Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Conditioning Regimens

Busulfex (i.v. BU) and CY regimen before SCT: Japanese-targeted phase II pharmacokinetics combined study

Abstract

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of an i.v. preparation of BU (12.8 mg/kg), combined with CY (120 mg/kg), a prospective study was performed on 30 Japanese patients (median age, 30 years) with hematologic malignancies undergoing hematopoietic SCT (28 allogeneic transplants from an HLA-matched donor and 2 autologous transplants). There were no significant toxicities, and all but one patient showed evidence of granulocyte engraftment at a median of 14 days for allogeneic and 11 days for autologous transplantation. Grades II–IV acute and chronic GVHD occurred in 9 (9/27, 33%) and 16 patients (16/27, 59%), respectively. Non-relapse mortality at days 100 and 365 was 3 and 17%, respectively. The pharmacokinetics of i.v. BU showed close inter- and intrapatient consistency; the area under the plasma concentration–time curve of the first administration remained at less than 1500 μmol min/l in 27 of the 29 patients (93%), and between 900 and 1350 μmol min/l in 22 patients (73%). As all of the profiles overlap with data from non-Japanese patients, we conclude that racial factors may not seriously influence the bioactivity of i.v. BU.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Litzow MR, Pérez WS, Klein JP, Bolwell BJ, Camitta B, Copelan EA et al. Comparison of outcome following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation with cyclophosphamide–total body irradiation versus busulphan–cyclophosphamide conditioning regimens for acute myelogenous leukaemia in first remission. Br J Haematol 2002; 119: 1115–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vassal G, Deroussent A, Hartmann O, Challine D, Benhamou E, Valteau-Couanet D et al. Dose-dependent neurotoxicity of high-dose busulfan in children: a clinical and pharmacological study. Cancer Res 1990; 50: 6203–6207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hassan M, Ljungman P, Bolme P, Ringdn O, Syrckov Z, Bekassy A et al. Busulfan bioavailability. Blood 1994; 84: 2144–2150.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuler U, Schroer S, Kühnle A, Blanz J, Mewes K, Kumbier I et al. Busulfan pharmacokinetics in bone marrow transplant patients: is drug monitoring warranted? Bone Marrow Transplant 1994; 14: 759–765.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Grochow LB, Jones RJ, Brundrett RB, Braine HG, Chen TL, Saral R et al. Pharmacokinetics of busulfan: correlation with veno-occlusive disease in patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 1989; 25: 55–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassan M, Oberg G, Ehrsson H, Ehrnebo M, Wallin I, Smedmyr B et al. Pharmacokinetic and metabolic studies of high-dose busulphan in adults. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1989; 36: 525–530.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Grochow LB . Busulfan disposition: the role of therapeutic monitoring in bone marrow transplantation induction regimens. Semin Oncol 1993; 20 (Suppl. 4): 18–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dix SP, Wingard JR, Mullins RE, Jerkunica I, Davidson TG, Gilmore CE et al. Association of busulfan area under the curve with veno-occlusive disease following BMT. Bone Marrow Transplant 1996; 17: 225–230.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Copelan EA, Bechtel TP, Avalos BR, Elder PJ, Ezzone SA, Scholl MD et al. Busulfan levels are influenced by prior treatment and are associated with hepatic veno-occlusive disease and early mortality but not with delayed complications following marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 27: 1121–1124.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Vassal G, Re M, Gouyette A . Gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay for busulfan in biological fluids using a deuterated internal standard. J Chromatogr 1988; 428: 357–361.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Slattery JT, Clift RA, Buckner CD, Radich J, Storer B, Bensinger WI et al. Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: the influence of plasma busulfan levels on the outcome of transplantation. Blood 1997; 89: 3055–3060.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McCune JS, Gooley T, Gibbs JP, Sanders JE, Petersdorf EW, Appelbaum FR et al. Busulfan concentration and graft rejection in pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2002; 30: 167–173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, Glidden D, DeSantes K, Heyn L et al. An evaluation of engraftment, toxicity and busulfan concentration in children receiving bone marrow transplantation for leukemia or genetic disease. Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25: 925–930.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolinger AM, Zangwill AB, Slattery JT, Risler LJ, Sultan DH, Glidden DV et al. Target dose adjustment of busulfan in pediatric patients undergoing bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001; 28: 1013–1018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deeg HJ, Storer B, Slattery JT, Anasetti C, Doney KC, Hansen JA et al. Conditioning with targeted busulfan and cyclophosphamide for hemopoietic stem cell transplantation from related and unrelated donors in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Blood 2002; 100: 1201–1207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kami M, Hamaki T, Maruta Y, Miyakoshi S, Mutou Y . Limitations of oral busulfan in preparative regimen before hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Haematologica 2002; 87: ELT10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andersson BS, Madden T, Tran HT, Hu WW, Blume KG, Chow DS et al. Acute safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan when used with oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as pretransplantation conditioning therapy: a phase I study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2000; 6: 548–554.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Andersson BS, Gajewski J, Donato M, Giralt S, Gian V, Wingard J et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (BMT) for AML and MDS following i.v. busulfan and cyclophosphamide (i.v. BuCy). Bone Marrow Transplant 2000; 25 (Suppl 2): S35–S38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Andersson BS, Kashyap A, Gian V, Wingard JR, Fernandez H, Cagnoni PJ et al. Conditioning therapy with intravenous busulfan and cyclophosphamide (IV BuCy2) for hematologic malignancies prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a phase II study. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002; 8: 145–154.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shimoni A, Bielorai B, Toren A, Hardan I, Avigdor A, Yeshurun M et al. Intravenous busulfan-based conditioning prior to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: myeloablation with reduced toxicity. Exp Hematol 2003; 31: 428–434.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kashyap A, Wingard J, Cagnoni P, Roy J, Tarantolo S, Hu W et al. Intravenous versus oral busulfan as part of a busulfan/cyclophosphamide preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: decreased incidence of hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD), HVOD-related mortality, and overall 100-day mortality. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2002; 8: 493–500.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Takama H, Tanaka H, Nakashima D, Ueda R, Takaue Y . Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006; 37: 345–351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kaplan El, Meier P . Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McDonald GB, Sharma P, Matthews DE, Shulman HM, Thomas ED . Venocclusive disease of the liver after bone marrow transplantation: diagnosis, incidence, and predisposing factors. Hepatology 1984; 4: 116–122.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jones RJ, Lee KS, Beschorner WE, Vogel VG, Grochow LB, Braine HG et al. Venoocclusive disease of the liver following bone marrow transplantation. Transplantation 1987; 44: 778–783.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Przepiorka D, Weisdorf D, Martin P, Klingemann HG, Beatty P, Hows J et al. 1994 consensus conference on acute GVHD grading. Bone Marrow Transplant 1995; 15: 825–828.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shulman HM, Sullivan KM, Weiden PL, McDonald GB, Striker GE, Sale GE et al. Chronic graft-versus-host syndrome in man. A long-term clinicopathologic study of 20 Seattle patients. Am J Med 1980; 69: 204–217.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Xie HG, Kim RB, Wood AJ, Stein CM . Molecular basis of ethnic differences in drug disposition and response. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 2001; 41: 815–850.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Santos GW, Tutschka PJ, Brookmeyer R, Saral R, Beschorner WE, Bias WB et al. Marrow transplantation for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia after treatment with busulfan and cyclophosphamide. N Engl J Med 1983; 309: 1347–1353.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen L, Fuller D, Lennon S, Leger F, Puozzo C . I.V. busulfan in pediatrics: a novel dosing to improve safety/efficacy for hematopoietic progenitor cell transplantation recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant 2004; 33: 979–987.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Kirin Pharma Co. Ltd. (Japan) and PDL Bio Pharma Inc. (USA) for their support for this study. This study was conducted as a pivotal trial supported by Kirin Pharma Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Takaue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kim, SW., Mori, Si., Tanosaki, R. et al. Busulfex (i.v. BU) and CY regimen before SCT: Japanese-targeted phase II pharmacokinetics combined study. Bone Marrow Transplant 43, 611–617 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.372

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bmt.2008.372

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links