml. No change was made if the concentration was <7 ng/ml. Subsequently, concentrations were generally monitored 2–3 times a week with dose adjustments as necessary. None of the 170 levels (3–12 per patient; median 5) obtained between days +1 and +16 were subtherapeutic (<5 ng/ml) and only 34 levels (20%) were >15 ng/ml. Each patient required dose reduction at least twice. The dose had to be increased in only two patients after the initial dose reduction. The median tacrolimus doses in mg/kg declined with time; being 0.022, 0.008 and 0.006 on days 0, 7 and 14, respectively. We conclude that a preemptive dose-reduction strategy is effective in maintaining tacrolimus concentrations within the desired therapeutic range, although serial monitoring remains prudent.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fay JW, Wingard JR, Antin JH, Collins RH, Pineiro LA, Blazar BR et al. FK506 (Tacrolimus) monotherapy for prevention of graft-versus-host disease after histocompatible sibling allogenic bone marrow transplantation. Blood 1996; 87: 3514–3519.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nash RA, Pineiro LA, Storb R, Deeg HJ, Fitzsimmons WE, Furlong T et al. FK506 in combination with methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host disease after marrow transplantation from matched unrelated donors. Blood 1996; 88: 3634–3641.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Przepiorka D, Devine S, Fay J, Uberti J, Wingard J . Practical considerations in the use of tacrolimus for allogeneic marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1999; 24: 1053–1056.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wingard JR, Nash RA, Przepiorka D, Klein JL, Weisdorf DJ, Fay JW et al. Relationship of tacrolimus (FK506) whole blood concentrations and efficacy and safety after HLA-identical sibling bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1998; 4: 157–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Press RR, Ploeger BA, den Hartigh J, van der Straaten T, van Pelt J, Danhof M et al. Explaining variability in tacrolimus pharmacokinetics to optimize early exposure in adult kidney transplant recipients. Ther Drug Monit 2009; 31: 187–197.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacobson P, Ng J, Ratanatharathorn V, Uberti J, Brundage RC . Factors affecting the pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus (FK506) in hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) patients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 753–758.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siwek GT, Pfaller MA, Polgreen PM, Cobb S, Hoth P, Magalheas-Silverman M et al. Incidence of invasive aspergillosis among allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients receiving voriconazole prophylaxis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2006; 55: 209–212.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Trifilio S, Singhal S, Williams S, Frankfurt O, Gordon L, Evens A et al. Breakthrough fungal infections after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients on prophylactic voriconazole. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007; 40: 451–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Flockhart DA . Drug Interactions: Cytochrome P450 Drug Interaction Table. Indiana University School of Medicine (2007). http://medicine.iupui.edu/clinpharm/ddis/table.asp. Accessed (23 July 2009).

  10. Jeong S, Nguyen PD, Desta Z . Comprehensive in vitro analysis of voriconazole inhibition of eight cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes: major effect on CYPs 2B6, 2C9, 2C19, and 3A. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 541–551.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saad AH, DePestel DD, Carver PL . Factors influencing the magnitude and clinical significance of drug interactions between azole antifungals and select immunosuppressants. Pharmacotherapy 2006; 26: 1730–1744.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vfend (Voriconazole) Package Insert. Pfizer US: New York, NY, 2006.

  13. Przepiorka D, Nash RA, Wingard JR, Zhu J, Maher RM, Fitzsimmons WE et al. Relationship of tacrolimus whole blood levels to efficacy and safety outcomes after unrelated donor marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 1999; 5: 94–97.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallemacq P, Goffinet JS, O’Morchoe S, Rosiere T, Maine GT, Labalette M et al. Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay. Ther Drug Monit 2009; 31: 198–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Prograf (Tacrolimus) Package Insert. Astellas Pharma US: Deerfield, IL, 2006.

  16. Clinical Pharmacology [Database Online]. Gold Standard, Inc.: Tampa, FL, 2006. URL: http://cp.gsm.com. Updated February 2006.

  17. Osowski CL, Dix SP, Lin LS, Mullins RE, Geller RB, Wingard JR . Evaluation of the drug interaction between intravenous high-dose fluconazole and cyclosporine or tacrolimus in bone marrow transplant patients. Transplantation 1996; 61: 1268–1272.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuypers DR, de Jonge H, Naesens M, Vanrenterghem Y . Effects of CYP3A5 and MDR1 single nucleotide polymorphisms on drug interactions between tacrolimus and fluconazole in renal allograft recipients. Pharmacogenet Genomics 2008; 18: 861–868.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Leather H, Boyette RM, Tian L, Wingard JR . Pharmacokinetic evaluation of the drug interaction between intravenous itraconazole and intravenous tacrolimus or intravenous cyclosporin A in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2006; 12: 325–334.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Venkataramanan R, Zang S, Gayowski T, Singh N . Voriconazole inhibition of the metabolism of tacrolimus in a liver transplant recipient and in human liver microsomes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 3091–3093.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mori T, Aisa Y, Kato J, Nakamura Y, Ikeda Y, Okamoto S . Drug interaction between voriconazole and calcineurin inhibitors in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2009; 44: 371–374.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J Mehta.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Trifilio, S., Scheetz, M., Pi, J. et al. Tacrolimus use in adult allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients receiving voriconazole: preemptive dose modification and therapeutic drug monitoring. Bone Marrow Transplant 45, 1352–1356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.345

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2009.345

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links